Kristel Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 I'm actually going to have to agree with Sheridan. It's not that it's not important to get to the bottom of Sheridan's claim, but it's been established that the only thing we can really do is have somebody role cop her, and we don't even know if we have a role cop. I'd say it would be best for the role cop (if there is one) to check Ms. Sheridan, and then talk to somebody they trust to be a member of the village. Has anybody noticed the absence of Ms. Long? I haven't seen her anywhere. I'm here and following the conversations with interest, just don't feel I have anything of value to add at this point that hasn't been said already.
Scubacarrot Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 And you do seem to be the only with (this much) trouble with my roleplaying. Roleplaying is fun! It's great. It's not intrusive, unless you're unable to see through it. I have a very standardized way of doing it, it's not like I randomly change words into other words. It's totally readable (perhaps with a tiny bit of effort). You don't have to like it. But I am playing a 17 year old american girl. Deal with it. This is directed at Caleb, by the way.
Captain Nemo Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 Look. I'll do this one without the fluff. Just read your previous post and my post before it. If it makes it easier, cross out all the like, whatevers and somethings. You're not saying anything relevant, not answering my points. My vote stays. Ugh you're like, so whatever, or something. And no. Not at all. Again with the jumps in logic, twisting of words, weird assumptions. Thanks for posting without the unclear fluff--it seems you can do that. Secondly I did read your post (to a reply if mine); that I replayed to. In regards to my comment you replied to, and saying "I'm twisting" your words--what am I twisting? I am stating the facts as I see them, chiefly that for the bast 4 or so pages you were very concerned with how people replied to your claim, and then suddenly wanted the talk about the claim to end. As for not relevantly answering your points? What are your points? You've not asked questions and hand only pointed fingers?
CMP Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 The Malevolent Carletta Emilia Benita Maria Roberta Consuela Rosalina Puerta will vote: Esther Thompson (Esurient). She's pointed out plenty of suspicious, yes - most seem to be in an attempt to draw attention away from her thinking that the mayor was trying to get power roles to claim to him. The Malevolent Carletta believes firmly Esther has not adequately defended herself against this accusations.
Tachyon Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 I'll vote Sheridan Thompson(Scubacarrot).You should be lynched or night killed for the possibility that it is to easy for you if you are an expendable mafia goon to fakeclaim miller and by doing this, making inroads and leading the lynch towards innocent townies
Tamamono Posted June 25, 2013 Author Posted June 25, 2013 I'll vote Sheridan Thompson(Scubacarrot).You should be lynched or night killed for the possibility that it is to easy for you if you are an expendable mafia goon to fakeclaim miller and by doing this, making inroads and leading the lynch towards innocent townies Mod Note: Remember to use this format: Vote: Character (Player)!!!
mostlytechnic Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I'll vote Sheridan. You should be lynched or night killed for the possibility that it is to easy for you if you are an expendable mafia goon to fakeclaim miller and by doing this, making inroads and leading the lynch towards innocent townies I'm not ready to go that far - it's too likely that the claim is legit, and then we'd just be killing off one of ourselves. It's easier to just put very little weight on what she says until she's proven herself. Safer for the town, since we really don't wanna be lynching our fellow loyal folk. I'm leaning towards voting for Esther at this point. That whole accusation thing over small font choice - in the C&D thread, not even in the real journal! - just seemed over the top and scummy to me. Not quite ready to lay the vote on her, but that's where i'm leaning.
TrumpetKing Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 Right now, I'm waiting for a response from Liz. If she provides a reasonable response to her confusing theories, then I'll unvote her, and switch my vote over to the next person I see as scummy- Esther. Accusing over font sizes, really? Yes, you've explained it, but you didn't even explain it that well.
