Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

Here's a question,

which Lego brick do you think is the most common/most popular that Lego has created, this can either mean in sets, or in media such as banners, icons, logos, artwork, etc

I think that the most commonly used/recognized brick is the 2X4 (part number: 3001)

so, what is your ideas?

Posted

The brick produced in most numbers during the last 50 years might be 2x4, but I think it must be one of the smaller bricks. Just think about how many black Technic-bushings are used in quite many sets.

Posted

I think I might have read somewhere that 1x2 bricks are some of the most produced bricks, at least in recent years. But as for the most well-known, definitely the 2x4 brick.

Posted

LEGO themselves use the image of the red 2 x 4 brick (3001) for promotional purposes, and recently failed in their attempt to copyright the image of the red 2 x 4 brick if I remember rightly.

Dr. D.

Posted

for promotional purposes, and recently failed in their attempt to copyright the image of the red 2 x 4 brick if I remember rightly.

Heck, Apple can claim bizarre things why not Lego something as that?

Posted

Heck, Apple can claim bizarre things why not Lego something as that?

I suppose they came at the issue too late. By now, pretty much every clone brand has a part identical to the classic 2x4 brick, so trademarking an image of the product itself (rather than a stylized logo like Apple's) would basically be granting TLG special rights to show pictures of their own product in advertising, while prohibiting other companies from showing a similar image of their own identical brick products. At this point, it would be like Kellogg's trying to copyright the image of the Corn Flake when every competitor under the sun has an identical product on the market.

Posted (edited)

Hi,

I definetley think that there is a huge amount of friction SA2L pegs that have been made since literally every technic set has at least one, some have 200 odd.

another fun fact is that there is 6.5 million bricks made each year (possibly even more in this year) so there is enough bricks for each human to have 50 bricks on average (again, possibly even more than that, that may be in this year)

note that in-between 2005 and 2009 there was an average increase of 46 Lego bricks for each person on earth so from 2009 to 20011 it stands to reason that people may have around 70.

I seen a James May Documentary on Lego and it showed you the first brick that was 'created' and prototyped and patented hey were red 2x4 (I forgot to mention this above hand) and there was a few inside of a glass cabinet that had different clutches (not like the ones we see today) and these were all patents, i bet if there is any more of those bricks leaked anywhere, they would be worth more than your average 2x4.

he also creates a "functional" 1:1 scale house as a project.

here is the video:

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=mEFPhXl3QQY (part 1)

http://www.youtube.c...feature=related (part 2)

http://www.youtube.c...feature=related (part 3)

http://www.youtube.c...feature=related (part 4)

http://www.youtube.c...feature=related (part 5)

hope you like it

Edited by SNIPE
Posted

I suppose they came at the issue too late. By now, pretty much every clone brand has a part identical to the classic 2x4 brick, so trademarking an image of the product itself (rather than a stylized logo like Apple's) would basically be granting TLG special rights to show pictures of their own product in advertising, while prohibiting other companies from showing a similar image of their own identical brick products. At this point, it would be like Kellogg's trying to copyright the image of the Corn Flake when every competitor under the sun has an identical product on the market.

Actually I believe it was rejected on the grounds that you can't trademark something which is a functional requirement of a product. Since the basic design of the 2x4 brick is essentially functional, it can't be used on it's own as a trademark. The aim of this is to prevent somebody from using, e.g. a wheel, in there trademark and then suing anyone who makes wheels and to avoid companies from using trademark protection to try and get around requirements for patents (which to some extent is exactly what TLG were trying to do).

Posted

Actually I believe it was rejected on the grounds that you can't trademark something which is a functional requirement of a product. Since the basic design of the 2x4 brick is essentially functional, it can't be used on it's own as a trademark. The aim of this is to prevent somebody from using, e.g. a wheel, in there trademark and then suing anyone who makes wheels and to avoid companies from using trademark protection to try and get around requirements for patents (which to some extent is exactly what TLG were trying to do).

Ah, but if I have my facts correct, the trademark they were trying to protect in this most recent legal battle was the image of the 2x4 red brick, not the product itself. Legal battles in the past have been decided by the reason you describe, though-- for instance, this is why the court case between LEGO and Mega Brands was decided in the latter's favor.

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...