Mafia After Dark - Night 3: Reservoir Dogs

[CorneliusMurdock]

Doggy, you're on to something with me? I don't recall you saying anything about me until I was brought up as an alternative to lynching you.

And Person A is only suspicious because Kris suspects them of passing information about their conversation to you. If you're not scum, you'd have no logical reason to suspect them. But you'd rather anyone go down than you.

I don't know what to say to you, dad. You're misinterpreting my behavior. You seem like a smart guy and I'd like to ask you at least think about alternative explanations about why I may not be playing exactly like some other recent situations.

[def]

And Person A is only suspicious because Kris suspects them of passing information about their conversation to you. If you're not scum, you'd have no logical reason to suspect them. But you'd rather anyone go down than you.

Good point.

[Chillax Darth Frodo]

Since the Town is usually trying to form a block behind the scenes to verify everyone and we can't do that, perhaps we open this game up and have everyone claim their roles...

[Peanuts]

Vote: Dogukan Akbulut (Dragonator)

I don't see why I shouldn't believe that Kristina is telling the truth, and she had some good points about Dogukan before. I was ready to lynch him last night, and I still am.

I don't care if they are all in the same group of Associates. Pudgy Peter is just a gut instinct. I basically don't like that he suggested there was a Cult. Scum often try to scare and confuse and suggesting there's a Cult is always a good way to do both.

I just brought a cult up as an example of a third party without a kill. We were lacking a kill and some people seemed to assume one kill had failed.

My top three is:

1. Dogukan: I don't think I have to elaborate on him. If I understand him right he pretended to be blocked from talking, and his defenses have been confusing and illogical.

2. Rolfe: I have voted for him before, and his behavior hasn't changed. Additionally to everything I said before, he seems to be taking the middle road. Also:

I think by this point we'd all agreed the tuxedo killer was probably the scum killer, so why did Peter seem to think otherwise? Was he trying to deflect suspicion away from the SK?

Why would I do this? I still am not sure the tuxedo killer is scum. His targets so far have been Jamie and Donny, both would have been excellent SK targets. And the presumed SK has only killed Shane, who makes for an odd SK target, but for a perfect scum target. And why in the world would I deflect suspicion away from the SK by painting him as scum killer?

3. I've been thinking about this spot, and I think I'd give it to Terrence. It's not a strong suspicion (not as strong as Dogukan and Rolfe), but he's been keeping in the middle of the road; never too silent, but never too proactive.

[CorneliusMurdock]

Since the Town is usually trying to form a block behind the scenes to verify everyone and we can't do that, perhaps we open this game up and have everyone claim their roles...

You think so? If we'd even taken down a scum or two already, it might make more sense. It seems like doing it now would only advantage the scum.

If it's something you'd really like to try though, perhaps we should vote on that as well?

[TrumpetKing]

Since the Town is usually trying to form a block behind the scenes to verify everyone and we can't do that, perhaps we open this game up and have everyone claim their roles...

It's a good idea, but it's one that I have a hard time rationalizing because we can't open PM's for our PR's to form a strategy, which basically leaves us with what we already have, but we'd then just know everybody's role and such. I think it benefits the scum just a little bit more in this case, and I'm open to voting, I'll just vote "No" for now.

[Captain Nemo]

Since the Town is usually trying to form a block behind the scenes to verify everyone and we can't do that, perhaps we open this game up and have everyone claim their roles...

I would vote no on that. It would open up town PR's to be killed, and then having the PR's form strategies in public would only make it easier for scum to avoid/block/etc. them. And I agree with Colin that a strategy such as that is better when we've taken down a few scum first.

---

Voting wise, I'll have to go with Dogfoodbowl. As I've said earlier, he's just top on my list, and lying about being silenced so he didn't have to talk, plus all the Kristina/Shane/Person A things just makes him come off as the most scummy to me.

Vote: Dogukan Akbulut (Dragonator)

[Chillax Darth Frodo]

Kristina could connect them in private if she is who she says. Did Shabe ever confirm he was talking to her?

[Captain Nemo]

Did Shabe ever confirm he was talking to her?

No, Shane was dead before she said anything (Which is actually the reason she did say her ability in public because Shane was killed).

[Tamamono]

Vote Count

Doğukan Akbulut (Dragonator) - 6 (CorneliusMurdock, Trumpetking, def, Cecilie, Peanuts, Captain Nemo)

Colin Malone (CorneliusMurdock) - 2 (Chillax Darth Frodo, Dragonator)

39 hours until Dawn.

