def Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Oh, these names. Very clever! Of course, no offense, God, but the names... It's hard to sort through all of this. Anyway, why Dufa why? What pings you about them? It's pretty much in my posts. At work, can't type much.
Waterbrick Down Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 I'm surprised nobody seemed to notice this? Wary's reasoning is sound but the person he's agreeing with and quoting is Chloe (I'm not typing that out), who did the exact same thing with Jarni. Why out of everybody looking at Mist at the time, did you choose the big friggin' sheep to agree with? Was it the most recent post at the time and you just wanted to look active? Were you just lending support to a scummy pal and trying to nudge him into the crowd of the people that're actually trying to figure things out? My agreement was more with Chlodochar's reasoning, not Jarni's hence why I voiced my support with him. Jarni brought up the comparison of Mist's actions to a previous individual, which I agree is a good analogy, but the more damnable evidence to me was Mist's reaction. I'm more surprised that there hasn't been any real thrust behind what some people are terming a bandwagon even though it only had 5 votes. If it were a bandwagon on an innocent Einherjar, I would have expected the servants of Loki to jump all over it. Considering that it has fizzled, makes me wonder if we might have caught one and his compatriots are trying to keep the fire off of him by bringing up other issues.
Hinckley Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Here's a quick summary (yes, a summary) of people's suspicions against the vote getters. Vote Count Mist (Mencot): 4 votes (Hinckley, Captain Genaro, Waterbrick Down, Rick) Early summaries and an odd rambling style that may just be a language barrier. The defensiveness towards Jarni is the big concern here. Wilhalm Bloodaxe (WhiteFang): 2 votes (Kristel, LegoDad) Short, nonsensical posts. Not around much, not responding to direct questions. name='TinyPiesRUs' timestamp='1385944380' post='1753193'][/b]Petr Half-Troll (Piratedave84): 2 votes (Captain Nemo, jamesn) Announcing his inactivity and then grouping his accusers into nonsensical categories, aka flailing. Sigrid (Sisco): 2 votes (CallMePie, Piratedave84) Refuses to talk. Sticking to a character trait or hiding behind it? Naemr Sledgehammer (Captain Nemo): 1 vote (Scubacarrot) Suggested gathering clues from the first game without actually acting upon it himself. Jarni Child-Sparer (jamesn): 1 vote (fhomess) Brought the initial suspicions against Mist but didn't place a vote for her. Passively leading a lynch. Snotra Carrotface (Scubacarrot): 1 vote (Bob) Gut instinct? Kolgrima the Deep-Minded (Kristel): 1 vote (Fugazi) For suspecting me! Just kidding. Defensive when compared to Petr and fixated on Helga, but who can blame her for that? Helga is sexy. I think Rurik summed up Kolgrima's odd behavior best when he pointed out that she accused me of trying to protect Dagstyr, but then said she didn't suspect Dagstyr. Chlodochar (Captain Genaro): 1 vote (Trumpetking) His vote seems like a forced re-hashing of other people's points. Trying to summarize but being an un-natural actor. Who would need to act? Scum would. Lefsi Red-Shirt (LegoDad): 1 vote (def) Not voting for the leading vote-getter and making a point to let everyone know it. _______ And yes, I don’t trust Helga. In fact, I don’t trust anyone or anything at this point. Do you believe that I should just blindly trust whatever Helga has to say? I know you’re not asking me but I would say no. I don’t trust anybody either but who do you think is trying to get you to trust me? I am wary of Helga. My gut is telling me not to trust her, so this may subconsciously have been a factor. Is there anything else making you feel that way? Because you are oddly fixated. You jump at being grouped with Petr like someone popped a paper bag behind you. If you felt Petr was “acting like an idiot” you should be able to discuss your opinion even if it’s similar to his. You know you’re not an idiot, right? Now you’re trying to say I was bringing up Dagstyr more than you. You're pinging me. Petr, the one who Kolgrima is so annoyed to be grouped with had this gem: I know my behaviour today is/was odd. It was intentional. I tried a risky move of making a call for people to scrutinize me; I wanted to see who would pounce. Today's reactions lead me to the following conclusions. 