russs15 Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 (edited) All the Landspeeders At the back, 7110, 4501, 8092 and 75052 At the front, re-creations of the Comic Con and Bag Charm Landspeeders Small scale Star Destroyers At the back, 30056, 4492 and the one from Super Star Destroyer 10221 At the front from 7958 R2 D2 Minifigures The first two are from numerous sets, followed by... Y Wing 8037, Ewok Village 10236 and Jedi Interceptor 75038/Sandcrawler 75059 R2 D2 Minifigure Keychains inc LED torch Edited August 16, 2014 by russs15 Quote
Nom Carver Posted August 16, 2014 Author Posted August 16, 2014 Thanks russs! I will update the front page right away. Quote
EvilBlackSheep Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 I'm not sure i'm at the right place but since it's the comparison topic, i guess it's appropriate. I would have love to have Lego SW fans advice, is it worth it buying the latest version of the millenium falcon (7965) if I already have the old version of it from 2000 (7190)? And if yes (or no) why? I'm not just looking at the sake of having one of everything, but i'm seriously wondering how much better (or worse but i doubt it ) is the new one Quote
Nom Carver Posted September 7, 2014 Author Posted September 7, 2014 (edited) I'm not sure i'm at the right place but since it's the comparison topic, i guess it's appropriate. I would have love to have Lego SW fans advice, is it worth it buying the latest version of the millenium falcon (7965) if I already have the old version of it from 2000 (7190)? And if yes (or no) why? I'm not just looking at the sake of having one of everything, but i'm seriously wondering how much better (or worse but i doubt it ) is the new one This is not a very popular topic but I can give you my opinion, 7965 (the new one) seems to be sturdier and has other features and little details that 4504 (the second one) doesnt have but is not significantly superior, specially if you are not going to be swoshing and playing around with it (only for display purposes), but if you had 7190 (the oldest one), this should be an instant buy too have one of the most iconic ships with a proper look, so my opinion is: if you have 4504 (the second one), and you want it for display only, dont buy 7965 (the new one). if you have 4504 (the second one), and you want to move it from one place to another, buy 7965 (the new one). if you have 7190 (the oldest one), buy 7965 (the new one) and sell the oldest one or store it, I am pretty sure that if it is in perfect state you could get a good amount of cash. If you want someone else's opinion head over to the Post your general LEGO Star Wars questions here topic, but feel free to come and ask over here and check the images to see it by your self. Edited September 7, 2014 by Nom Carver Quote
Jdurg Posted September 8, 2014 Posted September 8, 2014 The 7965 MF was the very first Star Wars set I ever bought earlier this year. It is an incredible set that is very durable, fairly accurate, and is great for display and playability. I would highly suggest it. Quote
EvilBlackSheep Posted September 8, 2014 Posted September 8, 2014 Thanks for your advice :) I'll go ask in the other topic to get more opinions but for sure I'm keeping yours in mind. I definitely have the first one (7190) so I'm gonna think about upgrading. Quote
Nom Carver Posted September 8, 2014 Author Posted September 8, 2014 Thanks for your advice :) I'll go ask in the other topic to get more opinions but for sure I'm keeping yours in mind. I definitely have the first one (7190) so I'm gonna think about upgrading. I am glad to be helpful. Quote
Elephant Knight Posted September 20, 2014 Posted September 20, 2014 I find your lack of Star Destroyers disturbing. Imperial Star Destroyers by Elephant-Knight, on Flickr There, problem solved. Quote
Darth Nader Posted September 20, 2014 Posted September 20, 2014 "Impressive, most impressive" Sorry to bother you, but can you take a picture of the system sets 2006 SD and 2014 SD together? I want to see the size difference. Quote
Gremer Posted September 20, 2014 Posted September 20, 2014 Could someone post a side-by-side comparison of the Clone Wars Jedi Starfighters? Quote
