On 4/17/2013 at 11:51 PM, Elrond said:

People are gonna be so sick of it.

Not necessarily. If they are done right, and are actually good movies, people will love them and be excited for every release. Star Wars is a beloved franchise and a lot of people will be interested in the movies, especially if they are more like the OT.

Boy, I really hope Disney knows what they're doing here. Because even as a hardcore Star Wars fan, I have my reservations about one film a year.

They've been doing ok so far with a not unlike formula for Marvel. As long as they keep them as good popcorn type action movies they will do well. Movie critics want new different and unusual. The paying public want the more familiar in regular doses.

I have no idea whether to be happy or worried about the rapid firing of movies. More SW is better than no SW, I guess. When I was a kid, there wasn't any hint of more SW movies or video. From 1983 (or so?) until 1999, not barely anything to hang your hat on. Just merchandise, comics, and really mediocre novels (I know I read a few lol).

I am excited for more Star Wars, and I stick to my view that the new movies can't be any worse than what Lucasfilm was already doing; but I hope that they can maintain good quality while pumping out movies at that pace, and I hope that they know when to end a storyline instead of going crazy all these new movies.

  On 4/18/2013 at 12:05 AM, Spider-Man said:

Not necessarily. If they are done right, and are actually good movies, people will love them and be excited for every release. Star Wars is a beloved franchise and a lot of people will be interested in the movies, especially if they are more like the OT.

They will never be like the OT. It will be a CGI and lens flare fest. If anything, they might look like the last Star Trek flicks.

I consider myself a huge SW fan but I have absolutely no interest in these new films. Hollywood doesn't care about the SW universe or the fans. The SW licence is their new toy and they just want to play with it and squeeze all the money they can get out of it. The Star Wars films were classics, now they've become just another generic movie series.

  On 4/18/2013 at 12:24 AM, Faefrost said:

They've been doing ok so far with a not unlike formula for Marvel. As long as they keep them as good popcorn type action movies they will do well. Movie critics want new different and unusual. The paying public want the more familiar in regular doses.

That just sounds terrible. From arguably one of the most iconic space operas ever to a series of generic popcorn action movies. Yuck!

  On 4/18/2013 at 1:12 AM, Elrond said:

They will never be like the OT. It will be a CGI and lens flare fest. If anything, they might look like the last Star Trek flicks.

I consider myself a huge SW fan but I have absolutely no interest in these new films. Hollywood doesn't care about the SW universe or the fans. The SW licence is their new toy and they just want to play with it and squeeze all the money they can get out of it. The Star Wars films were classics, now they've become just another generic movie series.

Isn't that a little bit of a close-minded view? We haven't even gotten to see really anything from Disney and you are already writing them off as greedy and uncaring to their audience. I am at least going to give Disney a chance before I say they are failures. I rather be optimistic and see what they have in-store before calling it all garbage, who knows they could end up being great movies!

  On 4/18/2013 at 1:12 AM, Elrond said:

They will never be like the OT. It will be a CGI and lens flare fest. If anything, they might look like the last Star Trek flicks.

I consider myself a huge SW fan but I have absolutely no interest in these new films. Hollywood doesn't care about the SW universe or the fans. The SW licence is their new toy and they just want to play with it and squeeze all the money they can get out of it. The Star Wars films were classics, now they've become just another generic movie series.

That just sounds terrible. From arguably one of the most iconic space operas ever to a series of generic popcorn action movies. Yuck!

To be fair, the last J J Abrams Star Trek movie (minus the lens flair) really was a better Star Wars movie than it was Star Trek. It lacked Treks cerebral vision and had a bit more of SWs swashbuckling adventure. And yes Star Wars is a swashbuckling type popcorn adventure movie. It draws its inspiration from old school classic serials, Erol Flynn type films, and more than a touch of westerns and samurai movies. They are actually fairly low end SciFi movies, but they are the best adventures ever put on film. Mixed with George Lucas's amazing ability to build and populate amazing living breathing worlds. His true gift that he does better than any before or since. SW at its best doesn't ask big questions (like a good Trek story does), it just runs with it... (And maybe worries a little bit about whether its ok to kiss your sister... Or sleep with the teenaged boy you used to babysit. Ok ok what few questions SW asks are kinda creepy).