1) those who actively sought me out and scrutinized me the most are likely to be town 2) those who let te attention flow towards me and did not address my statements are likely to be scum or neutral; my comments drew attention away from them. Make no mistake, I am a member of the Einherjar and although my actions were odd, the intention has ways been to try to root out servants of Loki. *has always been Oh, the odd behavior was intentional. I see. Wow, you really showed the Scum... look at them, laying at our feet now. At this poine, we need to consolidate our votes. If Kolgrima's reaction is an indication that they're on the same team, then a Petr lynch would answer the same question. They're both weird and more people seem willing to vote for Petr. Unvote: Mist (Mencot) and vote: Petr Half-Troll (PirateDave84) And yet, I can't help but point out that Dagstyr hasn't contributed much at all. He's doing very well at flying under the radar. I expected him to acknowledge the discussion that revolved around him. Considering that it has fizzled, makes me wonder if we might have caught one and his compatriots are trying to keep the fire off of him by bringing up other issues. That's bugging me too. I think this is the vote tally now: Vote Count Mist (Mencot): 3 votes (Captain Genaro, Waterbrick Down, Rick) Wilhalm Bloodaxe (WhiteFang): 2 votes (Kristel, LegoDad) Petr Half-Troll (Piratedave84): 4 votes (Captain Nemo, jamesn, Cornelius Murdock, Hinckley) Sigrid (Sisco): 3 votes (CallMePie, Piratedave84, Bob) Naemr Sledgehammer (Captain Nemo): 1 vote (Scubacarrot) Jarni Child-Sparer (jamesn): 1 vote (fhomess) Kolgrima the Deep-Minded (Kristel): 1 vote (Fugazi) Chlodochar (Captain Genaro): 1 vote (Trumpetking) Lefsi Red-Shirt (LegoDad): 2 votes (def, Palathadric) It's still a damn mess.
CMP Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 That's not what I said at all. I won't jump on any bandwagons, I make up my own mind and post my reasoning, as always. Didn't realize I should do it on your schedule. The day's been open for 58 hours, and the only reason you've spoken up a second time is because I called you out on it. But I'm interested to see who you'll end up voting for in any case.
Fugazi Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 If it were a bandwagon on an innocent Einherjar, I would have expected the servants of Loki to jump all over it. Considering that it has fizzled, makes me wonder if we might have caught one and his compatriots are trying to keep the fire off of him by bringing up other issues. That, or bandwagonphobia?
Hinckley Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 That, or bandwagonphobia? Is that a real affliction? Because I have some ox urine...
CMP Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Oh, the odd behavior was intentional. I see. Wow, you really showed the Scum... look at them, laying at our feet now. At this poine, we need to consolidate our votes. If Kolgrima's reaction is an indication that they're on the same team, then a Petr lynch would answer the same question. They're both weird and more people seem willing to vote for Petr. I'm willing to vote for him. At the end of the day, lynches generally always get us some answers. Petr's excuse is a pretty poor one. Unvote: Sigrid (Sisco) and Vote: Petr Half-Troll (PirateDave).
CorneliusMurdock Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Personally I hate bandwagons. They're too loud and full of musicians that don't share their stash of medicinal herbs.
TrumpetKing Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 What?? *sigh* A.) I read her as scum just about every game she's played B.) Unless I'm mistaken, she's been town every game C.) She's being confusing like her past games D.) See B. E.) Therefore, I'm hesitant to vote for her. I'm about to put the Christmas tree up in the dining room, I'll be back to look at everybody who's recieved a vote's posts, so it mit take a while regardless.
CMP Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Personally I hate bandwagons. They're too loud and full of musicians that don't share their stash of medicinal herbs. Reminds me of the time me and Sorag Smoke-Face went to go slay the mighty Colorblind Cow of Constantinople. To this day I can't eat steak without a ringing moo in my ears and the stench of smoked weed caught in my nose.
