Hinckley Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 I swear you are just trying to get people to suspect me. I think people already do. I'm just trying to give you a chance to clarify.
Rufus Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 I swear you are just trying to get people to suspect me. You have done that yourself: I have given this some more thought and I think we are going to be voting out a villager. Think guys and dive deeper into the information given, we cannot convict a man because he said "what factions", I didn't even pay any attention to that part of my role till it was pointed out by Harriet so who is to say that Zed is lying to us. You don't need it, the scummy werewolf will die anyway. Im sure if he turns out to be innocent (which he won't) Harriet will share the evidence. Those are two significantly different standpoints in a short space of time. Why the change of heart?
Hinckley Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Those are two significantly different standpoints in a short space of time. Why the change of heart? I can vouch for Ebenezer in this case. It seems that in trying to confide in Zeb Philips, he revealed information about the nature of the village. In the mean time, someone was trying to gauge if they could trust Zeb and Zeb provided the information given by Ebenezer to confirm his supposed village allegiance with this un-named third party. Does that make sense? Let me perform a little play: (Ahem) Person: Hello Zeb. Zeb: Hello, Person. Person: What is the nature of your affiliation? Zeb: Um, I just remembered there is a bun in my oven. Enjoy some cock and applesauce and I'll be right back. Scene 2 Zeb: Ebenezer, I don't trust you. Tell me the nature of your allegiance and I'll see if it matches mine. Ebenezer: I'm with the village. Zeb: Oh, now I trust you. Have some cock. Ebenezer: Thanks What, no applesauce? Scene 3: Zeb: Hello Person. Person: Hello Zeb. Zeb: I'm with the village. Person: OK, I trust you now. Zeb: Oh, good. Person: Why were you gone so long? Zeb: I was morphing into a lycanthrope and devouring humans...and getting information to make you trust me. That all takes time. Person: I see ... wait a minute... (Curtain Call) Thank you! Thank you! Oh, you're too kind. Oh, thank you. Two performances a day starting at ten. Don't miss the midnight show, it's topless!
Lord Arjay Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 change his vote .... These are not inflated yellow baloons strapped to my chest, y'know? *SNIP* Well, it should be obvious to anyone payng attention that I am the person who asked the question, which is why I was defending him earlier.
Fugazi Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Clap clap clap! Encore! Bring applesauce to this fair lady, she deserves it!
Hinckley Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Well, it should be obvious to anyone payng attention that I am the person who asked the question, which is why I was defending him earlier. Too true. Person is based on Arianna. That's why the character eats so much cock! Clap clap clap! Encore! Bring applesauce to this fair lady, she deserves it! Thank you. Really, go on
Peanuts Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Don't miss the midnight show, it's topless! Topless? I'm not sure I can trust this...I'll have to investigate the show closely. And don't think any detail will evade my sharp eyes! But I'm sure you're a great actress. As long as Zeb doesn't play himself... Okay, I have an idea. What if anyone, who has ever mentioned the village or something else to anyone tells this now. This way we might find out who might have told Zeb or his fellas.
Rufus Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Thank you! Thank you! Oh, you're too kind. Oh, thank you. Two performances a day starting at ten. Don't miss the midnight show, it's topless! What an entertaining player you are, Harriet! Maybe you might perform again for me ... later? But seriously, that explains things, thanks!
Hinckley Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Okay, I have an idea. What if anyone, who has ever mentioned the village or something else to anyone tells this now. This way we might find out who might have told Zeb or his fellas. Arianna posted this info earlier: This is the earliest public mention of it that I can find: It could very well be a simple mistake, but we cannot afford such mistakes if you are a member of the Village. I am sorry, but this is the best lead so far. It's been said in the thread, so even if Zeb (assuming he's a werewolf) didn't tell all his pack about it by that point, it's been mentioned publically.
Peanuts Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Topless? I'm not sure I can trust this...I'll have to investigate the show closely. And don't think any detail will evade my sharp eyes! I was just told this might be misunderstood. This is not meant to be a hint on my night action, only on my job as detective.
Sandy Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Bravo, Harriet! I think we all need some entertainment on this grim hour. I swear, if we've really nailed a werewolf on our first day, I'll be jumping through the roof with joy. There are quite many people who've decided to remain impartial on this vote, so naturally the focus would shift on them if Zed really is a culprit.
