Mencot Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Does anyone have an idea why Simone isn't wearing her shirt anymore? I am no fan of looking at clues in pictures, but I seem to not understand the story of this morning. Yea that catch also my eye, ok she changed to her own clothes but why and why did Mrs Dragonsworth say to go put the cheerleader top in the storage? And what does this mean?
Purpearljellyblob Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Sorry, I do not understand this sentence, could you explain it for me (why would she do what)? Thanks. Sure Adriano , if Claire is Black Mesa, then why is she betting her own future (getting expelled) just to get someone out of school?
PsyKater Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Sure Adriano , if Claire is Black Mesa, then why is she betting her own future (getting expelled) just to get someone out of school? By leading the town block and getting townies lynched? Well, perhaps she has balls. Seriously though, if she is Black Mesa, then she knows who is town (like you said), so she knows whom to lynch and whom not. She can prevent getting scum members lynched. It is a bit dangerous but on the other hand, would someone expect a Black Mesa to go right in front? (Ha, WIFOM!)
mostlytechnic Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Wow, actually very surprised by the results. Although I was surprised the day before too. I thought Ricky was scummy up until he got himself kicked out (sorta changed my mind at that, because I'd think the other scum would have been helping him if he was truly scum). I've voted with my gut 3 times, and been wrong all three. So although my gut wants to vote claire today, I'm not sure that's the wise course. My current leaning is NOT to lynch Claire today. There's a strong possibility she's a very gutsy and aggressive scum - but we can neutralize that by simply not trusting anything out of her mouth. The risk here is that she has a night ability... and she's definitely got some leadership skills. However, there's also a possibility that she's simply been given very bad info. Like others have said, I think she's being too pushy to be scum. That "lynch me if I'm wrong" was way too much for a scum. However, the net result here is the same as if she was scum - can't trust anything she says. I think the best course of action is to leave claire for the moment. The source of her info is the bigger problem if she is a misled town - but if she's aggressive scum, then she could be blaming a townie for her "bad info" to get another voted out. I'm definitely waiting to learn more before voting.
Hammerstein NWC Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 I'm in two minds, It's either a gutsy move or she genuinely believed Andrew? It's far too early in the day to be casting votes. We need to steer clear of jumping to conclusions. as Mary Jane says we can't afford to believe anything she says presently! She's given up Andrew as our investigator so is this a lie? I'm wondering if either he has lied to her or if she is just lying to us. In Andrews defence he can't come out and say either way (as he has already pointed out) without looking suspicious or putting himself in danger. Whatever happens I think Claire should vote early so if she is town then we won't accuse her of bandwagoning or trying to read which way the wind has blown. I've voted with my gut 3 times, and been wrong all three. So although my gut wants to vote claire today, I'm not sure that's the wise course. Other than day 3 it seems to me that's all we can do? We've had one "concrete" lead that we all jumped at and it proved a bum steer? One thing we aren't doing is taking a look at some of the queiter members of class? I nearly got lynched for over "roleplaying" early doors but some people in particular seem to be absent for class quite a lot! Are they trying to fly under the radar? I don't think names need to be mentioned but I wonder if we might hear a bit more from certain stay aways? Has Psykater grilled everyone? He sent me a list of questions aslong as my arm? I've got nothing to hide so I've answered them has everyone else done the same or should I worry because I've been targeted?
PsyKater Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Has Psykater grilled everyone? He sent me a list of questions aslong as my arm? I've got nothing to hide so I've answered them has everyone else done the same or should I worry because I've been targeted? Who is PsyKater?
Mencot Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Has Psykater grilled everyone? He sent me a list of questions aslong as my arm? I've got nothing to hide so I've answered them has everyone else done the same or should I worry because I've been targeted? You mean Adriano right , i think he has
-obelix- Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 I am very disappointed in how yesterday turned out... I trusted Claire and the evidence she provided, which was a lock in my books, and it led to another town lynch. While I can't ignore the fact that every time she suggested someone for a lynch it turned out to be town ( I knew about only one of them, so I didn't vote for her), I genuinely thought she was right the other two times, especially the last time since there was evidence. How can that be possible? While I leave the possibility she is scum, I have a feeling (and no concrete evidence to support that) that she is town. By the way, I am aware that this may look like scum trying to protect their own, but believe me it is not; just me putting my thoughts out with my personal gut feeling...
PsyKater Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Andrew or Claire is lying and it's pretty easy to find out. I am working on it. But I am 80% sure, I already know who is lying. Just waiting on more answers.
Shadows Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Looking at the expeled student list, all have been expelled but Bud was [Reassigned to Testing](and ricky killed but that was his own fault) Why was Bud put to testing, was it because he was the first one to be voted out or is there something to this his soon return or similar Due to a change in federal privacy regulations, student records no longer indicate the specific reason for expulsion. Unless that reason is death. Any records made prior to this change may indicate a reason, which should be ignored as it serves no purpose to you as a participant in this program. At no time will any student return from death, testing, or expulsion, nor will the weighted companion cube ever try to tell you anything, and, in fact, cannot speak. Even though they are sentient. This stroke to me as well, I believe it is just bad hosting ( ) that he got another wording than the others. On the other hand we have pretty professional hosts, so would they really make a "mistake" / a misleading hint. It should be noted that any appearance of a mistake being made is actually an educational opportunity waiting to happen. In the event that we do make an actual mistake, you will be informed in a clear and professional manner. See example above. (Signed) Aperture Academy Administration
PsyKater Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Thank you very much for clarification! I hope you did not feel offended, Mr. Shadeaux
PsyKater Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 And new info again which is quite annoying as it sets us back to the beginning.
