smittyfan Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 But the chronological order of your 'summary' izn't exactly correct, that inconsiztent structure iz characteristic of made-up stories. And I still don't believe that "there waz no "imminent danger" of uz not getting a conviction". Really? You're still sticking with that belief? The fact iz you did not cooperate with ze majority vote, which almost cost us ze non-conviction of Dreo, who you intentionally refused to vote for since he'z your fellow scumbag right? With regards to my scum list, it iz still ze three of you, Geert, and Erin. Unless you don't have the balls to talk to a French chick privately, where I could scrutinize if you're lying or not. Come 'on, I dare you three. I'll be waiting... Oooh.. Tough girl. I think the fact that we did manage to get a conviction, and it turned out to be a Scum proves that we were in 'imminent danger', and with no night killing, I think it's safe to say that we gave those Evil Scummies a good scare!! Danielle, you're not convincing me...
Capt. Redblade Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 Im going to start off the voting. Vote: Danielle Barrie (Dan the Brickman) Now, as we all know, this is just the early stage of the voting, so if you give proof you are innocent Danielle, then I will take back my vote. But for now, i'm going to have to vote against you. Cruz/CF Why are you so quick to vote for Danielle? Do you know something we don't?
Brickdoctor Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 Why are you so quick to vote for Danielle? Do you know something we don't? I think he just wants to put the pressure on her.
XimenaPaulina Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 Why are you so quick to vote for Danielle? Do you know something we don't? I think he based hiz vote on my stated allegations against Danielle early in the day. BTW, where have you been Casey? As much as I suspect Danielle, she does raise a good point, where ze heck are you during ze voting? That also makez you suspicious, are you alzo trying to protect your fellow scum Dreo that's why you didn't vote? I'll keep an eye on you baseball guy...
KartoffelViking Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 As I've said before, I am indeed innocent. I received a message earlier today from someone whose name I shall not reveal so as to keep them safe from the Scum. I have turned off my profile veiws too... sorry scummies.. NOT!!!! They can also verify my innocence, and so can the other confirmed members of our Townie Underground. Well, isn't that convenient... But I should really be happy if you have indeed been cleared I didn't suspect Dreo because (as I've said before) I've worked with him for quite a long time, and he's never done anything I've found suspicious. Well, assuming you're scum, I guess you would never consider a fellow scumbag suspicious I'm torn between voting for Danielle or Geert, now.
Izzy Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 This is all so confusing to me! I cannot believe how fast the voting time has come around, I must have spent too much time in the sun. All those perverts who are trying to watch or take pictures of my sweet smelling Panda and her excited dancing need to back off, NOW!
Dan the Brickman Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 Come 'on, I dare you three. I'll be waiting... challenge met. are you happy now? I dont think I can say anything more then I have. Im just a simple janitor, Im not eloquent or a speaker, but, I hope you guys will listen to me.
XimenaPaulina Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 challenge met. are you happy now? I dont think I can say anything more then I have. Im just a simple janitor, Im not eloquent or a speaker, but, I hope you guys will listen to me. I will only be happy when all of the scumbag mafia goonz are dead. Anyway, like what I've zaid to you privately, I will let the rezt of ze innocent people decide your fate, Danielle.
Brickdoctor Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 I dont think I can say anything more then I have. Im just a simple janitor, Im not eloquent or a speaker, but, I hope you guys will listen to me. A 'have pity on me' statement? That sounds wrong to me for some reason.
smittyfan Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 Well, if you truly are innocent than start playing the 'I'm innocent' card. Either people will believe you, and let you hang aroung a while longer, or if you're unconvicing, then we'll lynch you. Either way, you got a 50-50 shot.
CommanderFox Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 Why are you so quick to vote for Danielle? Do you know something we don't? Look down. I think he just wants to put the pressure on her. Exactly. I think he based hiz vote on my stated allegations against Danielle early in the day. Yes I did, but like Bridget said, also to put pressure on Danielle. Only 2 votes have been cast, we need to get to a conclusion within the next few hours if we are going to be able to lynch a person, I do hope we get lucky again and get another scum mafia. Cruz/CF
Gregorovich Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 Mostly I've found a lot of information in the book MafaWiki, but the library's catalog (read: Google) has proven very useful in digging up this kind of information. I can't find the book with that info at the moment, but I'll get back to you if I do. Ah, here we are: the book How to Play Mafia. Not very thorough otherwise, and it's based on older situations (read: the card game), but there is a chart showing numbers of scum per total people and which side that setup tends to lean towards. It only goes up to thirteen total, but you get the general idea. Oh, I see . Sorry for suspecting you.