Hinckley Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 What an entertaining player you are, Harriet! Maybe you might perform again for me ... later? But seriously, that explains things, thanks! Of course. Come over to my room. :wink: There's a private show at 2 am. And I'm happy to explain things. No problem. I know how thick-headed men can be. It's so lucky for you all that I'm around.
Zepher Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 I know you did, it was the moment you said Zed slipped up for the first time. But he slipped up again by saying the words my husband chose were overly formal. The blatant statement of "look at me, I'm town, I agree with everything that's been said" seemed formal to me. Not the word. Sure thing, you can find some statistics in this book. "Note that the probability for the Town drops when there are an odd number of players to start with." I was just trying to make a point, that it is idiotic to be so dead set against voting on the first day, as that just lets them kill one of us during the night and reduces our chances of survival etc. Sheesh. When I'm killed and then another is killed in the night you will have an even number again. Hurrah for math. You people are useless. I can not believe that I am getting killed because I actually have a life beyond hunting werewolves. I wish you all the best of luck.
CMP Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Harriet, it seems like a lot of people are blindly following you and taking your word for everything. Not defending Zed, just making observations.
sok117 Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Okay, I'm back everyone, it seems you've got a little far ahead, so I'm gonna be bringing up old points that I think I need to be addressed. so just bear with me a bit Mr. Sokern, you make some good points. If anything, my instincts are leaning towards Mr. Nathans too. It's one thing to want to vote, but another to speak with such conviction despite little to work from in the first place. It worries me how easily he seems to blame, and I find that suspicious. Thank you for seeing what I've had to say me good man, Mr. Nathans is acting very suspicious to me, he has started the bandwagon along with Harriet, and I think they should be something to watch out for. Dacious's passion coupled together with Harriets crazy ramblings are definitely screaming suspicion over to my end of the room. Why is it Sebastian, Harriet, and Dacius seem to be the only people openly accusing Zed? Harriet really started the campaign against him, Sebastian and Dacius are the only ones to yet vote for him. They seem kind of...eager. Yeah, it is interesting how these three were so eager to vote, but I think the werewolves would be smarter to just attack all together like this, is it possible they are all werewolves going on what little evidence has presented itself? yes, but I don't think it's likely, perhaps one or two of them are werewolves and the other is just pulling a Jesus, who knows for sure at this point, but Mr. Nathans actions definitely strike me as the most suspicious of the three. What evidence do you think we will get? God has told us we would be punished if we don't vote someone out. Do you really think he will provide us with evidence before the end of the day? All we have is our instincts at this point and Zed Philips is not very convincing in his defense. We have more reason to suspect him at this point than you do to trust him. untrue, although we think a punishment will befall us if we go today without voting, it was made clear to us that a punishment may occur, and therefore, should not be any reason to start a mob against people. Furthermore I think that the rule is there to keep things moving, and add a little heat if we hit a wall and can't go anywhere with our suspicions, but that is just speculation. But wait, whats this? You read one of the rules wrong? You must be a werewolf then! Everyone! I've found one! see what I mean ? I'm basing that on little evidence, maybe the werewolves are so keen on us to vote by threatening us with a punishment that may or may not occur, giving them an advantage so I must stress that if you don't want to vote for someone who you think is innocent, then it's as simple as not voting. You are an intelligent man and I have trouble believing you would be so sloppy before participating in this investigation. You are a writer and know how to weave a story. A writer should have more respect for the written word and make sure everything written for you is well absorbed. If you are voted out and are killed in vain, I hope it serves as a lesson that we should play life hard and take it as seriously as possible. Treating it lightly can lead to an early death or an unnecessary wrong conviction. But with reagards to what I have stated above, I reasoned you to be a clever wench and would have trouble believing you to be so sloppy in reading the rules we have been given for this wolf hunt. And furthermore, this line that I have bolded in my notes in which you said to take this situation seriously, your not doing a very good job of that considering all the applsauce and cock you've been throwing about. Why don't you take your own advice and take these matters seriously? Dacius and I are basing our vote based on what we know is in the hearts of the Villagers. Zed Phillip's early assertions in this investigation seem like those of someone who has bad intentions for the Villagers. I have seen more of Zed's defense in private and do not buy that either. Since I first made the accusation, I stand by my instincts and my fellow villagers who believe I may