Professor Flitwick Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 If none of us vote, we all get vote penalties, but since none of us got the first vote, what the hell happens? May have found a loophole. Holds dead fish up to ear. Koilette says that this means Bell Bastage would be voted off; she has the penalty votes from editing her post changing what she said. Hardly a fair alternative.
CMP Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Koilette says that this means Bell Bastage would be voted off; she has the penalty votes from editing her post changing what she said. Hardly a fair alternative. Damn. Thanks Bell. So basically random lynch or it's Bell.
CorneliusMurdock Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Mr. Beast's plan would also require some cooperation from everyone. Good luck with that. I'm not holding out much hope. This was how it started. Blood. Blood everywhere...
badboytje88 Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Well I have to admit that I thought about telling everyone that Mr Moonguy himself had been part of the Sinister insane in the past. He was converted to their side, yes I read your files. I organised them too you know! But it would not be fair to judge based on what happened 25 years ago. People change. Oh and not voting is not an option I believe I already have 6-7 votes against me... Stupid me!
Zepher Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Hey gramps, you ain't helping with your bloody blood speeches. We seem to be in the normal awful position of all them books I read. Never anything to go on, but needing to vote. Only difference is that one of us already lost their head and we've got these damn pills which everyone says don't do nothing, so, we don't have anything to go on. Any of y'all got any bright ideas on what to do? I don't think we ought to risk not voting. I don't think that Ms. Bloodbrick seems the type of gal who would be so happy with that.
CMP Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Oh and not voting is not an option I believe I already have 6-7 votes against me... Stupid me! It's an option if we don't find a more suitable canidate for lynching. Does anybody have clues in their backstories or something? I notice some of us are from the same areas, do we have any hints as to who's scum in them? That's the best I have.
Scouty Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 If we have to vote, perhaps it's best to get rid of loud people that call everyone and everything a shithole, even when it doesn't particularly fit correctly into the sentence they are speaking. Just a thought. No offense to anyone in particular. I agree, my pretty face just can't handle these loudmouths But it's not even past noon yet, so we shouldn't have to concern ourselves so much about not reaching a non-conclusive day. Anything goes. Hey, I should sing that!
Zepher Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 I dunno if anyone pointed this out yet, but just something to notice. I don't think it helps us right now either, but Ms. Bloodbrick said that she chose five folks. So we gotta find five folks. Just something to look at. Most of the time folks like Ms. Bloodbrick don't say how many agents they've got so it's nice to know what we're looking for.
Hinckley Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Does anybody have clues in their backstories or something? I notice some of us are from the same areas, do we have any hints as to who's scum in them? That's the best I have. Since when do we ever find clues there?
CMP Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Since when do we ever find clues there? Read this book called Mystery Castle. I don't see you coming up with anything better, rather than voting people out based on their personality. Which, ironically enough, is exactly what you think never happens.
Zepher Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Since when do we ever find clues there? Mine says I'm working for Ms. Bloodbrick. Could that be a clue!? That is a joke. If you all vote for me because of that, I will come back to life just to murder you all.
Hinckley Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Read this book called Mystery Castle. I don't see you coming up with anything better, rather than voting people out based on their personality. Which, ironically enough, is exactly what you think never happens. What? I'm not saying you're likely to be scum. I'm just saying you're obnoxious. If we have to vote for someone, why not the one calling us shitholes non-stop? It's possible your over-zealous roleplaying is your tactic for being scum and not slipping up. Maybe you think if you stick to your character you won't accidentally slip or something. It's possible, anyway. But, I'm mostly just calling you out for being annoying. I admit we have nothing concrete. The spaceman theory is something to go on, but I don't feel we should.
CMP Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 What? I'm not saying you're likely to be scum. I'm just saying you're obnoxious. If we have to vote for someone, why not the one calling us shitholes non-stop? It's possible your over-zealous roleplaying is your tactic for being scum and not slipping up. Maybe you think if you stick to your character you won't accidentally slip or something. It's possible, anyway. But, I'm mostly just calling you out for being annoying. I admit we have nothing concrete. The spaceman theory is something to go on, but I don't feel we should. Talk to the guy in the helmet about roleplaying. I'd rather not vote out Stan just for being drugged up many years ago. (Weren't we all?) But we need to make a decision whether to make a random vote, or let Bell die and we all get penalty votes tomorrow. (Then again, we'd ALL have them, so there's not a real difference.)