  On 4/18/2013 at 1:20 AM, Spider-Man said:

Isn't that a little bit of a close-minded view? We haven't even gotten to see really anything from Disney and you are already writing them off as greedy and uncaring to their audience. I am at least going to give Disney a chance before I say they are failures. I rather be optimistic and see what they have in-store before calling it all garbage, who knows they could end up being great movies!

They've already canned TCW, I don't think they give a frak about what their audience think.

With one movie/year? No way. You can't have quantity and quality. It's of course not a final judgement, just my opinion on what I've heard so far. And I must say, nothing I've heard pleases me. But it's rather normal, all the fans don't have the same expectations.

  On 4/18/2013 at 1:32 AM, Faefrost said:

To be fair, the last J J Abrams Star Trek movie (minus the lens flair) really was a better Star Wars movie than it was Star Trek. It lacked Treks cerebral vision and had a bit more of SWs swashbuckling adventure. And yes Star Wars is a swashbuckling type popcorn adventure movie. It draws its inspiration from old school classic serials, Erol Flynn type films, and more than a touch of westerns and samurai movies. They are actually fairly low end SciFi movies, but they are the best adventures ever put on film. Mixed with George Lucas's amazing ability to build and populate amazing living breathing worlds. His true gift that he does better than any before or since. SW at its best doesn't ask big questions (like a good Trek story does), it just runs with it... (And maybe worries a little bit about whether its ok to kiss your sister... Or sleep with the teenaged boy you used to babysit. Ok ok what few questions SW asks are kinda creepy).

That just proves Abrams doesn't understand anything about the universe in which the film was set.

Star Wars is a space opera, it's also based on mythology and classic epic tales. It's not just a popcorn adventure movie. I believe there's much more to it than most people think and it's the reason why so many people of different ages enjoy it. It's not just super heroes and super villains beating the crap out of each other with splosions everywhere.

Well we should all hope ... hope alot and some more...

We shall see the trailer and do first judgements :P

Well, I'm kinda surprised that this hasn't been brought up before, but Marvel has been doing 1-2 movies a year (Well, skipping 2009.) and that's still going strong. Audiences aren't sick yet, and yes, there is a big difference between the MCU and Star Wars, but if it's a good franchise, and if it gets out good movies, there is no reason that it can't work. That being said, Marvel doesn't have a lot of materiel already in place for that universe that will get stepped on in the process. There aren't any preconceived notions on where everything should go, and how it should play out. Somehow, I'm just not seeing Star Wars do that well in a rapid-fire format. With Marvel, you have separate movies that reference each other a lot, and are in the same universe, but contain different cast members, different directors, and different styles. With Star Wars, every other year will be back into the same trilogy, and the other years will be off to who knows where. And unless they're all in the same timeline, the flip-flop format may confuse more casual viewers.

Another point to consider is that nobody knew what to expect with the MCU, so it got a fairly clean slate. Star Wars on the other hand already has huge exceptions and a lot of biased-ness on each side. There really weren't any notable Marvel movies using the current heroes before, so there wasn't a feeling of "They have to make it like the old ones or else!" Again, very unlike Star Wars, which is already a sharply divided franchise. The MCU has just got started, while Star Wars movies will have been made for three totally different generations.

That being said, I'm no expert, and Star War's sheer popularity may fling these new movies to new heights....But if they're done wrong, they could mean new depths.

And to help clear things up, I used to be a big Star Wars fan, but not really anymore. So that may be clouding my judgement a bit.

