def Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 I have to say, I'm not all that opposed to a Riddler lynch. Of the more active posters, him and Catwoman have rung a few bells with me. I'm leaving my vote where it is for the time being, but I have lots of time to change it if it seems prudent.
XimenaPaulina Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Well I'm trying to be more active rather then passive, I'm trying to accomplish something rather then just sit around, say one thing for the day, then be on my marry way. I want to try to figure things out sooner rather then later. I guess your right that I could have just waited for tomorrow, but when you didn't answer my question simply the first time around, and not necessarily answer it, but acknowledge it, then I wouldn't have gotten suspicious and kept snooping. Then I wouldn't have accidentally put myself under the chopping block and we could be working towards finding someone who is actually scum. 1. The reason I wasn't able to answer your question first is because I've just logged in woken up and haven't had much time to catch up with the lengthy conversations that took place when I was sleeping. 2. I answered you on your second question, and STILL you kept bugging me about it, for the third and EVEN the fourth time! What part of the sentence "I WON'T TELL YOU" you don't understand?? 3. If you really are a concerned criminal, then why would you want to risk the survival of a "potential key central figure for the overall town cause" by wanting me to reveal the nature of my "allegiance revelation", knowing that it could get me killed and the criminals will lose an early advantage? You could have just damned waited. This behavior of your is what leads me to believe that you're acting scummy. If we happen to lynch you and you turn out to be scum, then good for us. If you're a criminal, then we wouldn't want someone who's putting their co-criminals at risk just to quench their thirst for answers.. Think about the team, not you individual survival!
Capt. Redblade Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Hmmm... The case against the Riddler is slowly becoming more and more damning. I will... Unvote: Ra's al Ghul (Fred Fred Burger) Vote: The Riddler (sok117) Even if Ra's is an undercover informant, the penalty votes are going to hit him like a ton of bricks at this rate.
Mrlegoninja Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Guys, seriously, stop! I think that each of you should calm down and think rationally... We have no evidence to lynch someone. It is a blind vote. Right now, we say that the person that hasn't posted should be voted off. So for right now, we should think of a team vote, not our personal arguments.
Oky Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Excuse my absence today; I have been a bit busy with cryogenic experiments, but rest assured that I am trying to find those scummy Undercover Agents just as much as the rest of you. I have been pondering about who to vote for, and while there has been some slightly suspicious activity lately, there is not enough evidence to really convict anyone for me. I usually don't trust anyone, much less a little girl, but in such situations a good ally can be quite useful, so I am inclined to believe Miss Doll. I talked to her in private this morning, and we agreed that the most likely suspects are the quiet ones. Therefore, I think I share her earlier sentiment for Killer Croc as he hasn't said much, and what he has said wasn't very useful. Vote: Killer Croc (Jedi Anakin) I may change my mind if there is any further development in the investigation. By the way, has anyone heard from Man-Bat? I haven't seen him around at all. He might be up to something... or maybe he's just off looking for prey. That furry freak does seem to be more bat than man. What a waste of a scientific talent...
sok117 Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 1. The reason I wasn't able to answer your question first is because I've just logged in woken up and haven't had much time to catch up with the lengthy conversations that took place when I was sleeping. 2. I answered you on your second question, and STILL you kept bugging me about it, for the third and EVEN the fourth time! What part of the sentence "I WON'T TELL YOU" you don't understand?? 3. If you really are a concerned criminal, then why would you want to risk the survival of a "potential key central figure for the overall town cause" by wanting me to reveal the nature of my "allegiance revelation", knowing that it could get me killed and the criminals will lose an early advantage? You could have just damned waited. This behavior of your is what leads me to believe that you're acting scummy. If we happen to lynch you and you turn out to be scum, then good for us. If you're a criminal, then we wouldn't want someone who's putting their co-criminals at risk just to quench their thirst for answers.. 1.If that was the reason, then you should've stated that originally as it being the reason why you overlooked my question. I know you said it earlier today and you were gonna do some catching up, but even after that my question went unacknowledged. 2. You told me you weren't going to tell me, then you started accusing me. My "bugging you" is simply me trying to defend myself for my actions. Again your making stuff up. The third time (no fourth time) was before you told me that you weren't going to tell me originally. Ever since you said you weren't saying, I've stopped asking, you need to get your information straight. To recap, I asked you once, twice, three times, I got an answer, I stopped asking. 3. If Penguin and Joker have already stated that there are no passive actions, which has been brought to my attention by Egg-head, then I have not condemned you anymore then you have condemned yourself, the knowledge I was looking for is knowledge that was already apparent to everyone else. You've already put yourself in a position of risk by announcing to everyone that you will be confirmed tomorrow, I have done nothing to increase or decrease the potential risk you have put yourself in. Since I have asked my question you have made up two of your points, the point that you do have is valid and will most likely be enough to start a bandwagon of votes beginning with the people who can't think for themselves.