Peanuts Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 If none of us vote, we all get vote penalties, but since none of us got the first vote, what the hell happens? May have found a loophole. That gotta be one of the worst plans I've ever heard. And I've heard some really bad plans. Like checking, why the wheat thresher doesn't work by putting my head into it. It's an option if we don't find a more suitable canidate for lynching. Does anybody have clues in their backstories or something? I notice some of us are from the same areas, do we have any hints as to who's scum in them? That's the best I have. Honestly, it's not an option. Mot-voting would mean that we convict Bell, so we should still rather vote for her than not-voting, so your suggestion is simply stupid. No offence. Well I have to admit that I thought about telling everyone that Mr Moonguy himself had been part of the Sinister insane in the past. He was converted to their side, yes I read your files. I organised them too you know! But it would not be fair to judge based on what happened 25 years ago. People change. Oh and not voting is not an option I believe I already have 6-7 votes against me... Stupid me! Actually, if we would judge people by their background stories, which would be even worde than randomly voting, it would even mean, that Stanley would be town. Because I don't think Frl. Bloodbrick would hire somebody who helped kill her father. If she thought rationally. But then, if she thought rationally, she wouldn't try to kill us or simply kill us without giving us a chance, so that would imply she's as whacky as you others. But still, let's not be biased towards Stanley. Yeah, well, we have no clues. I have no idea who to kill, so we'll have to talk and wait.
badboytje88 Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 I second that Mr Moonman would be a nice person to investigate, BUT it could also be very dangerous. The agent's know that Stanley might get investigated. If they send out a watcher to look after Stanley they might find out who our investigator is. I say wait a day or two with investigating Stanley and just let him be for the time being.
Tamamono Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Cause I want to get my way with you You could have just asked. So, we waiting 'til Day Two or making the usual uneducated Day One lynch? Like Rick says, we have to vote today. If we have to vote, perhaps it's best to get rid of loud people that call everyone and everything a shithole, even when it doesn't particularly fit correctly into the sentence they are speaking. Just a thought. No offense to anyone in particular. Beast (or Carl, or whatever) does have a pretty bad attitude, and he's certainly pissing me off, but that's just his character him. Basing accusations off of (seemingly) random matters is probably the worst kind of metagaming of all. So basically random lynch or it's Bell. Not a random vote. Why do people always call it a random vote? We look at peoples' behaviors and then choose the scummiest person of all. We seem to be in the normal awful position of all them books I read. Never anything to go on, but needing to vote. Only difference is that one of us already lost their head and we've got these damn pills which everyone says don't do nothing, so, we don't have anything to go on. I know. It's going to be extremely tough to decide on a conviction today, and even then we'll likely be sending a townie to his or her grave. We need to discuss this thoroughly, looking for the slightest piece of evidence in the pictures in peoples' behaviors. First, let's look at a list of people who we haven't heard from yet today: Crackerman (Ricecracker) Imes da Booey (iamded) Shinobu (WhiteFang) Kelly 'K-Girl' (KielDaMan) Janie (JimButcher) Skally (sok117 Bethany (Brickdoctor) Now, it's quite possible (and probable) that these people are busy with real life passed out from all the drinking, because I haven't seen any of them actively looking in on our conversation. Here's a list of people who have only spoken once to get their medication: Pandufus (Rufus & Pandora) Draxia (Dragonator) Manuel (Masked Builder) Rickety (Roncanator) It's likely that we'll find scum among those who aren't speaking often, but are speaking enough to avoid serious suspicion.
Hinckley Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Mine says I'm working for Ms. Bloodbrick. Could that be a clue!? That is a joke. If you all vote for me because of that, I will come back to life just to murder you all. Mine says I hypnotised people into killing themselves. If there's a rash of suicides, vote me out. Until then, I'm pretty sure there's nothing in our profiles that would indicate our affiliation.
