Jedi Temple Mafia - Day One

[Kadabra]

I don't see how I could have brought it up "too early", there generally isn’t a whole lot to talk about on day 1. I honestly thought that it would be seen as at least somewhat useful to perhaps a few people that hadn't realized that we don’t have to vote.

My post certainly have gotten quite a bit of attention, I still think it is rather irrational to not even consider not voting. I can't help but think that some of my accusers don't have the Jedi order’s interests at heart.

"Clickity chirp, chirp chirp screech tweet!" (Even if some people weren't aware of the option of not voting when we have told you repeatedly that the only ones it would help are the Sith! It just gives them both a free night kill, a penalty to work with the next day, and we don't have any voting patterns to analyze! It's clear you deserve the Fingers of Suspicion that have been pointed at you from your obstinacy in sticking toward your pro-Scum plan!)

[K-Nut]

As the noon sun hits the Jedi Temple. Debate is heard everywhere.

R2-D2 is talking to C-3PO in the corner, telling him how he can't talk and need C-3PO to translate, using many emotes while doing so.

Coryn is developing a plan to somehow vote before voting starts. He'll be lucky to avoid a mod-kill tonight.

You may now vote. You have 48 hours to reach a conviction.

(Note: With the site being down for seven hours, Masked and I agreed to leave this thread open an extra seven hours.)

[Kadabra]

"Chirpy chirp? Click tweet chirp tweet clack." (Well, Ahsoka? I've got my FoS on you, so if you don't produce any solid defenses, I think I know who I'll be voting for. )

[MacK]

Is there anybody else that feels that way?

[Darth Nihilus]

*sigh*

It was Aayla's scenario that proposed the existence of an investigator. As the discussion at hand was pertaining to a route of action for the first day, this would, by extension, mean that Aayla was suggesting the existence of a day-time investigator, since, again, this was all pertaining to the first day (that is, before any night actions could have possibly been sent in). Of course, based on more recent comments made by Master Secura, it seems she was already thinking ahead to the second or third day when she jumped on me, and thus her entire accusation was based on a flawed interpretation. Should not a Jedi be more level headed, and seek to understand the situation at hand, including the reasoning behind one's actions, before jumping to conclusions? I feel that Aayla could take a lesson in such matters from our resident protocol droid.

Yes, it was. I thought that you were addressing all days, not just today. The existence of a daytime investigator is extremely unlikely, as others have said. I apologize if I was confusing in my previous statements.

So Aayla's misunderstanding created the scenario of the existence of a daytime cop, but your extension of said scenario resulted in the suggestion that the daytime cop holds back his vote until the tie is reached, which makes no sence. If a cop has found someone to be a Sith, and that person is bandwagoned, he should vote early on. That's what I critizised your idea for, not for the existence of a day cop, but for being unlogical even if a day cop existed.

Thank you for being one of the only people to actually make sense around here. Exellent work on your analysis, too, although I seem to have forgotten that a daytime cop would basically have to reveal themselves if the Sith wasn't being bandwagoned, although there are no unvotes so it would be difficult to get them voted off if the Cop speaks too late. This is a very confusing situation, indeed.

Perhaps I am now misinterpreting what I have quoted from Aayla, but the way I read her scenario (the above quoted), the supposed investigator would already be in the position of breaking the hypothetical tie. Aayla's words were specifically 'break the tie', rather than anything that would imply voting earlier, before a tie could be established. I have already, several times, admitted my mistake in delving deeper into the whole scenario, but in this case, it was Aayla who set the parameters of the scenario upon which I elaborated.

I'm growing tired of quoting myself, as I've found myself having to do so fairly regularly because the same questions keep popping up, so check back through the records from the fourth page hour of the day, especially my reply to C-3PO's questions.

Yes, I too am growing tired of quoting you, so can we wrap this up? I do realize that I did, in fact, contribute to the continuation of this discussion, but it's getting a bit distracting to the masses, I think, when it is basically pointless. Perhaps we can continue this discussion in private, rather than clogging up the thread air with our arguments?