So my opinion on these movies is somewhat neutral with maybe a tiny glimmer of hope. But like Alcarin more-or-less said, the trailers will tell us a lot.

  On 4/18/2013 at 2:48 PM, SteampunkDoc said:

And unless they're all in the same timeline, the flip-flop format may confuse more casual viewers.

We already know they won't be. The new trilogy will be set a few decades after RotJ but they're apparently considering spin-offs on Boba Fett and a young Han Solo (played by a different actor).

The other major difference with Marvel is that the movies are set in an alternate reality and have absolutely no influence on the comics they're based upon. If the movies suck, it doesn't change anything for the comic book universes you like. That's not the case with the new SW films. There's only one universe, one reality.

Besides, I may be in the minority here but I don't really think the Marvel films are good movies. They're entertaining and ok as summer action movies... but that's about it. They certainly aren't classics or movies I want to watch more than once or twice (after a few years maybe). They're just the fast food of cinema.

  On 4/18/2013 at 3:25 PM, Elrond said:

........

You have such a negative view of everything that your not willing to even consider there could be some good come from this. Your closed mindedness is based on assumptions, hearsay, random quotes of truth which give absolutely nothing away to what the quality of the storylines and film will be like and your view of Abrams is based on the fact he Star Warsified Star trek and he doesn't understand anything about the universe the film is set in. Perhaps his directing is more suited to a swashbuckler type rather than a trekkie type of directing/result?

I know nothing of the Marvel comics, but I've seen the films and I think they were absolutely amazing films, kept me riveted to my seat and wide eyed the entire time.

As for the universe/reality thing... That's what imagination is for. Imagine it is, it's not a hard thing to do. If the Star Wars new films suck, they won't change anything for anything else I read/watch to do with Star Wars...

  On 4/18/2013 at 6:26 PM, Fuppylodders said:

You have such a negative view of everything that your not willing to even consider there could be some good come from this. Your closed mindedness is based on assumptions, hearsay, random quotes of truth which give absolutely nothing away to what the quality of the storylines and film will be like and your view of Abrams is based on the fact he Star Warsified Star trek and he doesn't understand anything about the universe the film is set in. Perhaps his directing is more suited to a swashbuckler type rather than a trekkie type of directing/result?

I know nothing of the Marvel comics, but I've seen the films and I think they were absolutely amazing films, kept me riveted to my seat and wide eyed the entire time.

As for the universe/reality thing... That's what imagination is for. Imagine it is, it's not a hard thing to do. If the Star Wars new films suck, they won't change anything for anything else I read/watch to do with Star Wars...

What's with the ad hominem attacks? You guys should really stop calling other people close-minded when they have a different opinion. I never attacked anyone in this discussion so why do you attack me personally?

I don't have a negative view of everything, only of this transaction. Since Disney bought Lucasfilm, they've cancelled a series I liked, shut down LucasArts, cancelled future video games, fired people, announced a crapload of unnecessary cash-grabbing sequels and spin-offs and hired a director I (and once again, that's my opinion) don't like and find extremely overrated... and it's only been 3 months, I'm sorry I'm not feeling too optimistic right now.

No, my view of Abrams is based on the fact I don't like everything he's made. Although here I was only speaking about his Star Trek flick.

Good for you. What do you want me to say? You loved them, I thought they were ok but incredibly dumb. More power to you I guess.

Even if I pretend these movies happen in a different universe, there are still going to be repercussions on the rest of the franchise (and our hobby), that's inevitable. If the new SW films suck, they might discredit the whole franchise. I just find it sad, that's all.

  On 4/18/2013 at 8:00 PM, Elrond said:

What's with the ad hominem attacks? You guys should really stop calling other people close-minded when they have a different opinion. I never attacked anyone in this discussion so why do you attack me personally?

