Tamamono Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 What if there's a reverse death miller whose win condition is to be lynched and come back as a purple hippo? Then it'd be in one of your games. But no, what I'm saying is that the rules do outline third parties. Last time there were none, and they didn't, and I have no reason to believe that our host would do things so differently this time. Basically, there are three options: 1. There's no thirds and our host is the king of inconsistency 2. The trickster is the third and its a shitty hooker role that only exists to piss everyone off 3. The zombie is the third party serial killer If it's one or three, the trickster is scum, and Pam was likely onto something. I feel like super-confusing WIFOM with curses is a bit far.
Scubacarrot Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 I have checked and don't see what Pamela could be on to. Most I can find is that she voted for Bleeb, was against lynching Kelly, and pressured Carl a little bit?
Tamamono Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 It might be to make it look like she's scum with Helen, which is stupid since Helen is obviously town.
jimmynick Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 I find this highly suspicious. Why? Just throwing out interesting tidbits for everyone. Don't forget Scum bitches, you have to kill me tonight or you'll definitely lose. I have everyone's claims but they all lead to dead ends. You intimated earlier that you were brimming with leads. Where have they gone? It might be to make it look like she's scum with Helen, which is stupid since Helen is obviously town. Why? I don't follow. Why?
Tamamono Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 Kelly said yesterday that Helen was "scum and faking the curse". Scum might have cursed Peanuts to make Kelly think she's scum too.
Hinckley Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 1. There's no thirds and our host is the king of inconsistency Or trumpets growth. You intimated earlier that you were brimming with leads. Where have they gone? Are you saying you want to be intimate, darling? I'd love to be treated rough by a conquistador or whatever type of knight you are. Scum murderer. But what I said was I put together what people had claimed to Derek, not that I was brimming with leads. What have you got, spaniard? Why? Why? Why? You sound like my five-year-old daughter...that I don't have. It sounded suspicious because she has sounded off all along and the witch is a witch. I'm aware the Bleeb was an alien and an alien but they appeared vastly different. One was a villain from Halo and the other were the ones that visit me at night and probe me. Why don't you think it's suspicious, Mr. Man-of-few-words. Why, why, why? What don't you understand about the things you're quoting? Or are we to believe you have also been cursed?
Piratedave84 Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 Carl, Dragonkiki and Giovanni; do you intend on participating in any of the discussions? On the subject of third parties; what are the possible roles? SK - the lack of second and third kills on the first nights makes me think this role is unlikely Trickster/curse giver - plausible given the curses 2 days in a row; what would be this person's win condition? How does this role fit in this situation? Cult - far fetched but possible What else?
Piratedave84 Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 Survivor. Interesting, I have never seen it in action before; is it plausible?
Hinckley Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 Yes. It's been used here...once. I think it's most likely that our host saw other hosts leave the 3rd party stipulation in the rules despite not having 3rd parties and simply followed suit. Period.
jimmynick Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 Why don't you think it's suspicious, Mr. Man-of-few-words. Why, why, why? What don't you understand about the things you're quoting? Or are we to believe you have also been cursed? No, I haven't been cursed. Re: Mikatta, I don't think drawing the Witch as both a character and a role is far-fetched. Also, I'm interested in why Timmy is so convinced you're town, and why Sally isn't (especially since she's been talking about PMing you, which gives only you information that she has). Just throwing out interesting tidbits for everyone. You have nothing to show for all the hard work you claim to have done. Surely you have something?
Hinckley Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 why Sally isn't (especially since she's been talking about PMing you, which gives only you information that she has). Agreed.
Piratedave84 Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 Yes. It's been used here...once. I think it's most likely that our host saw other hosts leave the 3rd party stipulation in the rules despite not having 3rd parties and simply followed suit. Period. Am I the only one to think that Tickle's weird behaviour and non comitment to the situation appears as one from a third party?
MagPiesRUs Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 *hops out of tiny car, along with twenty other clowns* Tickles hasn't done shit yet point final (at all) .... I don't think it's fair that you and Helen are accusing me of summarizing though - as far as I'm aware, most of my points and suggestions had not been mentioned beforehand. I'd like to think I've helped out. I was one of the first to defend Derek, and gave my thoughts about revealing alter egos. And I don't mean to toot my own horn, but I think I made some pretty good points. *honk honk* In all honesty, I can't say I was all that confident that Kingsley and Bleeb were scum. Thus, I chose not to vote. However, I did not feel strongly enough about their allegiance that I'd go out of my way to defend them. I did defend Derek though, because it was clear to me from his story that he was telling the truth.Unfortunately, clowns don't have regular sleep patterns, so I wasn't around during Kingsley's late day bandwagon. As for Bleeb, I wasn't sure about him. I was sort of waiting for him to come out and tell us why we shouldn't vote for him, but that never really happened. By the end of the day, he already had a majority vote, so there was no point in adding my vote against someone I was unsure about in the first place. As for accusations, I haven't got a particularly good read on anyone yet, so I have just been poking around a little. If I do see something scummy however, I'll let everyone know.
Hinckley Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 As for accusations, I haven't got a particularly good read on anyone yet, so I have just been poking around a little. If I do see something scummy however, I'll let everyone know. There's no time like the present. What are you waiting for? Someone to shove evidence into your horn, darling? You can look at what people have said and form opinions. We know you're capable, love.
