Fugazi Posted December 15, 2011 Posted December 15, 2011 Read my accusation, why don't you? Yeah read it, but my question stands. We have very little information about the motives of the killer(s) but we know that they were two, and that they have been surprised by the Chief. Yet your theory doesn't explain what I would have been doing out at night by the fountain, and why I needed an accomplice. If I had been after the Chief, I would have followed him and I would have surprised him, not the other way around.
CMP Posted December 15, 2011 Posted December 15, 2011 If I had been after the Chief, I would have followed him and I would have surprised him, not the other way around. Well, I don't think it's your own will how you would have killed the Chief, if you know what I mean.
Bob Posted December 16, 2011 Author Posted December 16, 2011 About Twenty-Four Hours Left before I can close this topic!
Peanuts Posted December 16, 2011 Posted December 16, 2011 I don't know. I mean, the best pile of evidence we have is against Scott. I'm almost sure she fits into this somehow. I could imagine that her love affair with the Chief was just some Act of God which happened to distract us from the real crime, as well as the love affair of Alex and Julia. And we mustn't disregard the CCTV heavily indicates the murder was an on-the-spot decision, even if the killers were played by the host weren't quite themselves that night. Amber, have you ever considered becoming Deputy Chief when I'm formally promoted to Chief? We would make a great team! Sure, why not. This investigation stuff can be pretty exciting.
Bob Posted December 17, 2011 Author Posted December 17, 2011 Ding Ding Ding Ding We have a winner! This topic can now be closed; look for the conclusion very soon (AKA, Chapter Ten)!
Recommended Posts