CMP Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 It isn't true and you know it. Making it bold also doesn't make it true. What are you going to try next? A huge font size like Canute used? A what? I'm pretty sure I slayed one of those once...
Palathadric Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 Isn't there a possibility that neither Petrus nor Dragmall are Loki's servants? Dagrun could have been lying to get Petrus lynching whereas the real scum is hiding amongst us having a great time as we throw mud at one another. Also Dragmall, do you really think that, if there were two scum factions, that Odin or Ragnar, whoever we are talking about, would have made it clear in the rules? Probably not. Why would he give us hints that there are two scum factions. Of course, I have never been in a situation where I had to fight against two scum factions, but I certainly have never had to face this many scum before either.
CMP Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 Isn't there a possibility that neither Petrus nor Dragmall are Loki's servants? Were that true, they would've died laughing by now.
WhiteFang Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 We got 6 scums (Servants of Loki) in the death listing and if we got 2 scum factions to begin with? The only thing I could ask myself is, each group starts out like 4 scums? I don't even know.. if I am making sense, and each conversion takes 2 days to complete? Assuming both parties are able to convert successfully on every 2 full days, and both sides will probably be gaining army and sharing abilities to pass their conversion baton around? It is just crazy and the town will just suck their thumbs and sit in a corner and wait for 2 scum factions to behave like clash of titans and the townies will just have to pick either side to survive? That does not make any sense at all. All the deaths so far, does not reveal any 3rd scum faction! And, that is something very hard for me to even swallow, not mentioning acknowledging as a fact. The thing that bugs me the most, is you (Snotra and Rurik) is banging on these facts and willing to stand all out for Petrus. Now the other side of the supposed inner circle, like Dragmall, Canute, Sveinn and Wary on one camp! The rest of us are like probably misleaded sheeps.. Crap, it is like as if the both sides know something that the minority innocents do not know. You guys behaving wierd and trying to discredit each other findings. I know there are always exceptions but I don't think the basics are fundamentals can be ignored... I could be naive... and lack of judgment due to extreme shadow participation with little less use of my fanglish, and I am not entirely buying what Dragmall is saying either... Nothing is ever confirmed until we are right dead and stick up by the longish spear... If I am wrong and if we are all wrong on this conviction, may all of the town sheeps including myself be burned in hell... After typing all of my thoughts down..... I am even unsure of what I should be voting... I am intending to medidate and digest a little further... Unvote: Petrus Fire-Starter (Pandora)
Dragonator Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 Rurik, the fact is, I know that I'm Einherjar, so I know we aren't going to lose today by lynching Petrus. All of the other people you named as being on my "team" know the that they are Einherjar too. Do you know that Petrus is Einherjar? No you do not. You have no reason to believe he is. He has not been confirmed as having an action, he has not been verified with any sort of night action as not being up to things at night. He has not done anything to indicate he is Einherjar. So why do you defend him so stubbornly? Why do you not even consider that I may be right? Why do you not look at the very likely possibility that Dagrun was being truthful to someone she was certain would be joining her team? Either because you're thick, or you're also a servant of Loki. It. All. Fits. Anyway, we have a majority and nobody is changing their minds, so there really isn't any reason to continue embarrassing yourself and blathering on.
Scubacarrot Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 I don't know if the 2 day conversion thing is true, likely it was bluff on Dagrun's part. Wilhalm, as I said, I think the third scum faction does not come up any differently than the other group. Both are servants of Loki. Think of it this way, there was a game with Gangs and Police, there were two gangs, both gangs would come up only as "gang". This is a hypothetical example, but a possible one. Wilhalm, if Dragmall would do the same for me, Rurik or Patrekr we could have made the exact same arguments... Dragmall, the fact is that there is a possibility we instantly lose by lynching Petrus, you tried to make it not so, but it's true. We've given you alternatives how Petrus can still die, but it's not good enough?
