Nicholas Dickory Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 Is anyone else enjoying Durm's blatant ducking of questions? When people started voting you, why would you still be in fluff mode? Stop back pedaling and rationalizing your erratic behavior with weak, contentless defenses. If you're scum, you're doing such a shoddy job defending yourself that you are actually making people think you're town. Great job. If you're town, I expect more effort to go into your game than posting random crap even when the pressure starts on you. If you aren't lynched today, I will be seriously disappointed in the town. Are you threatening the Town? If you are Town you would at least try and appreciate what I have done instead of criticizing and pointing your sausage at anyone who had an opinion and tries to help. You have done that to Catalina, and you are just criticizing based on nothingness, maybe you are trying to throw cold slippery potatoes to see if anyone got a shiver. I know your behavior is most likely Town, but you are barking up the wrong tree. There are more suspicious animals around. You want me to name them so I do all the. work for you? Alright: Twatty - refused to listen what I have to say, adamant that my behavior is scum. Her reluctance to listen to what I have to say is definitely scummy. Her reasons for voting me? I am weird. Wow that's a really good argument. Same goes for Wong: I am weird, so he voted for me. Wow clap clap. Godric: same as Twatty, couldn't even lift his goat ears to listen to what I have to say. Adamant that I lied, apparently he didn't read the whole thread properly. That's not Town behavior. If they are all Town, why didn't you criticize them for not making a better argument for their vote? If they are all Town, they should at least attempt to know what's going on from me. Their swift decisiveness really smelt like Odor i.e. can't wait to get rid of me. Think about it. The lady asked you a question, Durm; why are you avoiding it? This style-over-substance posting is precisely why you're for the chop, isn't it? I hope I have explained myself clear enough. Scum would love my kind, because I am attracting a lot of attention to myself. If you are Town, take a look at the quiet ones, it's obvious isn't it. If it is not clear enough, I did not wake up until I realized I am in trouble for my sloth and 'weirdness'. I have already gotten a few votes by that time. Now I am really appealing to the Town to make an informed decision. And to paraphrase some of the potatoes he threw at me: D.K.: You voted for me and are suspicious of me. I would like to clear the air with you and answer any grievances you have. N.D.: Why is your defence so weak? Why would you not take this seriously? Are you even playing? D.K.: Oh, dear, oh, dear, oh, woe is me. I tried so hard and I really hoped I did good. If I must do more, I shall. If you have any questions or complaints or suspicions you wish to address, please feel free to do so. *sobs in corner* N.D.: Uhhhh... didn't I just do that? Why was your defence so weak? Why are you ducking the question? Isn't it odd how he refused to answer at least two people (myself included) when they asked him such a basic question? Why would he do that? Whether he's a Penis or an Eater, it reflects poorly on him for not explaining his actions properly, doesn't it? It makes him look like he's either hiding something or not invested enough to fess up, okay?
Boris Biddlesdorf Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 The more I hear from Krup, the more I feel like he's a clueless townie drowning in a sea of inexperience. There's a chance that he's experienced scum putting on an act, but it'd have to be an awfully good one and if he were reall that good, he wouldn't have gotten in that situation in the first place. I feel I should Unvote: Durmudgelous Krup. Snarky has not quelled any misgivings I've had about him. Blatantly voting with a bandwagon for the sake of bandwagoning isn't much better than jumping on someone for making a mistake. His entire attitude does not seem to be townie based. Vote: Snarky Snickerpuss I'll let old Krup off the hook, But Snarky still seems like a crook.