Edited September 6, 2013 by Tamamono

[def]

Since the Town is usually trying to form a block behind the scenes to verify everyone and we can't do that, perhaps we open this game up and have everyone claim their roles...

Hmmm. Give scum a roadmap to who to kill.... Interesting strategy. I'm gonna say no on that one, and hope the instincts of town and the advantage of having town being able to build a PM network day by day lets us overpower scum.

The first couple days are often dark, so I think our luck will turn around soon.

Why would I do this? I still am not sure the tuxedo killer is scum. His targets so far have been Jamie and Donny, both would have been excellent SK targets. And the presumed SK has only killed Shane, who makes for an odd SK target, but for a perfect scum target. And why in the world would I deflect suspicion away from the SK by painting him as scum killer?

Why would Jamie and Donny be excellent SK targets?

[Cecilie]

Since the Town is usually trying to form a block behind the scenes to verify everyone and we can't do that, perhaps we open this game up and have everyone claim their roles...

Unless you have some brilliant strategy to protect them, they'd be toast pretty fast... I doubt this is going to help us more than it hurts us at this point.

[Peanuts]

Why would Jamie and Donny be excellent SK targets?

Both were good players, who might have posed a thread later on (Donny more so than Jamie), but both were relatively unlikely to be protected/watched at the time.

I'm against all our roles claiming in public. We can't protect all of them.

[Pandora]

Here's the three I am suspicious with:

Colin - As I've outlined earlier in previous days.

Dogukan - I am not going to repeat what others have said before, but I am going to add this:

I am not sure why as to he would post in the day thread if he was told to go to sleep. The lynch only occurs in the night so he always have the opportunity to come by night time to say whatever he wanted to say. He said he would be back later but I guess we are still waiting.

Rolfe -

Interesting to note that change in position.

Now you list him as one of your suspects. What changed? Twice?

This entire post is either you repeating yourself, you repeating other people (me), or you saying you're not going to repeat yourself. Could we have some original contributions from you, please?

You are Scum, Dogfoodcan.

Glad to see you've caught up with the rest of us.

So Patricia, care to drop a knowledge bomb on us? Shane was town. What does that tell you? And since you haven't decided on Dogukan (or hadn't, to be fair), who are you going to push for a lynch? Now is the time to live up to your talk. I imagine Shane's towniness will be a deciding factor since you made such an issue out of it

In the meantime, I'm going to:

Vote: Dogukan (Dragonator)

He's suspicious, and we just need to know. Patricia and Penelope are against investigating him, half the town already finds him suspicious, and we can't go forward with this hanging over us.

I'm really curious about Bernard and Colin. I don't think they are putting on a show here. Between Colin's reactions to Bernard, and his happy echoing of my interest in getting Dogukan investigated (which is scummy to me in a way that suggesting it in the first place isn't, Patricia, since scum often like to be second or third in all things), he's looking suss. I would suggest investigating Colin tonight, but I don't want to listen to Patricia harp on me any more

Oh Dexter, you know I love it when you go all tough guy. I hope I haven't upset you.

Skadoosh! Here's a knowledge bomb! Except I haven't got one, sorry, only one of Byr-Byr's old plastic bunches of flowers, but I really don't know what you were expecting. Let's recap:

You said you wanted to know what Byr-Byr's alignment was, I wondered why you weren't interested in Shane's alignment as well, you said it wouldn't make any difference to anything, I said that there was always the possibility it would make some difference, you said nope, it made no difference whatsoever. For me, if Shane had been shown to be scum, for instance, it would have ruled the zombie MO out as the scum kill. Out of interest, you were fascinated to know Byr-Byr's alignment, so what game-breaking revelations did that tell you, Dexie-poo?

And let's put the "Patricia's against investigating Dogfood" into perspective too. I thought, and still very much believe, that discussing who to investigate openly in the thread is a silly idea; an action that opens itself up to interference from the scum to give us an unreliable result at best, and an outed investigator (and who knows what else) at worst. What was that you said about a "roadmap for the scum"? A clever and strong man like you really shouldn't be spouting silly ideas like that, and as a wise man once said "scum or dumb?", so yeah, suggesting it in the first place is actually quite scummy. And because it's a silly idea, agreeing with it is also quite scummy (Colin and Rolfe). And suggesting it again for somebody else (Colin) is still scummy, because it's still a silly idea. Nice way to try to distance yourself from Uncle Colin, though.