Dragonator Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 Dragmall, the fact is that there is a possibility we instantly lose by lynching Petrus, you tried to make it not so, but it's true. We've given you alternatives how Petrus can still die, but it's not good enough? How is it possible!? HOW!? I see no point in lynching a townie when we have a clear scum to lynch. There mere fact that Rurik is working so hard to defend Petrus is a clear sign that they are desperate not to be defeated, they know they are doomed if Petrus is voted off today. Do you honestly think I would have gone for Petrus so hard if I was scum? Wouldn't it have been smarter, if I were scum, to say that the tracker saw you doing something last night when you claimed vigilant, and then say that Bob was covering for you with his rolecop result and lynch you instead? That would have been a far easier lynch, that's for sure. But no, I can't make up results, because I am town. Petrus has the most evidence against her, she is a clear lynch. I reject any notion that we are about to lose, because I know I am town. That in itself makes your entire theory invalid, so I know I'm right. The fact that I know I am town, means that I know Petrus is the best lynch for today.
Rick Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 We got 6 scums (Servants of Loki) in the death listing and if we got 2 scum factions to begin with? The only thing I could ask myself is, each group starts out like 4 scums? I don't even know.. if I am making sense, and each conversion takes 2 days to complete? Assuming both parties are able to convert successfully on every 2 full days, and both sides will probably be gaining army and sharing abilities to pass their conversion baton around? It is just crazy and the town will just suck their thumbs and sit in a corner and wait for 2 scum factions to behave like clash of titans and the townies will just have to pick either side to survive? That does not make any sense at all. The two sides to the same Scum team have to outnumber the Town. But that's not all. Each side's leader has to kill (usurp) the other side's leader. However, he has to make sure he only takes out their leader, because the number of Scum on the other side is still needed to help him achieve the majority against the Town. All the deaths so far, does not reveal any 3rd scum faction! And, that is something very hard for me to even swallow, not mentioning acknowledging as a fact. The thing that bugs me the most, is you (Snotra and Rurik) is banging on these facts and willing to stand all out for Petrus. There is no third faction. There are two sides to the same faction. I laid out why I think Petrus is Einherjar a couple of times. He hasn't done anything scummy and the "case" against him is based on a confirmed scum mentioning his name as her scum partner. But as Snotra says, we'd be having the exact same conversation if Dragmall had accused Snotra, Petrekr, Cranebeinn, or me. I know there are always exceptions but I don't think the basics are fundamentals can be ignored... I could be naive... and lack of judgment due to extreme shadow participation with little less use of my fanglish, and I am not entirely buying what Dragmall is saying either... Nothing is ever confirmed until we are right dead and stick up by the longish spear... If I am wrong and if we are all wrong on this conviction, may all of the town sheeps including myself be burned in hell... It's not agains the rules of the game. It can be compared to a Mafia usurper only winning if they kill the Godfather. One side to the Servants can only win if they manage to take out the other side's leader. It also makes any discussion of the numbers yesterday meaningless as Dragmall's side had not yet taken out Dagrun, the leader of "Hervi's side". She revealed herself in a last-ditch attempt to make Wary kill Dragmall. Rurik, the fact is, I know that I'm Einherjar, so I know we aren't going to lose today by lynching Petrus. All of the other people you named as being on my "team" know the that they are Einherjar too. Do you know that Petrus is Einherjar? No you do not. You have no reason to believe he is. He has not been confirmed as having an action, he has not been verified with any sort of night action as not being up to things at night. He has not done anything to indicate he is Einherjar. So why do you defend him so stubbornly? Why do you not even consider that I may be right? Why do you not look at the very likely possibility that Dagrun was being truthful to someone she was certain would be joining her team? Either because you're thick, or you're also a servant of Loki. It. All. Fits. He has not done anything suspicious and has done a lot to indicate he's Einherjar, as I laid that out repeatedly today. As I said your whole case against him is based on the words of a desperate dead Servant. Your refusal to test our theory is telling. You're clearly running our of arguments and you're not even addressing the points I raised against you.
Scubacarrot Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 How is it possible!? HOW!? I see no point in lynching a townie when we have a clear scum to lynch. There mere fact that Rurik is working so hard to defend Petrus is a clear sign that they are desperate not to be defeated, they know they are doomed if Petrus is voted off today. Do you honestly think I would have gone for Petrus so hard if I was scum? Wouldn't it have been smarter, if I were scum, to say that the tracker saw you doing something last night when you claimed vigilant, and then say that Bob was covering for you with his rolecop result and lynch you instead? That would have been a far easier lynch, that's for sure. But no, I can't make up results, because I am town. Petrus has the most evidence against her, she is a clear lynch. I reject any notion that we are about to lose, because I know I am town. That in itself makes your entire theory invalid, so I know I'm right. The fact that I know I am town, means that I know Petrus is the best lynch for today. It's quite laid out how, again, if it was not, we would not be having this conversation. The reason you chose Petrus was the fact that Dagrun spoke about him, and the fact that some of your allies (Sveinn), where already suspicious of him. For you to suddenly change your mind, now that would be very apparant. I have every idea that you went going in this day with the notion this would be easy for you. And I'm sorry for not believing you when you say you are town, not a great argument. I don't think the only words of a dead scum is enough evidence, as I've said before and before.
