Fugazi Posted January 10, 2012 Posted January 10, 2012 In all honesty I understand your vote Nicholas, and I have no problems with it whatsoever. I'm actually impressed how you seem to have noticed how less energetic and pro-active I am from usual. (Wait, how did you know how energetic I normally am if we've only met today?) Though I have to admit I'm not as active as I wanted to be, particularly for a couple of reasons: You raise good points Gordon. Have we only met today? I could swear I knew you for some time already! I do look forward to hear about Stephanie and Emma, when this ordeal is over! I will consider moving my vote to another target if a better option presents itself. Unvote: Toulouse Leplot (WhiteFang) I was a bit disappointed at Mr. Leplot's severe reaction to having a vote cast his way simply for quietness, but he was correct in that I didn't have anything convincing to go on. In addition, two people who are more familiar with Mr. Leplot vouched that quietness is nothing out of the ordinary for him. While I think voting for quiet people to draw them more into the conversation is a valid approach, I don't have any strong reason to suspect Mr. Leplot. Given the low vote totals of the leaders, I don't think it's wise to leave my vote with him given the lack of evidence. I understand your cautiousness, though of course being himself shouldn't clear Mr. Leplot of suspicion. Same goes for the others who are keeping a low profile 'as should be expected of them'. Point being, the scum are hunting for certain among us, and not merely trying to outnumber us. How do I know? Oh, let's just say Ra told me I am inclined to believe this story, in the light of the confusing rule #1 that the Gods bestowed upon us.
def Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 I am inclined to believe this story, in the light of the confusing rule #1 that the Gods bestowed upon us. Thanks Glad to see one of us is using their head. Or at least, one of the scum might be riding the town train while they have a chance to How do I know? Why don't I give concrete reasons as to how I know? There is no value in sharing that info publicly. Not one bit, except to save my own skin. It's terrible, terrible gameplay, and foolish to niggle me with those sorts of questions. Considering that I'm didn't reveal that while I had pressure on me, but when I had zero or one vote (I forget the timeline exactly), it seems to me that I was putting my neck on the line to share information with town. Predictably, I'm now a frontrunner in votes But, I'm town, and if I'm lynched, I will be shown to have been town And, you can have a list of 'townies' to choose from who decided to lynch the guy trying to bring us as a town forward. Seriously, voting for the one who is way the heck out front seems to be a, sad to say it, scum or dumb move. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ And it's not about insulting anyone's intelligence. I haven't been doing that. I've been trolled for a few days, and repeatedly told by a bunch of you that I'm fighting. That happened when I was a kid in school, where a bully would pick on me, and the teacher would punish us both equally for 'fighting'. I didn't enjoy it then, and I don't enjoy it now. And then I'm repeatedly told how obnoxious or stupid I'm being (ie, bitter, bitter Pie), when I really haven't been, I've positively been biting my tongue. When I named a suspect and some hard reasons for it before everyone else, and when I shared some info to help coordinate us without being forced to, then making me the top lynch candidate... Well, I'm not going to compliment you on your reasoning. If I were an outsider looking in, I'm sure I would see my posting as the most likely town here, drawing attention for the sake of helping us. You can reason that I'm scum playing a meta-game, but it would only make me wind up dead quickly, and on top of that, scum would rather you don't know what they need to do as long as possible. But, you are all free to disagree and certainly are ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Unvote: Hugh Janus (Eskallon) Hugh Janus is most certainly scummy, or just devoid of all smarts whatsoever, or possibly both. But, in this situation, I know I'm town, and I'm working hard (as always) for our team. Roger Goodenarde on the other hand chooses not to shift his vote when the nominations are so close, and in my estimation, is 'keeping his cool'. I think he is a better candidate for today than me Vote: Roger Goodenarde (Professor Flitwick) I was deciding between which to vote for, him or Mrs. Farago, and both have their draws, but Goodenarde's last post just struck me as the non-committal, on the fence posting that a scum would do, especially when his neck is on the chopping block, and so it is, I vote for him (which hopefully answers the expected questioning about why I'm not going for Farago).