Captain Genaro Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 (edited) Since there seems to be so much confusion, my name is Chlodochar. I remember all your Nordic names just fine and am really confused as to how you can’t remember the name of a true viking warrior . Well, if it appears that way, I guess that's as good a reason as any to condemn her to death.Yeah, I was suspicious of Mist at the time too, but you don't suspect somebody because they appear to be a good suspect. What the sheep? I did not condemn anyone to death. I simply placed a vote which would not have condemned her without the support of 11 others. Additionally, I can unvote. Placing a vote early on in the voting process on the first day allows me to pressure someone into talking. My vote was not necessarily concrete nor was it condemning, it simply showed where my suspicion was and who I felt other people should be suspicious of. That said, if that was all I had to go on and there were no better suspects for the day, yes, I would still vote for her. I understand that many of you feel that my vote was forced and was simply me jumping on a band wagon. At that time, Mist was the best suspect. Even ignoring the possible language barrier, her post was very defensive, far too defensive considering the post she was responding to. Naemr might have had a bad idea and not followed through on it, but I attribute this to a lack of experience. Nothing else he said makes me think scum. Petr made an incredibly dumb statement, and I would not mind him getting lynched. Nonetheless, I felt that Mist’s defensiveness was more telling than Petr’s stupidity. I don’t seem to understand your statement. You don’t suspect someone because they appear to be a good suspect? If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck (appears to be a duck), then I’m going to work off the assumption that I’m dealing with a duck. Vote Count Mist (Mencot): 3 votes (Captain Genaro, Waterbrick Down, Rick) Wilhalm Bloodaxe (WhiteFang): 2 votes (Kristel, LegoDad) Petr Half-Troll (Piratedave84): 4 votes (Captain Nemo, jamesn, Cornelius Murdock, Hinckley) Sigrid (Sisco): 3 votes (CallMePie, Piratedave84, Bob) Naemr Sledgehammer (Captain Nemo): 1 vote (Scubacarrot) Jarni Child-Sparer (jamesn): 1 vote (fhomess) Kolgrima the Deep-Minded (Kristel): 1 vote (Fugazi) Chlodochar (Captain Genaro): 1 vote (Trumpetking) Lefsi Red-Shirt (LegoDad): 2 votes (def, Palathadric) It's still a damn mess. It's been a while since I've played mafia games, but is it normal for this many people to have votes for them on Day 1? I recall one or two prime suspects, one of which would be lynched with 2, maybe 3 outliers. Unless this is the new norm, I can’t help but think this is the scums’ plan. Get us to be divided, confused, and prevent us from learning anything from a Day 1 lynch or voting pattern. Granted 6 people need to vote, but even if they all go for Petr, we won’t get a conviction. Sure they won’t get a townie lynched but perhaps they feel that several days of confusion is worth a lost lynch. Edited December 2, 2013 by Captain Genaro
WhiteFang Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 The vote is a mess and I will address my concerns as well for those who think I am suspicious. I am typing short and sweet and no value to add at this point in time, is because this is merely day 1 and we have hardly concrete clues to work on except working on our chatting behaviour in this game of life. Pretty ironic, and if we don't convict someone and then we will lose a day to get things moving, leaving the night to decide for one another for those gifted individuals. I may just be re-phrasing my wordings from time to time, but that does not mean anything. My only fear is that these Servants of Loki are probably gloating at us right now for being confused while they plot us to death in dark. I don't like this feeling and I don't trust any of you so easily as well. Furthermore, I am more suspicious of others who laid their votes easily just by gut feeling which does not quantify a certain person death by this sole justification. For all we know, we are being divided by the scums... I don't have a specific target vote in mind yet, but I am very much inclined to target people who are easily casting their votes in an irresponisble manner. An irresponsible player, be it vanilia, action player or scummy context, any of such sort is a liability to our winning cause to rid of these foul servants.
CMP Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 I don’t seem to understand your statement. You don’t suspect someone because they appear to be a good suspect? If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck (appears to be a duck), then I’m going to work off the assumption that I’m dealing with a duck. You worded it was though you were voting for her because it looked like she under heavy suspicion at the time and was already getting votes. An early bandwagon for you to jump on. It sounded very passive. 'I suspect so-and-so because....' gives a much different image than 'It looks like so-and-so is a good suspect.'
Hinckley Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Two things to point out: One, I don't want to mention until I have more info, but I'm sure we can all see it. I'm wondering why it's there. Two, there are 2 guests viewing this thread so either there's something in this thread that is interesting to unregistered members or we are close to getting a Servant of Loki.