Kadabra Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 It seemed as if you were questioning Liz's logic. What's even weirder is that you suddenly change the subject to Esther after spending some time referring to Liz, and even then, you spend a rather quick time on Esther. Your quick subject changing not only makes me more suspicious of Liz, but of you as well. However, Liz has been acting in a confusing matter recently, so my vote will be for her. Vote: Liz Devon (LegoDad) OK, seriously? No, Framer screws with alignment. Role Cop turns up your role. (A vig or the scum killer would both read 'killer', a Rolecop that is town OR scum would read 'rolecop', etc.) Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with Clay in that Michael and Sheridan doing this sort of buddy-ish thing is confusing, but I want to wit for the rolecop's results, if we have one. So I'll lay the first vote on Esther for her over analysis and repeatedly flawed logic. Please clarify your thought processes, Esther, unless 'causing confusion' is the only reason you have for your bad logic. Vote: Esther Thompson (esurient) I thought we were playing a Western game, not a ninja themed one. This is the post we're talking about, right? Let me break it down for you, because it's obvious you don't get it. No, Framer screws with alignment. Role Cop turns up your role. (A vig or the scum killer would both read 'killer', a Rolecop that is town OR scum would read 'rolecop', etc.) <---This is the only sentence in the post directed at Liz. Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with Clay in that Michael and Sheridan doing this sort of buddy-ish thing is confusing, but I want to wit for the rolecop's results, if we have one.<---This is in reference to Clay's post directly above mine. I am stating that I follow his logic but am not willing to sheep him yet. So I'll lay the first vote on Esther for her over analysis and repeatedly flawed logic. Please clarify your thought processes, Esther, unless 'causing confusion' is the only reason you have for your bad logic.All of the rest of the post, including the logic questioning, is directed at Esther. Literally the first sentence starts with "I'll lay a vote on Esther because blablabla. Vote: Esther Thompson (esurient) I thought we were playing a Western game, not a ninja themed one. I'm not sure who's that managed to confuse you because it was pretty simple. The only mistake Liz made was not understanding how Framers worked, why on Earth should that be a reason for being Scum? Esther, on the other hand, is accusing somebody of fishing for PRs because he was roleplaying... In the confirmation thread. Big time flawed logic. Makes sense now?
TrumpetKing Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I didn't see the "Anyways". That was foolish of me. Unvote: Liz Devon (LegoDad) I'm agreeing with the Esther case. Her logic is far off to even make sense, and she hasn't done well explaining it. Vote: Esther Thompson (Esurient)
Tamamono Posted June 26, 2013 Author Posted June 26, 2013 Vote Count Esther Thompson (Esurient) - 3 (Kadabra, CallMePie, Trumpetking) Michael Thompson (Mencot) - 2 (Capt. Redblade, Bob) Caleb Norman (Captain Nemo) - 1(Scubacarrot) Sheridan Thompson (Scubacarrot) - 1 (Zakura) 40 hours until Sunset.
Esurient Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 As promised. Scubacarrot, on 25 June 2013 - 07:07 AM, said: So. This is like totally obvious, but okay. So as you all know, Michael is like my Daddy (love you, daddy. ) And I like love him, so that's why I make the statementsthat I make, okay. There's like, no, other reason for it, or whatever. If you can't understand that, then that is bad for you, but whatever. Ugh. Just to be like a total downer, I'm like, not defending Daddy, but I like, couldn't believe if he was scum, or whatever. Look. Roleplaying. Look through it out, people. At the beginning, like Tristan, Molly and to like, a certain degree Jessica were all like, you're not fab, they could have been like, trying to get a quick lynch, or whatever. The ones that changed their opinion drastically are Tristan, Molly, Boris to like, some extent. You could have like, all read this for yourself or like whatever. I don't know about you but my time is like, limited or whatever. So if people keep asking me like, the same questions or something, I can't do much else. Ugh. But, I think like the reactions about what people think about the claim are like helpful, you don't have to agree, but you would be like, totally wrong. Whatever. Tristan stated that like, it seemed to him like my Daddy was like, protecting me, and not answering my questions, and that that makes us like, gangmembers. That's a faulty jump in like, logic or whatever. Not answering my questions or whatever could be a Coyote thing. That doesn't like, involve me, quite the opposite I think, if he'd go