WhiteFang Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 It's not that you weren't committed, because this is Day One when it's hard to be committed. You just went to the extreme. It's the fact that you suggested a random vote after other people had been accusing one another. There were suspects at that point, so a random vote wouldn't really make sense. The only thing I could see someone gaining from a random vote is if some other Scum had been accused and the person was trying to divert attention away from them. Random voting don't help the innocents except getting the cultists an advantage. The cultists know one another and we are basically clueless. Anyway, to get this going, I am voting as followed, Vote: Roger Goodenarde (Professor Flitwick) I hope I am right but we can't be definite right in Day 1. At the very least, it must have a high probable of scoring it right. Of course, the votes can sway including mine as long we have more conclusive agreement later. I also noted what Nicholas had mentioned and it seems there are some special conditions for the cultists to win, and it is not the usual outnumber kind of game. Furthermore, voting can lead to conviction as long the convicted party has the highest number of votes. I do think this will be very interesting to observe in the later days.
Tamamono Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 You must have some sort of opinion concerning the other suspects, and one little gut feeling of an opinion is always better than a random vote. Unless, of course, you're Scum and don't have an opinion because you already know who's Scum. In my experience, gut feelings rarely turn out well. Baa-haa-haa! I know it is a certain way to nab a cultist, I did say it was 6/24 chances! Oh, and don't forget my little filly, that just because someone is active, it doesn't automatically mean they're innocent. A ~75% chance of killing an innocent (there could very well be a SK or something) is not very good at all. How is it a 'certain' way to nab a cultist? Even if we did end up pulling the name of a cultist and sacrificing him/her, it wouldn't tell us anything because there wouldn't be any voting patterns! Baa-haa-haa! Who would take any non-committed statement, or worse still, not speaking, with anything other than suspicion. There are plenty of people who aren't saying much, and they're getting much less suspicion cast on them than you are. While early inactivity does not help the town, it's more excusable than someone coming up with stupid ideas that will very probably get an innocent killed off for no good reason. True, there were possibilities for sacrificing, on both sides of the 'ego debate', but as I stated earlier, I found neither to be particularly compelling. I couldn't see a prime target for sacrificing, and thus would rather go with the ?/24 chance of landing a scum, than the 0/24 chance. If you don't like any of the suspects on the chopping block, you go through the thread discussion, analyze what people have said, and suggest for someone else to be sacrificed. It's that simple.
fhomess Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Ok, I'm going to place my vote as follows: Vote: Patrick Fitzwilliam (def) This vote is because I think the information we'll learn from his departure will be the most helpful moving forward. Mr. Fitzwilliam has been a divisive figure today. Ms. Farago came to his defence at a very odd time early on. Mr. Apu and Mr. Attabar were the ones who argued the most with him throughout the day. Mr. Fitzwilliam's change of his vote from Mt. Attabar to Ms. Farago could be interpreted as an effort to distance the two of them. If Mr. Fitzwilliam is sacrificed and his status as either a cultist or innocent is revealed, then I think we'll learn the most about the discussion that went on today. There are other candidates that are equally suspicious to me, even some that could reveal a great deal about the discussion of today, but Mr. Fitzwilliam is at the top of those lists for me. Sorry, Patrick, this is less about what you said specifically than the reactions everyone has had to it.
Sandy Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Since people are choosing sides now, I might as well do that myself. Mr. Fitzwilliam, you certainly have not made any friends today with your behaviour, but somehow you still have people voting with you (especially Mr. Leplot). Try a piece of humble pie in your next life, okay? Unvote: Penelope Farago (Waterbrick Down) Vote: Patrick Fitzwilliam (def)
def Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 This vote is because I think the information we'll learn from his departure will be the most helpful moving forward. Mr. Fitzwilliam has been a divisive figure today. Ms. Farago came to his defence at a very odd time early on. Mr. Apu and Mr. Attabar were the ones who argued the most with him throughout the day. Mr. Fitzwilliam's change of his vote from Mt. Attabar to Ms. Farago could be interpreted as an effort to distance the two of them. If Mr. Fitzwilliam is sacrificed and his status as either a cultist or innocent is revealed, then I think we'll learn the most about the discussion that went on today. There are other candidates that are equally suspicious to me, even some that could reveal a great deal about the discussion of today, but Mr. Fitzwilliam is at the top of those lists for me. Sorry, Patrick, this is less about what you said specifically than the reactions everyone has had to it. Great strategy Sacrifice the most active, helpful player in order to see if they were telling the truth about being active and helpful. I'll have to keep note of that for my future lives Since people are choosing sides now, I might as well do that myself. Mr. Fitzwilliam, you certainly have not made any friends today with your behaviour, but somehow you still have people voting with you (especially Mr. Leplot). Try a piece of humble pie in your next life, okay? Thanks for the advice. I'll just do nothing next time, since that's the point of this, surviving to the end, right Seriously, I didn't come here to make friends... And I haven't
Hinckley Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Mr. Fitzdef, I've thought a lot about this all day. If you are really as pro-Town as you claim, please eat some humble pie and answer people's concerns instead of just insulting their game play. I can think of two reasons you would "know" what the Cultist's win conditions are. I assume you either are a cultist or one of the ones they need to kill. Your abrasive ego has come off more as a cultist who was trying to weed out the type they have to kill. Especially since you go from knowing the win condition to guessing it. If you are on their list, and are revealed by what's transpired today, there are certainly ways those Innocents with Nocturnal Skills to help you and/or the Town tonight. Thank you for working for us so diligently. Is it possible to work with us? With all that's come out today it would certainly help us all to start working together.
def Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ While I'm not guaranteed to be lynched, there is a very good chance for it (since all the people voting for me have no idea how to play mafia or are simply scum), so I may as well spill the rest of my story. You can use these last hours to decide if you want to start day one like or like or . Lynching me will be . I've tried to actually play day one. Got harassed by Hinck and Zeph Mehmet and Apu. I've tried to help clarify our situation, and got accused of being scum for it since I wasn't going to explain how I knew what I knew. And have been repeatedly told that I'm insulting your intelligence and obnoxious and what not. I'll tell you something, when you get told for the 50th time that you're being obnoxious, and insulting people's intelligence (or not making friends or whatever else), well, there is the temptation to call you out on it. After all, if the people repeatedly saying it are all wrong, maybe they need to someone to insult their intelligence... But it won't be me, not today Anyway, my role is Virgin, a powerless role that I'm assuming is one of the ones the scum need to 'sacrifice'. Hmm, why didn't I explain why I knew this about the game in thread... Hmm, think about it, deep and long, and realize that the act of explaining this in thread hurts the town and puts a target on my back, helping the scum to achieve their goals. So, I was cryptic in my statement, but definitely getting the ball rolling for us townies. So I'm at the top of the lynch that's what happens when you play with people who jump on others for being active, you force me to play my hand. It would have been a hell of a lot better if you trusted the idea that no scum would ever put themselves so far out in front on day one. Scum have limited numbers, they can't take that much heat on day one. It's a textbook fact of mafia, and would have been horrible play day one if I were scum, guaranteeing any manner of night actions targeted at me. (funny enough, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So, to the rest of the town not voting for me right now, please feel with confidence that there is scum most certainly voting for me, particularly the late comers who want to push my lynch to the front over Goodenarde. Thank you for working for us so diligently. Is it possible to work with us? I have been working with people (some in private), but you acted like colossal knobend for two days straight, so I don't feel like working with you personally. That's all. Feel free to post more private messages from me where I already explained to you that I don't feel like dealing with you for the time being. Wait, let me choose one, the one where I told you I didn't feel like squabbling with you (this is an example of how, right from the start, I was calling him scum or whatever he claims I've been doing ): So, is there any benefit into escalating things? Could that help us gauge other people's affiliation? By how they react to our conflict? Well, you do what you need to do. I'm just working for town, and if you're town, we'll be coordinating together I'm sure most of the scum are going to be quieter, but you never would play quietly, and so far you're making things more confusing for town. Making stuff up about me in thread doesn't help either. My two cents. I'm truly sorry I was such an obnoxious prick, being so difficult to deal with.