Mencot Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Whoa that was alot of text that had appered while I was gone (sleeping) About the voting, nobody seems to know and have anything big to go on, but that is a normal day 1 maybe abit more spread in the votes than usual but a normal day 1 in EB mafia. Can say anything, I wouldn´t want to be an non voter but I don´t really have much. Sigrid sat and listened to the events of the day unfold, her brow furrowing more and more as time went on. She didn't really want to vote for anyone, but one stood out as the most odd to her. So, she wrote down her vote on a slip of paper and passed it toward the front of the hall. Vote: Mist (Mencot) This I didn´t understand, she doesn´t say much under the day then comes to vote... and it is not here vote I am wondering about but her voting style. But then she got so complains and unvoted me, make it even more strange... make her look like a bandvagoner, just jumping on things when she don´t act or think for herself. I originally found your comment weird but now it's clear that it's just your posting style. My concern with you is more about your defensiveness towards Jarni. You defended yourself but said that Jarni is "on your list of scummy scummos". Accusing your accuser. Yet when voting started, you said you had no case. Why not Jarni at that point? And what of the rest of this list of scummy scummos? Now your defense only consists of self-defense. You're not accusing anyone else which is usually what Scum do when being lynched so we have nothing to work off of later. Don´t wanna go back to old things but what list is this of mine, did I say I have that... what I write don´t always come out as I want it but don´t remeber I said that [And to make something clear No my english understanding isn´t bad, it is my writting that is (word mixing up and so)] I will be back so, have to drink mead (work)
Captain Genaro Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 One, I don't want to mention until I have more info, but I'm sure we can all see it. I'm wondering why it's there. For whatever reason, when I posted my reply, it replaced emotes in the sections I quoted with file locations on my computer. All I did was remove the file locations. Period. Nothing else. Yes I know you’re not supposed to edit your posts and I’ve never done so before in any mafia game I’ve played.
Fugazi Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Two things to point out: One, I don't want to mention until I have more info, but I'm sure we can all see it. I'm wondering why it's there. Intriguing. Two, there are 2 guests viewing this thread so either there's something in this thread that is interesting to unregistered members or we are close to getting a Servant of Loki. Interesting. I never paid much attention to onlookers, isn't Valhalla worth at least a short visit between bigger attractions?
CMP Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 For whatever reason, when I posted my reply, it replaced emotes in the sections I quoted with file locations on my computer. I can vouch for Chloddy here, I did see. Some sort of black magic. Or something.
Hinckley Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Don´t wanna go back to old things but what list is this of mine, did I say I have that... what I write don´t always come out as I want it but don´t remeber I said that [And to make something clear No my english understanding isn´t bad, it is my writting that is (word mixing up and so)] I will be back so, have to drink mead (work) So what do you mean, when I have sometime followed and read throught the last game that I have some pointers in who is scum and who is not... no I don´t but the ones trying to mix up the words of other players and just quoting some of their stuff to make them look bad ARE on my list of scummy scummos For whatever reason, when I posted my reply, it replaced emotes in the sections I quoted with file locations on my computer. All I did was remove the file locations. Period. Nothing else. Yes I know you’re not supposed to edit your posts and I’ve never done so before in any mafia game I’ve played. Gotcha. Thank you.
TrumpetKing Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 I'm back, and I'm going to start analyzing. Be aware that each person will get their own post so it's slightly easier for me.
TrumpetKing Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Posts by Petr Half-Troll (Piratedave84) I only found 8 when the post count said there were 10 What is this!? We have a guy who likes to quote himself, another who thinks brewing ox piss will solve the first's issues, there's also a girl who speaks in the third person, a viking that clearly loves his schrooms too much, a brute who has a specch impediment and we're barely scratching the surface here ... is this not supposed to be Viking paradise? It sure looks more like a mental house to me! Now, why would the servants of Loki kill the guards and not leave with the magical boar which would enable them to ressucitate upon death .. what a stupid move! Fluff My apologies your majesty You hurt my feelings ... Sometimes I feel unimaginable pain, It's always in my mind, within my brain, It dwells inside all of my heart And inside my veins. I need a drink ... sniff Fluff I forgot about you ... turns out we have a LADY (ish) that likes to put her words in quotes AND a guy that likes to quote himself .... Fluff How is it that I have not landed on any of the 'no poster' or 'low poster' lists? I was barely present and said nothing of value but yet no one noticed ... Am I invisible? I can honestly say that I have absolutely no clue whom to vote for. there are a few individuals here which I have rarely/never crossed path with before and I find it very difficult to assess their allegiance. I find Wilhalm and Sigrid to be the oddest but that's probably