Fugazi Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Last night's events have explained many of the mysteries and questions that we had yesterday, and despite two more dead townies we're in a strong position with two investigators and a better grasp of what we're up against. However, unless I forgot something I don't think we have any obvious targets today? That is, unless Mr Vaughn has managed to investigate last night despite a busy schedule or unless the Follower has spotted anything unusual?
CMP Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Last night's events have explained many of the mysteries and questions that we had yesterday, and despite two more dead townies we're in a strong position with two investigators and a better grasp of what we're up against. However, unless I forgot something I don't think we have any obvious targets today? That is, unless Mr Vaughn has managed to investigate last night despite a busy schedule or unless the Follower has spotted anything unusual? I very much doubt Sebastien could do anything. Remember, from the flashback, he thought he was dead, so I doubt he would've had time to investigate. I'm thinking this witchy-like revival was a one time thing, and thought that we need Sebastien, especially because he was villager. I'm glad the reviver chose to revive him. Baron, did you give anyone silver bullets last night?
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Last night's events have explained many of the mysteries and questions that we had yesterday, and despite two more dead townies we're in a strong position with two investigators and a better grasp of what we're up against. However, unless I forgot something I don't think we have any obvious targets today? That is, unless Mr Vaughn has managed to investigate last night despite a busy schedule or unless the Follower has spotted anything unusual? Fiona, dear, this may be a long shot, but since you cleaned up the mess before anybody woke up, what were you doing over by the fireplace in this picture...from my photographic memory: Did you hide that pickaxe in your dress to use for later? I've used one before when I haven't had a man for a while, but I find the pickaxe too dangerous. Broom handles are my preference.
Fugazi Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Fiona, dear, this may be a long shot, but since you cleaned up the mess before anybody woke up, what were you doing over by the fireplace in this picture...from my photographic memory: Did you hide that pickaxe in your dress to use for later? I've used one before when I haven't had a man for a while, but I find the pickaxe too dangerous. Broom handles are my preference. As I mentioned earlier, there's more mess to clean in this house than just dead bodies. Applesauce all over the place, spilled drinks, with so many people here at once we're cleaning all the time. Although you are always welcome to have a look under my dress if you think I might be hiding something... Care to visit?
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Although you are always welcome to have a look under my dress if you think I might be hiding something... Care to visit? Yes, but please clean out the cobwebs first. You're wrapped so tightly in that dress I imagine your empty eye socket has seen the light of day more recently.
Shadows Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 That is, unless Mr Vaughn has managed to investigate last night despite a busy schedule or unless the Follower has spotted anything unusual? Yeah, you lot had me a little tied up from yesterday. It isn't like I spent the whole night just hanging around.
Fugazi Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Yeah, you lot had me a little tied up from yesterday. It isn't like I spent the whole night just hanging around. Well you didn't look very busy! Yes, but please clean out the cobwebs first. You're wrapped so tightly in that dress I imagine your empty eye socket has seen the light of day more recently. Well what can I say, the Baron and Penelope usually enjoy ourselves by night! (I mean, the Baron, Penelope and I )
Shadows Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Well you didn't look very busy! Yes, well I am a gentleman as you can tell from my impressive hat. Accordingly, I am unaccustomed to that tiresome thing you common folk refer to as 'work' and coming back from the dead was work enough for one night. Plus God never said I could do anything, it was all "Game Over" and then "Please insert a quarter to continue" from out of the blue.
Fugazi Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 then "Please insert a quarter to continue" from out of the blue. Or from that mysterious Person 5 perhaps?
iamded Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Well what can I say, the Baron, Penelope and I usually enjoy ourselves by night! I believed I mentioned my interest in the study of human anatomy? Baron, did you give anyone silver bullets last night? I did not. Why would I? Do you know of any more werewolves about? Vampires require a wooden stake to the heart, or decapitation, if the lore is correct. Silver bullets would do diddly squat against them, and regular bullets work just fine against this group of Rogues, as we've seen. No need to waste silver.