XimenaPaulina Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Guys, seriously, stop! I think that each of you should calm down and think rationally... We have no evidence to lynch someone. It is a blind vote. Right now, we say that the person that hasn't posted should be voted off. So for right now, we should think of a team vote, not our personal arguments. Which would you think is more of a blind vote Hush, voting for someone who's inactive, OR someone's who been acting scummy? While both can be considered grounds for lynching, I think the latter has more weight because we hold the person responsible on what they actually say and do AND NOT on what they don't say and don't do. Get it? My vote stays as is.
Brickdoctor Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Wow, you guys talk a lot. Guys, seriously, stop! I think that each of you should calm down and think rationally... We have no evidence to lynch someone. It is a blind vote. Right now, we say that the person that hasn't posted should be voted off. So for right now, we should think of a team vote, not our personal arguments. Um, so...What do you want us to do, then? All pick one person that none of us suspect and then bandwagon against them, so that we make a 'team vote' against someone without any 'personal arguments'?
The Penguin Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Oh Pengy! Where are you?... Right here, Joker. With a sharp end of my umbrella poking in your back. Waugh-waugh! Current vote tally Killer Croc (JediAnakin): 1 - def Man-Bat (Sirius Black): 1 - CallMePieOrDie Hush (Mrlegoninja): 1 - Bob_ Mr Freeze (Oky): 1 - Captain Tamamono Clayface (WhiteFang): 1 - sok117 Ra's al Ghul (Fred Fred Burger): 1 - Capt. Redblade The Mad Hatter (Jedi master Brick): 1 - Professor Flitwick This is getting chaotic! I love it! Good day, ladies and gen..... Wait a second! You already started accusing each other! Great! Waugh-waugh! Just make sure you don't get blood all over the place. I'd hate to pay for cleaning it! Martini anyone? Good day, ladies and gentlemen! )
CMP Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Figures everything happens just as I'm about to take a cat-nap. We have 24 hours left, so I'll come back in a few hours when I'm not tired as hell.... From what I've seen so far, people are getting suspicious of Nygma, Doll's being questioned more, and the Creeper's plan is falling to shambles. Great.
ADHO15 Posted November 12, 2011 Author Posted November 12, 2011 Current vote tally Killer Croc (JediAnakin): 2 - def, Oky Man-Bat (Sirius Black): 1 - CallMePieOrDie Hush (Mrlegoninja): 1 - Bob_ Clayface (WhiteFang): 1 - sok117 The Mad Hatter (Jedi master Brick): 1 - Professor Flitwick The Riddler (sok117): 2 - KielDaMan, Capt. Redblade
badboytje88 Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Wow I just listened to all you had to say (you people talk a lot!) need to reread everything to be able to read between the lines. It looks like the Riddler is playing a crazy game. Why would you fixate on Baby Doll. Just let her be, she's just a little kid. Her claim might be her fantasy acting up or it might be the truth, all will be revealed tomorrow. Then you can fixate on her if necessary. I understand why people would vote for you. I myself am inclined to vote for the creeper. I don't think it's necessarily the quiet ones we need to look out for. The creeper has been very outspoken and pro criminal all day. Which also is a good reason not to vote for the creeper. We need to weed out this garden of criminals!
Scorpiox Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Which would you think is more of a blind vote Hush, voting for someone who's inactive, OR someone's who been acting scummy? While both can be considered grounds for lynching, I think the latter has more weight because we hold the person responsible on what they actually say and do AND NOT on what they don't say and don't do. Get it? My vote stays as is. Simon says... This random voting is not going to work, voting for 10 people could get a scum, in about a 10% chance! It's not safe to risk a random conviction from Joker, it could end up a town figure head like Doll. I think Doll has raised some important arguments here, why would a town care whether it was an action. Basicly, Ed wants to find out your role to decide whether you are a good kill target. I Vote: The Riddler (sok117). Uh and Ed, you seem pretty sure Doll's the kill target for tonight, probably because you'll be trying it. I say now, if the doctor is reading this, I ask you to please protect Doll tonight. She seems to be the only logical thinker 'round here. (Oh and Creeper, I don't call random voting logical.)
