Sandy Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 I believe Charles means to be a true help to our village. He may not be the best at strategy or at making friends, or have any fashion sense, but he does mean well. You're really that easy, Harriet?! I'd love to know what he said (or did) to make you suddenly trust him so...
CMP Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 I'd love to know what he said (or did) to make you suddenly trust him so... No, you don't. It'd remind you too much of you and Beatrice.
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 You're really that easy, Harriet?! I'd love to know what he said (or did) to make you suddenly trust him so... Well, I may as well blow the whole family. Let's go talk in private... My jaw hurts. Well, that's enough private talks. I supposed it's best to just say this out loud so nobody votes for the sodder. Everybody already knows he has a night action, so we'll have to protect him anyway. You remember how somebody corrected our mistake of killing Sebastien? Well, Charles can similarly save us from making a mistake. We do not want to lose him. Let's focus on someone else to vote out. And Charles is hung. Like a horse, I meant. Not like lynched. He has a very long penis. That's what I was saying.
Admiral Ron Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 You remember how somebody corrected our mistake of killing Sebastien? Well, Charles can similarly save us from making a mistake. We do not want to lose him. Let's focus on someone else to vote out. Well, I am not so sure about this...but I will trust your judgement. I will not vote for Charles, but I don't exactly trust him either...
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Well, I am not so sure about this...but I will trust your judgement. I will not vote for Charles, but I don't exactly trust him either... Well, I'm not going to blow you too. I'm a slut, not a whore.
JimBee Posted February 15, 2011 Author Posted February 15, 2011 You can vote now, by the way. A little more than 47 hours until twilight.
Admiral Ron Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Well citizens, what is our next option? I am afraid I have nothing.
Hinckley Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 All I've got is that Fiona hid the pickaxe in her koochie and Quinn is too quiet.
Shadows Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 I say we have him investigate you and then kill you tomorrow whatever the result. Or just kill you today. I wouldn't suggest counting on my investigative skills any longer since someone revealed them to everyone before my 'death'. I'm sure that at least one scum faction will block me to insure I can't reveal them. I assume they can't block all of us, however, so I propose we pick two targets and have the insane investigator try one as well (even if that's me). Hopefully he will eventually recover his sanity as they sometimes do, but either way the information will be helpful (assuming we know if he's still insane or not). My 'death' I don't think I really did though I will likely refer to it as 'death' most of the time. In reality, I was led to believe that I say nearly died because the message from God regarding my return made it sound as if I was believed dead but not really fully dead. The 'magic' done to revive me may have been more of a medical procedure similar to electric paddles used to revive someone, just on a more primitive and mysterious level. Based on the background of the person and what I was told, I have no doubt that they are good. I don't have any information concerning their ability to repeat that action, but I doubt it seriously. We all got lucky once, I doubt we can expect it again. And The Baron is a villager and the Blacksmith. We saw him give silver bullets to Dacius Nathans on Day 1. He was trying to help the village by giving silver bullets to someone he believed to be the hunter! He's clearly a villager. And if he's a villager then I suppose the other person Sebastien investigated was too. So which one of our confirmed fellow villagers would you like to see dead? I agree with all of this but would be foolish not to remind everyone of one additional complication. If the factions can convert, none of our investigation results are permanent. I do believe that the Baron is likely to be immune from any form of conversion given the importance of his role, but I can't prove that and certainly can't say the same for the other investigation. It's just something to keep in mind before we blindly trust anyone forever. In case anyone is wondering why I believe that conversions are possible, I was told as much when I was revived. It was made very clear to me that the person who brought me back was doing so for the good of the village and that I needed to carry on with the job I was doing previously. I do not believe that either of us can be converted given our level of commitment to saving this village. I do think we should investigate Sebastien tonight to make sure he's not a zombie-poo-flinging-space-bunny, but until then nobody should lay a finger on him! He's my baby daddy! You know, given your appetite for the cock, are we absolutely sure it's mine? Oh, and here's the ice cream and pickle sandwich on pumpernickel that you asked me to pick up.
iamded Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Please excuse my absence, I accidentally locked myself in my study, and while I could hear everything going on down here, I could not contribute. But I'm here now! All I've got is that Fiona hid the pickaxe in her koochie and Quinn is too quiet. I don't think character placement in the scene people's locations in the photographs have any relation to their alignment, night actions, or anything else. Or maybe I'm just biased because Fiona is one of my dear servants. Now, I'm rather confused by the sudden and inexplicable turn-around on our opinions with Mr. Synclair, but I trust madam Harriet's judgement, so I won't be voting for him today.