If you do decide to lynch me, do at least consider these thoughts tomorrow. I shall Vote: Colin Malone (Cornelius Murdock).

I kinda think Uncle Colin's scum too, Dogbreath. You got bussed, now you're trying to gain distance. But that's just my opinion.

Voting wise, I'll have to go with Dogfoodbowl. As I've said earlier, he's just top on my list, and lying about being silenced so he didn't have to talk, plus all the Kristina/Shane/Person A things just makes him come off as the most scummy to me.

He lied about being silenced? How do you know this? Are you sure he wasn't actually silenced and hoped a public penalty would make him look more townie? He didn't get that public penalty, apparently it was private, and I still don't really get what was so urgent to post that couldn't have waited until tonight, but you know he lied? How?

Hmmm. Give scum a roadmap to who to kill.... Interesting strategy. I'm gonna say no on that one, and hope the instincts of town and the advantage of having town being able to build a PM network day by day lets us overpower scum.

Oh, yeah, that's where you mentioned the roadmap, but more interestingly, what on earth makes you think the PM network builds every day? It wouldn't seem unreasonable to me that Kristina had limited shots and decided to start using them early, or it could indeed be every day, but the only person who knows, presumably, is Kristina herself.

And before I forget, I Vote: Doğukan Akbulut (Dragonator).

[Chillax Darth Frodo]

plus all the Kristina/Shane/Person A things just makes him come off as the most scummy to me.

Oh, what a perfect explanation. Those "things". What about his involvement with the Kristina/Shane/Person A "things" makes you think he's so Scummy. Please explain.

Slut...

That's all sarcasm again.

Hi Adelaide! Here to scummily repeat what everyone else has said?

You seem like a smart guy and I'd like to ask you at least think about alternative explanations about why I may not be playing exactly like some other recent situations.

You think I can't figure out what you're trying to say here? You think a group of four of five scumbags couldn't figure it out too? Let's give a little credit to the SK while we're at it.

5 points to anyone who can tell Grandpa the Mafia term for what Colon just did.

[CorneliusMurdock]

I really couldn't tell you what your colon did but I'm not cleaning it up.

[Chillax Darth Frodo]

Listen you, if I wanted to hear from a Colon, I'd take a shit.

[Captain Nemo]

He lied about being silenced? How do you know this? Are you sure he wasn't actually silenced and hoped a public penalty would make him look more townie? He didn't get that public penalty, apparently it was private, and I still don't really get what was so urgent to post that couldn't have waited until tonight, but you know he lied? How?

A short time back, Dogfoodcan said this in his reply to the events:

Simple actually, I had a genius idea to try and indicate that I had, indeed, been prevented from talking and was not simply avoiding you all. Sadly it seems we do indeed receive private warnings, so that backfired somewhat, however I can still say that I have indeed been warned and I was indeed told not to post during the day; someone was clearly trying to silence me so they could continue with this ridiculous attempt to frame me for... not much right?

Here, Dogfoodcan seems to be saything that he made up the fact that he had been "silenced". Though he also apparently seems to be also saything it was true and that he did get a warning from Tam. Either way, I took it as him lying, and so did a few others (Peter brings it up further up this page as well); and the whole situation of it just adds more scummness to him in my view; since he's making up reasons to avoid talking.

Oh, what a perfect explanation. Those "things". What about his involvement with the Kristina/Shane/Person A "things" makes you think he's so Scummy. Please explain.

I meant "Things" in the sense of the events, like Kristina saying she thought it had to have been Shane talking (Or because of their apparent closeness in games of life) to Dogfoodcan, which led to the slip up and Shane's death (Indicating that Dogfoodcan is scum), ergo making Dogfoodcan scum.

[Chillax Darth Frodo]

I kinda think Uncle Colin's scum too, Dogbreath. You got bussed, now you're trying to gain distance. But that's just my opinion.

Don't you try to claim that opinion all for yourself! I want to have it too! Yes, this is what I was assuming from the minute Dogfoodcan opened his mouth and Colon came out.

[Pandora]

Yes, this is what I was assuming from the minute Dogfoodcan opened his mouth and Colon came out.

Eeeewwww.