Hinckley Posted April 24, 2013 Author Posted April 24, 2013 vote tally Flabflom Flimflam: 6 votes (penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty) Durmudgelous Krup: 12 votes (Nicholas Dickory, Godric Goaty-Blather, Rutherford Habblabble-Bibble, Gertrude Tincanchew, Orion Kettleboil, Helena Hippopaw, Wong Wang, Purplonia Pink, Ariattny Sugarbottom, Dillpickle Catterweed, Firuz Foxtail, Snarky Snickerpuss) Wong Wang: 4 votes (Drubulum Panck, Belinda Bugglesby, Twatty Tittlesteen, Bartholomew Bearbutt) Purplonia Pink: 1 vote (Barkonius Twitch) Snarky Snickerpuss: 4 votes (Looney Lumpylove, Lulu Pittoolo, Regelius Snoot, Boris Biddlesdorf)
Lulu Pittoolo Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 Quack, quack, quack! If it makes you guys feel better, I can unvote: Flabflom Flimflam and vote: Durmudgelous Krup. Hooray, bandwagon! Everybody must ride it or die! Seriously, are you guys expecting me to come up with some fancy-pants theories and complex analyses based on how people have introduced themselves? I haven't gotten any Flying Potato Messages from anyone, nobody has told me anything and I can't do anything about any of that. If that makes me scummy in your eyes, it makes you bleeting sheep in my eyes. Even without any solid cases, we have had better reasons to vote for people than just "He's not me". You're not scummy because you don't get any messages, you're scummy because you don't seem to care wheter a townie or scum gets lynched. And now you're all "Oh, nobody tells me anything, so how am I supposed to be helpful?". Big news, none of us knows more than anyone else, except for the scum. And there are several degrees of lynch rationalization than just "Fancy-pants theories" and randomly voting for whoever is most likely to be lynched. And there you are, jumping on the bandwagon and calling us sheep in the same sentence...Quack! Now that's scummy behaviour right there! "Oh, this one person gives me total scummy vibes, but I'm not going to vote for him because of my gut instincts. Tomorrow when all of you find him innocent, I can totally point how right I was and save my scummy megablocks." But hey, who am I to go against the Rolling Bandwagon? Are you just doing the same thing you just accused someone else of, i.e. "This person gives me scummy vibes, but I won't vote for them because I want to jump on the bandwagon"? Not saying you're necessarily wrong about Drubulum, but you're doing the same thing! All I said was that since I couldn't tell anything about any of you, it was all the same as to who was voted out to me today. I followed by choosing to vote for the one who was acting the most stupid back then, but apparently stupid people are somehow important in this topsy-turvy world... :hpmf: Stupid townies still have votes. I'm not saying we shouldn't lynch them, but only in a "scum or dumb" scenario, not in a "most likely a stupid townie" one. This has convinced me to keep my vote where it is. I'm still suspicious against Wong, who hasn't spoken up so far, but Snarky is just plain scummy.
Snarky Snickerpuss Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 I think you're missing the point here. It's about your reasoning behind your votes. And this reason isn't much better. Just switching to the bandwagon to get us to stop questioning you. Yeah, that's helpful. And I'm not implying you should make complex analysis here. There really isn't much to analyze... But I'm sure you can do better than this. I'm sorry you don't approve where I place my votes. Which is odd since how do you know I'm not actually voting for the bad guys while you are accusing a perfectly innocent crocodile? You don't! Please convince me otherwise if you're not an Odor Eater. I don't think anything I say will convince you, if you've set it in your mind that I'm one. I already said I know nothing, so I cannot provide you with a list of Odor Eaters, unfortunately. I would if I had such powers, trust me. Or a concerned Penis that senses scummy behavior. I was actually referring to my own saying. Would an Odor Eater really be Snarky like me, huh? Shouldn't they be all "Go Penises! I just love me some Penis! I want nothing but good things to everybuddy!" But have you even tried to find out who the scum are? You voted for someone who made a mistake, then flippantly changed to someone who has a bandwagon going against him. Why? Because, ... Oh wait, that's right, you don't have a good reason to vote for Durm, do you? You are just following the mob in what could be a good lynch, or could be a Penis stuck in a bad situation. You're right, I don't have any other reason to vote for Durm than the fact that he's the highest vote-getter right now. I'm betting my green tail that neither do the majority of people who voted for him, but I'm at least being honest about it. Baaandwagon! Yippee! Even without any solid cases, we have had better reasons to vote for people than just "He's not me". You're not scummy because you don't get any messages, you're scummy because you don't seem to care wheter a townie or scum gets lynched. And now you're all "Oh, nobody tells me anything, so how am I supposed to be helpful?". Big news, none of us knows more than anyone else, except for the scum. And there are several degrees of lynch rationalization than just "Fancy-pants theories" and randomly voting for whoever is most likely to be lynched. How is any of that scummy behaviour exactly, can you tell me that? I may be snarky, but my bark is worse than my bite. And I've got me a lot of teeth, as you can see... You're trying awfully hard to make everyone vote for me just because I'm being honest about my ignorance. I could be all "hmm, I think X is scum because his sentence structure is funny and he only has talked twice during this whole day, and his name is an anagram of a famous criminal...", but why bother? This is Day One, and we are all voting blindly here, no matter how hard we're trying to convince ourselves otherwise. Come back to me tomorrow, maybe I'll have something sensible to say then. If I'm bothered.