CMP Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 I did not. Why would I? Do you know of any more werewolves about? Vampires require a wooden stake to the heart, or decapitation, if the lore is correct. Silver bullets would do diddly squat against them, and regular bullets work just fine against this group of Rogues, as we've seen. No need to waste silver. Sorry. I just thought if you could still make bullets, than maybe there are still werewolves, but I forgot about the Hunter's story.
Sandy Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 NNOOOOO!!! Not my Beatrice! Where am I ever going to find a cleavage like hers to drown my sorrows in?! Before she departed from this world, she explained the vampire bite thing to me in private, and I don't think she knew that it might mean she could come back as a bloodsucker. So as much as I miss her, I really don't want to see her again - for all of our sakes. As for Mr. Vaugh, I sincerely apologize for our decision yesterday, and I'm thoroughly pleased to see it undone. I'm not entirely sure about this "Gary Coleman" fellow, though. He might be an insane investigator, but he might also be a liar through and through. Unless I missed something, and you doublechecked on him, Harriet. But alas, since us villagers haven't won yet, there is still work cut out for us. The pickaxe has a new owner, it seems, and the sword killer is still out there, and God only knows (literally) what else.
CMP Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Before she departed from this world, she explained the vampire bite thing to me in private, and I don't think she knew that it might mean she could come back as a bloodsucker. So as much as I miss her, I really don't want to see her again - for all of our sakes. Brother, you must tell me, did she say she could bite others?
Sandy Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Brother, you must tell me, did she say she could bite others? No, she only said she was bitten as a child, but the transformation wasn't complete, and she remained human but with immunity against vampire bites. And you heard how she was announced as a villager, didn't you? However, if she comes back from the dead, we have all the reasons to suspect she is not a villager anymore. I don't think the same applies to Sebastien Vaugh, though, since he didn't vanish in a puff, and his corpse underwent a ritual of some sort rather than just spontaneously springing up from a coffin.
CMP Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 No, she only said she was bitten as a child, but the transformation wasn't complete, and she remained human but with immunity against vampire bites. And you heard how she was announced as a villager, didn't you? However, if she comes back from the dead, we have all the reasons to suspect she is not a villager anymore. I don't think the same applies to Sebastien Vaugh, though, since he didn't vanish in a puff, and his corpse underwent a ritual of some sort rather than just spontaneously springing up from a coffin. Uh oh. So there could indeed be other vampires among us.
Rick Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Despite loosing two villagers, it looks like a moderately successful night. If I understand Harriet and Sebastien correctly based on Gary Coleman's findings, Benjamin was shot and Gary was confirmed as an insane ('reverse') investigator. Thanks to the 'resurrector' we now seem to have two investigators on our side. Although the bit about one being a 'fool' in Harriet's play still confuses me a bit. Are they both useful investigators or not? I'm glad the tone has settled down somewhat between Sebastien and Harriet, maybe we can finally get to work to rid us of vampires, rogues, and what else may be out there... And oh my, a love baby on the way?
WhiteFang Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Amazingly incredible! You lived to tell another tale from good Sebastian! Looks like one of our allies (villager likely) resurrect him. I am sorry to be part of the convicting party yesterday but please forgive our misjudgement. What's with the rogues... It is certainly possible to know that there is a 3rd faction trying to sabotage our numbers. Why can't this be a simpler rival between villagers and werewolves. I need to grab a cup of coffee to ease my mind a little or at the very least to make it alert.
Admiral Ron Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 A most peculiar evening indeed. But I was thinking about this, I do not think Beatrice will come back from the dead. According to God, she is listed as Deceased. I dont think she will be coming back anytime soon. But I cannot be sure, this is just a theory.
Alopex Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 We sure had an eventful night! I'm glad Sebastian is back, I was sad that he was lynched innocently. I believe the vigilante now, it seems that he just made a mistake last time. Poor Beatrice... But if she comes back we we'll have to kill her... Now I believe the vampire story.