CMP Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 You know, given your appetite for the cock, are we absolutely sure it's mine? Well...no.
Rick Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 As I said before, I have no reason to doubt the good intentions of you or your resurrector as of yet. I agree with all of this but would be foolish not to remind everyone of one additional complication. If the factions can convert, none of our investigation results are permanent. I do believe that the Baron is likely to be immune from any form of conversion given the importance of his role, but I can't prove that and certainly can't say the same for the other investigation. It's just something to keep in mind before we blindly trust anyone forever. In case anyone is wondering why I believe that conversions are possible, I was told as much when I was revived. It was made very clear to me that the person who brought me back was doing so for the good of the village and that I needed to carry on with the job I was doing previously. I do not believe that either of us can be converted given our level of commitment to saving this village. So, are you assuming that all those wandering at night and have been confirmed loyal to the village cannot be lured into working with evil factions? Or was it something more specific that you were told? Anyway, Harriet's turnaround on Charles is surprising. He must have had a really convincing story. But then again, she's probably in the best position to verify any claims someone makes. If he has a night action it should be easily confirmed or disproved based on the all the night action results Harriet knows of so far...
Inconspicuous Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Anyway, Harriet's turnaround on Charles is surprising. He must have had a really convincing story. But then again, she's probably in the best position to verify any claims someone makes. If he has a night action it should be easily confirmed or disproved based on the all the night action results Harriet knows of so far... My thoughts exactly. Charles did seem quite suspicious, but if he's revealed himself as important to Harriet, and Harriet trusts him, then that's totally okay. It's just a little surprising after there was so much accusation against him.
CMP Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 My thoughts exactly. Charles did seem quite suspicious, but if he's revealed himself as important to Harriet, and Harriet trusts him, then that's totally okay. It's just a little surprising after there was so much accusation against him. That's because Harriet was the only one who examined the information rationally. Write that down in your dictionary.
Rick Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 That's because Harriet was the only one who examined the information rationally. Write that down in your dictionary. Excuse me, you didn't inform the whole village, which I can perfectly understand and contacting Harriet is even what I suggested after you revealed having a night action. Perhaps I would also conclude rationally that your story makes sense if I would know it. That Harriet has confidence in your story convinces me enough that we perhaps should not go after you. But you can't blame this village based on information we know nothing about. We were rightfully suspicious of you. And I think Ignatius is actually backing you up (sort of, just like me) there. I would have thought you'd know when to keep your mouth shut by now.
Rufus Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 As people have said, it looks like we're back to square one. I was all ready to look again at Charles; but now Harriet seems to trust him, I don't know who else we should be looking at. We could investigate the quiet ones; however experience of other games... of life has shown that that is not an indicator of guilt, and some have been quieter than others .... I've looked back at our discussions of the last few days, and no reason for Walter's death readily presents itself; if I've missed something, please enlighten us. I guess we'll have to wait to see what information Harriet brings us.
Quarryman Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 All I've got is that Fiona hid the pickaxe in her koochie and Quinn is too quiet. Yeah, I'm sorry about not being able to contribute as much as I'd prefer, I've been really busy with workmy studies lately, so keeping track of all the discussions here has proved difficult and I've ended up with not having anything worthwhile to add to them.
