sheo Posted April 5, 2015 Author Posted April 5, 2015 (edited) Unfortunately i have some problems with the start Up System. I think there is to much friction! The M Motor struggles there! but i can live without this Function ;) Do you mean the fake motors and fans? Could you post some photos? In any case, try switching the polarity on the manual switch. Edited April 5, 2015 by sheo Quote
Duky Posted April 5, 2015 Posted April 5, 2015 Sorry Sheepo! It was my fault! If you turn up the rechargeable battery box everything works perfect ;) 80 Pages to go..... Quote
0RBlT Posted April 5, 2015 Posted April 5, 2015 Hello! sheo Terrific job, thank you for your efforts and for providing instructions, reading the comments and looking at the reviews I flashed this excavator and want to build it. But I have a question for sheo or those who already owns this beautiful creation. I've heard and read that this model is so equipped tightly that there's even a hair nowhere to fall, and so I would like to know whether it is possible in this model to replace 4 infrared receiver on two SBrick, will there be enough space?? Did someone? Is this possible? So I think such a model would be convenient to operate the gadget, and want to save it for the shelf, as it is a wonderful model. Quote
Blakbird Posted April 5, 2015 Posted April 5, 2015 Hello! sheo Terrific job, thank you for your efforts and for providing instructions, reading the comments and looking at the reviews I flashed this excavator and want to build it. But I have a question for sheo or those who already owns this beautiful creation. I've heard and read that this model is so equipped tightly that there's even a hair nowhere to fall, and so I would like to know whether it is possible in this model to replace 4 infrared receiver on two SBrick, will there be enough space?? Did someone? Is this possible? So I think such a model would be convenient to operate the gadget, and want to save it for the shelf, as it is a wonderful model. I think it is probably possible because you only need 2 Sbricks instead of 4 IR receivers. This would be an awesome model to control with SBrick. Quote
Duky Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 My Fingers are hurting! But it's worth! https://www.dropbox.com/sh/r11xx56yzu76qd7/AADlToKY_cgRxRncYyXvwni9a?dl=0 Sorry for the bad quality Quote
0RBlT Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 I think it is probably possible because you only need 2 Sbricks instead of 4 IR receivers. This would be an awesome model to control with SBrick. Yes I agree with you completely! But since I've heard a lot of comments about the fact that there is so little space,I'm afraid that may not be enough length of cable to connect 4re of the motor to one SBrick, so I would like to understand, there are some stock, or it is so compact that even at such manipulation is not enough space and the length of the cable. Quote
sheo Posted April 6, 2015 Author Posted April 6, 2015 Great job, Duky! Thanks for sharing photos! Quote
DrJB Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 I have to admit that I have only built an LDD version. Has anyone given any thought to making the track frames and boom a bit 'lighter/hollow'. I think we the use of the new t-bone part and other frames, there is room/opportunity to make the structure lighter and reduce friction. Don't get me wrong, this is a very 'solid' build (structure/design/functionality) but I'm tempted to make use of newer parts. Any thoughts on this? Quote
Blakbird Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 I have to admit that I have only built an LDD version. Has anyone given any thought to making the track frames and boom a bit 'lighter/hollow'. I think we the use of the new t-bone part and other frames, there is room/opportunity to make the structure lighter and reduce friction. Don't get me wrong, this is a very 'solid' build (structure/design/functionality) but I'm tempted to make use of newer parts. Any thoughts on this? The model already uses the most modern parts all over the place. Yes, it is possible to make it lighter, but only by completely changing the whole model. Quote
DrJB Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 (edited) I'm thinking few of these (below) in the track frame (they're exactly 5L wide) may alleviate the need for so many thin liftarms and pins, but again, just a thought. I guess I'm just trying to 'adapt' the build to parts I have on hand (got so many of those T-bones) Edited April 6, 2015 by DrJB Quote
DrJB Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 (edited) I can't say this often enough, this is a 'phenomenal' build. The more I do in LDD, the more I appreciate how intricate the design is. It's taking several hours to do the virtual build, and that's a bit 'deceptive' (non representative) compared to the number of hours (or maybe weeks) the author invested into this. That said, and for those of you who have built the actual/physical model, what is the function of two turntables stacked together?. As I'm only 'playing' with LDD, I can't figure out yet what they're for. Edit: Never mind, I found it. On page 826 onward, only the turntable is shown for 'clarity'. The superstructure is built on top of the track frame. I was used to two parts built separately then assembled together in the final step, but here it's not the case. Edited April 7, 2015 by DrJB Quote
OneMoreRobot Posted April 26, 2015 Posted April 26, 2015 (edited) Thought I would share my built of this great model. I opted to use 3 x SBricks for the control of all functions (I eliminated the two PF switches used to control lighting & incorporated with SBrick), Note: the clean exterior where the IR receivers are normally positioned. This has been the most complex build I have undertaken plus fitting SBricks required several partial tear-downs & rebuilds to get right. Now that it is completed I am 100% satisfied & proud of this build. It was shown publicly for the first time last weekend at the Sydney Brick Show (Australia) & received a wonderful reception from those who are Technic fans. Cheers - OneMoreRobot Mining Shovel.2 by OneMoreRobot_NZ, on Flickr Mining Shovel.3 by OneMoreRobot_NZ, on Flickr Mining Shovel.5 by OneMoreRobot_NZ, on Flickr Mining Shovel.9 by OneMoreRobot_NZ, on Flickr Edited April 26, 2015 by OneMoreRobot Quote
Nalyd997 Posted April 26, 2015 Posted April 26, 2015 How many SBricks do you have? Because all the other things you have shown have got them! Lucky person Quote