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 As for Mr. Vaugh, I sincerely apologize for our decision yesterday, and I'm thoroughly pleased to see it undone. I'm not entirely sure about this "Gary Coleman" fellow, though. He might be an insane investigator, but he might also be a liar through and through. Unless I missed something, and you doublechecked on him, Harriet. Maybe if you read the play, you would see that we had him investigate the Baron and the result came back evil so we asked the Hunter to shoot Benjamin who was Strawberry Shortcake that Gary had investigated on the first night. I'm spelling it out for you people, step by step with these plays. Fuckin' read them. Uh oh. So there could indeed be other vampires among us. Do we have to keep re-explaining things to you? We've known that for days. Although the bit about one being a 'fool' in Harriet's play still confuses me a bit. Are they both useful investigators or not? Read the fuckn play! We tested Gary, that's how we knew we should kill Benjamin. Sorry, I'm feeling a bit under the weather and all you people who don't read the information that we work so hard to put right in front of your eyes are starting to piss me off. And no, dear Samuel Synclair, just because somebody didn't disappear in a puff of smoke doens't mean they aren't evil. A robed figure chanting brought him back to life. We'd be fools not to be at least somewhat suspicious of him. And it's not metagaming! Resurrected from the dead is not normal! It's just smart to fuckn be suspicious. Proper ladies shouldn't be using the f-word so much, so please excuse me, but megabluck, people, let's try to use our heads and explore all possibilities. Our lives are at stake! So tired....
Alopex Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Proper ladies shouldn't be using the f-word so much Well your not a proper lady are you? I never use it... I don't think the resurrection is definitely, there is a village role called the reviver... Although this ability can usually only used once in the game.
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Well your not a proper lady are you? I never use it... No, I'm a slut! I don't think the resurrection is definitely, there is a village role called the reviver... Although this ability can usually only used once in the game. True, but the one-time shot is only one variation. There's another where the reviver must perish to bring another back to life. Is anyone else dead? No, so there's no reason to assume our ressurecter cannot use this power again...unless you know something.
Alopex Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 True, but the one-time shot is only one variation. There's another where the reviver must perish to bring another back to life. Is anyone else dead? No, so there's no reason to assume our ressurecter cannot use this power again...unless you know something. I do not know anything (sadly...) I'm just coming up with solutions to our mystery. It would be good if the reviver could use their ability several times but I don't think that's possible because it would be very powerful. And since nobody else is dead, our options are: a, It was a one-shot ability. b, there is something fishy going on...
Fugazi Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Flashback Harriet: Hello Strawberry Shortcake. Strawberry Shortcake: Hello. Harriet: We had you followed night one. What were you up to? Gary Coleman: But he wasn’t followed. I investigated him. Harriet: I know. I’m lying to him to try to trip him up. Gary Coleman: Oh, smart move. Harriet: Thanks. I’m a smart player. Sebastien: No!!!!!!!!! Stupid!!!!!!!!!! Harriet: Both of you hush and get out of the flashback. Strawberry Shortcake: I was out on Night One because I’m a Peeping Tom. I think Walter Knox has a night action. I followed him and he was out of bed. Harriet: Oh well. That makes sense. I trust you. Strawberry Shortcake: Oh good. Harriet: Sucker… Harriet, there's still something I don't understand after replaying your otherwise excellent play in my mind. How did you know that Benjamin Shortcake was lying to you? Was it because you knew that Walter had no night action? But in that case, we don't have any real leads. Unless anyone has any leads as to the killer? I'm gonna go see if anyone had something against Walter in past days. That's as good a place as any to start. Walter and Beatrice didn't have any obvious enemies, but did they have important actions? I may be wrong, but they both look to me like they were in close contact with Harriet before their death, so maybe she would know whether they could have been targeted because of their actions. Or maybe they were targeted simply because they were considered trustworthy by Harriet and thus likely Village. On the other hand, I'm surprised that with the number of protectors this village has, the scum still managed two successful kills last night. It's probably far-fetched, but it's worth keeping in mind that the enemy may be sneaky enough to be aware of the plans of the protectors.
Lord Arjay Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Was it because you knew that Walter had no night action? Before Walter died he contacted a group of people (me included) and told us that he didn't think he was going to survive the night. He then claimed that he was Person Four from Harriet's plays and said he was afraid his identity had been revealed to another faction. So, it looks like Benjamin was correct that Walter did have a night action, which makes me slightly worried about how he knew.
Recommended Posts