Elephant Knight Posted September 21, 2014 Posted September 21, 2014 "Impressive, most impressive" Sorry to bother you, but can you take a picture of the system sets 2006 SD and 2014 SD together? I want to see the size difference. Sure. I'll try and get to that tomorrow, if I have time. Quote
Elephant Knight Posted September 21, 2014 Posted September 21, 2014 Okay, here is the comparison shot asked for: 6211 and 75055 by Elephant-Knight, on Flickr ISD 002 by Elephant-Knight, on Flickr I actually plan on doing a full review of these two against each each other. Quote
Nom Carver Posted September 21, 2014 Author Posted September 21, 2014 (edited) I find your lack of Star Destroyers disturbing. Imperial Star Destroyers by Elephant-Knight, on Flickr There, problem solved. All official models!!! :wub: , I will update the first page right away. Edited September 21, 2014 by Nom Carver Quote
Darth Nader Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 Okay, here is the comparison shot asked for: [snip] 6211 and 75055 by Elephant-Knight, on Flickr by Elephant-Knight, on Flickr I actually plan on doing a full review of these two against each each other. Thanks for the great pictures It seems that there is a substantial difference in size, yet IIRC the original SD only had about 5 more pieces than the new one. I can't wait for your upcoming review. Quote
arc Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 Saw that no one compared the at-rt sets, so I decided to fill that gap: Let's keep this thread going! Quote
rollermonkey Posted October 7, 2014 Posted October 7, 2014 By January 1st, I expect a picture of all the iterations of Slave I. Quote
GallardoLU Posted October 7, 2014 Posted October 7, 2014 By January 1st, I expect a picture of all the iterations of Slave I. I am currently working on getting the missing ones for my collection, leading up to the release of the UCS. can't say for sure i'll get them all by then but I think I have enough time Quote
Mr Man Posted October 7, 2014 Posted October 7, 2014 Saw that no one compared the at-rt sets, so I decided to fill that gap: Do you have the 2 seater version from the Clone Battlepack? Quote
arc Posted October 7, 2014 Posted October 7, 2014 Do you have the 2 seater version from the Clone Battlepack? unfortunately not, but is that an at-rt? I thought it was a different vehicle. Quote
GallardoLU Posted October 7, 2014 Posted October 7, 2014 unfortunately not, but is that an at-rt? I thought it was a different vehicle. It was called simply "Clone Walker" and is similar to an AT-RCT (minus the side shields and appears to be slightly smaller) Quote
Mr Man Posted October 7, 2014 Posted October 7, 2014 unfortunately not, but is that an at-rt? I thought it was a different vehicle. It's pretty much a AT-RT. Quote
Venkefedo Posted October 7, 2014 Posted October 7, 2014 It's pretty much a AT-RT. Closer, as Gallardo said, to an AT-RCT; it's about the right size for a proper AT-RT, but needs several mods to make it work as a proper AT-RT (like in the one Arc posted). Quote
Mr Man Posted October 7, 2014 Posted October 7, 2014 Closer, as Gallardo said, to an AT-RCT; it's about the right size for a proper AT-RT, but needs several mods to make it work as a proper AT-RT (like in the one Arc posted). Oh, I just thought that was a typo, I've never heard of one of those before. Quote
Venkefedo Posted October 7, 2014 Posted October 7, 2014 They're bigger (probably closer to the size of the middle AT-RT in the comparison pic) with extra stuff on the sides, and seat two (tho I think the two are side by side, rather than front & back), but it feels more like the little BP walker anyway. I hadn't heard of it until mentioned here, too! I still haven't nabbed the 501st AT-RT yet...partly because it's so gigantic. It's more to scale with Hasbro SW figures that minifigures! Quote
Nom Carver Posted October 7, 2014 Author Posted October 7, 2014 (edited) Saw that no one compared the at-rt sets, so I decided to fill that gap: Let's keep this thread going! Thanks for that one, we really needed this one . Edited October 7, 2014 by Nom Carver Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.