CMP Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 That gotta be one of the worst plans I've ever heard. And I've heard some really bad plans. Like checking, why the wheat thresher doesn't work by putting my head into it. Honestly, it's not an option. Mot-voting would mean that we convict Bell, so we should still rather vote for her than not-voting, so your suggestion is simply stupid. No offence. Okay, we'll just a wait for a clue to fly out of somebody's pants then. Shouldn't take long. And it's not simply stupid. All of us having a penalty is the exact same as all of us not having any penalty. It's most votes is lynched, not majority.
badboytje88 Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Honestly, it's not an option. Not-voting would mean that we convict Bell, so we should still rather vote for her than not-voting, so your suggestion is simply stupid. No offence. Someone is thinking about hopping on the invisible bandwagon awfully soon...
Professor Flitwick Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 It's likely that we'll find scum among those who aren't speaking often, but are speaking enough to avoid serious suspicion. Holds dead fish to ear. Whilst Koilette appreciates you taking the time to do that, she says she wouldn't start worrying about who has/hasn't talked yet until at least a third of the way through the day; they could be in different time zones still in shock about what happened.
CMP Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 I call it a random vote because there's no evidence otherwise. It's one slip-up that we have to go off of. And in every book but one I've read, Day One lynches yield a Townie death. I'd rather avoid that.
Zepher Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Go read Werewolf. But seriously, y'all are actinglike a bunch of nitwits. I have this shell here. I'm going to pass it around and you can only speak when you have it in your hand or else chaos is just going to keep happening and everyone is going to be fighting everyone over nothing. Ace, right?
Tamamono Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Mine says I hypnotised people into killing themselves. If there's a rash of suicides, vote me out. Until then, I'm pretty sure there's nothing in our profiles that would indicate our affiliation. I agree. There's no point to trying to use our profiles to find scum; these things are generated randomly. Holds dead fish to ear. Whilst Koilette appreciates you taking the time to do that, she says she wouldn't start worrying about who has/hasn't talked yet until at least a third of the way through the day; they could be in different time zones still in shock about what happened. Koilette's got a point. Like I said, I haven't seen any of those people on the first list since the Day began, so I wouldn't worry about them too much right now. I call it a random vote because there's no evidence otherwise. It's one slip-up that we have to go off of. And in every book but one I've read, Day One lynches yield a Townie death. I'd rather avoid that. A random vote would be drawing a name out of a hat, but the kind of conviction that we should be trying for is one where we look very closely at behaviors and try to determine whether or not they're scum. That's our best shot at getting a scum today.
Peanuts Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 And it's not simply stupid. All of us having a penalty is the exact same as all of us not having any penalty. It's most votes is lynched, not majority. Yeah, but nobody having a penalty is better than everyone having a penalty. If we everyone decide not to vote, we've all used our only failure allowed. So every mistake we do in the whole game, would result in a mod kill. That's a high price just for avoiding a conviction on the first day. And by the way, it's called a penalty and not an alternative. We should try to play this by the rules, IMO. Someone is thinking about hopping on the invisible bandwagon awfully soon... I've never said I'd consider killing you as an option. It's just better than doing nothing and let you die anyway.
JimBee Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 I'm here! Well, I wonder why that Marcy girl died so early... it's horrible that we're already losing our neighbors. Also, what's this medicine all about? Sounds to me like a lot of confusion, from what Heng has told us. Might as well take mine and find out... Day One-Shift Two 1. Strawberry Dust Sassy Cooter 2. Dried Bull Testicles Carl 'Black Beast' Pie 3. Yellowjackets Ali "Periscope" Perry 4. Peach Cobbler Rickety Cannon 5. Downers 6. Pot Pourri 7. Bug Dust 8. Paint Thinner Janie Beeswax 9. Uppers 10. DMT Pearl Nuttin 11. Nasal Inhaler 12. Blue Bennies Mmm, paint thinner. What's that? Oh, you didn't say anything. I could've sworn I heard you say... Wha?
Recommended Posts