Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 163
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

But, it can still show us something. We start it now and stick with it, they can't always be happy to vote out their own. And we were running out of time. Getting a private message to everyone who we think trustable takes too much time, especially if they don't all agree. And what if I was telling a Sinister about my plan, thinking they were an innocent. I already had people I trust not fully on board with it, so this seemed the next best move. Something bold to move forward. We've already had some resistance to it from one member who we all thought previously suspicious anyway.

That sounds awfully lot like Martin Century's "if you don't vote with me, you're scum" philosophy. You can't directly interpret a differing opinion to be a mark of a Sinister. And even if we can trust Salvatore to be a good guy now, wouldn't the Sinisters want to convert or kill him as soon as possible. And then, if we pick a new "proxy carrier", they'd do that to him or her as well.

We can try it out, of course, and hope it nets us at least something.

Posted

Absolutely. :sweet:

Yay :classic: !

I gave your proxy post another read through and it sounds good.

unvote: Havel Pavlov (sok117)

Proxy: Ricardo Salvatore (Dragonator)

I trust Tim Tam (Lord Arjay) but not Tim Tim (Quarryman).

TamTam (Quarryman), actually.

Posted

TamTam (Quarryman), actually.

You're going to correct Jesus?! :oh:

Actually, I was going to do the same thing, but figured I needed as much leverage with the man upstairs as I could get. :tongue:

Posted

I was even thinking about this photo:

5337997853_d0604d44ec.jpg

that more a purple arm than a black (so it's not the Petey)

We know the staff is wearing white outfit, but what about our pijamas or casual clothes?Usually, nurses are naked under the uniform, but doctors are not under the white coat.

Can it be?

....................................................Hey!

I just notice that Petey colar is the same blue as the arm!

Coincidence ?

Posted

I trust Tim Tam (Lord Arjay) but not Tim Tim (Quarryman).

Hmm, what have I done to make you not trust me? Not sure what I could have done to make you trust me either, so please tell me what I should have done.

However, your proxy plan sounds good, so here goes: Proxy: Salvatore / Dragonator.

Posted

That sounds awfully lot like Martin Century's "if you don't vote with me, you're scum" philosophy. You can't directly interpret a differing opinion to be a mark of a Sinister.

It does. :sceptic: But, we're trying something and looking for reactions. It's something... Of course we should be careful about the results and these points you bring up are good ones to think about.

Salvatore isn't at any greater risk than he was before. We will always have a most trusted to proxy to. Martin's investigation revealed Salvatore as innocent and that leaves a big target on him, regardless of this proxy thing. If it doesn't work, it doesn't work but we have to be proactive.

Posted

It appears we were wrong about the King. And I am afraid the photo I recieved this morning does not help us much, well, it helps Perry Noid I guess.

5351344283_d41b8d4ae4.jpg

The photographer said that they followed Perry due to his behavior from yesterday. And, unless he doesnt have a Night Action, he is Insane.

Thanks for sharing, doctor. It's not great from the point of view of group progress, but it shows I'm not a killer. Is it your interpretation that I could be innocent, or was that proven officially in the action?

Maybe this might get me a little more trust around here.

As for the mass-proxy voting, it's an idea that could have potential. However, I think I'll wait until Sal actually votes before I proxy. No need to unvote if Sal's not going to vote at all.

Posted

You're going to correct Jesus?! :oh:

Actually, I was going to do the same thing, but figured I needed as much leverage with the man upstairs as I could get. :tongue:

I know, but it's a habit of mine for things to be correct nowhere2.gif.

Posted

Hmm, what have I done to make you not trust me? Not sure what I could have done to make you trust me either, so please tell me what I should have done.

However, your proxy plan sounds good, so here goes: Proxy: Salvatore / Dragonator.

You are an incredibly intelligent person. You know how not to raise red flags and how to appear innocent. You have been quiet, flying under the radar, not posting often and not contributing to theories or progressing our conversations in anyway with a typically smug "you people talk too much." Well, those who are trying to avoid detection by not participating are the most suspicious to me right now.