Ariattny Sugarbottom Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 Various words. You're not very good at this "Catch the bad guys" thing, are you?
Wong Wang Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 On the other hand, I'm suspicious of Wang. Mainly because of this: Here he repeats that he has been called out for repeating things And more importantly this: She has been accused and voted for, but still this is all the reaction we get. First she says "I haven't found anything scummy on Flabflom, but I might vote for him because of his penalty votes", which sounds like she visited the Snarky School of Vote Justification. She follows it up with a weird scenario of 2-3 town leaders, which I don't get. It doesn't sound like a good defense to me, though. Then she jumps on the Krup bandwagon, because "something is going weird with him". While the reasons to vote for Krup are not necessarily bad (for a Day One lynch), this one is. She just wanted to jump on there fast enough. I'm not going to vote for her right now, because I want her to explain the above scenario again and defend herself. OOC: My internet provider at school for somereason blocked EB today when it never has before, so that's why no response I'm not looking for a fight from anybody. I think that was a decent defense As for the jumping on the bandwagon idea you brought up, maybe to some it seems like I did. It seems like you have criticized me for being cautious with my vote, but when I do vote, you accuse me of being a bandwagoner. Yes, I admit that "something is weird with him" probably is not the greatest reason to vote, but it's better than bandwagoning. Day 1 lynches are always difficult; nobody can really prove except from scummy behavior over the day. I'm choosing what I think is the better option between a lot of bad choices. If I had my way, we would not vote today, and all the Odor Eaters would magically disappear and never be heard from again. (Is there a spell for that?) But that's in a perfect world, and we are not in a perfect world right now.
Hinckley Posted April 24, 2013 Author Posted April 24, 2013 Do not play the game outside the thread. Similarly, do not post out of character inside the thread. OOC: My internet provider at school for somereason blocked EB today when it never has before, so that's why no response vote tally Flabflom Flimflam: 6 votes (penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty) Durmudgelous Krup: 12 votes (Nicholas Dickory, Godric Goaty-Blather, Rutherford Habblabble-Bibble, Gertrude Tincanchew, Orion Kettleboil, Helena Hippopaw, Wong Wang, Purplonia Pink, Ariattny Sugarbottom, Dillpickle Catterweed, Firuz Foxtail, Snarky Snickerpuss) Wong Wang: 10 votes (Drubulum Panck, Belinda Bugglesby, Twatty Tittlesteen, Bartholomew Bearbutt, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty) Purplonia Pink: 1 vote (Barkonius Twitch) Snarky Snickerpuss: 4 votes (Looney Lumpylove, Lulu Pittoolo, Regelius Snoot, Boris Biddlesdorf)
Durmudgelous Krup Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 Well 12 votes for me. I can close shop early today. You know, I have this red lacrima powered plastic wand I found behind Burtgun & Buoobs. Since I don't know much about magic, I don't know how it works at night,I guess I never do now. So when ancient scrolls say there is always a reason for someone's actions, you better believe it. The list? I have said everything in the day threads. Read again. My vote? What's the point. Even if I survive today's lynch, the odors will target me anyway. I know they want that red lacrima. My last words? Well done Odors. Well done OotP, you should all get yourself a pair of clutches. Go ahead, cripple yourself. Go, quick. Bye now. Bye _i_ OotP for Life _i_
Langston Lionheart Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 Ugh, I wish I had more time for this, but studies first! I'll make the best informed decision I can... Anyway, I don't feel confident in the vote against Krup. To me it looks like your typical Day One bandwagon. Despite not the best of defenses, Krup's actions are what make me think he's town, or at least not an Odor Eater. Logically, I don't see why an Odor Eater would do what he did (pming peeps so early, which they can easily verify, so it'd be a difficult thing to lie about), unless there was some ulterior motive, which would be odd (though I cannot say would be impossible). Ultimately not lynch worthy, in my opinion. With this logic, sorta leaves him vulnerable to the Odor Eaters, but I think we should try and avoid lynching people we think are town (especially when there are better options). I won't have much chance to come back today in these closing hours, so I'm going to place my vote now. I would vote for somebody else, but at this point it would be unwise, since we need to reach a majority. So, I'm going to Vote: Wong Wang. Panck brings up one of the more convincing cases of the day against Wong, so I feel more confident with this vote. I concur with what he said (also I don't have time to really expand on it), but I can say that Wang's vote for Krup, based on "something is going weird with him, the numbers in my body can feel it", a pretty weak excuse when things seem to already be bandwagoning against Krup. I sorta feel bad for voting on top of his penalties, but I'd want to see a majority reached and when I don't see the other leading lynchee as an Odor Eater, this is the best option for me, I think.