[Tamamono]

Vote Count

Doğukan Akbulut (Dragonator) - 7 (CorneliusMurdock, Trumpetking, def, Cecilie, Peanuts, Captain Nemo, Pandora)

Colin Malone (CorneliusMurdock) - 2 (Chillax Darth Frodo, Dragonator)

31 hours until Dawn

Edited September 6, 2013 by Tamamono

[Capt. Redblade]

Dammit! I was sure Byron was scum.

So, Shane was town. Does that mean Person A was scum and in communication with Doğ-breath? Are we even still sure Hound Doğ is scum?

I too am waiting am waiting with bated breath to hear Kristina's answers on this matter.

What changed, Rolfe?.....

I'll give my list of suspicions now.

1) Doğ the Bounty Hunter - the reasons should be obvious, seein' as everyone and their grandma's repeated them. Between Doğ-and-pony-show over there and Kristina's mysterious contacts, something definitely ain't right.

2) Person A. I don't know who he or she is, but Kristina says they're the only other one who could've known about her being suspicious of Shane. If Shane didn't talk to Doğ-leg - and I don't buy into the "two Communication Experts" theory that someone floated (might even have been Doğ himself, I'm not sure) - then either Person A did or Doğ is just scarily, superhumanly perceptive, which I doubt. I know Kristina doesn't like the possibility, but if we lynch Doğ and he flips scum, we'll have to look at Person A.

3) I wasn't too sure who to put here for a while, but this post caught my eye:

I think by this point we'd all agreed the tuxedo killer was probably the scum killer, so why did Peter seem to think otherwise? Was he trying to deflect suspicion away from the SK?

Unless some bizarre celestial alignment occurs to bring radical new information to light, I think I'm going to vote for Old-Doğ-New-Tricks. He's got a big ol' question mark floating over his head right now, and question marks cannot go unattended. Whether he's scum or not could help us decide what to do in the coming days.

.... Or are we witnessing a bussing?

My first post was made in the heat of the moment. Shane flipping town caught me a bit off-guard and I wasn't quite sure what to think. Thus, why I wondered aloud if we were sure Admiral Akbulut was scum. However, after rereading the threads and giving it a bit more thought, I came to the conclusion that him being scum was the outcome that simply made the most sense when compared against the testimony we've been given.

Since the Town is usually trying to form a block behind the scenes to verify everyone and we can't do that, perhaps we open this game up and have everyone claim their roles...

Ummmmm... no.

When we're in a position where we haven't even got a single scum (hopefully subject to change very soon), then doing something like this would only help the scum, as they'd be pretty much free to choose who to pick off during the day. If we even have a protector, he can only protect so many people.

I'm actually starting to ponder if I should move Peter out of the third spot on my list and instead give it to Bernard. He's only been possessed by this weird Sith-hobbit creature for a day but already he's been going into overdrive. He's swiftly become an extremely aggressive player, and it almost seems to me like he's overcompensating. He pretty much jumped down Candy and Cebastiane's throats for not immediately responding to his request for suspect lists the minute he asked. He's been on Colin's back for a good chunk of the day because... why exactly? His list of suspects?

First, let me say that, yes, I realize that my contributions have been spotty in the last couple time periods. It was beyond my control. Sometimes they don't let me out of that rubber room and it takes me a while to escape. I promise to practice picking that particular lock and contribute more.

My top suspects (besides the ostrich [stop looking at me, damn it!]):

1 Dog-face Doggy Dog- Because of Kristina's information leak. Best lead we've had so far.

2 Cap'n Rolfe- a fashion nightmare. Vocal but pointing in the wrong direction mostly.

3 the Cop Talbott- Get a haircut, hippy! Just a feeling but I was wrong about Shane before, so....

But really, I think it's either Doggy or the Ostrich we should lynch today.

Yeah, Colin didn't justify his suspicions too well but it doesn't automatically strike me as scummy. Sheepish, sure, but not really scummy.

Bernard still seems to agree with the general consensus that All-Doğs-Go-to-Heaven is scum, but he's voting for Colin based on what I would argue is some flimsy evidence. Is he protecting a scummy teammate?

And of course his suggestion that the PRs just blatantly reveal themselves to everyone. This is not only a monumentally stupid idea, especially seeing as there are scum still out there, but it reeks of fishing.

At present, I'm more confident about lynching Doğ-With-A-Bone, but I think we should start paying a bit closer attention to Bernard. After all...

