Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Recommended Posts

Posted

i think he want more a sportcar rim with the diameter of the 8448 tires.

btw, the high torque diff is ready. any questions?

13910436935_194b694c68_z.jpg

high torque diff demonstration2 von efferman auf Flickr

is there a need for a two studs wide diff?

Love it, I have a couple questions though. Would it be possible for you to make a 12t single bevel on a 3.5M shaft as a single piece to drive it, like the tan one shown in my picture? Also, is there a way to prevent the two halves coming apart under high load? I know they cannot come apart when used inside the frame but this would cause excess friction so is there another way?

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

the 12 tooth gear should not be a problem.

coming the two halves apart, theoretical this is indeed a problem. practical i have the fear that dismantling is impossible :look: i think i have simple to test it in real and see what happens

edit:

the first sketch of a 2m differential. this needs definetely a solid frame, because the diff is riding on the gears which are connected to the axles

13913245674_5e1873017d_z.jpg

13912825035_135ae9cabe_z.jpg

and now i try a 2m diff with new gears

edit:

do you think these gears will work?

13914489793_5f7215ba1b_z.jpg

diff 2M V2 von efferman auf Flickr

edit²

if someone want test it

674x501_1875673_2577654_1397763668.jpg

Edited by efferman
Posted

Hmm, I've been thinking, I've always wanted a differential that can fit in a linear actuator bracket, with a 20z driver. Do you think it would be possible to adapt your existing design to that specification? It would be really helpful for when I redesign my ETF truck.

Posted (edited)

tataaa

13922086395_4d6c2f47b6_z.jpg

diff 2m20z von efferman auf Flickr

no idea how much torque it can deliver, but the knob gears are very prototype. to avoid contact with the 12 tooth bevel gear they can not made bigger

Edited by efferman
Posted

About the wheelloader rims for the 42030 and Liebherr L580, is it possible to make even more realistic complete rims insted of the rimcovers?

Although I like them, the real rims have a deeper profile.

Posted

Yes, that is exactly what I mean, but the offset, I have no idea what is best, they will have to fit botj wheelloaders, so I think the offset should be the same as on the rims you have used on your version of the Liebherr and 42030.

The rim looks awesome.

Great work, what is the financial damage if I would order those rims in the future?

Posted (edited)

i guess the rim would cost roundabout 20 euro. i will save so much material as possible to make it so cheap as possible.

a question: iam working actually at an a Air reservoir in a fuel tank design. how large it should be or make different lengths?

this on the picture is 7 studs long and roundabout 6 studs in diameter.

13964914011_747d1cd9b5_z.jpg

airtank von efferman auf Flickr

edit:

here is the rim. the offset is exactly the same like racing wheel medium. it cost 17 euro in white nylon

674x501_1890674_2617284_1398170899.jpg

13965910151_030bbb619e_z.jpg

wheelloader rim offset von efferman auf Flickr

Edited by efferman
Posted (edited)

Love it, love it! Any word yet on the 18 and 22 tooth clutch gears, and 10 and 14 tooth standard gears?

Edited by allanp
Posted (edited)

Very nice. Though, I thought the spacing between axles (in units of M) corresponds always to an integer number of teeth. In the above case, the distance between the 13 and 18 teeth (assuming you meant them to mesh together) will be (13+18)/2 = 15.5 ... and that is not an integer.

a small Air Tank in similar size to the original one

625x465_1894197_2626454_1398257148.jpg

The tank looks nice, though there is no need for 2 ports. One should suffice, unless you have some nice/upcoming ideas in mind.

Edited by DrJB
Posted (edited)

two ports is absolutely necessary for an airtank ... input and output ...

But effe - most fuel tanks aren't as round... the ends look a lot like ( )

Not so much like a pressurized vessel

Edited by fasterthanlight
Posted (edited)

FTL this above is only an airtank

this is a fuel tank

625x465_1891116_2618412_1398243928.jpg

doc JB

iam not a mathematic genius. i take a sheet of paper, draw a distance and a gear with lego compatible teeth in a wanted number. then i draw ithe counterpart in a try and error method till the teeth fit together. but if you think a 18/13 combination doesnt work proper i will take a look again.

edit:

doc JB, you was right, 14 teeths are working better

14Z gear

625x465_1898521_2642661_1398412607.jpg

14Z clutch

625x465_1898840_2642861_1398415169.jpg

Edited by efferman
Posted (edited)

two ports is absolutely necessary for an airtank ... input and output ...

Absolutely and most definitely not ... we're not talking about water, oil, or gasoline here .... but about compressed air. The same port can be used for both in/out. Need proof? Check Lego's own tank ... it has one single port!

Edit: as EV3Noob pointed below, the lego air-tank does in fact have two ports. Yet, my argument still 'holds', as you can do pneumatics with one port only. It is one of those 'situations' in life where it is not black and white, but multiple answers are still correct. Cheers.

doc JB

iam not a mathematic genius. i take a sheet of paper, draw a distance and a gear with lego compatible teeth in a wanted number. then i draw ithe counterpart in a try and error method till the teeth fit together. but if you think a 18/13 combination doesnt work proper i will take a look again.

edit:

doc JB, you was right, 14 teeth are working better

Thank you ... Sorry did not mean to throw in some math terminology :) ... and not a critique either. It was simply based on my observation over the many years, that all Lego gears have an even number of teeth.

Great Job and ingenuity though, keep up the good work.

Edited by DrJB
Posted (edited)

the lego airtank hast two out/inlets too

two new gears with a combined number ot teeths of 32

23Z

625x465_1900926_2643772_1398425186.jpg

and 9Z

625x465_1900921_2643756_1398425096.jpg

clutch versions will follow if possible

Edited by efferman
Posted (edited)

Hmm...

67c01.jpg

You're right ... and I stand corrected (i.e. wrong). I have not looked as such tanks for a while (and I have few of them).

Also, lately I have been working on a pneumatic project (at work, not lego), and used a tank as an accumulator. You really do not need two ports for air ... but you can use 2 if you so desire ...

If you use water however, then two ports are an absolute must, as, when you push water in, you need air to come out from the other side. This is in fact one of the main differences between hydraulic and pneumatic systems. In pneumatics, you do not need a return line to the tank, you simply vent the return out (ie, let air go out 'free'). In hydraulics however, you do need to send the fluid back to the hydraulic reservoir. Makes sense???

Edited by DrJB

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Announcements

  • THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

×
×
  • Create New...