Dragonator Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 My god, your entire theory is based on so many assumptions we could sink a ship with them. What makes you think Dagrun was the leader of the other team? Why did she talk to Wary about conversion if all she had to do was kill me? Why didn't she just get her fellow teammate to block Scouty, and she could kill me? Your entire theory makes NO SENSE. If what you say is true, wouldn't I have convinced Hervi to tell me who his leader was so that we could team up? Why would I have then lead the lynch against Hervi on day 3? Why would I have led the lynch against Genaro when he wasn't the leader? Why would I have had Wary kill Sisco? My case isn't just based on Petrus being outed by Dagrun. It is also based on Petrus' actions over the last few days. As I noted, Petrus has not helped catch a single servant. She simple sat around and bubbled on about doubting whether such and such was actually scum, which is a common scum tactic to try and make yourself look like you aren't trying to lynch townies. Let's also look at some of my discussion with Hervi on Day 2: So I just had a thought, which although not really relevant to the reasons I suspect you, it might be enough to save an awkward situation if you really are town and just misled by a joke. Is Artemis the alias for badboytje? If so that would make sense of a couple of things I have heard. If not then don't worry about it. I'm rather interested by how the discussion has gone, particularly that Pandora is still so hot on your heels. While I am inclined to agree with her, it has given me some pause because of other information I have received, from the town protector. I hope we haven't made a mistake today, it reminds me a little of you and Shadows in Infection when you spent three days trying to get each other killed and were both town... Hmm. Thank you!!!! Don't you think those things make sense together. Do you know how hard this day has been? It's so hard to work with amateurs. Yes, perhaps this was Infection. Double Post: Yes, you guessed right. Artemis is badboy. So let's have a man to man chat since I am too busy with study for long Mafia arguments. We're clearly not getting anywhere in the game thread. I'm the town blocker. I blocked badboytje last night. I know who the town protector is. He noted something very interesting last night, which considering Pandora's behaviour so far today puts some doubt on my suspicions against you That's all I've got so far, today I just saw your neutral crap and went for it because it was clearly wrong in my mind. Well, in retrospect, my thoughts weren't fleshed out. The last scene just kind of barfed onto the page as I was trying to get to bed. It made sense at first. Then people wanted to know, then you got angry. So, can you tell me what allays your suspicions? You've said it twice. Feel free to tell me when you are comfortable. I won't press you. I have a two-shot Action, by the way. Bodyguard. 50/50 chance of getting killed myself, if I survive I see the identity of the attacker. I used one last night on badboy. I think I may use it on him again tonight. May as well use them if I may get lynched soon, if Pandora has her way. I've been confused about Pandora's behavior, but it's been so bold she can't possibly be Scum. But then why is she pulling everything out of context? It's been really confusing. She's Dionysus. That's who I suggested to badboy to check out. I wasn't sure how long he'd be around and wanted to know about her. She can be a great ally, but she definitely does not trust me this time. Thanks for talking. This was really stressing me out. I know of an inventor too. He can give out an ascetic and a bulletproof vest. Those are pretty powerful inventions. It does make me think we could be up against a lot. Well, the protector thinks that Pandora was converted last night, based on the fact that he was successful but he woke up woozy and disoriented. I thought you and she must be on the same side, but then she kept attacking you... so now I am unsure. As for my suspicions, it was basically that you were using the joke to try and lynch me, and how active you were on day one. But if badboy is Artemis, then that makes sense now. You really need to not listen to Shadows, ever, you realise that right? I realize it now, but he turned up as Town, so why would he lie? It really didn't seem like a joke. I'll just never talk to him during a game again. OK, that's a weird result. Woozy and disoriented. It must mean something. I don't think I should go forward with it if we do want to try to lynch her today. Nobody would believe me. Genaro seems Scummy. I don't understand