Yes, bring on the scrutiny, no problem, as long as there's talking. Talk it up, bitches? Am I Scummy? What do you think? Is Colin contributing less because Shane is dead and he's Scum and he needs to lie low now? Why is Candy so slutty? Let's go. Talk talk talk talk talk talk talk!

I demand that you all talk!

Yes, I am the patriarch and you will all "smooch up" to me! Mwahahahahahahaha!

He did ask for it.

Before I forget:

Vote: Hair-of-the-Doğ-That-Bit-Me Akbulut (Dragonator)

[Purpearljellyblob]

This entire post is either you repeating yourself, you repeating other people (me), or you saying you're not going to repeat yourself. Could we have some original contributions from you, please?

Bernard asked for a list of suspects and why so that's the whole purpose of the post. Bernard is basically asking everyone for a nice summary of their own suspicions i.e. to repeat themselves and repeat what has been already said.

Well, not everyone repeated themselves, because I am surprised to say Terrence had me on his list for some metagame reason. I don't really know who Terrence is, I don't think he called my name or talked to me for the past few days and he is suddenly suspicious of me. I believe the reason he had for being suspicious of me is because of me being one of the people here whom he never really noticed.

OK, so why I'm not liking Adelaide.

First, she is one of the people here who I never really notice. Priscilla and Cebastien also fall into this category for me as well, but lately I've been noticing more from Cebastien, so I will leave him befor now. Second, she seems to join in on the case against me, repeating what Bernard has said, and also adding that I've been posting with a head full of hot air. I'm not sure what's making her think that, since I believe I have a pretty decent idea of what's going on, and I'm not mindlessly posting things. If she's referring to the post where I accidentally called Shane Person A, then that's warranted, but other than that, I see nothing of mine that really screams "Wow, he doesn't know what the hell he's talking about". Is it possible she's trying to put more blame on me to make me appear scummier? I think it is very possible, and I'll be sureto watch out for Adelaide.

Terrence had a lot to say about Adelaide and Cebastian, but I managed to somehow made it to his list of suspects even though I can't find anywhere he explained why I was suspicious, other than some metagame reason and "people here whom he never really noticed". Can you fill me up on this Terrence? Also, at this point into all the discussions, you are still metagaming?

I guess everyone listed their suspicions except for Dogukan. But while revisiting what had happened, I realised that Penelope's behaviour is rather interesting.

Her first post is this:

Interestingly enough, I'd have an eye out on all of the current "associates" of the family. Not all of them make my list though.

Dogukan is certainly on it. He's said nothing of worth and hasn't even tried to appear helpful. The only times he's really talked was to defend himself.

I don't really know if I can list the two next people I find the most scummy, but I can tell you that my list looks pretty similar to what Patricia gave us.

So Patricia is suspicious of Dogukan, Dexter, Colin, Rolfe, Terrence and Candy, and Penelope did not even say how similar her list is compared to Patricia. 0-100% similar?

Second post:

The Great Byron (Bob) - 9 (Capt. Redblade, Trumpetking, def, Palathadric, Cecilie, Purpearljellyblob, Pandora, Kristel, jamesn)

Cap'n Rolfe (Capt. Redblade) - 3 (Adam, Captain Nemo, Peanuts)

Doğukan Akbulut (Dragonator) - 1 (Bob)

A dead person (Shadows) - 1 (CorneliusMurdock)

Kristina Malone (Kristel) - 1 (Dragonator)

Oddly enough, most of my suspects did not end up voting for Byron.

I would like to think Penelope is buying time as to who she should suspect. Penelope's hesitance doesn't sit well with me.

Adelaide has not really been on my suspicions list ever, but she has hardly spoken about anything except the "policy lynch" issue. She argued it with Jamie and the captain throughout night and day one, and then did little more than show up on night two to cast a vote. She hasn't yet given me that scumy vibe yet, and today her speech seems at least a bit more worthwhile. Also, all of the people on her list would be on my list although some further down from the top three.

Nice use of the words 'ever' and 'but'. Penelope seemed to agree with Adelaide's list as well (Dogukan, Terrence, Rolfe).

