Nom Carver Posted October 12, 2015 Author Posted October 12, 2015 Thanks guys, I updated the first post with your pics. Quote
Artanis I Posted October 13, 2015 Posted October 13, 2015 I think the 2nd Maul face is the best. I only have the CW and the awful 3rd one. Quote
Nom Carver Posted October 13, 2015 Author Posted October 13, 2015 I think the 2nd Maul face is the best. I only have the CW and the awful 3rd one. Agreed! after that one they only started to look quite awful. Quote
Nom Carver Posted October 1, 2016 Author Posted October 1, 2016 AT-ST comparison at Brick Fanatics: http://brickfanatics.co.uk/75153-at-st-walker-review/ Quote
LiLmeFromDaFuture Posted October 1, 2016 Posted October 1, 2016 Many thanks Nom Carver! The AT-ST has certainly com a long way from its first set. Despite the clunky appearance of the legs, the Rogue One version is clearly LEGO's best! Quote
1980-Something-Space-Guy Posted October 1, 2016 Posted October 1, 2016 (edited) Thanks for the comparison link! Now I feel the pull to the consumerist side... Gotta get that new AT-ST... Edited October 1, 2016 by BrickHat Quote
TWP Posted October 2, 2016 Posted October 2, 2016 Wow, the new AT-ST looks bigger then I expected, quite a bit taller then Lego last's rendition. Hoping it won't dwarf the AT-AT walker Quote
Nom Carver Posted October 2, 2016 Author Posted October 2, 2016 17 hours ago, LiLmeFromDaFuture said: The AT-ST has certainly com a long way from its first set. Despite the clunky appearance of the legs, the Rogue One version is clearly LEGO's best! Indeed, it is a huge improvement over its predecessors (unlike many other vehicles), yet some of the older versions still have some charm to themselves. 17 hours ago, BrickHat said: Thanks for the comparison link! Now I feel the pull to the consumerist side... Gotta get that new AT-ST... Give up and join the consumer side. 14 minutes ago, TWP said: Wow, the new AT-ST looks bigger then I expected, quite a bit taller then Lego last's rendition. Hoping it won't dwarf the AT-AT walker Sadly it does, the new AT-AT looks puny beside this guy, specially because its huge head compared to the skinny body. Quote
1980-Something-Space-Guy Posted October 2, 2016 Posted October 2, 2016 6 hours ago, Nom Carver said: Give up and join the consumer side. Fair enough, once I have more money again I will. Quote
wesker Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 The latest AT-ST is a massive improvement over the first two. I still think the Battle of Endor one holds up rather well though. The size and proportions are quite nice even if it lacks the polish of the newest version. Quote
BrickBob Studpants Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 I made a comparison picture of all light-flesh versions of Qui-Gon Jinn: Quote
Forresto Posted January 27, 2017 Posted January 27, 2017 What an amazing topic and source of reference. I cant believe ive missed this for so long. I might have some model comparisons I can contribute. Quote
arc Posted January 27, 2017 Posted January 27, 2017 ] I unfortunately don't own the original AAT from the early 2000's, but here's a comparison between the newer two. Quote
Nom Carver Posted January 28, 2017 Author Posted January 28, 2017 (edited) Thanks guys! this topic is still alive because of you!!! , frontpage updated. Qui-Gon Jinn comparison by Lego-Freak: AAT comparison by arc: Edited January 28, 2017 by Nom Carver Quote
eliminator Posted May 21, 2017 Posted May 21, 2017 Sorry for the thread bump, any updates? This is a great topic! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.