XimenaPaulina Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Anyway, my role is Virgin blah blah blah For some reason, I'm inclined to believe Mr. Fitzfitz's claim. Now that he has claimed a Virgin, and knowing that the Cultists ulterior motive is to kill/sacrifice the select number of Virgins amongst us, we wouldn't want to lose a highly-important Townie (in terms of being a Virgin) this early. I didn't vote for Mr. Fitz, and since I feel that he is worth saving and my hunch about Ms. Farago isn't that strong, I will: Unvote: Penelope Farago (Waterbrick Down) Vote: Roger Goodenarde (Professor Flitwick)
fhomess Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Great strategy Sacrifice the most active, helpful player in order to see if they were telling the truth about being active and helpful. I'll have to keep note of that for my future lives You have indeed been very active, and possibly helpful, too, but helpful in some ways tend to paint a target on your back. To be fair, having a target painted on your back can indeed be helpful if you're trying to distract people from other useful innocents. Cultists can also be helpful, though. All that said, this is not a one day affair. A strategy that looks at the benefits a decision made today can have on tomorrow is logical. Mr. Fitzdef, I've thought a lot about this all day. If you are really as pro-Town as you claim, please eat some humble pie and answer people's concerns instead of just insulting their game play. I don't necessarily think you need to accommodate this request, but you have to understand that the reaction people have had is to be expected. Anyway, my role is Virgin, a powerless role that I'm assuming is one of the ones the scum need to 'sacrifice'. That is a bit of a strange sounding role, but it certainly seems like the type of thing that would make sense. If the Cultists task is to eliminate all Virgins, then you would be exactly the kind of target they're looking for, and it would make sense why you wouldn't want to reveal that. On the other hand, if you're a cultist, it is something you would know exists, and be the thing you'd claim to save yourself. Since it's possible you're telling the truth, I will Unvote: Patrick Fitzwilliam (def). If you are really a virgin, and that really is the win condition for the cultists, it would be a mistake to sacrifice you. Instead, I will Vote: Jennifer Taylor (Sandy). After our initial little sillyness with stating you'd just vote for whoever got voted first, you hopped on the Farago bandwagon and then the Fitzwilliam bandwagon when it appeared that both were going to be the sacrificial lamb.
XimenaPaulina Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Since it's possible you're telling the truth, I will Unvote: Patrick Fitzwilliam (def). If you are really a virgin, and that really is the win condition for the cultists, it would be a mistake to sacrifice you. Instead, I will Vote: Jennifer Taylor (Sandy). After our initial little sillyness with stating you'd just vote for whoever got voted first, you hopped on the Farago bandwagon and then the Fitzwilliam bandwagon when it appeared that both were going to be the sacrificial lamb. Ms. Taylor's suspicious late bandwagon voting should be noted and seriously considered for tomorrow. But if you really are keen on saving Mr. Fitz's megablocks, you might as well go the full distance and vote for Roger Goodenarde as it will give our Virgin (or so he claims) a better chance of surviving today's lynch.
Waterbrick Down Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...Anyway, my role is Virgin, a powerless role that I'm assuming is one of the ones the scum need to 'sacrifice'. Hmm, why didn't I explain why I knew this about the game in thread... Hmm, think about it, deep and long, and realize that the act of explaining this in thread hurts the town and puts a target on my back, helping the scum to achieve their goals. So, I was cryptic in my statement, but definitely getting the ball rolling for us townies. So I'm at the top of the lynch that's what happens when you play with people who jump on others for being active, you force me to play my hand. It would have been a hell of a lot better if you trusted the idea that no scum would ever put themselves so far out in front on day one. Scum have limited numbers, they can't take that much heat on day one. It's a textbook fact of mafia, and would have been horrible play day one if I were scum, guaranteeing any manner of night actions targeted at me... If I might ask for some clarification, you are not concretely positive that the Cultists' aim is to eliminate all the virgins among us correct?
Rick Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Ms. Taylor's suspicious late bandwagon voting should be noted and seriously considered for tomorrow. But if you really are keen on saving Mr. Fitz's megablocks, you might as well go the full distance and vote for Roger Goodenarde as it will give our Virgin (or so he claims) a better chance of surviving today's lynch. Ah, now that it's time to save Patrick Fitzwilliam's big behind you're back again. Yet, when you're asked questions yourself you're surprisingly quiet...
Eskallon Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 (edited) Just because you're a Virgin doesnt make you the target of the scum! Before you all jump on the wagon and believe him, I thought I would bring some attention to you. Being a Virgin is a good thing! Okay, I dont know the importance of virgins and not virgins, but what I do know is that being a Virgin isn't likely gonna make you the target of the scum. I am to believe its even a good thing. I suggest we unvote him for now. Anyway if he is correct in his thinking that they are hunting the virgins, then he will be dead tonight anyway. Unvote: Patrick Fitzwilliam (def) Hugh Janus is most certainly scummy, or just devoid of all smarts whatsoever, or possibly both. But, in this situation, I know I'm town, and I'm working hard (as always) for our team. Okay, I wanna get this out of your system for you. I'm not scum, tell me what I have done thats so so scummy today then? Since your the only one who seems to be the only one accusing me? Edited January 11, 2012 by Eskallon
XimenaPaulina Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Ah, now that it's time to save Patrick Fitzwilliam's big behind you're back again. Yet, when you're asked questions yourself you're surprisingly quiet... And yet here you are nagging me again for the third freakin' time. Why do you have sort of weird infatuation with me and you always seem to ZERO in on my comments?!? I have the right NOT to answer questions that I feel they aren't worthy to be answered. Your questions on my statement about investigating Mehmet and Fitz being "great assets" and useful for "our cause"? I wouldn't waste my time answering such elementary question.