out of his way not to anwer MY questions. Understand my like, suspicion for Tristan now or whatever? It's like, the same thing, yeah. Thanks, my child. I will take a closer look at the posts made by Tristan Molly Jessica Boris Boris I believe Sheridan is telling the truth. The first post being a roleclaim is unusual, but I believe it, just because of how outrageous It is. The odds of a scum pulling a move like that, that gives us a potentially productive start are practically nonexistent. It does seem to me like it has the towns best intentions at heart, but I can't fully trust her yet. Damien, you do make a good point that it is a convenient claim for a potential scum, but why on earth would a Scum pull such a audacious gambit before anything at all has happened? Sorry, from my perspective there seemed to be an air of accusation. Rereading it, I completely disagree with your final statement Damien. What has a scum got to gain from a move like that? A free pass through investigations, potentially a few people trusting them completely, maybe even a few other people claiming. There would be benefits for a scum claiming. A stupid scum claim, but one that would have potential benefits for a Scum nonetheless. I sort of get the impression that you had a scum read on Sheridan, has that changed for you now? Molly Naw, I think I was pretty much on the fence the whole dang time. My first post I said why wait, why not wait? The claim can't be verified at this time, likely never, so there's not a ton we can discuss and decide. Her loyalties will have to be found other ways, like voting records and so forth, like anyone else. During my dancing breaks I did a little diggin' to learn more about the role and found that an immediate claim is a very common way that good people of other towns handled being scapegoats. But like Tony up there said, there's also not much downside to a gutsy scummo claiming either. It's not hugely likely for such claims to be tested via death - considering we don't know if the great and wise Captain Minnow there even turned anyone into a scapegoat. Maybe Sheridan's telling the whole truth like a proper young lady should, and maybe she's a dastardly scheming conniving scummy gang member. There's just no way to know yet and that's why I've been on the fence. If I were a scapegoat, I'd probably have done the same thing. Makes me lean maybe 51% townread on her. That's about all I think we can get from the topic at this point. Naw, there's plenty of times when a lynch to determine allegiance is a perfectly legit way to go. I don't think so here - nothing to be learned other than her loyalties - but it's certainly not something to make a blanket statement like that. Why I remember a time in this special Academy when we tried to learn lots of things from lynching. Hints at the possibility of lynching Sheridan to reveal her allegiance, when Molly claimed not to have any read on Sheridan, then back peddled to say Sheridan's claim is legit. I ask you again Molly, what is your read on Sheridan now? Tristan TrumpetKing, on 24 June 2013 - 07:48 PM, said: I am thinking this through. I'm finding your claim a little hard to believe. It just seems a little too convenient. For now, though, I'll choose to believe you. Your recent explanation seems to show your thought process a bit better, to me, and I feel like you're more likely to be telling the truth the more I look at it. That doesn't mean I won't be watching out for you, though. I've got my eyes on you. TrumpetKing, on 24 June 2013 - 07:55 PM, said: Perry, that's true. In past situations, the traitor was given one member of the scum, and the other scum could easily drop that claim. Sheridan is likely telling the truth, the more I think about it. TrumpetKing, on 24 June 2013 - 08:26 PM, said: Boris, I'm thinking if Sheridan was scum she might have thought this through a little bit more. Don't you think she would have thought it would have been dismissed as false quickly. There's a lot of risks to this, and why would a scum claim something that would be quickly deemed false? I know it completely contradicts my original thoughts, but it's how I'm starting to feel. I'm starting to think it would be a really stupid scum claim. Sheridan, I think you're more likely to be town, but your claim is still a little fishy to me. There's always that little chance that you're scum. TrumpetKing, on 24 June 2013 - 08:57 PM, said: I believe Sheridan said she'd come up Coyote on investigation, but is really aligned with the Village. That means she'd come up as Village if killed or lynched. The only way to test this is obviously to kill or lynch her. The good side about lynching her is that there'd be no later confusion surrounding her and her affiliation. The downside would be that we would be risking the loss of a townie. TrumpetKing, on 24 June 2013 - 10:15 PM, said: I think Sheridan