Bob Posted February 19, 2013 Author Posted February 19, 2013 Public opinion had turned against Pierre, the waiter of the Ice Lounge. Still in his Islander get-up, he was flanked by two more security officers who were completely different then the previous day's security officers. "This is all a big mistake!" he said. "Too bad." the guard said. "Let's go." "I wanna lawyer!" Pierre whined. "Did someone say lawyer?" a man asked as he pushed his way through the crowd. "I am Mr. Expend Able, Attorney at Law. No relation to Officer Expend Able, although I haven't been able to find him. We went on this cruise together." A security guard coughed in the background and cleared his throat. "Right then, we should get a move on." he said hastily. "I'd like copies of all the witness statements, any and all evidence you've found..." "Yeah, sure." a guard said, placating him. The party soon left, leaving the others alone. Afterwards, Stacy and Bristol began the show while an embarrassed Dave stood and shook the spear. Lauren stayed on the drum playing a beat. Bill refused to wear his ridiculous costume any longer and had changed back into his real outfit. "Is this fish fresh?" Paul asked. "Yes." the chef answered. "How fresh?" "Oh, so you're one of those people." the irate chef said. Once again, the people of the Pearl felt as though they were on the vacation that they all paid for.
badboytje88 Posted February 20, 2013 Posted February 20, 2013 As for that Michael Guy, I actually had to look the name up, because I had no idea who that was. I checked his posts, and I gotta say, he's not really any better than Lifegard Girl. Like, at all. I wouldn't mind if he got lynched. Ouch straight to the chest... That hurt! So, either he completely changed his mind within few hours, or the first statement was meant to be some kind of trap for the scum. That's surprising, because he's not been very aggressive so far (I can't even come up with a name for him, so I'll have to learn his real one), and setting traps is usually more a thing aggressive players do. Also, he never really followed it up with more than two sentences. Which, by itself, is strange, but not necessarily scummy. What's really interesting is how he changed his opinion again, today, after Stupid Theory Guy and Lifeguard Girl promoted this theory. Yep, you're definitely added to my list of suspicious people, and you've even surpassed Lifeguard Girl, who's just gone with Stupid Theory Guy's stupid theory. Well I am really torn by the numbers we got. I highly doubt they would be added if they didn't have any meaning. I still think we whould have tested the bad number theory on day one even after our host told us they had nothing to do with the affiliation. I still suspect it's part of the game mechanic but it went bad, so our host tried to save his game. But since noone seems to agree with me I'll just drop this theory and give up on it. But there is more than 2 scum members, and I've been, like, very suspicious of Michael. I already have been so earlier, but the tracker/thief thing seemed more important, and I didn't want to distract the town form the task at hand, but now that the day is coming to an end, here we go. Not even talking about it, or about the fact that there is at least one neutral person, and possibly even more, with a potentially deadly action. So, did you find something you need to address? Once again, you were flying under the radar. I had already accused you earlier of this, as well as distracting from the numbers, but I think you didn't reply. I don't know, I thought you said something, about me being contradicting myself, but I couldn't find that comment, and I feel like I'm hallucinating because of it. So, since my vote isn't going to change anything, I'll use this opportunity to Vote: Michael (badboytje88) I'm just suspicious of you, I don't want to repeat myself, so if anyone wants to know why exactly, please look at everything I said about Michael today. I don't think he should be our lynch today, or even tomorrow, but he should be scrutinized, after we're done with the business of the two tracker claims and the neutral jewel thief (thieves?). Well it is lovely that you waited so long because you didn't want to distract the town. How townish of you. We are really glad to have such a townish player like you amoungst us. I haven't found anything interesting so far, otherwise I would have come forth with it. I never accused you of anything. I never said you were contradicting yourself. At least not that I am aware of. Plus you yourself can't seem to find the comment I made in which I said you are contradicting yourself. So my guess is that it most likely did not happen at all. You are voting for me because I changed my opinion. If you were to read my comments you will notice that I never really changed my opinion. I was doubtfull when I first stated my opinion about the numbers, and my vote. The second time I remained doubtfull about the whole number ordeal. So I pretty much didn't change my opinion at all... But thanks for being an ever so helpfull townie! Why vote for michael if you don't think he should be lynched!? How does that make sense? "Hey! Look at me voting for this guy who I'm suspicious of but we should not lynch!! Let's sceutinize him but not vote for him!" WTF! Votin is not mandatory and if you are just gonna vote "but not to get a lynch" then withhold your vote! My thoughts exactly. If you think I should be lynched you should make a case against me and try to get the rest to vote along with you. I understand you want me to be less flying-under-the-radar-ish and I guess you voting for me is the way you want to make that clear to me. I'll stick with my vote for now, as once again, there's no point in voting with the group once a majority is reached. And I know my vote at that point could have led to a lynch of Michael Guy, but really, I would have liked that. I'm more suspicious of him than of Weird Number Girl. You know all you have is hardly reason enough to start a lynch against someone...
Recommended Posts