Pandora Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 All those perverts who are trying to watch or take pictures of my sweet smelling Panda and her excited dancing need to back off, NOW! My hero! I'll happily dance for you Kylan As to our discussion, Colette is aware of my opinions of the two. It seems Danielle is fighting hard for her life, and there were other people who could have joined us in the vote, but didn't. I'm surprised that Bridget voted so late, however it is easy to forget the passage of time in the sunshine (despite crazed Mafia scum trying to kill us in our beds), however, let me be clear, I am not saying I find Bridget suspicious for this. Geert, on the other hand seems to think that only Siegmund finds him suspicious, but that is not so. I am wondering why, of all of us, you decided so early in the day that you were unwilling to vote. At the end of the day, just as we reached a conviction you said: "Yet another person going to be killed..." Unfortunately you don't seem to realise that unless we catch the scum (by voting and thus lynching) we will all be killed. We may have been lucky so far (not lucky enough for poor Claudia, I miss her ) but that is the end-point if we don't catch the scum first.
Gregorovich Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 My hero! I'll happily dance for you Kylan As to our discussion, Colette is aware of my opinions of the two. It seems Danielle is fighting hard for her life, and there were other people who could have joined us in the vote, but didn't. I'm surprised that Bridget voted so late, however it is easy to forget the passage of time in the sunshine (despite crazed Mafia scum trying to kill us in our beds), however, let me be clear, I am not saying I find Bridget suspicious for this. Geert, on the other hand seems to think that only Siegmund finds him suspicious, but that is not so. I am wondering why, of all of us, you decided so early in the day that you were unwilling to vote. At the end of the day, just as we reached a conviction you said: "Yet another person going to be killed..." Unfortunately you don't seem to realise that unless we catch the scum (by voting and thus lynching) we will all be killed. We may have been lucky so far (not lucky enough for poor Claudia, I miss her ) but that is the end-point if we don't catch the scum first. Well it's only really been Siegmund that's been saying why he finds me suspicious. Plenty of people have been saying I'm suspicious, but only Siegmund has explained why. I'm actually a little suspicious of Collette. She is always ready to pounce on someone the first chance she gets, and she's always so keen to speak with people in private. I took the time to have a private chat with her, and it was nothing that could have been said infront of everyone else. And whenever anyone refuses to speak with her in private, she rants about people "not having the balls to do it". I find this very odd, so I'm going to Vote: Colette LeMans Hopefully this will put pressure on you to explain why act so strangely. I'll definetely take back my vote if you convince me of your innocence.
Dan the Brickman Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 Do to a very convincing conversation, I am going to UNVOTE: Erin Ennis (Euvor) and instead Vote:Geert Rotterdam, (Gregorovich) I cant change this now, so I hope you guys are right.
Gregorovich Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 Do to a very convincing conversation, I am going to UNVOTE: Erin Ennis (Euvor) and instead Vote:Geert Rotterdam, (Gregorovich) I cant change this now, so I hope you guys are right. Why are you voting me? I don't think I've done anything suspicious, but if I have I'm sure I can explain it.
KartoffelViking Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 Do to a very convincing conversation, I am going to UNVOTE: Erin Ennis (Euvor) and instead Vote:Geert Rotterdam, (Gregorovich) I cant change this now, so I hope you guys are right. How come you can't change your vote?
Sandy Posted March 23, 2011 Author Posted March 23, 2011 Vote Tally: Danielle Barrie/Dan the Brickman: 1 (CommanderFox) Colette LeMans/KielDaMan: 1 (Gregorovich) Geert Rotterdam/Gregorovich: 1 (Dan the Brickman) You still have about 24 hours to reach a conviction. It takes 7 votes to convict someone. Note that "The Forest's" rule about one unvote per day is not in effect in this game. You can take back your vote as many times as you want.
