Professor Flitwick Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 I can't say I fully support this lynching. I know he's hardly helped us, but based on the amount of evidence we've have, it could just end up being one less townie, slowly allowing the Rouges to gain a majority. I know we had scarcely any evidence against Zed either, but I'm going to abstain here.
Admiral Ron Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 No, you didn't vote for him, but you vocally supported the conviction before voting was open. Good way to play both sides. I did, then I heard his defense, and my mind was changed. And now I am glad that I didnt vote for him.
Fugazi Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Now, I'm not going to lie to you about me being a valuable asset that can do fancy things at Night, because I can't. I'm an innocent villager and that's it. So no, you won't lose a great deal when you're lynching me today. Seriously, I wonder how many plain villagers there are anyway, with all the night actions floating around. Quinn, I really think you should have a word in private with Harriet, she has a good record of keeping her mouth shut when required (and opened when there's cock). Just look at how it got Charles out dire straits.
Hinckley Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Seriously, I wonder how many plain villagers there are anyway, with all the night actions floating around. Quinn, I really think you should have a word in private with Harriet, she has a good record of keeping her mouth shut when required (and opened when there's cock). Just look at how it got Charles out dire straits. We've spoken. He didn't have much to say in his defense, only what he's said here. He's busy and he doesn't have much more to contribute. It's dangerous to play these games...of life with that attitude because the town won't know what to make of your apathy until you are dead.
Fugazi Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 We've spoken. He didn't have much to say in his defense, only what he's said here. He's busy and he doesn't have much more to contribute. It's dangerous to play these games...of life with that attitude because the town won't no what to make of your apathy until you are dead. I see. I'm really torn in two about this. On the one hand, I want to believe Quinn when he says that he doesn't speak when he doesn't have anything to contribute. Some men are like this. On the other hand, he may choose not to speak in order to avoid slip-ups and blowing his cover. But he is right in saying that other people in this house keep a low profile just like he does. Which is not a valid excuse for his silence. All things considered, a decision must be made and the only way forward is to lynch. I know we're taking chances here, but until there is other evidence I vote Quinn Synclair (Quarryman).
Hinckley Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Charles and I were talking and wondering why the sword killer didn't show up on Night One? Was he blocked? The blocker I know of blocked Adam Sokern. Did the scum block him or her? Did he or she not have the power to kill yet? Was this killer awakened after the werewolf was killed? Anybody have any insight into this? The sword killer has struck every night since. Why not the first night? Perhaps he or she just needed a little sword lesson first?
Rufus Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Charles and I were talking and wondering why the sword killer didn't show up on Night One? Was he blocked? The blocker I know of blocked Adam Sokern. Did the scum block him or her? Did he or she not have the power to kill yet? Was this killer awakened after the werewolf was killed? Anybody have any insight into this? The sword killer has struck every night since. Why not the first night? Perhaps he or she just needed a little sword lesson first? Or maybe the sword killer also targeted Dacius, but the axe-wielder got there first?
Shadows Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 yet he was right on board with lynching Sebastien... He wasn't the only one. That said, I can't see anything else coming out of today and it's probably the best we've got. Vote: Quinn Sinclair / Quarryman
CMP Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 Or maybe the sword killer also targeted Dacius, but the axe-wielder got there first? I don't think so. The pickaxe wielder was a Rogue, probably out to kill everyone. But we're assuming the sword killer is a villager vigilante. Dacius was the first or second person to vote Zed, so why would sword guy target one of the clear-cut villagers like that?
iamded Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 I can't say I'm rightly comfortable with voting for Quinn. He's already been convicted of course, but I won't be adding my vote to his condemnation. Of course, I'm hardly comfortable voting for anyone unless I'm sure they're scum, and so far I've only voted for... hmm, was it Sebastian? So, I guess I've been wrong so far. Perhaps master Synclair could be scum after all...
Hinckley Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 I don't think so. The pickaxe wielder was a Rogue, probably out to kill everyone. But we're assuming the sword killer is a villager vigilante. Dacius was the first or second person to vote Zed, so why would sword guy target one of the clear-cut villagers like that? Who's we? The sword killer has taken out Daniel and Beatrice, a Rogue and a Villager. The pickaxe killer has taken out two villagers. What are you trying to do? Get people to believe that the past happened differently than it did?