Also, as we can now vote, I think the real discussion can begin, rather than this idle chit-chat about daytime investigators and translations.

[Piranha]

So you suggested something but were never committed to it or sure about it. Mmkay, that's just what Scum like to do. Claim uncertainty regarding or lack of dedication to a theory or idea, so that if it goes wrong, they have an excuse.

FoS: Ahsoka (MacK)

Indeed, I also think that is Sith-like behavior, they want to cast doubts and confusion in our minds by mentioning "What if?" scenarios or hypothesis.

Since right now, the only thing we can go off is the initial conversations that have taken place thus far, I am very suspicious of Ahsoka right now.

[Brickdoctor]

Is there anybody else that feels that way?

Trying to assess how many people are actually considering lynching you? Why not just address your accuser? Because you know that we can't vote for you lightly and can't pressure you to say anything right away? Maybe because you're stalling for time to contact your Scum teammates?

I definitely feel that you're the top suspect, but that's because of your 'defense', not your previous actions. You've basically defended yourself by saying that you wanted to alert people to the possibility, but you aren't committed to the idea yourself. That's a great way for a Scum to seem like he's helping by proposing theories, but at the same time to have an excuse later on by acting as if he's unsure and sitting on the fence.

[swils]

Yes, it was. I thought that you were addressing all days, not just today. The existence of a daytime investigator is extremely unlikely, as others have said. I apologize if I was confusing in my previous statements.

You weren't confusing in your statements, you were confused. Your hasty accusation, as well as the example you provided to back it up, were based on a false assumption on your own part.

Yes, I too am growing tired of quoting you, so can we wrap this up? I do realize that I did, in fact, contribute to the continuation of this discussion, but it's getting a bit distracting to the masses, I think, when it is basically pointless. Perhaps we can continue this discussion in private, rather than clogging up the thread air with our arguments?

Don't take blame for the continuation of the matter, that one was on me. If folks would read pay attention to everything that has transpired before commenting/questioning things, then there would be much, much less repetition, so I would advise everyone to give that a try, as well.

Also, as we can now vote, I think the real discussion can begin, rather than this idle chit-chat about daytime investigators and translations.

I actually believe that there has been plenty of real discussion already today (as well as potential for plenty more). The topic of the discussions may not be useful, but the discussions themselves, how people have handled themselves both on the offensive and defensive, can be very useful, I think.

[Kadabra]

Trying to assess how many people are actually considering lynching you? Why not just address your accuser? Because you know that we can't vote for you lightly and can't pressure you to say anything right away? Maybe because you're stalling for time to contact your Scum teammates?

I definitely feel that you're the top suspect, but that's because of your 'defense', not your previous actions. You've basically defended yourself by saying that you wanted to alert people to the possibility, but you aren't committed to the idea yourself. That's a great way for a Scum to seem like he's helping by proposing theories, but at the same time to have an excuse later on by acting as if he's unsure and sitting on the fence.

This is precisely why she didn't trip my scumdar originally while Anakin did. His defensiveness in his replies to loose, almost random accusations made me think he was scummy. Ahsoka's defenses have sent my Scumdar readings for her Up to Eleven, and I think she is the best lynch candidate today at this point unless she provides an adequate defense.