XimenaPaulina Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 After some private conversationz with my fellow innocents and with the two prime scum suzpects, we've come to two major points: 1. Even if Danielle was being highly suspected during the early partz of ze day, she has clearly exerted more effort in convincing us that she iz innocent, both publicly (game thread) and in private discussions (PM). Even if I'm not completely convinced, she haz agreed to cooperate with the rest of ze innocent people, which shows that she's indeed serious in proving her innocence. The majority of ze innocent people think that way too, and for that we're inclined to give our janitress a second chance. 2. On the other hand, Geert has been highly suspicious on moz of the innocent's 'scum radar' right from the very start, due to hiz relative inactivity in ze discussions in ze past few days (general scummy behavior), unusual refusal to vote Dreo (fellow scum?) yesterday, and hiz seemingly lack of urgency and concern towards lynching out ze killers which iz perceived as scummy behavior. And compared to Danielle, he haz shown less effort to cooperate with ze majority of the innocent people, even to the point of voting me even if I've already proven myself innocent to ze rest. For all those reasons, I will: Vote: Geert Rotterdam (Gregorovich)
Gregorovich Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 2. On the other hand, Geert has been highly suspicious on moz of the innocent's 'scum radar' right from the very start, due to hiz relative inactivity in ze discussions in ze past few days (general scummy behavior), unusual refusal to vote Dreo (fellow scum?) yesterday, and hiz seemingly lack of urgency and concern towards lynching out ze killers which iz perceived as scummy behavior. And compared to Danielle, he haz shown less effort to cooperate with ze majority of the innocent people, even to the point of voting me even if I've already proven myself innocent to ze rest. For all those reasons, I will: Vote: Geert Rotterdam (Gregorovich) General inactivity? I've had a private discussion with you today, and I've actually participated quite a lot in today's conversation. I'm goin to unvote you because you seem to be just as concerned and serious about this as I am, so Unvote: Colette LeMans What can I do to make you believe that I am innocent? If you convict me, then there'll be even less innocents left. There's already been 3 innocents murdered, do you want another one of your own to be dead?
Brickdoctor Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 General inactivity? I've had a private discussion with you today, and I've actually participated quite a lot in today's conversation. She means that overall you haven't talked very much during this vacation. I originally thought maybe you are too busy with real life take a lot of naps, but all of a sudden when we suspect you for being inactive you decide to become very active. Like you were trying to avoid attention and then when we said that that was suspicious behavior you decided to do a 180.
Gregorovich Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 She means that overall you haven't talked very much during this vacation. I originally thought maybe you are too busy with real life take a lot of naps, but all of a sudden when we suspect you for being inactive you decide to become very active. Like you were trying to avoid attention and then when we said that that was suspicious behavior you decided to do a 180. Well now that I know being quiet is seen as scummy, I've decided to post in this thread as much as humanly possiblenap a lot less and not work as much.
XimenaPaulina Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 What can I do to make you believe that I am innocent? If you convict me, then there'll be even less innocents left. There's already been 3 innocents murdered, do you want another one of your own to be dead? You have provided me with a very convincing statement on our private conversation. And for that I'm inclined to believe you, and I will: Unvote: Geert Rotterdam (Gregorovich) I will share this significant intel with my co-innocents.
Gregorovich Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 You have provided me with a very convincing statement on our private conversation. And for that I'm inclined to believe you, and I will: Unvote: Geert Rotterdam (Gregorovich) I will share this significant intel with my co-innocents. Please, do. I am determined for as much people as possible to know of my innocence. Thanks for unvoting me .
Brickdoctor Posted March 23, 2011 Posted March 23, 2011 Well now that I know being quiet is seen as scummy, I've decided to post in this thread as much as humanly possiblenap a lot less and not work as much. That's just what I'm getting at. It's like you don't want to be seen as scummy so you do what everyone tells you is not scummy, which is something that sounds like you're trying too hard to blend in. Not sure if that is because you're Scum who doesn't want to be noticed or a Townie trying to sneak to victory. I will share this significant intel with my co-innocents. I'll be waiting.
Recommended Posts