Mencot Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 You are hilarious; my posts, explanations, justifications and votes are all based on facts and are well thought out or at least laid out in a way people can actually understand; unlike someone else Substanciate your accusation if you want me to defend myslef. Me and Melinda are talking in private and agree on some points; Can you point me to the part where I or she copied the other? I can't find it I think those accusations against you Peter and Melinda are pretty much clear, you are not being any helpful. And you mentioned facts, what facts do you mean? There are no facts, only those that you and Melinda wanted to vote and counterclaim for Derek yesterday, whqat was up with that? Can you give us a clear answer this time and not more questions? And I never meant you two copy each other, but you two seemed to agree and say similar things alot. And also similar things with our dead "didn´t get laid" girl. But Melinda on the other and did seem to copy things from Helen.
TrumpetKing Posted January 31, 2014 Author Posted January 31, 2014 Interlude The WAMP? Guy, Abraham Lincoln, and Marsha stand next to each other, discussing the day. "Oh, I have some great riddles, Abe, would you like to hear?" "Yes, sweetie" Marsha begins to sing. "We are very little creatures; all of us have different features. One of us in a glass is set; one of us you'll find in a jet. Another you may find in a tin, and a fourth is boxed within. If you pursue a fifth, it can never fly from you. Also, if you can answer that and the riddle below, you may earn a special prize. Two cannibals were chatting as they had dinner. One complained about a discontent for his nasty mother-in-law. What was his friend's advice?" The first two to come to me with an answer has the chance to earn a special "prize". I won't be around to check my PM until later tonight, though, so don't worry if I don't respond immediately. Voting is open early tonight. With 14 players, it takes a majority of 8 votes to form a lynch.
Piratedave84 Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 24hrs are up; I'm going to: vote: Tickles (TinyPiesRUs) His behaviour is extremely odd, he has not bothered to cast a valid vote, keeps hiding behind his roleplay and has yet to formulate a concrete accusation against anyone.
Hinckley Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 I will also vote: Tickles the clown (TinyPiesRUs) Enough time has passed for you to form an opinion. Hanging out, lurking and flying under the radar, cleverly summarizing the day's happenings so they sound like new points, darling, aren't being proactive for the Town. We can't be left wondering about you and you're trying to stay perfectly in the center to avoid detection.
Piratedave84 Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 I think those accusations against you Peter and Melinda are pretty much clear, you are not being any helpful. And you mentioned facts, what facts do you mean? There are no facts, only those that you and Melinda wanted to vote and counterclaim for Derek yesterday, whqat was up with that? Can you give us a clear answer this time and not more questions? And I never meant you two copy each other, but you two seemed to agree and say similar things alot. And also similar things with our dead "didn´t get laid" girl. But Melinda on the other and did seem to copy things from Helen. I.don't.even ... What?
Hinckley Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 By the way, I believe I know who the zombie is. I've been piecing a list of people who claimed and when they claimed to Derek and the roles he was sorting. The zombie has been nice enough to work with me today and help me fill in the gaps, but it just occurred to me I should announce this in case this zombie is a liar zombie. Or in case the Scum would like to try to get the zombie lynched by claiming to be the zombie as well. Either way works. Thanks I think those accusations against you Peter and Melinda are pretty much clear, you are not being any helpful. And you mentioned facts, what facts do you mean? There are no facts, only those that you and Melinda wanted to vote and counterclaim for Derek yesterday, whqat was up with that? Can you give us a clear answer this time and not more questions? And I never meant you two copy each other, but you two seemed to agree and say similar things alot. And also similar things with our dead "didn´t get laid" girl. But Melinda on the other and did seem to copy things from Helen. Mikakatata, love, darling, I don't think Scum would be so foolishly bold as to openly try to convince us to kill the only investigated player before killing Derek off.
MetroiD Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 I never heard back from Tickles after starting a conversation with him regarding alter-egos. You'd expect every Townie to try and gather as much information as possible behind the scenes as possible at this stage. Tickles didn't seem interested. I'm also still unsure about Mikatta, among other people. And why has the wannabe mermaid gone so silent all of a sudden!? Vote: Kelly Lester (Kristel) mainly because I think she has / should have something to share and this should serve as good incentive.
Mencot Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 I.don't.even ... What? Yea I see, great answer. Thank you Peter for your cooperation! Mikakatata, love, darling, I don't think Scum would be so foolishly bold as to openly try to convince us to kill the only investigated player before killing Derek off. What are you saying? Did I say that, did it sound like I said that? I thought i said that they wanted to kill Derek! Ah Okay (not ok-ey) you are talking about they going for Kelly, yeah that would be a bold move. But possible, if the scum plays foolishly but they didn´t Derek was killed. And that is what i am talking about, Derek. That there was 2 person yesterday, who wanted to counterclaim and vote for Derek and Derek turned up dead. Why should we not look at those two people?
Hinckley Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 I just said. Well, look at Melinda all you want. I just think Peter would have to be absurdly stupid to suggest so adamantly that we lynch Kristel to try and catch the potential Scum of Derek, who the Scum then killed. To cast doubt on Derek, he'd have to keep him around for that to pay off. Know what I mean?
Recommended Posts