Cap'n Rolfe is a bit of an odd character. He struck me as suspicious from the beginning. He accused Shane of being passive, but then backed down quickly when Shane didn't say anything. Now that Shane flipped town, though, I'm not sure what to think. I would have thought that if he were scum, he would try to use Shane's passiveness to his advantage. All throughout Night 1 and Day 2 he stuck to his guns about policy lynching until it almost seemed a bit forced. You know it's supposedly a town-tell to be stubborn and not back down or whatever, but it almost seemed like he was sticking to a lost cause on purpose to look town. I still think it's very odd the way he seemed to twisty Jamie's words when he voted for her on Night 1. He also insisted on the Byron vote and started it off. Now admittedly I believe I forgot about Byron's Night 1 post explaining his vote for me, but for someone who was actively pushing for a vote on Byron, one would think that the captain would have been studying his words a bit better. Cap'n Rolfe was also quick to agree to Dexter's statement about the cop investigating Dogukan. All three of those people I have my suspicions on, but I think Dexter would be to a lesser extent than the other two. Still, I'm not sure if two scum would try to jump on a move for the cop to investigate a specific person when one would probably be enough. It doesn't seem likely.

Actually, looking over this list reignites my suspicions of Cap'n Rolfe, but, perhaps Jamie's thoughts on him being town decrease my suspicion.

Candy has also been rather odd. I don't really know what to think of him. He had a very lazy attitude on the first day and night and in general made wishy-washy statements (not to be hypocritical ). He was called out by Patricia and gave a weak response, finally voted Redblade, and then we saw this:

The first part comes after Jamie commented on a number of people saying that I "never sat well with them", etc after Dexter and Shane offered their suspicions of my thinking there wasn't much to be learned about speculating on the kills. It seems like Candy did not think at all before posting his thoughts about how suspicious I was and had to quickly come up with something, hence he settled on some obscure statements about my being a corrupt cop, etc. That already sounds like he's not really interested or actively looking for suspicious people, but then he makes the oddest statement about Jamie protecting Byron. He then gets Jamie's vote target mixed up with his own and imagines Jamie was going after Rolfe. It's possible that this was just a slip of the tongue, but was there a cause? It seems odd to accidentally insert the name of the person he was voting for himself. Perhaps he had forgotten whom he was accusing because he never really was interested in accusing them at all.

Oh, and then today there's this:

Now I have my doubts about this Person A and Kristina's tale, but Candy seems a little too desperate to find out who Person A, who could be our protector...possibly, is.

Sorry if this all came out a bit jumbled and mixed up. I'm in field work for a reason. Wasn't organized enough to sit behind a desk at the police station.

By the way, can't say I've noticed anything incredibly odd about Cebastian. No real suspicions there.

Colin jumped on Shane from the very beginning. Now Shane was acting a bit lackadaisically, but I kind of agree that there wasn't much going on and Day 1 lynches often don't turn out particularly well or helpfully. When Colin first jumped on him, I thought it seemed like it would be an ideal opportunity for scum to try to out a strong character early on, especially since Shane was doing little to protect himself, but just stating his feelings bluntly. However, when Shane continued on that path, I thought more and more that he must be scum. Colin disappeared for a while then, and after that he's not really done much at all. His post today was rather odd, but he did manage to give us three suspicions at least.

Something odd about him though, is that for someone who has a record of getting killed early on, he's still alive and kicking and doesn't seem very helpful. I would imagine that somebody of his reputation would be much more influential in helping town out, but he's certainly not been that way.

Apologies if sometimes I'm just recalling former events. I didn't want to start quoting all those posts, as some of them are quite long. Hopefully this will give you all at least a little something to work with.

Penelope finally listed Rolfe, Candy and Colin as his suspects. Taking all her suspicions together, we can see that Penelope is suspicious of Dogukan, Dexter, Colin, Rolfe, Terrence and Candy. Rolfe, Terrence and Dexter voted for Byron and the other 3 did not vote for Byron.

Penelope, care to explain why you said "Oddly enough, most of my suspects did not end up voting for Byron" when it is rather clear that half of your suspicions voted for Byron? I would like to think you made up your list along the way after seeing the lists of others but can you clear that up for me? Also what is your opinion on Dexter and Terrence? I don't think I have read your opinions on them, perhaps you could point them out to me?

[Tamamono]

Vote Count

Doğukan Akbulut (Dragonator) - 8 (CorneliusMurdock, Trumpetking, def, Cecilie, Peanuts, Captain Nemo, Pandora, Capt. Redblade)

Colin Malone (CorneliusMurdock) - 2 (Chillax Darth Frodo, Dragonator)

30 hours until Dawn

[def]

How squabbley things are getting. It's better than no talk, but an effort to sift through.

Are there four people yet to vote? Why can't everyone get a vote in during the first 24 hours of voting?