Wong Wang Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 I sorta feel bad for voting on top of his penalties, but I'd want to see a majority reached and when I don't see the other leading lynchee as an Odor Eater, this is the best option for me, I think. I have to be honest and say I know where you are coming from with that vote. I said the same thing earlier when Snarky laid down his vote along with the six penalty votes.
Helena Hippopaw Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 Neigh! Neeeeeeeeeigh! I don't like how fast the bandwagon against Krup has formed. His attitude hasn't been helping, and he is flailing around, but I can't see how this makes him scum. He has been acting weird, but I think he's town. He just doesn't seem to have a scum team helping him. Sure, I doubt on Day One the scum would actively defend one of theirs, but unless they willingly bus Krup, I doubt the bandwagon would have formed the way it has. They would at least plant the seed of doubt somewhere and thus decelerate the bandwagon. The bandwagon wasn't very fast. Nine others didn't vote for Krup. And a few have sais like you, they think he's Penis. If Krup isn't an Oder Eater, this is a scum thing to say. Scum know he isn't scum, so they can say told you so tomorrow. For me, I talked to Krup today in private more, and I gave him a chance to lie and he didn'T. He had too many votes at that time, but now it is close, and I think Wong Wang is suspicious, for the reasons said. A lot of talk, but not saying anything and voting without reason. Unvote: Durmugelus Krup Vote: Wong Wang vote tally Flabflom Flimflam: 6 votes (penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty) Durmudgelous Krup: 12 votes (Nicholas Dickory, Godric Goaty-Blather, Rutherford Habblabble-Bibble, Gertrude Tincanchew, Orion Kettleboil, Helena Hippopaw, Wong Wang, Purplonia Pink, Ariattny Sugarbottom, Dillpickle Catterweed, Firuz Foxtail, Snarky Snickerpuss) Wong Wang: 10 votes (Drubulum Panck, Belinda Bugglesby, Twatty Tittlesteen, Bartholomew Bearbutt, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty) Purplonia Pink: 1 vote (Barkonius Twitch) Snarky Snickerpuss: 4 votes (Looney Lumpylove, Lulu Pittoolo, Regelius Snoot, Boris Biddlesdorf) With the votes tied, at least I hope Barkonius Twitch will abandon his vote and make a decision between Krup or Wang. We know his suspicion, but we need people to make votes with a difference.
Drubulum Panck Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 You're right, I don't have any other reason to vote for Durm than the fact that he's the highest vote-getter right now. I'm betting my green tail that neither do the majority of people who voted for him, but I'm at least being honest about it. You're right there. Most people I am fairly certain do not have a good reason for their voting for Krup, which is why we'll look into it tomorrow, but just because they don't have a good reason for voting for him doesn't mean that you have an excuse for not reasoning before voting. Come on! You're a reptilian like me. Use your reptile head to look at what's going on around you. With the votes tied, at least I hope Barkonius Twitch will abandon his vote and make a decision between Krup or Wang. We know his suspicion, but we need people to make votes with a difference. I think with yours and the lion man's votes the tide has actually turned so it's [Wong 12-11 Krup].
Orion Kettleboil Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 Gah, Durmy's reactions are too legitimate. Unvote: Durmugelus Krup Vote: Snarky Snickerpuss I don't like Wong's agreeable attitude to his accusers, but Snarky is without a doubt the scummiest person here.
Drubulum Panck Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 Is anyone else enjoying Durm's blatant ducking of questions? Isn't it odd how he refused to answer at least two people (myself included) when they asked him such a basic question? Why would he do that? Whether he's a Penis or an Eater, it reflects poorly on him for not explaining his actions properly, doesn't it? It makes him look like he's either hiding something or not invested enough to fess up, okay? I can't say I'm enjoying it at all. It's really annoying actually. It seems hard to get any clear statements from him, he's always bemoaning his sorry state, especially recently. It almost makes me want to switch my vote to him, because if he's a penis he seems rather impotent at best. However, I still feel more confident in Wong turning up scum than him. Krup, if you're a townie and you want to be useful try to help us and quit moaning and complaining.