could have gone without claiming. However, somethin' else has come up yonder that makes me feel like There's some fishy bizness goin' on 'round these parts. Notice how Sheridan's dad came in? I know he's her father and all, but it just seemed weird. Saying you'll protect her may be a bad role-playing attempt, but the way you didn't even answer her original requests, just to say you'll protect her makes me wonder if you two have something with each other other than family relations. Actually, Sherri's claim wasn't necessary, but it was justified. Back and forth reads on Sheridan, eventually settles on a town read on Sheridan, but wants to lynch Sheridan to find out her allegiance. Seem to me like you are trying to buddy up with Sheridan. Jessica TrumpetKing, on 24 June 2013 - 08:57 PM, said: I believe Sheridan said she'd come up Coyote on investigation, but is really aligned with the Village. That means she'd come up as Village if killed or lynched. The only way to test this is obviously to kill or lynch her. The good side about lynching her is that there'd be no later confusion surrounding her and her affiliation. The downside would be that we would be risking the loss of a townie. I may have misinterpreted what they said, but these two looked like they were pushing for a lynch so I wanted to put my two cents in to say that lynching her today is probably a bad idea. Also, not even because they thought she is scum, but because we'd "find out her true allegiance". That's a stupid reason to lynch someone. What caught my attention with Jessica is that Tristan has failed to respond to Jessica. Tristan, can you respond to Jessica on why you wanted a lynch on Sheridan? No, Framer screws with alignment. Role Cop turns up your role. (A vig or the scum killer would both read 'killer', a Rolecop that is town OR scum would read 'rolecop', etc.) Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with Clay in that Michael and Sheridan doing this sort of buddy-ish thing is confusing, but I want to wit for the rolecop's results, if we have one. So I'll lay the first vote on Esther for her over analysis and repeatedly flawed logic. Please clarify your thought processes, Esther, unless 'causing confusion' is the only reason you have for your bad logic. Vote: Esther Thompson (esurient) The Malevolent Carletta Emilia Benita Maria Roberta Consuela Rosalina Puerta will vote: Esther Thompson (Esurient). She's pointed out plenty of suspicious, yes - most seem to be in an attempt to draw attention away from her thinking that the mayor was trying to get power roles to claim to him. The Malevolent Carletta believes firmly Esther has not adequately defended herself against this accusations. Right now, I'm waiting for a response from Liz. If she provides a reasonable response to her confusing theories, then I'll unvote her, and switch my vote over to the next person I see as scummy- Esther. Accusing over font sizes, really? Yes, you've explained it, but you didn't even explain it that well. I'm not ready to go that far - it's too likely that the claim is legit, and then we'd just be killing off one of ourselves. It's easier to just put very little weight on what she says until she's proven herself. Safer for the town, since we really don't wanna be lynching our fellow loyal folk. I'm leaning towards voting for Esther at this point. That whole accusation thing over small font choice - in the C&D thread, not even in the real journal! - just seemed over the top and scummy to me. Not quite ready to lay the vote on her, but that's where i'm leaning. Tell me, you four, how is clarifying any doubts I have, scummy in any sense? The way you four act and behave is getting really suspicious in my eyes, Kane, Tristan, Carletta and Molly, it seems to me that there are greater, more important matters to be discussed, and you four choose to nitpick something that is trivial and blow it up to something scummy. I am getting the vibe that you four are being neutral just about everything that is being discussed here. Kane, jumping from Michael and Sheridan roleplaying to my query to Drake. Trying to find someone to lynch? Is it not Kane? Right now, it seems that you four are determined to find something suspicious in my activity, I am not sure if you are serious in finding scum or just interested into getting me lynched. I am also not sure if you four think I am scummy for scum hunting? or you four think I am an easy lynch target (do some research and you will find that scum actually do these kind of crazy stuff). I'm here and following the conversations with interest, just don't feel I have anything of value to add at this point that hasn't been said already. Self-proclaimed lurker . If you have any opinions or views, even though they have been said already, there is no harm repeating them yourself. It adds value to the conversation and to the matters at hand. You can weigh in your opinion and it adds value. If you are Town that is. Here is my list. Scum Molly Kane Tristan Carletta Drake Kimberly (50/50) Town Sheridan Null Rest - You all haven't done enough for me to have a clear read. If you are town, step up and don't be afraid of accusations. Why Drake as scum? I see the fantastic four busying trying to prevent me from hounding Drake. So Drake should be hiding something interesting. I will claim once the vote reaches 50% +1. Too easy for a Day 1. Thanks Sheridan