Waterbrick Down Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Just because you're a Virgin doesnt make you the target of the scum! Before you all jump on the wagon and believe him, I thought I would bring some attention to you. Being a Virgin is a good thing! Okay, I dont know the importance of virgins and not virgins, but what I do know is that being a Virgin isn't likely gonna make you the target of the scum. I am to believe its even a good thing. I suggest we unvote him for now. Anyway if he is correct in his thinking that they are hunting the virgins, then he will be dead tonight anyway. Actually if this is what the "specific sacrifice" thing is about then it would make him a prime target, so I'm curious why you disagree? Ah, now that it's time to save Patrick Fitzwilliam's big behind you're back again. Yet, when you're asked questions yourself you're surprisingly quiet... While we are all in the questioning mood, I take it then that you are not satisfied by Mr. Fitzwilliam's defense? I haven't made up my mind either way, but I am rather put off by his not answering my question
Eskallon Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Actually if this is what the "specific sacrifice" thing is about then it would make him a prime target, so I'm curious why you disagree? If this is the specific sacrifice then I'm screwed being here, thats why I know its not. Besides it doesn't really matter for Patrick any more, if this is the specific sacrifice he will be killed by the cultists tonight, if not then tomorrow night, or the next. The scum wont not kill him if they know he is one step closer to them winning.
Rick Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 And yet here you are nagging me again for the third freakin' time. Why do you have sort of weird infatuation with me and you always seem to ZERO in on my comments?!? Because it stood out to me. And it was just one comment that I responded to. You just didn't respond to me. No, you wait with speaking up again until the choice seems to become either Patrick or Roger. I have the right NOT to answer questions that I feel they aren't worthy to be answered. Your questions on my statement about investigating Mehmet and Fitz being "great assets" and useful for "our cause"? I wouldn't waste my time answering such elementary question. It seemed to me like you were trying to steer any investigative actions. I honestly don't see why, just by being "out there", either Attabar or Patrick happen to be great assets to our cause, as you put it. One of them could be a cultist, but could get "cleared" tonight because they appear innocent or because investigation results simply can't always be trusted. If we would put too much reliance on such a result we could easily be led astray for a number of days. I was just trying to warn against this and was merely asking why you'd make the suggestion at that point to investigate either Attabar or Patrick and why they in particular are such great assets. But if you don't want to explain yourself... you have the right not to answer, of course. While we are all in the questioning mood, I take it then that you are not satisfied by Mr. Fitzwilliam's defense? I haven't made up my mind either way, but I am rather put off by his not answering my question I'm still undecided. I'm wondering whether a cultist would really go this far on the first day and try to confuse us all. It would seem like a stupid thing to do, but... it could be a way to appear 'towniest of town'.
Waterbrick Down Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 I still fail to see your reasoning here Mr. Janus, if the "specific sacrifice" refered to earlier is what the Cultists need to win, then it is pertinent that we the Town keep him alive or at least from being sacrificed by our own hands this first day. I'm still undecided. I'm wondering whether a cultist would really go this far on the first day and try to confuse us all. It would seem like a stupid thing to do, but... it could be a way to appear 'towniest of town'. This is true and as someone has already pointed out, the virgin claim would be a perfect disguise for a Cultist, however it would require revealing their win condition, which potentially helps the Townies.
Eskallon Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 I still fail to see your reasoning here Mr. Janus, if the "specific sacrifice" refered to earlier is what the Cultists need to win, then it is pertinent that we the Town keep him alive or at least from being sacrificed by our own hands this first day. This is true and as someone has already pointed out, the virgin claim would be a perfect disguise for a Cultist, however it would require revealing their win condition, which potentially helps the Townies. Im sorry, but you guys are gonna have to trust me, I know little, but what I do know is that if the Virgins are to be the hunted ones, then it condemns me anyway. I unvoted Patrick because I believe him to be innocent because of what he revealed to us about himself being a Virgin... Its hard for me to talk in the open about this, if anyone wants to get some more information, then maybe in private I will speak to you later.
