Hinckley Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 I suppose there is still a possibility that Ms. Stools isn't a cultist, but it seems incredibly small at this point. As small as a snake's chance at curing insanity. I'm going to feel like a real dipshit if she turns up Innocent tomorrow.
Waterbrick Down Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Ooh, so we have evil cultists trying to feed us to talking rock? This stuff seems to write itself! Imhotep was a giant rock this canyon's a giant lock He needs to eat Though he has no feet And...um...I don't think poems are supposed to be longer than 4 lines. So that'll do. Unless somebody's found the ducks? Well, okay. So the cultheads need to feed Imhotep some of us, and we need to feed him some of them? Do you mind telling us how hungry he is? Well I finally finished listening to all of everybody's conversation and here is my two cents too hopefully seal the case. Now that we have a positive role claim on the part of Ms. Tools I can reveal this tidbit. After Fitzwilliam first revealed his virginity I thought I'd go back and do some reflection and lo and behold I remembered this statement. If you will turn your attention to the second to last statement you will notice that Ms. Tools seems privilidged to the fact that the Cultists needed to feed only "some" of the innocents to the statue. Now, as has already been discussed, only virgins and cultists were privy to this information, the former by deduction and the latter by matter of default. Thus it would be impossible for her to make this conjecture given her most recent role claim, thus she is most probably a Cultist taking on the advice of some of our group in not claiming to be a virgin. With all that said I will vote: Malaena Tools (CallMePieOrDie).
Hinckley Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Well I finally finished listening to all of everybody's conversation and here is my two cents too hopefully seal the case. Now that we have a positive role claim on the part of Ms. Tools I can reveal this tidbit. After Fitzwilliam first revealed his virginity I thought I'd go back and do some reflection and lo and behold I remembered this statement. If you will turn your attention to the second to last statement you will notice that Ms. Tools seems privilidged to the fact that the Cultists needed to feed only "some" of the innocents to the statue. Now, as has already been discussed, only virgins and cultists were privy to this information, the former by deduction and the latter by matter of default. Thus it would be impossible for her to make this conjecture given her most recent role claim, thus she is most probably a Cultist taking on the advice of some of our group in not claiming to be a virgin. With all that said I will vote: Malaena Tools (CallMePieOrDie). Ossie and Is did give us this warning: But be warned - his Dark Side demands specific sacrifice too.' But, yes, that statement you quoted is way too clear of an interpretation of that vague warning, much earlier than Patrick's revelation. Good call. As if the Vampire Hunter Snake Charmer claim wasn't cockamamie enough, adding to that Patrick's earlier analysis of statements and voting, I'm willing to be we have our first Cultist. I bet Nadir Zenith is feeling a little silly about defending Freud all evening.
CMP Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Sorry Malaena. I really am. Ah. I don't blame you. From the sounds of it, you tried to find reasoning to save me. Or at least, made it seem like you wanted to. At least you did that much.
Scubacarrot Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Hmm, Changing my vote won't make a difference for the votes as they stand now, so Ill hold off doing it. After reading the last pages, I will be surprised if Ms Stools does not turn up as scum. And that would certainly help in clearing my current suspect, mr Cook.
Cecilie Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Well well, all this new information that has come up has certainly made it easier to vote. The Freud-story sure is a funny one . So I will: Unvote: Jennifer Taylor (Sandy) Vote: Melaena Stools (CallMePieOrDie)
Fugazi Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 And I thought the day couldn't get any more exciting! What started as a hunch of Patrick's seems to have escalated into a full blown comedy! Thanks to a dubious claim of turning serial killers into lambs with the help of a female snake, it would seem that the days of Melaena are over. I can only agree with the collective decision that Melaena is the most suspicious candidate today. Vote: Melaena Stools (CallMePie) Hopefully a successful lynch today will help us uncover other Cultists, based on the interaction of Malaena with the group.
ADHO15 Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Well it has taken a few hours to catch up on everything that has been going on, but it has ended with quite a revelation that certainly condemns Miss Stools in my eyes, therefore, I will: Unvote: Jennifer Taylor (Sandy) Vote: Melaena Stools (CallMePieOrDie) Hopefully Miss Taylor can be investigated in some way tonight to prove or disprove her Virgin claim.
Pandora Posted January 16, 2012 Author Posted January 16, 2012 Vote Tally Mehmet Attabar (Hinckley): 1 Vote (Scubacarrot) Jennifer Taylor (Sandy): 2 Votes (Eskallon, CorneliusMurdock) Melaena Stools (CallMePieOrDie): 16 Votes (def, JimButcher, Sandy, Zepher, Hinckley, Professor Flitwick, Bob_, Brickdoctor, WhiteFang, Tamamono, KielDaMan, fhomess, Waterbrick Down, Cecilie, Fugazi, ADHO 15) Approximately 7 hours remain of Day Two.