I don't have a negative view of everything, only of this transaction. Since Disney bought Lucasfilm, they've cancelled a series I liked, shut down LucasArts, cancelled future video games, fired people, announced a crapload of unnecessary cash-grabbing sequels and spin-offs and hired a director I (and once again, that's my opinion) don't like and find extremely overrated... and it's only been 3 months, I'm sorry I'm not feeling too optimistic right now.

No, my view of Abrams is based on the fact I don't like everything he's made. Although here I was only speaking about his Star Trek flick.

Good for you. What do you want me to say? You loved them, I thought they were ok but incredibly dumb. More power to you I guess.

Even if I pretend these movies happen in a different universe, there are still going to be repercussions on the rest of the franchise (and our hobby), that's inevitable. If the new SW films suck, they might discredit the whole franchise. I just find it sad, that's all.

They've done what should have been done ages ago (apart from TCW, but no one actually knows why that was cancelled for the full reasons). Lucasarts was sucking on games for quite a while now. Their best games are very old, and there was no sign of any different improvements.

Attacks? I'm not attacking you at all, it is a perceived view based on the thoughts that you have opinioned in this forum. In everything anyone says about Disney/Nnew trilogy, you have such negativity to it ALL. Why do you feel an observational truth is an attack? Try be a bit more open minded to what the statements are actually saying rather than being so defensive.

You question my 'attacks' (if they can be even be called that at all) and yet you come back with sarcastic rhetoric like this: "Good for you. What do you want me to say? More power to you I guess."

So what sort of response do you expect now? Rather than fan the flames and be hypocritical, try taking a different approach, then perhaps your query on 'personal attacks' might be taken more seriously

Anyone that truly loves SW and doesn't like the SW Disnology films will always like the older stuff and won't let something that hasn't been a part of SW change their mind of it at all.

*edit* As to your 'ad hominem' statement, it is a little out of place. I clearly indicated my observation at: '' is based on assumptions, hearsay, random quotes of truth which give absolutely nothing away to what the quality of the storylines'' Which is the basis of the subject at hand.

Edited April 18, 201311 yr by Fuppylodders

  On 4/18/2013 at 8:19 PM, Fuppylodders said:

They've done what should have been done ages ago (apart from TCW, but no one actually knows why that was cancelled for the full reasons). Lucasarts was sucking on games for quite a while now. Their best games are very old, and there was no sign of any different improvements.

Attacks? I'm not attacking you at all, it is a perceived view based on the thoughts that you have opinioned in this forum. In everything anyone says about Disney/Nnew trilogy, you have such negativity to it ALL. Why do you feel an observational truth is an attack? Try be a bit more open minded to what the statements are actually saying rather than being so defensive.

You question my 'attacks' (if they can be even be called that at all) and yet you come back with sarcastic rhetoric like this: "Good for you. What do you want me to say? More power to you I guess."

So what sort of response do you expect now? Rather than fan the flames and be hypocritical, try taking a different approach, then perhaps your query on 'personal attacks' might be taken more seriously

Anyone that truly loves SW and doesn't like the SW Disnology films will always like the older stuff and won't let something that hasn't been a part of SW change their mind of it at all.

Be more open-minded... This expression is so overused these days it has completely lost its meaning. That's probably why you don't see it as an attack.

Be more open-minded = stop disliking what I like. Oh the irony.

Yeah, I don't like the new direction the SW franchise is taking? So what should I do? Pretend I'm ok with it so I don't hurt your feelings? Which different approach should I take then?

How on Earth am I hypocritical? I voiced an opinion on something I dislike, you tell me I'm close-minded and when I ask you what that has to do with anything I'm an hypocrit? Are you for real?

Alright, I guess you're just intolerant then. But don't worry, I'm not attacking you at all, it is a perceived view based on the thoughts that you have opinioned in this forum.

Note to self: in the future, only voice positive opinions... that somehow doesn't make you an hypocrit.

  On 4/18/2013 at 8:19 PM, Fuppylodders said:

*edit* As to your 'ad hominem' statement, it is a little out of place. I clearly indicated my observation at: '' is based on assumptions, hearsay, random quotes of truth which give absolutely nothing away to what the quality of the storylines'' Which is the basis of the subject at hand.