how this could be Pandora's Scum game but maybe if she was converted, she would try to keep up her original suspicions of me. Hmmmm... So, Pandora... I don't know if "woozy" is enough to go on. Yes, I thought she was acting strange, certainly overly aggressive. She still continues to take things out of context and she picked apart my posts line by line making each one seem like a Scum tactic. I couldn't even follow it. Of course I'm going to "flip-flop" but I call it discovering and thinking. This isn't a presidential election. I don't have to solidify my stances before I go out start figuring stuff out. So, I guess I really don't know, but I was suspicious enough to suggest her as an investigation target, you've mentioned her and now Scouty just mentioned her. Her tactics seem too bold to be Scum, but maybe the Scum really don't want me forming a Town block. Maybe, as Scouty just said, she saw an in with your two votes and found it a perfect time to pounce. Did she vote third? ... Yes, she did. Maybe we have something here. Should we move forward with it? If so, how would we do that? If the inventor has an ascetic, could the Scum? And the woozy thing is the result? But no, the protector was told they were successful. And badboy wasn't successful cause you blocked him, not because Pandora had an ascetic. My brain is fried. I'm going to get some sleep before I have to pick up Steve. Discussing things with my other group, we've agreed Genaro is the best lead for the day. I hope we're right. I hope after all the confusion today we can even achieve a lynch today! This is all from Day 2, after I thought that Hervi must be town because Petrus looked like she had been converted. I think it is quite telling; at this point Petrus wasn't yet scum, so Hervi didn't mind either way if we went for him or not. However, he knew that the first half of the conversion had been done against Petrus, so he tried to gently prod me away from Petrus. Clearly, it worked. I figured they couldn't possibly be on the same side. So when Hervi came up scum, Sveinn and I determined that Petrus probably wasn't converted. Except, she was, just later on, night 2 or 3. The perfect cover wouldn't you say?
Scubacarrot Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 The same can be said so much, why weren't you killed earlier, you claimed to a known scum? I have little doubt that is all true in the PMs and stuff, but fact is at least one of you was lying. I have the details wrong where I thought you teamed up then and there, okay. I don't think you either could or would find out about their leader, not only would it bring massive attention to you, they were never going to say that, they knew they had to help their team, allowing their leader to be killed would be exactly against that. You may have noticed, you're not exactly a helpful towny yourself. I believe your stunt with either Patrekr Wilhalm or me was a huge mistake on your part. But of course there is the slight possibility I am wrong, I don't think so, but there is the possibility, and that's why we kill him at night. I just don't want the risk that we lose because of this. I think I've done a lot to make sure that there is no possibility that this is the last day, but that possibility is there. I think it's time to let people decide. If they want to take the risk to follow Dragmall and risk losing? That's on them. I don't want to say stupid stuff (although I have been known to say stupid stuff), but it's on the townies that vote for Petrus, then.
Dragonator Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 All of us that are voting for Petrus are confirmed townies, so I can be glad in the knowledge that we must be doing the right thing. My plan is to lynch Petrus and kill Rurik tonight, as Rurik could well be a remaining scum member with Petrus. Doing this will not end the game for town, even if they are both townies, which they are not. It is impossible that there are currently 4-5 scum remaining. Utterly impossible. Working with Rurik's theory, if I were scum I would have immediately pumped Hervi for information regarding who his leader is. If we have to team up, that makes the most sense. Why would the scum want to kill 6 of their own? That's honestly the stupidest thing I have ever heard if they needed those numbers to win. As to your question Snotra, the easy explanation is that I have been protected each night, and the scum knew I would be, so they didn't want to waste a kill on me. My questions can not be so easily answered, I'll be interested to see what explanation rurik has for them. As for not being helpful Snotra, I've killed 6 scum. Surely that should be pretty telling.