Kristel Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I am town and taking everything in with the intention of trying to identify who the scum are. I don't have a clue who to vote for at this stage. I've already said how I feel about Sheridan's claim. I'm not ready to lynch her over it yet. I'll ask a question when I think it's appropriate. Like this one: Esther, why not claim now if you have a good reason not to be lynched?
CMP Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 The Amazing Carletta Emilia Benita Cecilia Maria Roberta Consuela Rosalina Puerta applauds you for outlining your suspicions so concisely, do not mistake her. She simply believes you're doing so only to dissuade attention to yourself because of your extremely foolish accusations of Drake. If you have better reasoning for his being suspicious, please do share. At the moment, she simply thinks you're pointing fingers anywhere that's not at yourself, rather than trying to explain your reasons for thinking Drake is trying to snoop for power roles. The Amazing Carletta simply doesn't see any better choices right now. The back-and-forth of Caleb and Sheridan is noteworthy, she supposes, but thinks they're simply two townies trying to find the best ways to keep scum talking. Michael I give the benefit of the doubt, he's new to this sort of experience and is simply acting like a caring father should...Tristan I agree has been acting strangely, and I am starting to think he's only trying to jump on the bandwagon early. My eye is close on him, but I'm not prepared to lynch him over it, I have known him to be overexcited in the past. The Amazing Carletta doesn't understand what you mean by clarifying any doubts. If you mean where you clarified why you think Drake's comment was suspicious, well, just look what you drew from it. Now now, ladies, don't you worry. We'll clean up this town quickly. In the meantime, come over here so I can get a good look protect you from this dark menace. I will have more on Sheridan later but I have some questions for Drake, 1. I suppose you have intentionally reduced the font for the following words, "get a good look", in the confirmation and discussion topic. Why did you do that? 2. What does "get a good look" supposed to mean? 3. Are you trying to get PRs to claim to you? Because right now I have a "Drake soft claimed PR before the start of the game" read on you. You've come to the conclusion that based on that statement, he's trying to get power roles to claim to him. Take a moment to think about it. Is that not just a tad far-fetched?
TrumpetKing Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I'm sorry, but I'm trying to buddy up to Sheridan by suggesting a lynch on her? What logic are you using? As for the lynch suggestion, it's day one, and I was just tossing around ideas. We don't usually have something that's worth discussing so much so early in these games, so I was encouraging discussion within the town, to gather reactions. I think Sheridan is town, so why would I really want to lynch her if I had already said I thought she was town? And my reads weren't back and forth. At first, I was just saying what was on my head, but after thinking things trough, that would be a dumb move to make as scum. As for accusing you, your logic makes no sense. You accused Drake, I believe, for some roleplaying he did in the Confirmation thread. Not asked for clarification, but your wording implied an accusation. I, for one, haven't been neutral in any of the topics discussed today. In fact, I believe I've been rather obvious on which side I'm on in today's discussions. It seems you are the one trying to find reasons to make me look scummy. It's almost as if your accusations are OMFGUS-based. Noe, seeing that Carletta has made an entry while I am typing this, it seems like you were sort of asking for clarification, but you jumped to such a conclusion that it seemed like an accusation. I guess I can give you that, but your response to this is unsettling to me. *Now
CMP Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I think Sheridan is town, so why would I really want to lynch her if I had already said I thought she was town? The Amazing Carletta Emilia Benita Cecilia Maria Roberta Consuela Rosalina Margarita Puerta is wondering why you even thought it was an option, if you were so sure she was town.