And as I said in one of my preceding messages :

  On 4/18/2013 at 2:17 AM, Elrond said:

It's of course not a final judgement, just my opinion on what I've heard so far. And I must say, nothing I've heard pleases me. But it's rather normal, all the fans don't have the same expectations.

How can this be any clearer? Should I post a disclaimer at the beginning of all my messages?

You clearly don't read posts when you reply, do you...

Hypocritical because:

"Good for you. What do you want me to say? More power to you I guess." is a sarcastic statement/observation/whatever you want to call it, yet you question about personal attacks, and then respond with one?

"Pretend I'm ok with it so I don't hurt your feelings?"

So, by your words, you don't really want me to voice my opinion of your opinion either because it appears I've hurt your feelings and clearly you get jumped up about it.

Im saying you are closed minded because your assumptions are based on nothing at all with any weight to it, again, as I stated:

"assumptions, hearsay, random quotes of truth which give absolutely nothing away to what the quality of the storylines"...

"Alright, I guess you're just intolerant"

pot, kettle, black... but then I guess that is just so overused as well huh...

If you are going to reply, at least try and read the post you are replying to first

*edit* I'm done for tonight, Im going to watch some of TCW. But feel free to reply as you like, Im happy for you to as I know you'll feel better for it.

Edited April 18, 201311 yr by Fuppylodders

The new movies will be made, maybe even one a year as is said. People will go and see them, they will rake in a lot of cash; and maybe even be heralded as fantastic films. Peoples' opinions on these new movies will change, some will hate them and some will love them. But they will still be made, complaining in thread doesn't solve anything. At best, write a letter to Disney, though of course, they won't read it.

  On 4/18/2013 at 3:25 PM, Elrond said:

We already know they won't be. The new trilogy will be set a few decades after RotJ but they're apparently considering spin-offs on Boba Fett and a young Han Solo (played by a different actor).

It was bound to happen eventually, spin-offs with new actors replacing the old. When did you expect this would occur? A hundred years from now, when we're dead? Would it be ok then? Or should Star Wars just fade into anonymity with its' fans getting old with it?

  On 4/18/2013 at 3:25 PM, Elrond said:

The other major difference with Marvel is that the movies are set in an alternate reality and have absolutely no influence on the comics they're based upon. If the movies suck, it doesn't change anything for the comic book universes you like. That's not the case with the new SW films. There's only one universe, one reality.

It doesn't change anything, you can perceive the mythos as you prefer. If I wanted to imagine that after ROTJ Ewok's took over, I could and no one could tell me differently.

  On 4/18/2013 at 3:25 PM, Elrond said:

Besides, I may be in the minority here but I don't really think the Marvel films are good movies. They're entertaining and ok as summer action movies... but that's about it. They certainly aren't classics or movies I want to watch more than once or twice (after a few years maybe). They're just the fast food of cinema.

I strongly agree with you here. The Marvel movies are banal and thoughtless, the script for Captain America was garbage imo. So, I don't go and see them. But, I also don't have an interest in Marvel so that probably adds to my distaste. Star Wars, on the other hand, I love. Which is why I enjoy pretty much anything with it's logo on it. Because of this I think I may enjoy the new movies, unless they do what Kingdom of the Crystal Skull did to Indy... But even that wasn't too bad the third time I watched it.

Still, I have reservations about the new movies. They could be horrible and I'd be sadly disappointed. But this is Star Wars, and Disney isn't stupid enough to throw away a golden opportunity like this. It's more profitable to make good movies than bad, especially when the fate of Star Wars could have an effect on their reputation as a whole.