have uncovered a werewolf in our presence. Vote: Zed Phillips/Zepher My sincerest apologies if you are convicted and it turns out we lose you in vain. Human life is important and I value it greatly but to keep ourselves safe we have to follow what little we have to go on... well i'm taking a page from your book here and I must say that I do not buy your apology, rather then stating earlier like others that you were unsure of whether you were voting for a villager or not is unclear to me, so I can't say I believe you for valuing human life, I don't think you truly care for Zed, just one more villager you won't have to deal with. Also you are refusing to tell us who trusts you. Trust via pigeon messages won't get you far. I won't vote for you (just jet) since I believe anyone could make a honest mistake. But I do not think your defense is very adequate. Throwing out alliances this early in the game is a quick way to screw it up for all of us, why would he come out with members of his alliance, to have them converted and act as double agents? Thats the stupidest reasoning I've heard and it makes me a bit suspicious of you too. But I guess it's rather obvious that people still trust him or at least don't think he is likely to be werewolf by the way they state it in the day thread. Sure thing, you can find some statistics in this book. "Note that the probability for the Town drops when there are an odd number of players to start with." I was just trying to make a point, that it is idiotic to be so dead set against voting on the first day, as that just lets them kill one of us during the night and reduces our chances of survival etc. Sheesh. That list doesn't make any sense to me as it appears when you get to higher even numbers like 18-24 the number of mafia players changes from 1 to 2 for even numbers of players, so that list is inconclusive and pointless to the situation at hand, and furthermore, we do not know the number of evil forces out to get us, so the list is even more usless, and to go even further I don' think I understand what your saying you say that "the probability of the town drops when there is an odd number of players", but on that chart it increases, unless you've already factored in a different number of scum, in ehich case I would need to see more statistics, but then again, you were never really good at math or probability for that matter. Well then you're going to be waiting an awfully long time Officer, as evidence doesn't normally just fall out of the sky in situations like this. The best we can hope for is that one of the werewolves slips up, but until then, we're on our own. I would have thought that the Academy would've taught you that much at least. on the contrary officer, you keep providing me with all the evidence I need. I think that If you are a werewolf you've already slipped up, and then some. And back at the academy, I was using critical thinking rather then just making assumptions, its why I got higher on our final, and you got three weeks suspension for rash behavior. In normal circumstances, I would never consider it, but we have been asked to vote, and thus it is our duty to do so. I'm not standing by while the werewolves start ripping us to pieces, and frankly I can't understand why you are happy to do so. As I said, this vote is my opinion, feel free to vote for whoever you want to. But, vote we must, otherwise we're just sheep waiting to be taken by the big bad wolf... If I've said that I'm just idly waiting to have my head ripped off by a werewolf, then by all means cast me out of this group right now. I think your being to rash with your voting, but it is your vote and while I disagree with who your voting for, I'll defend to the death your right to do so. But I would like to say that I am not opposed to voting, I just wish we would have more evidence before condemning this man. Whendid I say I was most likely condemning a villager? I said statistically it is more likely, yes, but that doesn't mean I think he is one. Currently, I think he is a werewolf, hence why I'm voting for him. I would have thought an Officer of the Force would have a bit more sense. You find my actions suspicious do you? Well, I find it highly suspicious that you are so quick to defend someone you know nothing about and should have no reason to trust whatsoever. Or do you? If my memory serves me correct, you stated and I quote "we're more likely to convict a fellow Villager" even statistically speaking that is not comforting to know when your all jumping on a bandwagon, the fact that he knows it, and is still committed. You guys must be able to see something wrong with this. Seriously, I don't get you people and your squeamishness with voting, but as we can see, by placing my vote I have at least triggered several very interesting responses from people. Very interesting... I have to agree with you on this though, through that I have seen some of these peoples positions, and I think it helped me a bit to determine who I may be able to trust, and who I should start keeping an eye on, but for now, I have my sight set on you. Yes, several responses which tell you how stupid you are being, yet you are still determined to vote off Zed. At first I thought it was just you trying to make a conviction but now I think you are acting extremely determined, more determined than everyone else. Aswell as this your statistics don't take much into account. Everything you say is only taking into account one side of the argument and I feel like you are just trying to lose us an innocent since even you said yourself that it is likely he will be innocent. I have to say I agree with