just because I'm not used to their styles. I feel like I'm speaking for the sake of speaking ... I honestly have nothing to say ... How embarrassing. Here's where it gets interesting. He comes here and says he wants the spotlight, then continues to be unhelpful by saying he doesn't know what to do. Thanks for giving me attention; I feel less lonely now. I have nothing to hide and nothing to fear, I drew attention to me in he hopes that people would realize that the few lists of low posters made so far were very selective. Do you not find it odd that every single person who made a list of low posters seems to have, deliberately or not, forgotten several other low posters? The posts where individuals said "oh look such and such did not post much" were all very selective and omitted players who were clearly low posters, some even more than the people listed. We cross posted. We also cross posted. He mentions a decent point here, but Petr, have you thought that maybe those others just didn't stick out to the people who talked about inactive players? We have a lot of veterans here and if they aren't being vocal, we tend to go crazy because we find ourselves relying on veteran's experiences a lot. God damned cursed phone! When have these two stepped back from an argument before? Sure! that's what a scumbo would do, you would know right? I don't even know here... What in the? How can this happen? You cross posted and echoed EXACTLY the same thoughts. Is it not a bit early to have conversations in the background? Unless ... It takes place on a writeboard. I'm going to vote: Sigrid (sisco) For a) saying nothing of value b) popping in and voting while blatantly saying he has not bothered to read/try to understand the conversation and c) finally ending up just retracting his vote. I know my behaviour today is/was odd. It was intentional. I tried a risky move of making a call for people to scrutinize me; I wanted to see who would pounce. Today's reactions lead me to the following conclusions. 1) those who actively sought me out and scrutinized me the most are likely to be town 2) those who let te attention flow towards me and did not address my statements are likely to be scum or neutral; my comments drew attention away from them. Make no mistake, I am a member of the Einherjar and although my actions were odd, the intention has ways been to try to root out servants of Loki. *has always been He calls Dufa and I out for cross posting, then goes on to say that he was just trying to gather reactions to him asking for attention. Why wuld you intentionally ask for attention? But then again, why would a Servant of Loki intentionally ask for attention? What bugs me here is that he gives th same reason he does every single time I notice him trying to grab attention. Those who go after him are town and those who dnt are scum. It's getting old, Petr. Way to misinterpret and twisty words. What I said is that those who pursued a case against me are more likely to be town hunting scum and that people who let that happen are likely to be scum; do you not agree? I know you cross posted but that was not my point; you and Dufa said the EXACT same thing at the EXACT same time. I was pointing out it was odd; you chose to ignore that statement and are trying to confuse us because you made a blunder. He accuses me of twisting his words and basically calls me a lying scum. Petr, if you're so suspicious of me, why don't you vote for me? Not liking what we've seen from Petr at all.
Mencot Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Mencot, on 30 November 2013 - 06:48 PM, said: So what do you mean, when I have sometime followed and read throught the last game that I have some pointers in who is scum and who is not... no I don´t but the ones trying to mix up the words of other players and just quoting some of their stuff to make them look bad ARE on my list of scummy scummos Aah yes sorry, you meant that comment. Okay (not ok-ey) actually there is no list yet, it was an expression for a future list when days go on and I get so clue about all players. The only person back then who could be on the list, ah lets forget the list. Lets I who I thought could be scum was Jarni because of his behaviour but his reply here explained some to make me get that I did a hesitated comment without reading all his words (so I also did mix a little of his words): I have been around, but I didn't feel a need to respond because I have transparently *not* been twisting your words. But since you asked: I know you didn't; I quoted what you and Naemr said that set me on edge - the fact is, I haven't twisted your words. All I did was notice a striking similarity in a phrase used by both you (Mist) and a well-known scumster (Paris Shawty). I put it to you that you've been reading up on how to be a scummo and have slipped up. Oh man when I reread my comments (of course after I have posted them and can´t edit them) I can understand you people have a hard time understanding what i try to say