[Dannylonglegs]

"Chirpy chirp? Click tweet chirp tweet clack." (Well, Ahsoka? I've got my FoS on you, so if you don't produce any solid defenses, I think I know who I'll be voting for. )

What sort of solid defense do you think she can conjure up? I'm not saying I agree with her original suggestion, but I'm not convinced it means she's scum. I sense a bandwagon forming, and, while several of those casting their finger upon her have made solid arguments against her (to which she has replied and answered for the most part), this does not strike me as one of those. This strikes me as either an opportunistic scum's attempt to side with the group about to lynch a townie, or the move of someone who's not trying very hard to help form a case against someone he suspects as scum. I understand if it's the later, and in that case, I suggest you write out your reasoning more convincingly. I am most curious at your use of the word solid defense, because it's obvious that she could not have one. She suggested something that would benefit the scum, early on, and has been dealing with it since. There's no defense for that, solid or otherwise. She's made her case time and again. What you really mean is, I am unconvinced by your pleas of innocence, I'm gonna vote for you unless someone else suggests a better candidate. I don't mean to offend you, or to suggest that you're a Lynching candidate, but this statement makes me somewhat suspicious of you.

[MacK]

Trying to assess how many people are actually considering lynching you? Why not just address your accuser? Because you know that we can't vote for you lightly and can't pressure you to say anything right away? Maybe because you're stalling for time to contact your Scum teammates?

I definitely feel that you're the top suspect, but that's because of your 'defense', not your previous actions. You've basically defended yourself by saying that you wanted to alert people to the possibility, but you aren't committed to the idea yourself. That's a great way for a Scum to seem like he's helping by proposing theories, but at the same time to have an excuse later on by acting as if he's unsure and sitting on the fence.

I've tried my best to address my accusers. I just want to see if there are any lingering questions that I could maybe answer to prevent this wrongful lynch. You must believe me in that I was only trying to help I just didn't want to say "oh no the Sith are here how terrible", now I fear that I may have hindered the town before the game has even had a chance to really start .

[Flipz]

"All right. It is time to vote. Let's recap, shall we?"

"The Suspects:"

"Ahsoka Tanao: Has a rather suspicious plan about not voting, and refuses to admit how untenable it is. So far, my top suspect."

"Plo Koon: spoke once, and with a supremely obvious and unhelpful comment. It might have worked out for him if he had followed up on it at all, but given that it has been his ONLY contribution..."

"Actually, speaking of Plo Koon, Quinlan Vos, Saesee Tiin, Ili Seosty and Ithra Srryn are all in the same airspeeder."

"R2-D2: R2's comments themselves haven't been too scummy, but the droid's insistence on not explaining its beeps and whistles is confusing at best and disruptive at worst. Anakin, you're good with technology, surely you can grab a spare vocabluator from the droid repair room and jury-rig it to the astromech, right? We'd all be very grateful if you did."

"Lastly, we have Euna Iladru, whose comments have been short and low-key, but are ultimately not very helpful. They are passive statements rather than active accusations or counter-accusations."

"Interestingly, of the five of us who are non-canon characters not listed in the Archives, three of them have come up as rather suspicious, and one of them (Hugar Ssiht) is on the fence in my book. Only one of them (Coryn Kellyns) comes off as genuinely trying to help us Jedi find and cast out the Sith."

"Next, The Trusted:"

"C-3PO, the protocol droid programmed for etiquette, not metagaming paranoia, has done a remarkable job thus far in debunking fallacious arguments and pointing out suspicious behavior. Despite my earlier comment, I currently have full confidence in him."

"Coryn Kellyns also seems most trustworthy to me. His plans involving the Finger of Suspicion, while borrowed from Master Modanma, have allowed us to outright state suspicions in an easy-to-read format, which helps keep things clear and orderly for the loyal Jedi. In addition, his reasoning is sound and his efforts appear genuine. If he turns out to be a Sith, I will be very surprised. Of course, he could be another Sleeping Beauty, but I think I've learned a few things since then."

"Lastly, we have Anakin Skywalker. While he did contribute to Ahsoka's bizzare no-lynch scenario, I get the impression that he was genuinely trying to examine and explain the options--note how much of the time, he has been pointing out the flaws and disadvantages in such a plan, albeit in a rather confusing manner. Call it a gut instinct intuitive feeling, but we Jedi are taught to trust our feelings, so in the case of Jedi Skywalker, that's exactly what I'll do."