Stop with the fighting guys. Fuppylodders, I would advise not getting so worked up that you want to start a fight. In my personal opinion, Elrond did nothing wrong, he merely stated his opinion on this (albeit in a way that could perhaps be toned down slightly). He did not do anything that called for you to personally address him in such a confrontational manner. If you disagree with a certain viewpoint from another poster, you should either make a post without resorting to directly calling out said poster, or just refrain from posting if you feel you cannot do so.

Thanks.

Not to try and bring reality into the discussion...

Disney did not necessarily "cancel" TCW. TCW found itself in a tricky place when the sale of Lucasfilms to Disney occurred. TCW was then airing on a network of their new owners largest direct competitor. Common sense says that neither WB and CN nor Disney were thrilled with this arrangement. Worse is all this came about at a point where TCW's contract and orders were up for renewal at CN. Technically CN cancelled the show weeks ago, when it did not appear on their list of next seasons shows.

Now what has everyone upset is they were expecting the show to be moved to Disney XD. But honestly we do not know the business decisions involved. We have jumped to the conclusion that it fell prey to some wholesale slah and burn on the part of Disney management, but this is not necessarily the case.

Look at it from the perspective of Disney XD and the business case. It is likely that Disney XD has some degree of independent control over their own scheduling and budgeting. They as a business unit have a goal of bringing in a profit. Now how attractive would TCW look to them? On the Pro side, it was a popular and strongly rated show, based on Star Wars, that has a strong embedded viewer base. Cons however may tell us more. The show was in it's fifth season, and was based on a fairly tight block of time. The legitimate question of how much story was left was there. There are costs involved in taking over another networks show and relaunching it on your network. It takes a substantial marketing campaign. Is the show worth that when it may realistically only have one or two more seasons, and when while popular it may be past its prime ratings wise? Would not that money be better spent launching a new series that may have its own five year run? Especially when the shows in question would be the most expensive per episode shows on the network? (TCW while much cheaper than a live action SW show, was still $2 million an episode. Typical Disney channel fare does not come close to that. That's why they make those horrid tween sitcoms, they're cheap). That they kept TCW in production past CN's cancelation is a good indicator that they did strongly consider moving the show. But chances are Disney XD asked for the new show instead. Disney currently has Dave Filoni working on something Star Wars.

  On 4/18/2013 at 9:06 PM, Fuppylodders said:

You clearly don't read posts when you reply, do you...

Hypocritical because:

"Good for you. What do you want me to say? More power to you I guess." is a sarcastic statement/observation/whatever you want to call it, yet you question about personal attacks, and then respond with one?

Wait a minute. You call me close-minded and you're upset when you get soft "sarcasm" in return? That wasn't even real sarcasm, there was really nothing else to say... because well, you know, that was just like your opinion man.

But if you can't discuss opinions and instead have to use personal attacks, don't expect people to take you seriously.

  On 4/18/2013 at 9:06 PM, Fuppylodders said:

"Pretend I'm ok with it so I don't hurt your feelings?"

So, by your words, you don't really want me to voice my opinion of your opinion either because it appears I've hurt your feelings and clearly you get jumped up about it.

That's not really what that sentence meant but ok...

Except you didn't voice an opinion on my opinion but on myself. That's quite a big difference, isn't it?

  On 4/18/2013 at 9:06 PM, Fuppylodders said:

Im saying you are closed minded because your assumptions are based on nothing at all with any weight to it, again, as I stated:

"assumptions, hearsay, random quotes of truth which give absolutely nothing away to what the quality of the storylines"...

And as I said:

"It's of course not a final judgement, just my opinion on what I've heard so far. And I must say, nothing I've heard pleases me. But it's rather normal, all the fans don't have the same expectations."

I guess I do have to post that disclaimer after all.

Based on nothing at all? All I said is I don't like the idea of a sequel trilogy directed by a director I don't like, the cancellation of TCW and Disney shutting down LA... how is that based on nothing at all, these are just facts. I just don't like them. What should I say then? Please tell me.