TrumpetKing Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 I must have rubbed the ox urine the wrong way, I can't find more than 8 posts for Mist (Mencot) either. Posts for Mist (Mencot) Oh my head, what a party last night, what a party. Clearly Mist stay of that mead for the rest of the day... What is this I hear, servents of Loki amongst us and Odin and Thor gone and only that poor man Harald in charge Judging by the size of your sword, I wouldn´t brag about being a "Man" Fluff There is some sence in Naemer´s speech but I don´t know if there is much to go on in reality as others pointed out. I wasn´t at Valhalla that time because I was riding with the other valkyrie but I heard about what happened but here are some of thee that were. But we don´t know if these heroes are truly still einherjar or has Loki´s poisoned some of their minds. What I am trying to say we can´t trust everything until we start having a clue about whom are servents of Loki. But I thank thee Naemer for saying one of the wisest things today... the ox/cow piss thing was getting abit of topic Here she basically rambles on about obvious stuff and how Naemr has said the wisest thing of the day. How? I'm not sure. Other than starting to get focused, there's really nothing worth noting here, to my eyes at least. Whoa use of magic scroll "wikipedia" And seriously I am drunk but not that drunk, so get that cow piss out of my face, it might ruin my beutiful valkyrie looks F-L-U-F-F Yea wasn´t it, hand me some of that cow piss maybe it will cure my bad speech (english writting) Hopefuly it will blend with the mead True suspicion is almost all we have to go on but I am not gonna be this fast throwing stones yet. FLUFF with a metaphor on how she won't accuse anybody so quickly. Why not, Mist? Why aren't you helping us? I think everybody do I haven´t, I said I wont yet go on anything but I haven´t dropped that he did this. But again he has been around to say anything after my comment so I will not say anything on that matter until Here she at least says she's waiting for a response, but still gives nothing but a short statement worth not much. Ok so I have like 3-4 votes on me no, thats Okay (not ok-ey). I can maybe still handle this and not be an useless day 1 lynch. But what can I say, i have zero-two procent any suspision on anyone as usually I have on day 1. There has been some good playing and participating by some of you in the last hours but then again the it has been from the best players in EB mafia so I can´t say anything yet about if it useful or fluff as you guys would call it. So far jarni goes, as much you like me to vote for him... guess what I won´t i was annoyed of him twisting my words but I guess I twisted some of his words also. What i meant by trowing the first stone was, I wont by part of trowing on Naemr... yet, I didn´t me Jarni when I said that. I don´t have anything on but I would like to hear from those who haven´t said much all day (And I don´t mean that those would be scum but some could be) The first paragraph is basically useless fluff that says she's not giving up to us, but rambled on into a paragraph. The second section seems like an apology to Jarni for accidentally twisting his words. I don't understand what the third paragraph means except the end where she pushes attention off to "those who haven't said much". And then she says that she doesn't mean they would be scum, but could be. No shit. No offense, but I'm 90% sure almost everybody thinks there's scum lurking in the least active players, but focusing on them won't help if we have so many inactive players to look at. Looking at the voting post so far the once voting for me are veteran players, so I guess they know what they are doing... Not Helga (hinckley) you said my comment back then was vague but what do you do and some of the others who have vote for me do... Blow and hang up on some of my words. Didn´t know that the word wise is banned and out of use, especially said somehow wrong... Look at this wise wiser wisest and your voting for me isn´t wise, based on anything else then fluff. But I am not hidding or trying to throw stones on others to get you of my back. If you have some more questions for me or suspicons of me bring them on, I havn´t got anything to hide, I am an einherjar, like you... or actually I am an Valkyrie who fake my death to get here an become an einherjar.. but you already knew that part. Basically he's saying that the veterans who voted for him know what they're doing, but are wrong about him. Ah, the elusive scumtown, back again from the wild. Whoa that was alot of text that had appered while I was gone (sleeping) About the voting, nobody seems to know and have anything big to go on, but that is a normal day 1 maybe abit more spread in the votes than usual but a normal day 1 in EB mafia. Can say anything, I wouldn´t want to be an non voter but I don´t really have much. This I didn´t understand, she doesn´t say much under the day then comes to vote... and it is not here vote I am wondering about but her voting style. But then she got so complains and unvoted me, make it even more strange... make her look like a bandvagoner, just jumping on things when she don´t act or think for herself. Don´t wanna go back to old things but what list is this of mine, did I say I have that... what I write don´t always come out as I want it but don´t remeber I said that [And to make something clear No my english understanding isn´t bad, it is my writting that is (word mixing up and so)] I will be back so, have to drink mead (work) Basicallythings we've already heard about people, and from people. She also notes that her writing is bad, which is what I figured. Overall, I think Mist is acting weird, but from past experiences with her, she tends to act somewhat fluffy and speaks similarly. Like I said, she likely has a hard time communicating with us through her writing, which is what is making her so confusing. I'm not quite ready to vote for her.
def Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 We should have a lynch. Of the people I'm suspicious of, Sigrid is highest, so that is what I must do. Unvote: Legodad Vote: Sigrid (sisco) I do agree that Petr's being much weirder than usual, and could see changing my vote there, if that lynch picks up. I'd like to strongly suggest people not voting for, say, the top three (Mist, Petr, or Sigrid) unvote and vote for one of those three, or vote if you haven't in the first place. It would lead us to a lynch, and would give us more to work with later in the game. Being a single voter in a situation like this is akin to throwing your vote away, and shows you are afraid to show a real opinion in this deathly serious matter.
Recommended Posts