It seems all the people we have voted off have been very active, yet trustworhty. The active players trying to find solutions are the ones I trust.

It is possible that we will all proxy our votes to Salvatore. That could mean one of two things (or more...) Either the Sinister are playing chicken with us, hoping that if everyone proxies their vote we will assume we're convicting an innocent and change our target, and they are willing to sacrifice one of their own in order to not show themselves if we are right. Or we are wrong about Havel and they are happily proxying their vote to Salvatore knowing that he will kill an innocent.

Posted

Before provying my vote I'd like to know who Ricardo will vote.

Is this legitimate or I (we) have to completely trust him?

Can we at least give him a hint like "half of the spacey..." ?

Posted

So, if Petey Pirowski can discover who's insane or not, sane/insane wouldn't vote him.

Not insane, but sinister. There's a difference: If I would investigate a neutral (if I was a sane cop) I would get "not sinister". If everything is the opposite, both insanes and neutrals seem sinister, while sinisters seem "not sinister" So I can't figure out whether people are insane, but if they're sinister. You understand the difference?

Can someone explain me why we should be against Pavlov? He offended me, but even if I don't like this patient, doesn't mean that won't need a real reason to lynch him.

Because I investigated him and got "not sinister". Two insanes were shown as sinister, so I'm most likely an insane investigator.

Petey, who are you gonna investigate tonight?

I hope you understand I'm not gonna tell publicly. You never know what the scum have got up their sleeves.

And I don't exactly understand how your plan works, but if it helps you to figure out some scum: Unvote: Havel Pavlov/Sok Proxy: Sal Samuels/Dragonator

Posted

Before provying my vote I'd like to know who Ricardo will vote.

Is this legitimate or I (we) have to completely trust him?

Can we at least give him a hint like "half of the spacey..." ?

Do you read what we write first Nurse??

The plan is to discuss it as a group and agree who to vote and Salvatore will vote that person. If he doesn't comply, we can unproxy. He doesn't have to hint, we'll see his vote. Have you not even been here the last few days? Are you unaware of how the game works? Or are you sinister trying to spread confusion??

You would probably understand more if you listen to what we are saying.

half the reason these threads get so rambly is because people keep asking the same damb questions over and over. Pay attention people! :hmpf_bad:

Posted

I just notice that Petey colar is the same blue as the arm!

Coincidence ?

Err, that's my neck, and it's not blue-purple but grey. It's a third degree burn, which has left serious scars. I've only got them on my head, as my arms are protected against fire.

Posted

Err, that's my neck, and it's not blue-purple but grey. It's a third degree burn, which has left serious scars. I've only got them on my head, as my arms are protected against fire.

She misspelled color. She's talking about the color of you arm, not your collar.

Mr. Nowhere's hands are light gray, so I don't think that's him in the picture. Petey's face is dark gray. Do his hands match?

If Petey and Mr. Nowhere are pulling a fast one on us...they're brilliant. :look:

Posted

Actually you're the dumb one that of an entire monologue of mine, just catched a simple sentence and replied to it.

On the last hour I asked you why we should trust your behaviour.

You didn't reply.

It's ok to me if you want to avoid part of a dialog, but don't be harsh with people.

I'll keep asking till I understand if you don't mind.

Instead, why not talking about Stanley Spussemmin,Dudley Eisenhower,Cookie Custer,Ted Nathan Tompkins or some of the staff that are flying under the radar as you said?

I want to know things. That's my nature. I'd like to know even about the anesthetic that the Doctor pretended.

Does he want to perform a surgery on alive people? Is he helping someone?

Oh, and the photographer may even be a sinister posting just photos useful to his cause.

I'm confused, so I'll keep asking everything that will make this fog dissapear.

Posted

Actually you're the dumb one that of an entire monologue of mine, just catched a simple sentence and replied to it.