TrumpetKing Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I didn't think of the possibility of there being a role cop. We don't even know if there is one still. However, it's always an option. I didn't have to bring it up and it still could have been an option. That doesn't mean I have to participate in something I mentioned. It was just an idea that I thought could be brought up so we could discuss. That's all. I wasn't really trying to form a lynch on her, I wanted to hear the reactions of others.
Piratedave84 Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I am town and taking everything in with the intention of trying to identify who the scum are. I don't have a clue who to vote for at this stage. I've already said how I feel about Sheridan's claim. I'm not ready to lynch her over it yet. I'll ask a question when I think it's appropriate. Like this one: Esther, why not claim now if you have a good reason not to be lynched? Prying for info are we!? Why are you so eager for Esther to claim?
mostlytechnic Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 Molly Hints at the possibility of lynching Sheridan to reveal her allegiance, when Molly claimed not to have any read on Sheridan, then back peddled to say Sheridan's claim is legit. I ask you again Molly, what is your read on Sheridan now? I will claim once the vote reaches 50% +1. Too easy for a Day 1. Thanks Sheridan Wow, massive wall of text there, but I'm not sure any of it is worth much. Seems overall to be much yammering about tiny nothings. Or even yammering wrongly. For example, you say I hint at lynching Sherri, but the quote YOU BOLDED OF MINE says no such thing. In fact, I said "It's not hugely likely for such claims to be tested via death" because I don't think she's getting lynched today and I don't think she should be. The other statement of mine that you quoted was even more clear - "there's plenty of times when a lynch to determine allegiance is a perfectly legit way to go. I don't think so here" I've said my opinion of her repeatedly, but since you asked, again, I rate her about 51% town because I'm going on nothing but the fact that scapegoat claims are usually legit. So that's a townread, but not nearly solid enough to do much on yet. Prying for info are we!? Why are you so eager for Esther to claim? I'm pretty interested myself - Esther's softclaim that she WILL claim later seems like she's just hoping we'll go away. If it's a legit claim, I'd think she'd have kept quiet about it, defended herself, and then ONLY WHEN A LYNCH WAS IMMINENT (ie had a strong lead in the votes, or a slight lead with <12 hours left) made a flat out claim. As it is, her claim that she's going to claim reads like flailing scum to me. I could be wrong, it's not a strong read, but it does reinforce my gut. So for now, I'll go with it and say Vote: Esther Thompson (Esurient) I'm not yet strongly confident, but it IS day 1 and there's normally not much to go on. Please, Esther, if you ARE town, defend yourself (and ideally without claiming since you don't have any way to prove your role yet). If you're scum, keep flailing :)
LegoDad Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 Framers only affect allegiance investigations. So, a rolecop is our best chance of catching Sheridan out if she is lying. No, Framer screws with alignment. Role Cop turns up your role. (A vig or the scum killer would both read 'killer', a Rolecop that is town OR scum would read 'rolecop', etc.) Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with Clay in that Michael and Sheridan doing this sort of buddy-ish thing is confusing, but I want to wit for the rolecop's results, if we have one. So I'll lay the first vote on Esther for her over analysis and repeatedly flawed logic. Please clarify your thought processes, Esther, unless 'causing confusion' is the only reason you have for your bad logic. Vote: Esther Thompson (esurient) I thought we were playing a Western game, not a ninja themed one. Ok. Thanks for clearing that up. I was not 100% what all town roles a framer could mess with. I know from my schooling that an investigation can be messed with(believe me, I know ), but wasn't sure about if a role cop could be messed with by framing. Right now, I'm waiting for a response from Liz. If she provides a reasonable response to her confusing theories, then I'll unvote her, and switch my vote over to the next person I see as scummy- Esther. Accusing over font sizes, really? Yes, you've explained it, but you didn't even explain it that well. Believe me, I'm not trying to confuse anybody, just wrapping my head around a "frame". When I was in school, I saw a frame mess with an investigation, so I knew how that worked with an investigator, but we had no cops. I was involved with another mafia later in life and wasn't around long enough to ever see it work from a bad guy's perspective. I am 100% clear on it now. Hope I have answered your questions.
