Alopex Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 For those of you who think I am a vampire, you are wrong. I was brought back to life by the same person who brought Sebastian back to life. Can't you see? My night action is that I may survive a attack at night due to my 'vampire'power. I don’t know who resurrected me. But it happened in the same way as Sebastian was resurrected. And all I know is that I was village before I died and I still am village after I was resurrected. I said that if I get killed during the night I will die for a day and night and come back with a message from God. Like what happened to me today. If I get voted of that probably won't happen. If you want to test my theory you will have me killed at night. Go ahead just vote me out. I'm not going to fight you guys. I won't win this fight. Everybody keeps saying that I keep changing my story which isn't true. I just had to repeat parts of it over and over again. If you find it necessary go ahead and lynch me. I'm sorry to say that you do change your story... I guess lynching is the way to get the truth...
Eskallon Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 I'm sorry to say that you do change your story... I guess lynching is the way to get the truth... You do keep changing your story Beatrice, as the person above points out. I am not so sure about this Little Bunny character though, you know Harriet who the blocker is and while there is the unlikely chance there may be another I do doubt it. The person may be taking advantage of the fact that our God has possibly given us a few unusual roles.
Hinckley Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Beatrice admits she can convert!!! Sorry, Beatrice. I love the village more than you. I'll miss our snuggle sessions.
Eskallon Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Beatrice admits she can convert!!! Sorry, Beatrice. I love the village more than you. I'll miss our snuggle sessions. Really?
CMP Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Harriet, you're allowed to quote private messages. (Just not from JB, I don't think.) Mind showing us what she said?
Alopex Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Harriet, you're allowed to quote private messages. (Just not from JB, I don't think.) Mind showing us what she said? I would like to see that too... If this is true she definitely is an enemy.
Eskallon Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Harriet, you're allowed to quote private messages. (Just not from JB, I don't think.) Mind showing us what she said? Yes, let's see what Beatrice said.
Hinckley Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 I believe there's only one rogue left! I'll come forward with more as soon as I can. Apologies to everyone. I had to threaten Beatrice with something to get her to talk to me in private. It worked. She's talking. I believe what she has to say, so give me a few more minutes with her. Thanks.
Sandy Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 I believe what she has to say, so give me a few more minutes with her. Thanks. You're hopeless, Harriet. Just because they agree to suck your titties doesn't mean they're automatically your friends...
CMP Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Just because they agree to suck your titties doesn't mean they're automatically your friends... ...Oh.
Rick Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 ...Oh. So, I guess you offered the same thing yesterday?
Hinckley Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 You're hopeless, Harriet. Just because they agree to suck your titties doesn't mean they're automatically your friends... It doesn't?
CMP Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 So, I guess you offered the same thing yesterday? ...Maybe. So, you're still unable to vote?
Rick Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 So, you're still unable to vote? Yes... why would that have changed?
Alopex Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 It doesn't? Titties Cleavage isn't the solution to the worlds problems. If it was we would have killed all non-village factions on day 1...
CMP Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Yes... why would that have changed? I thought maybe you were the ex-werewolf bodyguard, and unable to vote for them, which was the case on night one. I checked, and you still haven't voted, so that's understandable, and I guess you're not it.
Eskallon Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Yes... why would that have changed? I know that you have already said but I cannot remember, why cannot you vote?
Rufus Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Beatrice, we're not stupid. What kind of idiot would purposefully revive you, even though most of us read Zed's book on mafiascum.net - Vampires, and that if you came back you'd be rogue? The 'other necromancer' would revive someone that has such a problematic role if revived? Here's my theory. The 'other necromancer' is either Sam (BUT he didn't know he was doing it, he was possessed to do so by God because it's his wife) OR this is some sort of messenger from God sent to do it. Either way, it's done because you were a vampire. <Ahem> You remember how somebody corrected our mistake of killing Sebastien? Well, Charles can similarly save us from making a mistake. We do not want to lose him. Let's focus on someone else to vote out. I seem to remember Charles has told Harriet he has a similar resurrection action. If this is true it means: Charles revived Beatrice, despite what he said above; or God revived Beatrice, but in personified form; or There's a third resurrector, which I find incredibly hard to believe. I would have thought that if Beatrice had 'popped' back into life, it would have been done with a puff of smoke, like the way she disappeared; but she didn't. I guess we just have to wait to hear what transpires from her discussions with Harriet.
Hinckley Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 I seem to remember Charles has told Harriet he has a similar resurrection action. If this is true it means: Charles revived Beatrice, despite what he said above; or Nope. I said similar ability to correct a mistake. Not a similar ability to revive the dead. Good guess, though.
CMP Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Nope. I said similar ability to correct a mistake. Not a similar ability to revive the dead. Yea, so tick off, Cambridge.
Inconspicuous Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Beatrice's story just doesn't add up. On top of that, it sounds exactly like the role from Zed's book, so I have no reason to trust her at this point. Especially if the reviver who resurrected Sebastien didn't consciously do the same for her. I say we vote her off, unless another, better suspect emerges.
Hinckley Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Speaking of suspects, why don't we ever hear from William Fairfax? It's clear he has a double vote, but what else does he do with his time? We don't hear much from him around here.
Hinckley Posted February 19, 2011 Posted February 19, 2011 Beatrice, we're not stupid. What kind of idiot would purposefully revive you, even though most of us read Zed's book on mafiascum.net - Vampires, and that if you came back you'd be rogue? The 'other necromancer' would revive someone that has such a problematic role if revived? Here's my theory. The 'other necromancer' is either Sam (BUT he didn't know he was doing it, he was possessed to do so by God because it's his wife) OR this is some sort of messenger from God sent to do it. Either way, it's done because you were a vampire. It's very odd that you have no idea what's going on with other things around here and yet you are very knowledgeable about this particular subject. Maybe raising the dead runs in the family? Perhaps Sam didn't raise Beatrice, but could it have been his brother, Charles? I think you know him? It's you! Which perhaps is why you claim to have the role you claim to have. It's a very convenient role to claim. Interesting how there's a differentiation in the affiliation. Perhaps you have two methods of doing what you claim and are telling the truth about having to put the one away. Put perhaps you have another method without the one you put away. William Fairfax is most likely our remaining Rogue. Charles Synclair, after avoiding the vote twice, is most likely our sword killer. I can't believe I didn't see it earlier...
CMP Posted February 19, 2011 Posted February 19, 2011 It's very odd that you have no idea what's going on with other things around here and yet you are very knowledgeable about this particular subject. Maybe raising the dead runs in the family? Perhaps Sam didn't raise Beatrice, but could it have been his brother, Charles? I think you know him? It's you! Which perhaps is why you claim to have the role you claim to have. It's a very convenient role to claim. Interesting how there's a differentiation in the affiliation. Perhaps you have two methods of doing what you claim and are telling the truth about having to put the one away. Put perhaps you have another method without the one you put away. William Fairfax is most likely our remaining Rogue. Charles Synclair, after avoiding the vote twice, is most likely our sword killer. I can't believe I didn't see it earlier... 'No idea what's going on with other things?' The only thing I'm confused about is the persons 1 2 3 and 4 thing, which as far as I know has ended. This is a theory. What? 'Maybe Charles raised Beatrice!' 'He's the sword killer!' Pick your pointless accusation and stick with it instead of switching it around. And how have I 'avoided the vote twice?' I voted for everyone that's been convicted. How do you assume I'm the sword killer? If you're so sure I am, block me tonight. It won't stop the real sword killer. Discuss this in private, please, so we can talk freely about my role.
Recommended Posts