I haven't voiced any definitive opinion, quite the contrary. All I said is you can't have quality and quantity and that was immediately followed by the sentence I quoted above.

  On 4/18/2013 at 9:06 PM, Fuppylodders said:

"Alright, I guess you're just intolerant"

pot, kettle, black... but then I guess that is just so overused as well huh...

If you are going to reply, at least try and read the post you are replying to first

*edit* I'm done for tonight, Im going to watch some of TCW. But feel free to reply as you like, Im happy for you to as I know you'll feel better for it.

Ah looks like you didn't get all the ironic remarks.

  On 4/18/2013 at 9:21 PM, Nightshroud99 said:

The new movies will be made, maybe even one a year as is said. People will go and see them, they will rake in a lot of cash; and maybe even be heralded as fantastic films. Peoples' opinions on these new movies will change, some will hate them and some will love them. But they will still be made, complaining in thread doesn't solve anything. At best, write a letter to Disney, though of course, they won't read it.

It was bound to happen eventually, spin-offs with new actors replacing the old. When did you expect this would occur? A hundred years from now, when we're dead? Would it be ok then? Or should Star Wars just fade into anonymity with its' fans getting old with it?

I know, but discussing the recent news is part of the "fun". I don't know any SW fans IRL so Internet message boards are the only places where I can talk about this. It's harsh when something you like is heading towards a direction you don't like and there's nothing you can do about it.

I know this would happen but I thought it would have happened after Lucas's death. That's why I'm still surprised. I never thought this would happen so soon (and I suppose nobody did). I don't think SW would fade into anonimity. There's no sequel to Casablanca or Citizen Kane, yet people still know about these films.

The risk here is that the older movies will be submerged by dozens of new films.

  On 4/18/2013 at 9:21 PM, Nightshroud99 said:

It doesn't change anything, you can perceive the mythos as you prefer. If I wanted to imagine that after ROTJ Ewok's took over, I could and no one could tell me differently.

Yeah but probably for the next decade or so the focus will be on these new films, it will even affect LEGO. I don't think many people would like it if another author added new chapters to their favourite book. That's pretty much how I feel right now.

  On 4/18/2013 at 9:22 PM, Erdbeereis said:

Stop with the fighting guys. Fuppylodders, I would advise not getting so worked up that you want to start a fight. In my personal opinion, Elrond did nothing wrong, he merely stated his opinion on this (albeit in a way that could perhaps be toned down slightly). He did not do anything that called for you to personally address him in such a confrontational manner. If you disagree with a certain viewpoint from another poster, you should either make a post without resorting to directly calling out said poster, or just refrain from posting if you feel you cannot do so.

Thanks.

I know I'm a little passionate when SW is concerned. Especially since that was fresh news at the time.

And thank you for your message.

Edited April 18, 201311 yr by Elrond

  On 4/18/2013 at 10:38 PM, Elrond said:

I There's no sequel to Casablanca or Citizen Kane, yet people still know about these films.

The risk here is that the older movies will be submerged by dozens of new films.

ummm?!? I got some bad news for you kid... http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/screenplay_it_again_sam_u7YrxK2pRZ9DKmTCbEphWM

  On 4/19/2013 at 12:28 AM, Faefrost said:

ummm?!? I got some bad news for you kid... http://www.nypost.co...pRZ9DKmTCbEphWM

HAHA oh Hollywood.

Well point still stands, they didn't make it. :D

  On 4/18/2013 at 9:36 PM, Faefrost said:

Typical Disney channel fare does not come close to that. That's why they make those horrid tween sitcoms, they're cheap....But chances are Disney XD asked for the new show instead. Disney currently has Dave Filoni working on something Star Wars.

Oh god. They're going to make the Young Jedi Knights series into a TV show.

  On 4/19/2013 at 12:53 AM, Flipz said:

Oh god. They're going to make the Young Jedi Knights series into a TV show.

Well then at least that will be based on existing canon instead of overwriting it.