Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Conclusion  

18 members have voted

  1. 1. Did you like this game

  2. 2. What did you like the most?

    • Characters
    • Story
    • Settings
    • Pictures
    • Sarcastic Remarks
    • Agent Stone
    • I hated everything! I'm so cynical!
  3. 3. Do you think I did a good job as a host?

    • Yes
    • No
      0
    • Could have been better
    • Who are you again?
  4. 4. Did you see this coming?



Recommended Posts

Posted

If you want?

Players (14)

mr.monty.jpg

Mr. Jack Montgomery, husband of Julia, father of Jeremy

Owner of Local Pet Store

Played By: --- Mrlegoninja

You were rather fair in your own analysis. You were strong in the start, but you slowly started to stop playing which was rather annoying because you had a good character. All in all, I'd say you did a good job.

Thanks. Once again, I'm sorry that I stopped playing, but that's because I had other things in life to do.

Posted

It's alright, you started out strong in the beginning and then slowly faded out. It happens sometimes in these games.

Posted

I've been so busy lately I didn't take the time to give some feedback now that the game is over. It certainly turned out to be a different style of game than Red Scare, but I found it very enjoyable. Characters were well fleshed out and the buildings and props were top notch. :thumbup:

What didn't work so well was that by sometime mid-game there was nothing left to be discovered. We kept investigating homes where there was nothing to be found. Did you want to teach us a lesson Bob, that clues were not to be found in physical places but rather in discussion with one another? Or maybe we missed something vital? At the end, that James and Amber were the killers came as a surprise, because there was no strong case pointing at them over someone else.

It's not as black and white as rooting out scum. You have to communicate and speak with other players to try and make them screw up or miss a detail. You need to be vigilant. If all you're doing the entire game is investigating without talking at all, then you won't win

I guess that answers my previous comment -- we were expecting concrete proofs that X was killer or Y was not, and there weren't any. Just hints pointing in many directions, and we had to choose/guess which one was the right one. In Red Scare the mafia-like night actions had us talking and comparing results. This time around there was less incentive to do so. We spent too much time searching for clues when there was nothing more to be found and we should have focused on the players themselves.

Deputy Chief Scott was unkillable at night, which is how she survived the fire and the exploding van.

Ah, I thought I was just being lucky! :blush:

However, there is something that has been bothering me, so I'd like to congratulate a second winner:

Amber Robertson, played by Peanuts!

Theoretically you were not identified in any of the answers, and as a result you didn't lose. Thus, you are our second winner of the game.

Congratulations Peanuts, great game for the scum! :thumbup:

Things I'd Like to Change:

-NO MORE TOWN SETTINGS.EVER: There's to many places to go, it's hard to photograph, it's just an overall pain in the butt.

I understand it must be difficult to pull off but you did it well. I'm looking forward to finding out the locale of your next mystery!

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...