CorneliusMurdock Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 See, Taylor, the day wasn't over. Unvote: Jennifer Taylor (Sandy) Vote: Melaena Stools (CallMePieOrDie)
Sandy Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 See, Taylor, the day wasn't over. I'm aware, and relieved. But I don't think Melaena would have approached Mehmet with that crazy-megablocks story of hers if I hadn't caused a ruckus and made people look into other options. We'll never know. I've got to say, though, that if Melaena really turns out to be a cultist, I will have to apologize to Mehmet and his allies for mistrusting them with such an intensity. It's become clear now that the only way we can win this thing is by organization, even at the risk that the cultists may be able to weasel in. But I'm not counting my chickens before they hatch, yet. The day's still not over, and Melaena has not yet been confirmed as a cultist.
def Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 But I don't think Melaena would have approached Mehmet with that crazy-megablocks story of hers if I hadn't caused a ruckus and made people look into other options. We'll never know. Oh no, there is no chance you would have survived. When you are the lynch-vote leader, and nobody is coming to your defense, the only appropriate townie-response is to out your role. Luckily, in this situation, being a vanilla townie is enough to save you from the lynch mob. Always glad to have another virgin on board. If only poor, sweet Father Tomato could be here to see us lynch our first cultist He would be so proud of us all, I know he would
MagPiesRUs Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Well, I'm going to catch another early night tonight. We have already have plenty of votes on Ms. Stool, so I see no point in throwing my vote in as well. She's all but given up now, so I trust you guys won't be making any last minute vote changes this time.
Hinckley Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Hmm, Changing my vote won't make a difference for the votes as they stand now, so Ill hold off doing it. After reading the last pages, I will be surprised if Ms Stools does not turn up as scum. And that would certainly help in clearing my current suspect, mr Cook. The revelation that def's investigator "thought" he investigated me doesn't change your mind at all? Hopefully Miss Taylor can be investigated in some way tonight to prove or disprove her Virgin claim. Again, do we really need to focus all night actions on me again? Now that def has admitted the investigator "thought" he investigated me, can we move forward by confirming some of these other suspicious people. I don't mind being investigated, I'm just saying we should consider progressing some of our other leads...
ADHO15 Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Again, do we really need to focus all night actions on me again? Now that def has admitted the investigator "thought" he investigated me, can we move forward by confirming some of these other suspicious people. I don't mind being investigated, I'm just saying we should consider progressing some of our other leads... I'm sorry? I didn't even mention you in that quote. In fact, I am saying we should do the exact same thing you're suggesting.
Hinckley Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 I'm sorry? I didn't even mention you in that quote. In fact, I am saying we should do the exact same thing you're suggesting. I know. I'm referencing other people's insistence that we confirm me again. I realize nothing has confirmed me and am OK with being investigated again. I'm just suggesting that we send some action to our other suspicions as well. That response was not directly responding to your quote. It was more to Gordon's plan to focus the investigator on me again. Sorry for the confusion. We may as well investigate me again. It's only night two and it's better to have me confirmed. We have other ways to catch liars.
Eskallon Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Well it looks like Melaena Stools has been put on the chopping block now. Im gonna change my vote now, but I don't want anyone to be all mad at me tomorrow when/if she's a cultist. Im not changing my vote because: 1) She's already got more than enough votes to convict her. 2) I still don't trust Jennifer. Btw, just to let you know, I have been in contact with someone who claims to be able to investigate as a one off night action. They have offered to investigate Jennifer tonight. I do trust the person and I will make sure that we find out her real alliance tomorrow.
Hinckley Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Btw, just to let you know, I have been in contact with someone who claims to be able to investigate as a one off night action. They have offered to investigate Jennifer tonight. I do trust the person and I will make sure that we find out her real alliance tomorrow. A one-shot investigation? Um... Sounds convenient... Do all the Virgins have one-shot investigations? That would explain def targeting me if the mirror cloak showed the opposite of what the tracker's results would have been. I can barely follow the sentence I just wrote. Stupid Mirror Cloak.
fhomess Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Do all the Virgins have one-shot investigations? I strongly doubt any of the Virgins have a night action, even as a one-shot deal. If you look back at the win conditions Is and Ossie gave us at the start of this day, you can see there that it states in the Virgin win condition that they have no night action. I trust the authenticity of the wording of those win conditions (aside from the parts left out to protect those roles), because mine is word for word what I was told at the beginning of this expedition. I trust Is and Ossie not to post a blanket statement like that about the Virgins if it's not true for all of them.
Hinckley Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 I strongly doubt any of the Virgins have a night action, even as a one-shot deal. If you look back at the win conditions Is and Ossie gave us at the start of this day, you can see there that it states in the Virgin win condition that they have no night action. I trust the authenticity of the wording of those win conditions (aside from the parts left out to protect those roles), because mine is word for word what I was told at the beginning of this expedition. I trust Is and Ossie not to post a blanket statement like that about the Virgins if it's not true for all of them. Then who would have a one-shot action? Not at you. at the liar who told Huge that he has a one-shot Action. Lying liar. Why would you tell a lie like that, megablock cultist? Unless there's an inventor out there. But, with all the claims and the remaining people I'm unsure of, who is Scum then?? Oh...
Zepher Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Just to clear something up for me, the Mirror Cloak made the person target themselves, right? So the investigator "thought" they targeted Mehmet and got scum, but they targeted them self and they got scum? That actually makes no sense. The investigator sounds fishy.
Hinckley Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Just to clear something up for me, the Mirror Cloak made the person target themselves, right? So the investigator "thought" they targeted Mehmet and got scum, but they targeted them self and they got scum? That actually makes no sense. The investigator sounds fishy. It's still possible I was framed. They've succeeded in one thing. We're stuck verifying a Campie instead of searching for them.
Zepher Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 No you CAN'T have been framed. The framer would have framed themselves. I think Fitzdef's investigator is a liar or an invention.
CMP Posted January 16, 2012 Posted January 16, 2012 Maybe the cloak randomizes results too? Or the framer targeted the investigator so that he investigated himself? As scum?
Recommended Posts