Hinckley Posted April 24, 2013 Author Posted April 24, 2013 vote tally Flabflom Flimflam: 6 votes (penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty) Durmudgelous Krup: 10 votes (Nicholas Dickory, Godric Goaty-Blather, Rutherford Habblabble-Bibble, Gertrude Tincanchew, Wong Wang, Purplonia Pink, Ariattny Sugarbottom, Dillpickle Catterweed, Firuz Foxtail, Snarky Snickerpuss) Wong Wang: 12 votes (Drubulum Panck, Belinda Bugglesby, Twatty Tittlesteen, Bartholomew Bearbutt, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, Langston Lionheart, Helena Hippopaw) Purplonia Pink: 1 vote (Barkonius Twitch) Snarky Snickerpuss: 5 votes (Looney Lumpylove, Lulu Pittoolo, Regelius Snoot, Boris Biddlesdorf, Orion Kettleboil)
Godric Goaty-Blather Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 Well 12 votes for me. I can close shop early today. You know, I have this red lacrima powered plastic wand I found behind Burtgun & Buoobs. Since I don't know much about magic, I don't know how it works at night,I guess I never do now. So when ancient scrolls say there is always a reason for someone's actions, you better believe it. The list? I have said everything in the day threads. Read again. My vote? What's the point. Even if I survive today's lynch, the odors will target me anyway. I know they want that red lacrima. My last words? Well done Odors. Well done OotP, you should all get yourself a pair of clutches. Go ahead, cripple yourself. Go, quick. Bye now. Bye _i_ OotP for Life _i_ See what's gone and happened now? You never ever give up like this ever. You've completely given up and revealed you have some special wand, which I can only assume means you have a night action, and have now made yourself a target. Well done.
Gertrude Tincanchew Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 Well 12 votes for me. I can close shop early today. You know, I have this red lacrima powered plastic wand I found behind Burtgun & Buoobs. Since I don't know much about magic, I don't know how it works at night,I guess I never do now. So when ancient scrolls say there is always a reason for someone's actions, you better believe it. The list? I have said everything in the day threads. Read again. My vote? What's the point. Even if I survive today's lynch, the odors will target me anyway. I know they want that red lacrima. My last words? Well done Odors. Well done OotP, you should all get yourself a pair of clutches. Go ahead, cripple yourself. Go, quick. Bye now. Bye _i_ OotP for Life _i_ Town's gone to pot while I'm away. Come on guys, get your heads in the game! Look at this post. Is this a townie post to you? "oh, woe is me, I'm being lynched. OotP rocks. I don't want to compile my suspicions. Hurp a derp. Everyone hates me. Boo hoo." Ww guys, if this is the kind of iron-clad defense that gets you to stop a bandwagon, then there is something seriously wrong with us. What will lynching Wang tell us in the morning? As far as I can tell, nothing. If we lynch Krup, however, then we get at least two solid leads, plus one side benefit. Let me summarize here: *If this is Krup's A-game (floundering, ducking questions, being completely imbecilic, dicking around in PMs without making his whole defense or list of suspects publicly clear) and he's town, then later in the game, when mislynches cost us far more, Krup will be a major distraction that could screw us over by confusing us with his erratic behavior. *If he flips Scum, we can analyze today's voting and discussion to see who tried to shift the bandwagon onto Snarky/Wong, who jumped on Wong as soon as he got penalties, and who was trying to deflect suspicion from Krup with minor leads. That would give us a strong foundation to work with, *If he flips Town, we have two options to pursue: We can examine his aggressors (that's me, by the way. I didn't start this bandwagon, but I'm driving it like I stole it.), as at least one or two Scum will be on the wagon in order to take out a Townie. Or we could look at the people like Catalina, who said "Oh, he feels oh so town to me, I won't vote him!", who would then take the opportunity tomorrow should he flip town to flaunt that. "I knew he was town and got off his bandwagon, look at me I'm confirmed innocent, herp a derp." At least one or two of the scum are sure to do that, as well. So what do you think would be better for the Town? Getting rid of a distraction and earning all the information and leads outlined above, or lynching a fellow who can at least talk coherently and is capable of defending himself when asked?
Hinckley Posted April 24, 2013 Author Posted April 24, 2013 vote tally Flabflom Flimflam 6 votes (penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty) Wong Wang 6 votes (penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty) Mod note: The votes have been reset and the day extended by 24 hours as the Provocarus Curse has been cast on Snarky Snickerpuss and Wong Wang. You may only casts votes for Snarky Snickerpuss or Wong Wang. Penalties will still be counted and accrue on current penalty votes. Further explanation and pictures to come ...
Wong Wang Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 Snip I like the mathematical possibilities of your comments.