Scubacarrot Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 Oh well, at least I tried. If people want to be dumb and risk the town loss. So be it. I have really tried. I had to endure insults, having to repeat everything multiple times, had to deal with complete idiocy (Carl, I mean you)... People purposefully misconstructing what I said, people not reading what I have said, not responding what I said, ignoring what I said... I can say that I have done everything in my power to make sure this is not the last day for the town. If people don't want to see, they don't. I read something the other day, once people have an opinion, it's actually incredibly hard to make them change it. I guess this shows, people rather believe that it's all fine and everything will be alright just wait and see, than think critically. No doubt you are laughing very hard, and I can hardly blame you, if I were you, I would too. You have your victory if people don't see the light. Not every towny here can say the same as me. I honestly believe that if you were town, you'd at least see the fact that I could be right, not try to push every inch of the way. Your strategy has worked, Dragmall, by constant pushing and shoving you have put the lid over people's eyes. Congratulations, I guess. Your statements don't even add up, confirmed townies? How? I don't see no investigator, do you? It's not impossible there are four five scum... you did not kill 6 scum, don't flatter yourself. I think it's way easier the reason you weren't killed (and Sveinn wasn't killed), was because they had no reason to.
Dragonator Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 Agreed Snotra, once you formed the opinion that I must be scum, you haven't even considered the possibility that I might not be. But yes, enough arguing, the majority has spoken and we know you are wrong.
Rick Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 My god, your entire theory is based on so many assumptions we could sink a ship with them. What makes you think Dagrun was the leader of the other team? Why did she talk to Wary about conversion if all she had to do was kill me? Why didn't she just get her fellow teammate to block Scouty, and she could kill me? Your entire theory makes NO SENSE. Roles like 'Converted', 'Decoy' and 'Prankster' certainly make me think it's not at all simple for the two sides to come to an agreement by just talking to each other. It makes me think that no one has any guarantee that the other party will not renege on their agreement. If what you say is true, wouldn't I have convinced Hervi to tell me who his leader was so that we could team up? Why would I have then lead the lynch against Hervi on day 3? Why would I have led the lynch against Genaro when he wasn't the leader? Why would I have had Wary kill Sisco? As I said, there are probably mechanisms in place that make it almost impossible for the two sides to "just come together" and agree. You're informed in that respect, we aren't. I think you were concerned Hervi had some sort of conversion ability as you've been saying before. Just not to convert Einherjar, but to convert Servants from one side to the other. That's why you wanted him out of the way. Interesting that you claim to be responsible for Sigmund's death. You defended Sveinn in PM to me by saying he and Wary agreed on killing Sisco without your influence. My case isn't just based on Petrus being outed by Dagrun. It is also based on Petrus' actions over the last few days. As I noted, Petrus has not helped catch a single servant. She simple sat around and bubbled on about doubting whether such and such was actually scum, which is a common scum tactic to try and make yourself look like you aren't trying to lynch townies. He's helped to prevent you kill Einherjar, like Cranebeinn and Petrekr. He also didn't go along with your suspicions against Finn. I'm convinced this prevented you from lynching Finn that day. Unfortunately, he was still killed at night. There is absolutely nothing to suggest Petrus is scum. And, I'll say it again, Dagrun - a confirmed Servant - mentioning his name, should actually go a long way towards clearing him and definitely not be a reason for suspecting him. Clearly, it worked. I figured they couldn't possibly be on the same side. So when Hervi came up scum, Sveinn and I determined that Petrus probably wasn't converted. Except, she was, just later on, night 2 or 3. The perfect cover wouldn't you say? On Day Two you suspect that the supposed conversion isn't completed, yet on Night Three - when who you suspected to be their converter (Hervi) was dead - it was magically completed. Oh, right, they switch actions around. How convenient that Dagrun mentioned that in her PMs (probably because she was left on her own). What's the point of having a Role Cop (Beorn) then? What reason did you have to protect Beorn anyway? Role Cope is a scummy role and the result on Snotra must have sounded ridiculous given that you know the protector. You unvoted Petrekr when you found out you couldn't get him lynched. You didn't switch your vote to Beorn immediately, but made sure to add it quickly enough when you saw people started voting for him. Maybe you expected to quietly finish the job at night by killing Dagrun and made the bold move to propose Petrekr as a lynch candidate yesterday? As to your question Snotra, the easy explanation is that I have been protected each night, and the scum knew I would be, so they didn't want to waste a kill on me. My questions can not be so easily answered, I'll be interested to see what explanation rurik has for them. Yet, you expected to be killed by Dagrun? Dagrun probably knew Sveinn was talking to Wary and wanted to make sure Dragmall was killed and unprotected.