the chief on this one, your only taking in one side of the argument, and your addressing all my points with statistics and past experiences, but this is real. You seem to eager and I hope others can see your rash decision making. I fore warned you that I will see to it tomorrow that you are watched with close eyes and open ears. It has been pointed out to me that the stats I bookmarked there are for when the werewolves have already struck the night before. Regardless, I was simply using them to back up my point that it is ridiculous not even to consider voting on the first day. For example, not voting today is the equivalent of starting with a kill at night. And then when we get no further evidence you'll all start saying you don't want to vote tomorrow either. Oh, so you made a mistake I see, well that can only mean one thing, your a werewolf right? Using Harriets and your own logic, you would be a werewolf, no? I'm going to be more then happy to vote tomorrow when we see Zed's true alliance, it will be very interesting, yes, indeed. I feel as thopugh your just presureing people to vote, and I don't like it, once again, your fueling your bandwagon, and once it's started it's next to impossible to stop, so theres not much I can do now. Feel free to vote for me, I don't mind, but you'll only be losing a potentially useful villager. More useful than our illiterate novelist over there. Your loyalty to your staff is... remarkable to say the least, chief. oh thats a great defense, he says he is a useful villager, therefore we know he can't have bad intentions for us, little evidence, little defense. Thats definitely what they taught you in the academy, pathetic. A good point, and I wonder why a couple of other people are so quick to defend as well. Caution I can understand, but they seem very determined to save someone who by all rights they shouldn't give a toss about. Very interesting. Well I'm going to answer this with a question, if faced with defending someone who was most likely innocent, whose convicted on little evidence, would you help them? I don't know his true allegiance, actually to say the truth I'm indifferent as to whether he gets voted off or not, if you noticed I haven't made direct inference that he was good or bad in my above arguments just used him to state what was going on, I couldn't care if it was Zed or any other of us, and I don't know if he is werewolf or not, but this ordeal has certainly made you look suspicious, and if he gets voted out tomorrow his death will shed some more light on these points I've made, for one, if he's innocent, I think I've found our first werewolf, and If he's a werewolf, then thank god Mr. Nathans for doing your job, but for right now, I have a strong feeling that he will prove to be an innocent villager.
Walter Kovacs Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Bravo, Harriet! I think we all need some entertainment on this grim hour. I swear, if we've really nailed a werewolf on our first day, I'll be jumping through the roof with joy. There are quite many people who've decided to remain impartial on this vote, so naturally the focus would shift on them if Zed really is a culprit. I'm not sure I like this plan. I have my doubts about Zed's guilt, I have decided to abstain from the vote. I haven't tried to convince anyone else of his innocence. If that makes me a Werewolf, well, this village is in trouble. And this: if we've really nailed a werewolf on our first day, is a really big IF. Let's find out the truth first. Then we can discuss the allegience of those that did not vote. We might be the right thinking ones. We might not. Time will tell. Besides, jumping on the bandwagon now would look pretty pathetic, in my opinion. I think I'd rather take my chances with my abstension.
Hinckley Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Harriet, it seems like a lot of people are blindly following you and taking your word for everything. Not defending Zed, just making observations. Blindly? It's not blind when we're pointing out the reasons we are finding. I admit the evidence is circumstantial. Perhaps if you don't see that our findings show possible reason for suspicion, it is you who are blind. and the other is just pulling a Jesus, This pisses me off for some reason. I wonder why? You read one of the rules wrong? You must be a werewolf then! Everyone! I've found one! see what I mean ? Reading a rule wrong and not having the same information about your allegiance are two completely different things. And furthermore, this line that I have bolded in my notes in which you said to take this situation seriously, your not doing a very good job of that considering all the applsauce and cock you've been throwing about. Why don't you take your own advice and take these matters seriously? Why don't you blow it out your megablocks? well i'm taking a page ... what the hell??? ... suspicious, and if he gets voted out tomorrow his death will shed some more light on these points I've made, for one, if he's innocent, I think I've found our first werewolf, and If he's a werewolf, then thank god Mr. Nathans for doing your job, but for right now, I have a strong feeling that he will prove to be an innocent villager. Have you not read any of the other points we've brought up. Your exhaustive diatribe defending Mr. Philips is about as nonsensical as your claiming our evidence against him is. On Day One, with as much suspicion as Zed's actions have caused for himself, to defend him so vehemently is rather odd. Perhaps you should sit down and have some damn applesauce. That way your mouth can give your brain a chance to think.