[Brickdoctor]

I've tried my best to address my accusers. I just want to see if there are any lingering questions that I could maybe answer to prevent this wrongful lynch. You must believe me in that I was only trying to help I just didn't want to say "oh no the Sith are here how terrible", now I fear that I may have hindered the town before the game has even had a chance to really start .

So the entire reason you brought this up is so that you wouldn't have to give the typical statement? You didn't want to give the typical response because you wanted to appear Townie. How very Scummy. Townies don't have to try to do things to appear Townie, because they are Townie.

[Sisco]

I apologize for not speaking much, but I'm just a youngling. All the Jedi masters have done all the talking, and I agree with most; if not all of it. I just don't know where to chime in. It's the first day, and I just haven't seen a chance to insert myself into the conversation.

[Kadabra]

What sort of solid defense do you think she can conjure up? I'm not saying I agree with her original suggestion, but I'm not convinced it means she's scum. I sense a bandwagon forming, and, while several of those casting their finger upon her have made solid arguments against her (to which she has replied and answered for the most part), this does not strike me as one of those. This strikes me as either an opportunistic scum's attempt to side with the group about to lynch a townie, or the move of someone who's not trying very hard to help form a case against someone he suspects as scum. I understand if it's the later, and in that case, I suggest you write out your reasoning more convincingly. I am most curious at your use of the word solid defense, because it's obvious that she could not have one. She suggested something that would benefit the scum, early on, and has been dealing with it since. There's no defense for that, solid or otherwise. She's made her case time and again. What you really mean is, I am unconvinced by your pleas of innocence, I'm gonna vote for you unless someone else suggests a better candidate. I don't mean to offend you, or to suggest that you're a Lynching candidate, but this statement makes me somewhat suspicious of you.

"Chirpity click clack chirp. Chirp clack tweet screech. Tick click clack chirp chirp." (I believe she is the best lynch candidate because of her obvious pro-Scum argument, as well as her repeated and flawed defensesw. [i.e. claiming that she was only suggesting it because some players may not have been aware that we had the option to No-Lynch. Why would you bother offering inexperienced Jedi who didn't already know that an option that would only benefit Scum? ] If she were to explain her mindset on these fallacious defenses, or, as you said, provide a better candidate, I may switch my vote, but even if she were Town all she's done is confuse us, trip our Scumdars, clutter the thread air, and not offer any concrete opinions or accusations, as she has repeatedly stated she is on the fence about everything she's said, which is a major Scumtell. The reason for my short accusation with little explanation is that I felt Thrrepio and myself had already explained my suspicions thoroughly enough earlier on and I didn't wish for my explanations to seem redundant or tacked on, as my first post statement appeared to be. Once bitten twice shy, as they say. I apologize for any confusion this has caused, as I sadly seem to be quite adept with spreading it. I believe I need to be more blunt and obvious with my posts statements, I shall work on this in the future.)

[Flipz]

What sort of solid defense do you think she can conjure up? I'm not saying I agree with her original suggestion, but I'm not convinced it means she's scum. I sense a bandwagon forming, and, while several of those casting their finger upon her have made solid arguments against her (to which she has replied and answered for the most part), this does not strike me as one of those. This strikes me as either an opportunistic scum's attempt to side with the group about to lynch a townie, or the move of someone who's not trying very hard to help form a case against someone he suspects as scum. I understand if it's the later, and in that case, I suggest you write out your reasoning more convincingly. I am most curious at your use of the word solid defense, because it's obvious that she could not have one. She suggested something that would benefit the scum, early on, and has been dealing with it since. There's no defense for that, solid or otherwise. She's made her case time and again. What you really mean is, I am unconvinced by your pleas of innocence, I'm gonna vote for you unless someone else suggests a better candidate. I don't mean to offend you, or to suggest that you're a Lynching candidate, but this statement makes me somewhat suspicious of you.