Gertrude Tincanchew Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 See what's gone and happened now? You never ever give up like this ever. You've completely given up and revealed you have some special wand, which I can only assume means you have a night action, and have now made yourself a target. Well done. Not like he would know how to use it. . If he even has a NA, he shouldn't have ousted himself. In my opinion, this is just him being obfuscatingly stupid while subtly sticking in another reason to save his sorry megablocks. Soft claims hurt the Town, folks! They provide the scum with a target without giving the Town any information! Now the doc, if we have one, will probably waste his protection on a nimrod like you. So now that the scum know you have a NA, you need to tell us what it is so we can plan around it later. We can't count on having a cop of it was you and you got yourself killed, so spill. I like the mathematical possibilities of your comments. Stop sheeping me, you're a panda. I'm sticking my head on the line to get something done that benefits you and this is all you've got? Give us your own analyses. Tell us if you think Krup is scum. Tell us if you think I'm an aggressive bitch. Tell us anything except for "Yeah, what she said," because repeating other people and not thinking for yourself is what out your head on the chopping block to begin with,
Godric Goaty-Blather Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 vote tally Flabflom Flimflam 6 votes (penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty) Wong Wang 6 votes (penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty) Mod note: The votes have been reset and the day extended by 24 hours as the Provacarus Curse has been cast on Snarky Snickerpuss and Wong Wang. You may only casts votes for Snarky Snickerpuss or Wong Wang. Penalties will still be counted and accrue on current penalty votes. Further explanation and pictures to come ... Okay. Well, I suppose out of those two I'd have to go for: Vote: Wong Wang
Drubulum Panck Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 vote tally Flabflom Flimflam 6 votes (penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty) Wong Wang 6 votes (penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty, penalty) Mod note: The votes have been reset and the day extended by 24 hours as the Provacarus Curse has been cast on Snarky Snickerpuss and Wong Wang. You may only casts votes for Snarky Snickerpuss or Wong Wang. Penalties will still be counted and accrue on current penalty votes. Further explanation and pictures to come ... What the devil is this? Provacarus Curse on Snarky and Wong? I don't have a clue what this is, but assuming it's an Odor Eater who cast the curse, but I could be wrong about that, why for Snarky and Wong? Are they both town? I seriously doubt that. I will continue my vote. Vote: Wong Wang Although they are about equally as scummy as I see it.
Wong Wang Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 Stop sheeping me, you're a panda. I'm sticking my head on the line to get something done that benefits you and this is all you've got? Give us your own analyses. Tell us if you think Krup is scum. Tell us if you think I'm an aggressive bitch. Tell us anything except for "Yeah, what she said," because repeating other people and not thinking for yourself is what out your head on the chopping block to begin with, I know you are, and I thank you. The thing is, Krup is either scum or a bumbling Townie, that much is known. Somebody just placed a curse so only myself or Snarky can be chosen to vote for. On the subject of Krup, if I am worthy to live (and make it through the night) Krup may be killed by say a vigilante, a scum killer, or he may be left alone to completely confuse us tomorrow. Then he's revealed as a townie and we will have lost two townies, him and me, if he is killed or lynched if he is town. If Krup is scum, well, he's either not good at hiding it, or he is so completely of his rocker that even a wand won't fix his mind but it works for him because the blame has shifted to me. Now that Snarky is in the mix against me, he has done some interesting things, such as voting for Filbflam Flom-whooey. Yes, I do know that I said it is something I would possibly do. I was actually referring to my own saying. Would an Odor Eater really be Snarky like me, huh? Shouldn't they be all "Go Penises! I just love me some Penis! I want nothing but good things to everybuddy!" Snarky said the above, and it's something I think any scum would do. Point out their own bad behavior but cover it up and push it onto somebody else. I also would like to say that Regelius Snoot voted for Snarky because Snarky was voting for Krup because of the bandwagon effect. Snoot defended Krup, though that was a gamble, to say that Krup is just naive and stupid. What the devil is this? Provacarus Curse on Snarky and Wong? I don't have a clue what this is, but assuming it's an Odor Eater who cast the curse, but I could be wrong about that, why for Snarky and Wong? Are they both town? I seriously doubt that.I will continue my vote. Vote: Wong Wang Although they are about equally as scummy as I see it. Panck said the above. I know I am town; just look down my pants. Vote: Snarky Snickerpuss
Orion Kettleboil Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 That is the weirdest thing. Vote: Snarky Snickerpuss
Recommended Posts