Dannylonglegs Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Another note! Did you guys read that? Walter (WaterbrickDown) professional summarizer and lame lie detector plan setter was blocked last night. No Scum kill, Scummy hedgehog-hating Walter blocked. Hmmmm.... Well this certainly is information! I am always amazed with your behind-closed-door skill. I think this may be enough to lynch him. There are always other options to be considered though, but I think Walter may have some 'splaining to do. (Most beneficially in private)
Hinckley Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 I was honestly convinced about being able to lie-detector our way out of this mess and you should know that I'm more than willing to try solving these puzzles in more outside the box ways. As to summerizing, if agreeing is summerizing then you caught me and a dozen other people red-handed. No, I found your summary rather special because it came so late and wasn't really accurate. But that's not really evidence just gut feelings on things. No Scum kill, you were blocked. That's something. You didn't declare you were aligned with the Town until after the lie detector was de-bunked either. You said you'd find a way for it to be fool-proof but you didn't claim until after Trisha admitted she didn't have one. God, Trisha was weird. Sorry, Trisha. Shouldn't speak ill of the dead. Well this certainly is information! I am always amazed with your behind-closed-door skill. I think this may be enough to lynch him. There are always other options to be considered though, but I think Walter may have some 'splaining to do. (Most beneficially in private) Hedgehogs are very charismatic. Occupations/Job/Role-in-this-entire-affair, i.e. something distinctly different from a "lunch". Could you clarify on your conclusions question? Almost all of us are in the dark, so hard set conclusions are difficult to make, however as time goes on and conversations progress we are able to cement our understanding and move forward. Night Actions are way different than lunches. What lunch did you have? Daisy has only stated about 1000 times that she watched me with her lunch but that she has no Action otherwise. I wouldn't hire you as a summarizer because you seem to lack an understanding of what's going on. Maybe you're distracted talking with the Scum team about your kill being blocked. Maybe you're not fully reading the day thread because only getting to the night phase to try out your Scummy Actions again is all that seems important to you. I don't know. You're usually super smart. I don't expect this type of thing from you, metagamey as that may be. Venison is also rather metagamey. I don't care for it.
TheBoyWonder Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 That is brilliant news Oscar, have a penny. No scum kill and Oscar was blocked. Coincedence? I think not. I also agree with the points about Jimmy. However, I have other suspects. The silent Jane, who has made only 2 comments so far, and Penny, the one who claims her beef jerky sandwich was stolen. This is so sad, and disappointing. Two towns in a day/night. In other news, my beef pasty got stolen in the night Her two posts yesterday were also short and sweet, with one that was calling her female accuser 'buddy boy' and asking he picked someone at random and her other one was virtually the same as today minus the two towns and beef jerky bit.
Hinckley Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 I've contacted Walter in private and the results aren't satisfactorily quieting any suspicions. That is brilliant news Oscar, have a penny. Nom nom nom Hey, that's my penny. Hey! I didn't even read that one!
fhomess Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 That is brilliant news Oscar, have a penny. No scum kill and Oscar was blocked. Coincedence? I think not. Avoiding the issue that you're not accurately responding to what was said ... why not? I also agree with the points about Jimmy. However, I have other suspects. The silent Jane, who has made only 2 comments so far, and Penny, the one who claims her beef jerky sandwich was stolen.Her two posts yesterday were also short and sweet, with one that was calling her female accuser 'buddy boy' and asking he picked someone at random and her other one was virtually the same as today minus the two towns and beef jerky bit. Why don't you believe Penny's lunch was stolen? You seem like you're jumping to the conclusions you want to see.
Hinckley Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 That is brilliant news Oscar, have a penny. No scum kill and Oscar was blocked. Coincedence? I think not. Walter was blocked, not me.
TheBoyWonder Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Sorry about that, slip of the tongue. As for what you said Heather, It said she claimed, I never once said that I didn't believe her.
Hinckley Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Sorry about that, slip of the tongue. As for what you said Heather, It said she claimed, I never once said that I didn't believe her. What about it then? Several people claimed to have their lunches stolen and we know why. Anyone who chose steak in the signup got a thief action. Hello? Walter didn't realize this either.
TheBoyWonder Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 I read that I just didnt see the post where someone admitted stealing Penny's lunch.
Hinckley Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 I read that I just didnt see the post where someone admitted stealing Penny's lunch. And the other thieves who claimed? There were three people who claimed to have a lunch that allowed them to steal other people's lunches. Bullies.
Scubacarrot Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Someone claiming to have their lunch stolen does not give info towards their alignment either way... And the other thieves who claimed? There were three people who claimed to have a lunch that allowed them to steal other people's lunches. Bullies. Carnivores.