TheBoyWonder Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 (edited) I may of only said one thing, but I have other priorities. I may of pointed out the obvious, but I have spoke. Commenting once is no reason to lynch, when others had not spoke. I vote : The riddler (sok117) He seems too sure babydoll is dead tonight. Babydoll, I trust your statement is correct. Why would you lie? Edited November 12, 2011 by JediAnakin
def Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 I say now, if the doctor is reading this, I ask you to please protect Doll tonight. She seems to be the only logical thinker 'round here. (Oh and Creeper, I don't call random voting logical.) And please go over what was said so you can understand it. If you think I am simply randomly voting, you obviously don't understand. Sorry, but it's true. It's been explained a few times already, so I shouldn't have to listen to these sorts of comments anymore
Jedi master Brick Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Calm down, please. I am sorry for the mistake I made at the start . But slow down, lynching me is a mistake. I am going to look over what has been said and cast my vote carefully
Professor Flitwick Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Vote:The Riddler/sok117. Now den, why would one ah dese infiltrators risk a lynching on day two, just to find out a few peoples night actions? Lots 'o people may decide nawt ta trust her, but her story would recieve validation in 72 24 hours. Therefore, she is most likely an honest criminal; no infiltrators would risk a gamble that would come to fruition so soon. If she were scum, she either wouldn't use this ploy so soon, or lie, and say that the Joker/Penguin would reveal her aligences in two days, or more. SO DEN WHY ARE YA STILL DRILLIN' HER ABOUT HER ABILITIES 'N SKILLS? This post has been edited by JediAnakin: Today, 10:27 AM Great ya've gawn an' got yaself five mo' votes! As ma mamma us ta say, "ya dumb as a mule, an' twice as ugly!"
ADHO15 Posted November 12, 2011 Author Posted November 12, 2011 Vote:The Riddler/sok117. You need to take back your vote for The Mad Hatter before you do this. Great ya've gawn an' got yaself five mo' votes! As ma mamma us ta say, "ya dumb as a mule, an' twice as ugly!" I'm sorry but Flitwick's right. Editing your posts, as stated in the rules, will get you five penalty votes. Current vote tally Killer Croc (JediAnakin): 7 - def, Oky, 5 penalty votes Man-Bat (Sirius Black): 1 - CallMePieOrDie Hush (Mrlegoninja): 1 - Bob_ Clayface (WhiteFang): 1 - sok117 The Mad Hatter (Jedi master Brick): 1 - Professor Flitwick The Riddler (sok117): 3 - KielDaMan, Capt. Redblade, Scorpiox
Professor Flitwick Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 You need to take back your vote for The Mad Hatter before you do this. I guess you're a bit of a 'mule' yourself, sir? Shuddup an' do it right! Very well, sir. Unvote:The Mad Hatter/Jedi master Brick, Vote:The Riddler/sok117.
badboytje88 Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 I vote: the Creeper (Def) For being a very outspoken criminal which could mean he's a very outspoken criminal or is a agent playing a very outspoken criminal. I'm sorry mister Creeper. I vote: the Creeper (Def) Forgot to bold it
TheBoyWonder Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 I made a bad Mistake. But we can still get Riddler out. He just seems too scummy.
def Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 I vote: the Creeper (Def) For being a very outspoken criminal which could mean he's a very outspoken criminal or is a agent playing a very outspoken criminal. I'm sorry mister Creeper. I vote: the Creeper (Def) Forgot to bold it No worries. Your logic is noted. You think scum tend to be the ones out front one day one
Rumble Strike Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Phew, this day is beginning to pick up pace. I still think that the Ventriloquist looked a bit scummy at the start, but maybe he was just genuinely trying to work out how many agents we are facing. I guess it can't be easy having that gangster sat on your knee all day. However after reading listening to you all I have to say Edward, you really are coming across as being too eager to work out how Baby Doll's abilities work. She's sticking her neck out for the criminals here. Vote: The Riddler (sok117
Peanuts Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 I myself am inclined to vote for the creeper. I don't think it's necessarily the quiet ones we need to look out for. The creeper has been very outspoken and pro criminal all day. Which also is a good reason not to vote for the creeper. I vote: the Creeper (Def) Now that's simply insane. Do you need some medicine? I can prescribe you some excellent fear gas. With Killer Croc being stupid enough to get himself penalty votes, I suppose I'll vote for the Riddler for now: Vote: The Riddler/Sok I don't have much time right now, so I might change my vote later. Now I got to get back to another experiment I'm running right now.
XimenaPaulina Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Vote: The Riddler/Sok Now now aren't you supposed to be smarter than two alien prisoners from a recent movie I saw to follow a simple voting format? Vote: The Riddler (sok117 You may want to add the missing end parenthesis too. Why am I being so nit-picky?
Recommended Posts