"While your points about Master Moudanma are most valid, I must point out that it is not Ahsoka's theory itself that is suspicious, it is her steadfast refusal to admit how unhelpful it was, and her overly defensive response to the comments debunking her theory that bring suspicion upon her."

"And as to you, Jedi Ahsoka, why are you giving up so easily? None of us have cast our votes yet, why are you so convinced you will be the one lynched? Giving up is a Scum trait, girl, for a truly loyal Jedi would fight to the end to prevent the other Jedi from making a terrible mistake. You're digging a deeper and deeper hole for yourself, child..."

[MacK]

So the entire reason you brought this up is so that you wouldn't have to give the typical statement? You didn't want to give the typical response because you wanted to appear Townie. How very Scummy. Townies don't have to try to do things to appear Townie, because they are Townie.

No that wasn't the only reason brought it up. At the time I thought it would serve some purpose, and maybe could get us past the usual day one dribble . It certainly has done that as far as I could tell, thanks to my stupidity today's behavior and voting patterns should be quite informative.

If anyone has any questions or any thing to say to me please do (in private if you want).

[Kadabra]

"While your points about Master Moudanma are most valid, I must point out that it is not Ahsoka's theory itself that is suspicious, it is her steadfast refusal to admit how unhelpful it was, and her overly defensive response to the comments debunking her theory that bring suspicion upon her."

"And as to you, Jedi Ahsoka, why are you giving up so easily? None of us have cast our votes yet, why are you so convinced you will be the one lynched? Giving up is a Scum trait, girl, for a truly loyal Jedi would fight to the end to prevent the other Jedi from making a terrible mistake. You're digging a deeper and deeper hole for yourself, child..."

"Click! Chirp! ClickclickchirptweetSCREEEEEEECH! Tweet tweet chirp! " (Moudama, not Moudanma, not Master Chirp, not Clickityclack, Moudama! Is it really that hard to spell pronounce? )

[Brickdoctor]

"Click! Chirp! ClickclickchirptweetSCREEEEEEECH! Tweet tweet chirp! " (Moudama, not Moudanma, not Master Chirp, not Clickityclack, Moudama! Is it really that hard to spell pronounce? )

Talk about a useless post.

[MacK]

I don't want to give up, but I just don't know what else to say. Being day one and all I don't expect any sudden evidence to surface.

I made a mistake in my continual defence of my no lynch plan. I wish I could have a second chance perhaps an investigation to prove my innocence, but its up to guys to decide what to do.

[Kadabra]

Talk about a useless post.

"Clickity chirp, tweet! Screech..." (Aaagh, I did it again! My apologies, this is really turning into a bad habit of mine, isn't it? The typos are rather frustrating, but I shouldn't have posted spoken up for such a trivial matter, especially after accusing Ahsoka for cluttering up the thread air... I'll just be quiet until I have something productive to say now,

[Piranha]

Here is my recap:

"I must say, I know almost all of you, but Hugar Ssiht, Coryn Kelens, Ithra Srryn, Ili Seosty, and Euna Iladru are all totally unfamiliar to me. Perhaps you would like to explain a bit about yourselves? A Jedi does not fear what they do not know, but I cannot believe any of my Jedi bretheren would be capable of this."

Useless metagame, although I do actually think he was just curious about our past missions.

"I would suspect one who is young, and inexperienced, one easily swayed by the seductive lure of power offered by the Dark Side. One much like yourself...just kidding! No, I have my suspicions, but only time, meditation, and honest discussion will confirm or deny them."

Useless metagame again, implying Anakin and having suspects before most Jedi even spoke, but he did explain later that he wasn't talking about his "real" suspicions yet.

Thank you for the insight Sky guy. I agree we'll need to strike hard and fast, but I doubt it is as easy as simply reviewing security footage from around the temple.