Dragonator Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 Right, so the two sides win together, but they can't come together easily, and they have to convert people. Not to mention that, by your reasoning, one side has completely decimated the other side. Man your logic is amazing. I'm done answering tiny nitpicking attempts to undermine the validity of my reasoning, sorry scumbo. You can throw as much of a tantrum as you like, your scummy buddy Petrus is being lynched.
Scubacarrot Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 I'm done answering tiny nitpicking attempts to undermine the validity of my reasoning, sorry scumbo. Now you are just mocking me.
Dragonator Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 Now you are just mocking me. That was directed at Rurik actually.
Rick Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 I'm done answering tiny nitpicking attempts to undermine the validity of my reasoning, sorry scumbo. You can throw as much of a tantrum as you like, your scummy buddy Petrus is being lynched. I don't think I'm throwing a tantrum. I'm simply trying to point out why I think Petrus is not scummy at all, yet you are. You don't think you should address any of that? Yesterday was certainly an eye-opener for me. You thought you could win this by giving the Role Cop - an outright scummy role that got a crazy result on Snotra - another night and lynch Petrekr, clearly an Einherjar.
Chromeknight Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 unvote:Petrus(Pandora) To my way of thinking attitude counts for a lot. Civility and graciousness and so on. Dragmall, you had 6 votes for Petrus and there were still two others left to vote. Yet you still snipe and snark at Snotra and Rurik. Why? You've made your case Dagrun, a confirmed scum, said Petrus is scum. Done. You've also made the counter case against Ruruk and Snotra's proposal, ie. It's really unlikely that the game has a twist that twisty. Done So why keep going? I know why Snotra is keeping at it, that's how he's played all game. He calls names and raves. But coming from you it smacks of desperation, back-footedness and ... scumminess. Is that really helping? also. Wooziness is not likely to be a sign of conversion. Bergulf reported wooziness on day two. Finn reported wooziness on day four. Yet both of them came up town.
Dragonator Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 Right, that was why I abandoned the idea of wooziness meaning conversion after we lynched Hervi. It's why I thought Petrus was probably town until recently. I have since changed my view. I am sorry if my attitude seems scummy, but I can't help but laugh at how ridiculous the three team theory is, it is so full of holes I can't help but point then out when new ones are brought up. As I said though, I don't wish to talk in circles, I've said what I needed to and it is for us all to decide now what the best course of action is. if you wish to risk our town win by not lynching Petrus, and leaving things to the uncertainty of the night, then so be it. I suspect that Petrus and Rurik wouldn't be working so hard to keep Petrus alive today if they didn't have something planned to severely screw us over during the night. Oh, sorry I think I misread your point on wooziness. It wasn't Petrus that was woozy, it was Sveinn, the protector that targeted Petrus. Bergulf did report wooziness, and note that he was woozy when he saw Hervi as a fellow townie. I think it most likely had something to do with the Decoy action that the scum had. So on night one, Sveinn would have protected the decoy, not Petrus, leaving her open to conversion (if protection could stop conversion that is, but either way). Bergulf would have compared himself to someone else too, and I assume Finn was in the same boat.
WhiteFang Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 I will not be able to change my vote after this, and I will continue to stick with my guts... if I am wrong, I deserved to be banished.... Vote: Petrus Fire-Starter (Pandora)
MagPiesRUs Posted November 7, 2012 Author Posted November 7, 2012 Vote Count Petrus Fire-Starter - 6 votes (CallMePie, Dragonator, Scouty, Waterbrick Down, Capt. Redblade, WhiteFang) Canute Grey-Bush (CallMePie) - 3 votes (Scubacarrot, Rick, Pandora) With 11 players remaining, 6 votes are required to lynch. There are 16 hours left in the day.
Scubacarrot Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 I will not be able to change my vote after this, and I will continue to stick with my guts... if I am wrong, I deserved to be banished.... Vote: Petrus Fire-Starter (Pandora) I remember that's what you said in the forest. Whatever that means. That worked out great for you. And it went actually great for Dragmall. Similarities. Awesome.
WhiteFang Posted November 7, 2012 Posted November 7, 2012 This is driving me nuts.... And this is the last straw. Right or wrong, we got one more day to last it out.... And let's dance! Unvote: Petrus Fire-Starter (Pandora) Vote: Canute Grey-Bush (CallMePie)
Recommended Posts