XimenaPaulina Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Because it stood out to me. And it was just one comment that I responded to. You just didn't respond to me. No, you wait with speaking up again until the choice seems to become either Patrick or Roger. It seemed to me like you were trying to steer any investigative actions. I honestly don't see why, just by being "out there", either Attabar or Patrick happen to be great assets to our cause, as you put it. One of them could be a cultist, but could get "cleared" tonight because they appear innocent or because investigation results simply can't always be trusted. If we would put too much reliance on such a result we could easily be led astray for a number of days. I was just trying to warn against this and was merely asking why you'd make the suggestion at that point to investigate either Attabar or Patrick and why they in particular are such great assets. But if you don't want to explain yourself... you have the right not to answer, of course. Don't worry I'll answer since you explained why you kept on asking me, sorry if I found your zeroing on my comments rather weird and a bit annoying. But just to straighten the record once and for all: 1.) No I wasn't steering any investigative actions. Is this greasy inexperienced engineer influential enough to persuade an unknown investigator to follow my suggestion? I don't think so. It was just a simple and humble suggestion on my part, and I'm just acknowledging the valuable skills and experience of both Mehmet and Mr. Fitz and thought they could be great team players if ever they are cleared innocent in investigations. 2.) But you are right in saying that the possibilities of conversion and false investigations would certainly mess things up. I admit I didn't think of that when I said that spur-of-the-moment statement. Yeah my thinking was ideal but not realistic, not impossible but highly improbable. To that end, I acknowledge my mistake. 3.) And with regards to me suddenly saving Mr. Fitz's in the lynch? Even if I suspected his super high activity earlier, I thought him claiming to be a Virgin is worth "looking at" in the coming days. I certainly wouldn't want to sacrifice a Virgin (and consequently allow the Cultist one more step closer to their goal) without at least verifying the truth about his claim.
XimenaPaulina Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Now that it is becoming apparently clear that the Cultists' ultimate goal is to specifically "any"/kill a select group of Virgins among us, I think it would be wise for the Virgins to never reveal their roles under any circumstances to anyone no matter what, not even to your closest trustworthy allies! Why am I being Captain Obvious here? Because someone (who I won't name - it depends on him/her if he/she would like to surface) behind the scenes claimed to be a Virgin also. It's either he/she is indeed a Virgin and honestly "slipped-up" after thinking aloud or he/she is a cultist who intentionally claimed as a Virgin in order to gain the trust of other possible Virgins. Just sayin' guys - BE EXTREMELY CAREFUL! Our only way to get out of this goddamned desert hole is to save the virgins and weed out the cultists.
MagPiesRUs Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 In light of Mr. Fitzpatricks' RC, I'm not sure we can afford to send him to the chopping block today. As for Mr. Goodenarde, I dunno, I never really took his suggestion of a random vote seriously. I thought of it as just a silly joke, a suggestion he didn't really intend on carrying out. Perhaps it's because I've been observing everything through the screen of our tent the whole day, but it doesn't really seem like he's been particularly serious about anything he's said today. Look, another pebble! I think I'll stick to my guns and keep my vote on Ms Farago for now, though I admit that having heard her defense, and now that I've looked back, her comments weren't as severe as I'd initially thought. I still believe she's our best choice of the three major suspects at the moment. I'm still not sure about Ms. Taylor and Ms. Balls, given their shenanigans at the start of the day, as well as their more recent attempt to tip the balance in favour of a Fitzpatrick lynch. Personally, I'd have no qualms voting for either one of them today, if enough people agree. Ooh, a waterfall! Who's up for a pool party?
Wuntin Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 (since all the people voting for me have no idea how to play mafia or are simply scum) Way to go not insulting the intelligence of the innocents who are voting for you. Anyway, my role is Virgin, a powerless role that I'm assuming is one of the ones the scum need to 'sacrifice'. So you didn't know what the cultists' win condition was - you were guessing. A guess that I'm more inclined to believe than your earlier stated "fact". Funny how that works. Unvote: Patrick Fitzwilliam (def).
Recommended Posts