Gee Yoda sure seems like a hard megablocks, considering that he wants us to vote somebody off before any real intelligence can be gathered. Hopefully somebody will slip up, and make that an easy decision. But in the event that doesn’t happen I would like to point out that if nobody votes we won’t have to vote anybody off today. If I've interpreted the rules correctly we'd all be given 5 penalty votes tomorrow. Of course we could only ever not vote once, and it is based off of the assumption that we will have made new insights by tomorrow, but it may be better than blindly voting somebody off today.

Any thoughts?

Suggesting to not lynch.

I think we'd be better off drawing a tie, shy of a majority-split. If someone tries to tip the scales at the end of the day, it'll paint a target on their forehead for tomorrow (though the target may be a bit larger to accommodate the canvas that Ki-Adi's head provides!). Plus, the day is young, I'm sure someone will slip up. They always do!

Suggesting a tie vote, useless.

W.T.F? First off, the tie would not have to be broken, because the first person to reach the number of votes to be tied would be lynched. No-one would benefit from that but the Scum. Also, your logic is faulty in that only a scum would try to break a tie. For example, what if an investigator got a result on one of the lynchees, but doesn't want to reveal themselves? If they don't break the tie, a Scum might not get lynched. If they do, as you say, "a target will be painted on their forehead the next day". It's a lose-lose situation.

You, sir, seem awfully scummy for the "Chosen One". We'll see if you continue this way.

Jumping on Anakin for bringing up the tie vote plan.

This is interesting. Anakin seems defensive and people are suggesting a no lynch. We should Lynch, as not may help the Sith.

Useless and somewhat distracting comment.

Sorry I am late to contribute in the discussion of this dreadful charity, I have been giving it much thought though. We must be quick and stay on target. Master Corobb ha been very quick to ask us minor jedi to tell him about ourselves, which 3-cpo say that may benefit the town. 3-cpo understood and helped. It could be Master Corobb is a sith and 3-CPO is also a sith trying to get master Corobb out of a sticky situation. It could be Master Corobb is sith and 3-CPO though his intentions were good. And it could be how 3-CPO say it is, Corobb is trying to start a dissuasion. Please not most of the above are just theorys and I am not making any serious accusations yet but we need to have our options clear to us

Going in circles of who is a Sith and who isn't, leading to nowhere.

And this is why I hate Coruscant.

It seems that there has already been much debate on whether we should vote or not. At this point we have to take everything seriously and be certain as to who to vote. Any ideas anyone?

Useless/distracting comment.

In my opinion, they seem like people who are trying to help and spark discussion rather than untrustworthy characters out to deliberately stir trouble. I know this is not particularly helpful, but those are my thoughts, and I don't think I could chose anyone who stands out as a worthy candidate for lynching at this time.

I do agree with Master Fisto that we shouldn't automatically jump on the ones who were trying to spark a conversation to try and expose the Sith.

"If no one speaks, there will be no behavior to be analyzed. We need to talk as much as we can, so that the Sith are drawn into saying things they will later regret."

I would agree, the more we talk the better we can get a feel for who might be acting scummy.

This statement isn't very 'pro-town'. Yes, we understand that Master Corobb threw out some weird theories and started metagaming began acting paranoid, but you (and several others including Nahdar) continue to push him. Surely you know that scum wouldn't put their necks on the line so early? No, I think it's very likely that Master Corobb is town who was simply trying to help.

I too have read through the archives, and I've found a very interesting trend. Time after time, one loyalist puts his/her neck on the line by being too radical, and then the scum jump on him/her like a pack of rabid dogs. I believe this is what's going on here. Plus, your statement is incredibly fencesitty. "Well, this thing about you isn't very town... But you could still be town. I don't know." Scum like to stay fencesitty so they can jump to whichever side is the most convenient at the moment.

FoS: Mace Windu (Nightshroud99)

Yes, I cast a second FoS.

Actually, if nothing else comes up, I would love a Master Windu lynch today. He has been tripping my scumdar all day.

Nahdar, I find it disturbing how you and Master Windu seem to have teamed up on Master Corobb. Like I said above, scum doesn't put their neck on the line this early - nevermind ask for investigators to contact them. Why are you pushing this?