Sandy Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 And this: if we've really nailed a werewolf on our first day, is a really big IF. Let's find out the truth first. Then we can discuss the allegience of those that did not vote. We might be the right thinking ones. We might not. Time will tell. I admit that it really is a big if, but wouldn't it be great [for a change]? I apologize if my optimism bothers you. Besides, jumping on the bandwagon now would look pretty pathetic, in my opinion. Not only pathetic, but scummy, too, if Zed turns out to be a werewolf. That's why I have a hard time believing that Officer Nathans or Harriet would be werewolves (granted, they might be representatives of another faction instead of Villagers, but there's no knowing that at this point). If you want to hide, you don't initiate a vote on the first day. Hiding in plain sight is much tougher and riskier than hiding in a crowd, so why would werewolves take such chances on Day One of this ordeal? It however makes me wonder why several people are making such long speeches against voting Zed (or against voting in general). I know for a fact that my only weapon in this case is to vote out people, and I'm not going to feel guilty for doing exactly that. It's all for the good of our community, in the end. If we don't vote, then the werewolves have won by default.
CMP Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Blindly? It's not blind when we're pointing out the reasons we are finding. I admit the evidence is circumstantial. Perhaps if you don't see that our findings show possible reason for suspicion, it is you who are blind. You mean the reason? Your findings? I'm just saying, everyone seems to be siding with you over one piece of evidence. But I did notice it's a large number of people, and it is unlikely the werewolves would have such a number. But I do hope we don't have to vote someone out over such a small bit of evidence again.
Fugazi Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Now if only I was allowed to vote, I'd support you all. Admiral, would you care to elaborate on your predicament? Were you instructed not to vote by someone here among us, are you waiting for someone else to vote before you can do so yourself, or are you just not allowed to by some power beyond our understanding? No, it's a role like having a brother one, we are close but still village and not our own. Chief Hewitt, I'm sure that it wouldn't hurt you or anyone else -- and perhaps defuse some suspicions -- to explain what kind of ally you have. Is it a partner in some sort of business, a family member, a religious group, a fellow Templar? A few details would help me (and possibly others) believe that you're one with us, instead of a different allegiance.
Hinckley Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 You mean the reason? Your findings? I'm just saying, everyone seems to be siding with you over one piece of evidence. But I did notice it's a large number of people, and it is unlikely the werewolves would have such a number. But I do hope we don't have to vote someone out over such a small bit of evidence again. I found a slip up, Beatrice pointed out another. Then Arianna and Ebenezer uncovered a ruse in private. That's four reasons and findings. Read before you get all smart-mouthed, sir. By the way, you crossed out the 'n' in reason. Do you think that reason is the plural form of reaso?
Walter Kovacs Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 I admit that it really is a big if, but wouldn't it be great [for a change]? I apologize if my optimism bothers you. Nope, it doesn't bother me at all. Pointing the finger at those who didn't vote does, however. Seeing as I am one of them. And yes, it would be a refreshing change. Not only pathetic, but scummy, too, if Zed turns out to be a werewolf. That's why I have a hard time believing that Officer Nathans or Harriet would be werewolves (granted, they might be representatives of another faction instead of Villagers, but there's no knowing that at this point). If you want to hide, you don't initiate a vote on the first day. Hiding in plain sight is much tougher and riskier than hiding in a crowd, so why would werewolves take such chances on Day One of this ordeal? It however makes me wonder why several people are making such long speeches against voting Zed (or against voting in general). I know for a fact that my only weapon in this case is to vote out people, and I'm not going to feel guilty for doing exactly that. It's all for the good of our community, in the end. If we don't vote, then the werewolves have won by default. If you reflect back on the things I said earlier, I stated that I wasn't opposed to voting today. I just didn't think the evidence against Zed was all that strong, and I couldn't, in good conscience, vote for him myself. I do think that the results of this vote will be telling, regardless of whether Zed ends up being Village, Werewolf or...other? It could be that this vote looks so much like a ringer that Harriet or Officer Nathans felt no risk in leading the way? Though I do agree with you; I doubt that they are Werewolves.