CMP Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 Who's we? The sword killer has taken out Daniel and Beatrice, a Rogue and a Villager. The pickaxe killer has taken out two villagers. What are you trying to do? Get people to believe that the past happened differently than it did? What? The sword killer is almost certainly a vigilante (or a serial killer), because a Rogue wouldn't kill his/her own teammate. The pickaxe killer is almost certainly a Rogue, the weapon probably passed on by Daniel.
Hinckley Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 What? The sword killer is almost certainly a vigilante (or a serial killer), because a Rogue wouldn't kill his/her own teammate. The pickaxe killer is almost certainly a Rogue, the weapon probably passed on by Daniel. Since the sword killer is killing indiscriminately I would imagine he or she is a serial killer. It would be a huge relief to hear that he or she is indeed a vigilante. If the sword killer doesn't trust me to tell me they're the sword killer, fine, but I can certainly tell him or her who to avoid! But, hopefully he or she will continue to take out the Rogues. Trust me or not, take out those Rogues. Come on Charles, pay attention. When did I ever suggest the sword killer was a Rogue?
CMP Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 Since the sword killer is killing indiscriminately I would imagine he or she is a serial killer. It would be a huge relief to hear that he or she is indeed a vigilante. If the sword killer doesn't trust me to tell me they're the sword killer, fine, but I can certainly tell him or her who to avoid! But, hopefully he or she will continue to take out the Rogues. Trust me or not, take out those Rogues. Come on Charles, pay attention. When did I ever suggest the sword killer was a Rogue? I'm assuming the sword killer made a mistake with that kill, just like the musket killer. But yes, it's entirely possible he's a serial killer.
Inconspicuous Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 But we're assuming the sword killer is a villager vigilante. Speak for yourself. Because the sword killer killed a Rogue, they're definitely not part of that faction. The weird Witch-hat rifle-carrying figure is a town vigilante according to Harriet. This is a crazy game-of-life with multiple people with similar roles, so it's a possibility that we have a second vigilante. But if they haven't contacted Harriet and joined the town communication network, like most important townies roles have, that raises a red flag in my mind.
Hinckley Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 I'm assuming the sword killer made a mistake with that kill, just like the musket killer. That's a mountain of wishful thinking. I hope you're right, but until any of us have heard from the sword killer, it's best to assume they mean us harm. The musket killer is communicating with us and working to find scum. The sword killer took out Beatrice who was proven to be a villager and we don't know why he or she decided to do that. And Fiona jammed a pickaxe up her koochie.
CMP Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 That's a mountain of wishful thinking. I hope you're right, but until any of us have heard from the sword killer, it's best to assume they mean us harm. The musket killer is communicating with us and working to find scum. The sword killer took out Beatrice who was proven to be a villager and we don't know why he or she decided to do that. You're communicating with the musket killer but he/she won't tell you why he/she killed Beatrice?
Admiral Ron Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 You're communicating with the musket killer but he/she won't tell you why he/she killed Beatrice? No, the sword killer killed Beatrice.
CMP Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 No, the sword killer killed Beatrice. Oh yea. Ok, my last statement is void.
Hinckley Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 You're communicating with the musket killer but he/she won't tell you why he/she killed Beatrice? Maybe we should kill you anyway...
Rufus Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 Well, I don't have any better ideas, so .... vote: Quinn Sinclair (Quarryman)
WhiteFang Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 I know that we are taking chances and to avoid myself from not being able to participate and vote. I will also follow the rest in this convicition by voting too. Let's pray that we got this right instead. Vote: Quinn Sinclair (Quarryman)
MagPiesRUs Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 I see no reason to vote for Quinn today. Sure, targeting people flying under the radar can sometimes be a good idea, but I'm not comfortable convicting someone solely for that reason. It's understandable that a regular townie would be so quiet - we have so many active players contributing that it's difficult to add anything meaningful to the daily discussions.
Fugazi Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 That's a mountain of wishful thinking. I hope you're right, but until any of us have heard from the sword killer, it's best to assume they mean us harm. The musket killer is communicating with us and working to find scum. The sword killer took out Beatrice who was proven to be a villager and we don't know why he or she decided to do that. And Fiona jammed a pickaxe up her koochie. Are you trying to get me skewered by the sword killer, dear Harriet? Tsk tsk, nasty girl!
iamded Posted February 16, 2011 Posted February 16, 2011 Are you trying to get me skewered by the sword killer, dear Harriet? Tsk tsk, nasty girl! Not my Fiona! Her eye-patch is so... alluring...
Recommended Posts