Antonio Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 And our game is getting better and better! but last I knew the investigation was going to be on John. Well i'm townie and "investigating" (if he is even the investigator) Would be a waste of an investigation ,since there's nothing interesting about me.It's my first time experiencing such thing so yeah,i sometimes overreact or do weird stuff.But if he wants to investigate ,just do it! Seems so, I guess either the killer got blocked or chose not to kill Wow. Simone flipped town, but there is a possibility Claire is a loyal and is being played I guess he was going after number 4 and the blocker did the same (depends of what he does:defends someone or blocks someone from using his special abilities) Hablah Hablah Hablah I couldn't understand what you ment. All people who voted for Claire on Day 2 are dead now. Oh and confirmed town. Creepy as hell if you ask me.. That we are failures and screwed! 1.The investigator is fake that told Claire and CO. things and the real one is already lynched 2. or then the investigator is real but Claire and Andrew lied about the information. We need to shut Claire up, we know she is scum, scum lover or stupied but deserves to be lynched no matter what But the question is should we lynch someone else because we know Claire is nobody to trust, so we can get it right today? Actually i'd say that Claire has too much courage, maybe she is a Black Mesa trying to "sacrifice" herself so that we would think she's not?I want to say that she's a scum that is risking?(maybe,not sure)
LegoDad Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 I have answered all the questions that people had for me in pm. I hope you find them adequate. Again, either I have been duped by Andrew or his night result of the infiltration guide wasn't meant to signify scum. But I'm not sure how it couldn't. I am going to be pretty quiet today unless spoken to since opening my trap hasn't worked. I'm pretty bummed right now.
Tamamono Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Alright, well, I just got confirmation from the town doctor that she saved Andrew last night, for what it's worth. If there's a blocker out there who blocked someone, don't hesitate to come to me (or some other probable town like Adriano... Andrew would even be good, I daresay he's town as well). I agree with Mary that we should leave Claire for another day. More later.
Mencot Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 cameron, that the doctor saved andrew doesnt need to mean he is town. Because of the night killer is a serialkiller then he/she is neutral, yes. And would kill both town and scum, wouldnt it? So if the matter is so then the doctor possibly protected a scum! a claire, you didn't answer the question I left for you!
PsyKater Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 cameron, that the doctor saved andrew doesnt need to mean he is town. Because of the night killer is a serialkiller then he/she is neutral, yes. And would kill both town and scum, wouldnt it? So if the matter is so then the doctor possibly protected a scum! a claire, you didn't answer the question I left for you! I don't understand properly. Can you reword it?
LegoDad Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 cameron, that the doctor saved andrew doesnt need to mean he is town. Because of the night killer is a serialkiller then he/she is neutral, yes. And would kill both town and scum, wouldnt it? So if the matter is so then the doctor possibly protected a scum! a claire, you didn't answer the question I left for you! I don't see any questions directed at me. What do you want to know? If you're talking about post #5, read post #6.
jimmynick Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Bob gets killed the Night after he had voted for Shawna. It would be a rather dumb move for the first scum victim, but still. What do you guys read from the voting patterns? I think the scum got lucky on Night One. I mean, out of 17 or so people to choose, how lucky must you be to randomly choose the vigilante? And that's bad for us. They probably got lucky pushing a lynch or doing a night kill on the investigator (or did scum have more information in the past two days?) I don't get much from the voting patterns now to say much other than no-one has a clue what's been going on, apart from a privileged few (including Andrew, it seems). We should consider that possibility that Claire is the puppet being pushed around by people (Cameron, Andrew & CO.) So Cameron and Andrew, what is your side of the story? Please enlighten us. I agree; I think that possibility (that Claire is being pushed around) is more probable than three scum together pretending to be the core of town. I think the best course of action is to leave claire for the moment. The source of her info is the bigger problem if she is a misled town - but if she's aggressive scum, then she could be blaming a townie for her "bad info" to get another voted out. I'm definitely waiting to learn more before voting. This is key. Needless to say, I'm most suspicious of Andrew at the moment (and, to a lesser extent, Cameron then Claire).
Mencot Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 I meant and this is my on think so corrrect me if i am wrong or havent understod all of the diffrent roles. We dont know if the killer was blocked or the victim was protected, right. All we know is that non was killed this night, and now that the doctor protectef Andrew, right what I meant was, if Andrew was the hit for the serialkiller (who is neutral) andrew can also be scum, right? Because the neutral serialkiller would kill both sides? But my thoughts are based on that the nightkiller is neutral, if he is scum then andrew ofcourse have to be town. Was this better explained? Claire, lets forget the quesions right now
LegoDad Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Good point Davey. It could be not so much that the Blocker blocked the killer but that the Protector protected the target. I still don't think we have a neutral Serial Killer.
PsyKater Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Unfortunately I am still waiting on some results / answers. I won't be around for a couple of hours probably, so I'll discuss my conclusions "tomorrow".
Tamamono Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 Two other things to note: 1. Andrew says Ms. Dragonsworth told him not to trust his results 100%. 2. The doctor says she got a result of "success" that she'd not seen before. This implies that Andrew was saved. I'm starting to think there's a framer afoot, but honestly, if there is, Claire basically has to be scum.
Darkdragon Posted March 23, 2013 Author Posted March 23, 2013 Voting is now open. With 15 players left, it takes 8 for a successful expulsion.
Recommended Posts