On the last hour I asked you why we should trust your behaviour.

You didn't reply.

It's ok to me if you want to avoid part of a dialog, but don't be harsh with people.

I'll keep asking till I understand if you don't mind.

I can't tell you why you should trust me. You have to decide that on your own.

Do you ask a wild tiger if you can trust it? Or do you watch it's behavior and learn things about it before trying to interact? Silly nurse, thinking that there's such a possible answer to why I should be trusted.

I shouldn't be.

Nobody should.

We can only trust our instincts and make the best choice we see possible.

So, yes nurse, pay more attention to what has been said and you tell me if you can trust me. Only a fool believes that can be told why they should trust. What a silly exercise you ask me to participate in. :hmpf: You seem more sinister by the moment.

Instead, why not talking about Stanley Spussemmin,Dudley Eisenhower,Cookie Custer,Ted Nathan Tompkins or some of the staff that are flying under the radar as you said?

That's a great list to start with. I agree with you. What about them? I have been talking about them. Don't you read? I have an entire list separating everyone into categories of trusted, not trusted, and unsure. So, now you are finally asking questions. Good for you. But they have already been asked. So add something or shut up.

Read our thorough discussion, make decisions on your own or bring new information. But do your research before one more question that fog has already been lifted from. Take notes if you have to.

I love you. :blush: Sorry I yelled.

Posted

I can't tell you why you should trust me. You have to decide that on your own.

I love you. :blush: Sorry I yelled.

This woman understood.

Ok with me.

I'll research more and I'll ask few obvious questions.

I have to reveal that I don't trust natural born leaders.

A leader is charismatic and this means he has a divine gift...of course being the God's son is a gift but beside great analitic logic, you didn't show too much.

Gosh, I feel I'm alone here. Sinister can be everywhere.

It's ok about yelling, it's part of being clear.

Anyway: Proxy: Ricardo

Posted

Just for the record, I'm not flying "under the radar". The moon is most decidedly above the radar. At least you're sharing your thoughts on this whole mess, though.

As far as discussing who Sal should vote for, I think we have something with Havel. If we threw Petey out the airlock for misunderstanding his ability, we might be wasting one of the few people who can actually help us catch these sinisters. I agree with whoever said a sinister would not out himself to save Mr. Nowhere. If he turns out to be lying tonight, however, out the airlock he shall go tomorrow.

As for the picture with the arm, I think it is a promising lead but not one that should be pursued above Petey's because these pictures have proven difficult to read. I say we discuss theories about it but voting off anyone based on it should wait till tomorrow.

Just my thoughts.

Posted

Oh wow, things are really starting to heat up now. 3 insanes deaths is too many. I really thought we actually have something with the King but I guess we were off. But I will always remember him as a matyr to our cause. And I will be forever thankful of that.

Now to Jesus strategy, I feel this is really the only thing we can do at this stage. Our photographer was unable to get a good shot, does that photo confirm Perry's innocence, or would that be too presumptuous or us? Its also unclear if Petey's investigating techniques are as true as they could be. But it seems he has worked it out and lets just hope they are backwards, not randomized results. So without a further or do Proxy: Salvatore Ricardo Samuels / Dragonator

Posted

The picture shows that Perry has no night action, is does not confirm his allegiance.

Furthermore, both space twins and Petey have yellow hands...

Someone should tell Dr. Blitzheifer that a lobotomy is just the removal of the frontal lobe, not the whole head. :wacko:

Posted

Most of the patients, including you, have yellow hands.

But you have blue arms, yellow hand and are suspcious. We are talking about the hand in the picture, you block of wood. The hand holding the machete that killed Martin... :hmpf:

Now we're playing, "I'm too stupid to be Sinister." :hmpf:

5337997853_d0604d44ec.jpg

And in this picture we see Tam Tam Timmers murdering Martin with a machete...

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Announcements

  • THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

×
×
  • Create New...