Sandy Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 I don't think character placement in the scene people's locations in the photographs have any relation to their alignment, night actions, or anything else. Why not? It might be a bit farfetched in Fiona's case, but it wouldn't be the first time it has happened in cases like this. But it seems my brother has Harriet convinced (and impressed as well), and I know she is not an easy person to either convince or impress, since she's been around so much. So for now, I will not vote against my brother, but I will keep an eye on him. Then there's the subject of my son, Quinn. It might be his inexperience and youth, but he has been very passive during this ordeal. Furthermore, since my wife was revealed to be some sort of a half-vampire, I can't help but to fear those genes might have transferred into our child. My wife revealed specifically that she was bitten as a young girl, long before I impregnated her. Now, before anybody claims that our night actions have nothing to do with our personalities, I must disagree on this. It seems we all have our night actions on purpose, even though they might not be that apparent. That means I suspect my son to be a vampire as well. Whether he is on the side of the village or another faction, that I cannot tell. If you wish to enlighten me, Quinn, I'm all ears. Optionally, I'm sure Harriet will let you into second base with her cleavage if you confess to her.
Fugazi Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Now, before anybody claims that our night actions have nothing to do with our personalities, I must disagree on this. It seems we all have our night actions on purpose, even though they might not be that apparent. That means I suspect my son to be a vampire as well. Whether he is on the side of the village or another faction, that I cannot tell. If you wish to enlighten me, Quinn, I'm all ears. Optionally, I'm sure Harriet will let you into second base with her cleavage if you confess to her. Is revealing that you have a night action some sort of strategy, or were you using the we in a broad sense? In case you do have a night action, did you consider having a chat with our resident slut-confessor? Or confessor-slut, whatever. It is true that Quinn is one of the silent types, but we have so little to go on that I can't bring myself to vote, for him or anyone else. That said, failing to lynch is a step backward for the town -- the scum won't stand their ground tonight. Moreover, I'm not sure that the vigilante has any good leads either, and he might get another villager killed if he shoots at random.
Shadows Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 So, are you assuming that all those wandering at night and have been confirmed loyal to the village cannot be lured into working with evil factions? Or was it something more specific that you were told? No, I don't assume that at all, I'm saying that I believe that in the case of Baron VonVampirepants his role is too specifically vital to the village (or at least it was) to be convertable. I can't say for certain about anyone but myself. Anyway, Harriet's turnaround on Charles is surprising. He must have had a really convincing story. But then again, she's probably in the best position to verify any claims someone makes. If he has a night action it should be easily confirmed or disproved based on the all the night action results Harriet knows of so far... I'm not even fully in the loop there, so it comes as a bit of a surprise to me as well. I assume, as you do, that there must be a good reason for the turnaround.
Rick Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 No, I don't assume that at all, I'm saying that I believe that in the case of Baron VonVampirepants his role is too specifically vital to the village (or at least it was) to be convertable. I can't say for certain about anyone but myself. Thanks, I think you certainly may be right about Baron von Poopshispants and his role. I was just wondering if you were basing it on something more...
iamded Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 So, it seems we've no one to vote for today. I hope we're all prepared for whatever consequences are bestowed upon us for our lack of condemnation. Although to be fair, when this thing started we were voting to take out a werewolf, and we did that. So technically, no punishment should be placed upon us. Hear that, God?
Hinckley Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 That means I suspect my son to be a vampire as well. Whether he is on the side of the village or another faction, that I cannot tell. If you wish to enlighten me, Quinn, I'm all ears. Optionally, I'm sure Harriet will let you into second base with her cleavage if you confess to her. Kill the demon seed! Vote: Quinn Synclair/Quarryman A villager who can't help us, hurts us. Moreover, I'm not sure that the vigilante has any good leads either, and he might get another villager killed if he shoots at random. I don't think Porky Pig would shoot at random. I think any decision about who to shoot would be reached with reason.
Alopex Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Kill the demon seed! Vote: Quinn Synclair/Quarryman A villager who can't help us, hurts us. Are you quite sure? Although he is truly not very contributive. I think I'll wait for more information. Although if nothing comes I think I'll vote for him to... And Harriet, why did you suddenly start trusting Charles? It's weird... But I think I'll trust you're judgement.
Eskallon Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Kill the demon seed! Vote: Quinn Synclair/Quarryman A villager who can't help us, hurts us. That was rather surprising but I am not sure if totally serious. While Quinn has been rather silent, so have a few others and we need to dive deeper into what he has said and done before we can vote him out.
Recommended Posts