Dannylonglegs Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 *Snip* I will claim once the vote reaches 50% +1. Too easy for a Day 1. Thanks Sheridan Well, that's an unwelcome surprise. I'm aware that you have not participated in quite as many games (of life) as some of us have, but I'd reckon even a tenderfoot like yourself would have the common sense to realize that claiming you'll claim is practically the same as claiming! It doesn't matter to the scum whether you're an investigator or a blocker or a lover, they want you dead. Unless you're the revenant, your job is to lay low until you've done something useful. As it is, objectively speaking, you haven't really done anything particularly useful yet, and already you've painted a Smith and Wesson target on your back. That is of course if you're even telling the truth that you're a Town PR, which it's just as possible you aren't. I'm going out on a limb and thinking that if you had a team of scum backing you, you wouldn't come off nearly this confused and flaily, but even there I have my doubts. If you are a PR, and you don't lynch yourself, I wish you luck tonight.
Darkdragon Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 Well, quite a lot has happened while I've been attending to paperwork today. Wait, what do I mean by paperwork? Oh goodness, that could be sinister secret things that I accidentally typed just now! Anyway, folks, I see a lot of talking. A few of you, well I've seen you around town before and let me tell you, you are acting a bit strange today. Now I'm not going to say who all I suspect because, let's face it, we can only catch one person a day and hope they are the right one. I don't want the others trying to stop doing what they are doing that makes me suspect them. Number one on my list is <looking around at everyone suspiciously> Esther. Yes, Esther. The pretty lady with the plain shirt. You may be wanting to ask "But, why, Drake?" Let me tell you why. First time she spoke, Esther was already accusing folks. Yesterday she never said hello to us, just showed up, right in the middle of the day (not too suspicious by itself, but still worth noting). Even when she wasn't being really accused of anything, she was overly defensive with lots of quoting. Has some sort of list of people already who she thinks is good or bad...this soon, a list..really? We have nothing to go on here, nobody should have any sort of solid list or even a 50/50 at this point, that is nobody except those who do know and who need to cast doubt on others. Vote:Esther Thompson (Esurient)
Tamamono Posted June 26, 2013 Author Posted June 26, 2013 Vote Count Esther Thompson (Esurient) - 5 (Kadabra, CallMePie, Trumpetking, mostlytechnic, Darkdragon) Michael Thompson (Mencot) - 2 (Capt. Redblade, Bob) Caleb Norman (Captain Nemo) - 1(Scubacarrot) Sheridan Thompson (Scubacarrot) - 1 (Zakura) 36 hours until Sunset.
TheBoyWonder Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I don't like how Kimberley is using the defence of I didn't know what to say or I didn't have anything to add. As a townie, you always have to add something, be it a brief agreement with a post or Sheridans claim, or disagreeing with a post or answering a question. However, I'm not quite sure whether to read quiet townie or scum on you. But I also see the points made against Esther. I echo Damien's points, even if you survive the lynch, you will die or be blocked, because the Scum will know that you have a PR. That is all if you are town of course. But I read it as a scum flail, extremely similar to some of the work I had done in Yakuza, trying desperately to move the lynch onto someone else. Therefore, I Vote:Esther Thompson (Esurient)
Recommended Posts