sok117 Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Blindly? It's not blind when we're pointing out the reasons we are finding. I admit the evidence is circumstantial. Perhaps if you don't see that our findings show possible reason for suspicion, it is you who are blind. Perhaps, and yet, perhaps not. I think your findings support reason for asumption, yes, but I do not think they support a lynch, perhaps with more time we could narrow this down more, but that is something we don't have, so with that I will refuse to vote for the author. Reading a rule wrong and not having the same information about your allegiance are two completely different things. Ah my dear, I must correct you on this, they are not two completely different things as you say, but rather they both involve reading yes? and through reading things can often be mis-interpreted, correct? So if you look at that it's not really what your reading, it's how you read it. You read the rules and made a mistake, he read himself and made a mistake, or there is your option, but I think it more or less unlikely. Why don't you blow it out your megablocks? well its good to see im talking to a mature and serious individual, I am an officer of the law and I would appreciate if you would treat me as such. Have you not read any of the other points we've brought up. Your exhaustive diatribe defending Mr. Philips is about as nonsensical as your claiming our evidence against him is. On Day One, with as much suspicion as Zed's actions have caused for himself, to defend him so vehemently is rather odd. Perhaps you should sit down and have some damn applesauce. That way your mouth can give your brain a chance to think. I apologize if I have come off rather harsh, but I fell that an injustice is about to occur and as a figure of the law it is my duty to stand against it. I've paid attention to your points, however few there may be, but you still have not swayed me to vote for Zed. And I will take your applesauce, I need to take a breather. Not only pathetic, but scummy, too, if Zed turns out to be a werewolf. That's why I have a hard time believing that Officer Nathans or Harriet would be werewolves (granted, they might be representatives of another faction instead of Villagers, but there's no knowing that at this point). If you want to hide, you don't initiate a vote on the first day. Hiding in plain sight is much tougher and riskier than hiding in a crowd, so why would werewolves take such chances on Day One of this ordeal? I agree, this is why I find this whole situation rather peculiar. But what if, and a big what if, they are planning on hiding in plain sight? It would certainly be an interesting tactic, but it's not unheard of. Just by what you have said, if they are werewolves hiding in plain sight, then they certainly have you fooled don't you think? Just keep your options open, and don't trust anyone on the way they've been acting alone.
iamded Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 <snip> Good show! I do enjoy a good play. <ahem> Right, err.. Harriet, it seems like a lot of people are blindly following you and taking your word for everything. Not defending Zed, just making observations. I wouldn't say blindly. I think there's two very valid, very voluptuous reasons for people to follow her. Joking aside, she has made some good points, so they do have reason to follow her. Now I've been thinking about this whole vote against Mr Phillips. Apparently abstaining from voting today would only cast suspicion on myself, yet pitching in my vote for him now would also draw suspicion. I think I have a solution. This vote against Mr Phillips was based on a slip-up of his, yes? Well I think I've found another slip-up. No, it's a role like having a brother one, we are close but still village and not our own.If you are not sure, it is like when I wrote a book about being an assassin in town called Eurodina, the other assassin was a friend of mine but we were both aware of each others alliance but were still part of the townies. Well until he was converted. You know I read that book. I distinctly remember that those two characters were actually impartial, not townies... Now, having said what you said, it seems you've twisted the truth to your benefit. This I find rather suspicious. Therefore, I vote: Chief Hewitt. Give me a good reason to, and I shall unvote you, not that holding my vote against you will accomplish much today with the majority rules. Still, I hope people remember this tomorrow.
CMP Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 I found a slip up, Beatrice pointed out another. Then Arianna and Ebenezer uncovered a ruse in private. That's four reasons and findings. Oh. Sorry madame. You know I read that book. I distinctly remember that those two characters were actually impartial, not townies... Now, having said what you said, it seems you've twisted the truth to your benefit. This I find rather suspicious. Therefore, I vote: Chief Hewitt. Give me a good reason to, and I shall unvote you, not that holding my vote against you will accomplish much today with the majority rules. Still, I hope people remember this tomorrow. Hmm...that's also interesting.
Recommended Posts