I would like to go back to this, I also think that Master Windu has not been of any help either, however I think that Nahdar was confused and Master Corobb explained to him that he wanted to be investigated then contacted as a trusted Jedi. Whereas Nahdar originally thought that Master Corobb was saying a scummy thing to suggest that the power roles contact him.

"Actually, speaking of Plo Koon, Quinlan Vos, Saesee Tiin, Ili Seosty and Ithra Srryn are all in the same airspeeder."

Can you clarify this statement please? Do you mean in the same air speeder as having only posted once? Or being suspicious of Ahsoka?

[Sisco]

I'm tired of listening to you people talk.

Vote: Ashoka Tano/MacK

The time for action is now, and Ashoka has me convinced that she's turned to the dark side.

[Flipz]

Can you clarify this statement please? Do you mean in the same air speeder as having only posted once? Or being suspicious of Ahsoka?

"Yes, it is indeed the airspeeder of those who had made only one or two very short, rather unhelpful statements up to that point. Suffice to say, you have stepped firmly out of that airspeeder. "

"...though upon further consideration of the metaphor, perhaps I should come up with a better one; with all respect to Jedi Skywalker, stepping out of an airspeeder mid-flight isn't exactly the best idea. "

[Tamamono]

Plo Koon: spoke once, and with a supremely obvious and unhelpful comment. It might have worked out for him if he had followed up on it at all, but given that it has been his ONLY contribution...

I agree that Master Plo Koon has been incredibly unhelpful, but in my own humble opinion, lurkers should be left alive for the first couple of days - if they're still lurking after that, then that's the time to worry.

"R2-D2: R2's comments themselves haven't been too scummy, but the droid's insistence on not explaining its beeps and whistles is confusing at best and disruptive at worst. Anakin, you're good with technology, surely you can grab a spare vocabluator from the droid repair room and jury-rig it to the astromech, right? We'd all be very grateful if you did."

To be honest, I'd love to lynch the little guy just to get his annoying beeping to stop. Unless he finds a way to fix his statements, I know where my vote's going.

"Next, The Trusted:"

"C-3PO, the protocol droid programmed for etiquette, not metagaming paranoia, has done a remarkable job thus far in debunking fallacious arguments and pointing out suspicious behavior. Despite my earlier comment, I currently have full confidence in him."

3PO's my main townread as well, along with you. Master Mundi looks like a true Jedi as well, but I can't be sure yet.

"Coryn Kellyns also seems most trustworthy to me. His plans involving the Finger of Suspicion, while borrowed from Master Modanma, have allowed us to outright state suspicions in an easy-to-read format, which helps keep things clear and orderly for the loyal Jedi. In addition, his reasoning is sound and his efforts appear genuine. If he turns out to be a Sith, I will be very surprised. Of course, he could be another Sleeping Beauty, but I think I've learned a few things since then."

No, I can assure you, I'm not a Sith, and it's good to hear that my efforts are being recognized. If we all pull together, I'm sure we can lynch a scum today.

And, for the record, I had that FoS plan before Master Chirpity-Chirp

~~~~~~~~~

Master Corobb's recap sums things up very well, but, if I may, I'd like to add a couple more suspects:

Mace Windu: As I said earlier, he's been constantly pushing on Master Corobb, even when it's been made obvious that Master Corobb has been trying to help.

Aayla Secura: I believe her erratic behavior speaks for itself.

But, all suspects considered, I'd like a lynch between Mace Windu and R2-D2. Feel free to vote one of them with me.

I'm tired of listening to you people talk.

Vote: Ashoka Tano/MacK

The time for action is now, and Ashoka has me convinced that she's turned to the dark side.

Aren't you quick to vote? Let me just say right now that while her defenses are rather flimsy, I think there's a good chance Ahsoka is a Jedi. I wouldn't vote her if I were you.