OneMoreRobot Posted April 26, 2015 Posted April 26, 2015 How many SBricks do you have? Because all the other things you have shown have got them! Lucky person Bought a bunch during the Kickstarter for a good price - won't see these three again, they are well & truely buried deep inside. Cheers OMR Quote
afol1969 Posted April 26, 2015 Posted April 26, 2015 I can't say this often enough, this is a 'phenomenal' build. The more I do in LDD, the more I appreciate how intricate the design is. It's taking several hours to do the virtual build, and that's a bit 'deceptive' (non representative) compared to the number of hours (or maybe weeks) the author invested into this. That said, and for those of you who have built the actual/physical model, what is the function of two turntables stacked together?. As I'm only 'playing' with LDD, I can't figure out yet what they're for. Edit: Never mind, I found it. On page 826 onward, only the turntable is shown for 'clarity'. The superstructure is built on top of the track frame. I was used to two parts built separately then assembled together in the final step, but here it's not the case. I just come to finish the LDRAW file for the excavator, I'll upload it in the next days. A quick'n dirty build stepping I've already made. So in next future time, I'll build the model, so I can go on to create the instructions with LPUB. But that will be a real challenge, there are so many submodels to integrate, so complex building steps, that I know that I'll not finish the inetructions before summer end. Greetings Alex Quote
sheo Posted April 27, 2015 Author Posted April 27, 2015 Thought I would share my built of this great model. I opted to use 3 x SBricks for the control of all functions Wow, it's so much better with SBricks hidden inside! Quote
afol1969 Posted April 28, 2015 Posted April 28, 2015 I have it! And now let's build it! Greetings Alex Quote
Scapuc Posted April 28, 2015 Posted April 28, 2015 (edited) I'm building this incredible Moc, but I am having big problems with the wiring. The interior space is scarce and many parts does not connect well. I'm in a good place with the superstructure, but I realized that some functions are not to be. I must have detached something when I entered the back of Terex (refused to go). Now unmount the superstructure and start again from scratch. However I want to thank Sheo for this fantastic work and for having created and shared with us all the instructions! Edited April 28, 2015 by Scapuc Quote
sheo Posted April 30, 2015 Author Posted April 30, 2015 Congratulations, Alex! Only one remark: the 5.5L axle on the boom seems to protrude a little further than it should. Scapuc, maybe you should wait for Alex's instructions? Quote
afol1969 Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 (edited) Congratulations, Alex! Only one remark: the 5.5L axle on the boom seems to protrude a little further than it should. Hi sheo, Thanks, it was a massive effort to create the LDRAW file. You're right, the 5.5 axles were placed one stud too far outside. I've made the correction. But I'm sure that the file needs some more corrections. That's I need to build to create the instructions. And maybe I'll not finish them before autumn. The LDRAW file you can download here: http://www.bricksafe.../TerexTH400.mpd Do you still have the LFX file? It would be fine if I have it to compare and find out some errors. And if somebody want to support the instruction generation - you're welcome. Greetings Edited April 30, 2015 by afol1969 Quote
Blakbird Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Thanks, it was a massive effort to create the LDRAW file. Did you have to create this whole file from scratch or were you able to start with my LDraw file? My file should have had all the parts in the right places but no steps or submodels. I was just paging through your file and the amount of work you put into subdividing the model into logical parts is staggering. Thanks! Quote
afol1969 Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Hi blakbird, I created it from scratch. That gave me the occasion to make an provisional build stepping to work for the later instructions. The most difficult part was setting the correct rotating points for the boom sections and the actuators. Greetings Alex Quote
Captain Dee Posted May 1, 2015 Posted May 1, 2015 You had me with the title! The O&K RH400 is my favorite shovel excavator and this is the second fully-functioning Lego design I've seen (the first was on MOCpages several years ago). It looks incredible even if it isn't built strictly according to the real design. I'm surprised there's been no talk of specs on the previous pages, so if you'll allow I'll fill the void. It was engineered by O&K in 1995 just before they were bought by Terex. Syncrude in Canada bought the first four machines which were red and white and had approx. 85 ton payload capacity. The design was thoroughly redone, increasing the size, weight, power, and capacity of the machines. By the time Terex sold its Mining Division to Bucyrus International in 2010 the machines were equipped with 68 cubic yard shovels rated for just over 103 tons payload! The two 16-cylinder, 60-L Cummins QSK60 engines produced a total of 4500 hp (3360 kW) and the optional twin electric motors produced 3200 kW, good for almost 270 tons of breakout force and more than 360 tons of crowd force. The machines weigh some 1080 tons (980 metric tonnes) and were the biggest in the world. Cat bought Bucyrus in 2011 and renamed the machine 6090 FS before announcing that it was developing a bigger, 1400-ton, 85-yd monster with hybrid tech called the 6120B FS (120 metric tonne payload, or approx. 130 tons for 3-pass loading 400 ton trucks). But back to the Lego models - just incredible! It looks great in these colors too. Oh, I might add that the full name was "Terex O&K RH400." Terex always kept purchased names alive. Great job everyone! Now someone needs to build a Unit Rig MT6300 or Cat 797F 400-ton haul truck to match! Quote
OneMoreRobot Posted May 2, 2015 Posted May 2, 2015 Great job everyone! Now someone needs to build a Unit Rig MT6300 or Cat 797F 400-ton haul truck to match! Agreed - Sheo, the challenge has been laid down Quote
Scapuc Posted May 2, 2015 Posted May 2, 2015 Scapuc, maybe you should wait for Alex's instructions? Surely I will wait the new instructions of Alex, but in the meantime I want to be able to finish this model. In many have done and I have to be able too! ;) Again, thank you for sharing this fantastic building. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.