Hinckley Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 That is brilliant news Oscar, have a penny. No scum kill and Oscar was blocked. Coincedence? I think not. It actually could be coincidence. What makes you think it's not? I also agree with the points about Jimmy. However, I have other suspects. The silent Jane, who has made only 2 comments so far, and Penny, the one who claims her beef jerky sandwich was stolen. You didn't just wonder about the theft, you clearly listed her as one of your suspects. Why would you suspect Penny for having her lunch stolen and then try to make us believe that's not what you meant?
Piratedave84 Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 OK so here are some known facts: - Oscar was targeted last night - Someone was watching Oscar (thanks to VERY special lunches) and saw someone (Walter?) posing an action, which if I get the mechanics of this particular lunch right means we don't know what Walter intended on doing. - Walter was blocked from doing whatever to Oscar - Oscar was investigated and turned up town - No night kills last night - Oscar likes pennies Am I right? If so is there still any doubt as to Walter's scumminess? Please correct me if I'm wrong
Hinckley Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 OK so here are some known facts: - Oscar was targeted last night - Someone was watching Oscar (thanks to VERY special lunches) and saw someone (Walter?) posing an action, which if I get the mechanics of this particular lunch right means we don't know what Walter intended on doing. - Walter was blocked from doing whatever to Oscar - Oscar was investigated and turned up town - No night kills last night - Oscar likes pennies Am I right? If so is there still any doubt as to Walter's scumminess? Please correct me if I'm wrong No. Walter was not seeing targeting me. Walter was blocked and therefore wouldn't be seen doing anything. Daisy saw the person who investigated me targeting me. So someone has claimed investigator. If there's another one out there, you may want to tell someone you trust in case the first one, the one that confirmed me, is lying to us. And the lunch Action is a one-shot watch. They see who ever targeted their target, but just who, not what they did. This particular weak watcher only shows the "first" person to target the target, whatever that means. Can the others with the watcher clarify this with God? That's what Daisy told me, so I'd like to know if that's corroborated. Actually, someone else already did. Who was that?
Piratedave84 Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 No. Walter was not seeing targeting me. Walter was blocked and therefore wouldn't be seen doing anything. Daisy saw the person who investigated me targeting me. So someone has claimed investigator. If there's another one out there, you may want to tell someone you trust in case the first one, the one that confirmed me, is lying to us. And the lunch Action is a one-shot watch. They see who ever targeted their target, but just who, not what they did. This particular weak watcher only shows the "first" person to target the target, whatever that means. Can the others with the watcher clarify this with God? That's what Daisy told me, so I'd like to know if that's corroborated. Actually, someone else already did. Who was that? Thanks for the clarification! Pardon my ignorance but how did we find out Walter had targeted you again? (there is a LOT to read and yes I admit to skimming parts of the "awesome" summaries we were graced with!) I told you how my Banana worked! I can assert that yes in fact you can see the perpetrator (first one that is); not the action.
Hinckley Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Thanks for the clarification! Pardon my ignorance but how did we find out Walter had targeted you again? (there is a LOT to read and yes I admit to skimming parts of the "awesome" summaries we were graced with!) You didn't understand the clarification. Walter didn't target anyone. He was blocked! Stop reading those summaries you lazy human! They're not even accurate let alone substantial to understand what's happening. If you're just reading summaries...that suck...how can you catch people in lies. Don't be lazy! We'll kill you!
Piratedave84 Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Also: Wild Dragon, Penny, Zara, Mike, Jane .... Have you not anything to add ... ANYTHING. (Echo ....)
CMP Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Wild Dragon, Penny, Zara, Mike, Jane .... Have you not anything to add ... ANYTHING. Good observation! Do you have anything to say for yourself, Zara?
Hinckley Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Also: Wild Dragon, Penny, Zara, Mike, Jane .... Have you not anything to add ... ANYTHING. (Echo ....) Respond to my last post! And Zara is dead! She probably won't be responding. :wall:
Waterbrick Down Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Thanks for the clarification! Pardon my ignorance but how did we find out Walter had targeted you again? (there is a LOT to read and yes I admit to skimming parts of the "awesome" summaries we were graced with!) I told you how my Banana worked! I can assert that yes in fact you can see the perpetrator (first one that is); not the action. We didn't because I didn't target him, or anyone last night for that matter.
Hinckley Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Do you have anything to say for yourself, Zara? We didn't because I didn't target him, or anyone last night for that matter. Scummy scummy scum-pants. Scummy-poo! Scummy-poo! Scummy-scummy-scum-pants!! Sorry, hedgehogs are notoriously sing-songy-pokey-loo.
Waterbrick Down Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Scummy scummy scum-pants. Scummy-poo! Scummy-poo! Scummy-scummy-scum-pants!! Sorry, hedgehogs are notoriously sing-songy-pokey-loo. And you wonder why I want to get rid of all hedgehogs.
TheBoyWonder Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Responding to earlier, I never suspected her because her lunch was stolen, i suspect her due to a gut feeling, and to a lack of insights, or eeven thoughts in her posts. Coincedences can happen Oscar, but it just seems right. Just seems right that Walter is Scum Killer*
Recommended Posts