allanp Posted July 15, 2015 Posted July 15, 2015 If it has to be RC, an RC gearbox on a supercar or RC control for pneumatics would be pretty awesome. Point is, i'de like the model to be good even if you removed the RC aspect of it. If you removed the RC element from 8043 you'de still have some pretty complex geartrains at least. If you remove the RC from the crawler, the volvo or the bulldozer you got nothing! Quote
Saberwing40k Posted July 16, 2015 Posted July 16, 2015 If it has to be RC, an RC gearbox on a supercar or RC control for pneumatics would be pretty awesome. Point is, i'de like the model to be good even if you removed the RC aspect of it. If you removed the RC element from 8043 you'de still have some pretty complex geartrains at least. If you remove the RC from the crawler, the volvo or the bulldozer you got nothing! I'd actually say that you get nothing out of the crawler to begin with. With 42030 and 8275, you would get a full featured wheel loader and bulldozer, even if they did not have RC. With the crawler, you get nothing. No interior, no engine, unrealistic suspension, and bad steering. I think Lego spent a bit too much time, and made too many sacrifices, to make it kid proof when most likely it would not be kids playing with it. Even as it is, it would still be too easy for a young child to break. So, why even bother? Make it more appealing to older fans, and trust their judgement. I'd only like to see a flagship supercar if it was designed by NKuipers! Quote
Geekphysique Posted July 16, 2015 Posted July 16, 2015 I'd actually say that you get nothing out of the crawler to begin with. With 42030 and 8275, you would get a full featured wheel loader and bulldozer, even if they did not have RC. With the crawler, you get nothing. No interior, no engine, unrealistic suspension, and bad steering. I think Lego spent a bit too much time, and made too many sacrifices, to make it kid proof when most likely it would not be kids playing with it. Even as it is, it would still be too easy for a young child to break. So, why even bother? Make it more appealing to older fans, and trust their judgement. I'd only like to see a flagship supercar if it was designed by NKuipers! As an AFOL only recently getting back in to Lego, the crawler was actually an awesome purchase for me. Despite its lack of Technic functions, it became a great parts donor for colours I did not have, Several PF parts I needed, and gave me an excuse to experiment swapping parts around from set 8466. I had always wanted to motorize 8466 but at the time, motors simply were't strong enough. The crawler (for me) was a nostalgic experience, as I not only enjoyed that set, but relived the excitement I had from building and playing with 8466. Quote
allanp Posted July 16, 2015 Posted July 16, 2015 2017 should be interesting! it's the 40th anniversary of Technic and it should be a nice big more teen/adult orientated complex set if the pattern if the previous 6 years are anything to go by. Quote
Jockos Posted July 16, 2015 Posted July 16, 2015 Yes. They really should give us a 16+ set, because they haven't done it before, and we beg for sets like what I mentioned. Quote
Victor Imaginator Posted July 16, 2015 Posted July 16, 2015 "LEGO Technic 16+"... oh it looks really weird) Quote
allanp Posted July 16, 2015 Posted July 16, 2015 (edited) Well, when I say "should", I don't mean they are obliged to do it, but that's how the pattern of the past few years has gone and seeing as it's the 40th anniversary, I just suspect it's gonna be something special. If it's going to top the Arocs, it'll have to be something really really special. What about a one off special to celebrate technics past, a set that is 12 years and up, 3000+ pieces with great new functional parts and with the old school golden era packaging from the late 80's/90's with the blue box and the blueprint of the set in the background and the flip up lid to see all the parts inside, just as a one off or a limited edition. It would be a new supercar as a homage to the original auto chassis which started it all. Other second half sets could include a helicopter, a tractor and a forklift (just like the original 1977 line up), all with special edition versions. #daydreamer! Edited July 16, 2015 by allanp Quote
tehkei Posted July 16, 2015 Posted July 16, 2015 for 40th anniversary they will bring back the technic figure. Quote
MaxSupercars Posted July 16, 2015 Posted July 16, 2015 (edited) How about this? I would say UCS Technic (Ultimate Collector's Series) :) Max... Edited July 16, 2015 by MaxSupercars Quote
Jockos Posted July 16, 2015 Posted July 16, 2015 OOOOOhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... This will never happen :-( Quote
Kaanere Posted July 16, 2015 Posted July 16, 2015 (edited) They could do a tribute of the 853 car chasis, made with modern beams and parts but with the original colours, and call it CAR CHASSIS HOMAGE for 40th anniversary they will bring back the technic figure. That would be EPIC , too. But I don't think that it will happen. Edited July 16, 2015 by Kaanere Quote
Corvette3 Posted July 17, 2015 Posted July 17, 2015 "LEGO Technic 16+"... oh it looks really weird) How about Technic 18+ "looks both ways awkwardly" Quote
Alasdair Ryan Posted July 17, 2015 Posted July 17, 2015 (edited) How about Technic 18+ I don't think that is going to work,have you gone through the topics in the past from over eighteens asking for help simply because they put the differential the wrong way around? Edited July 17, 2015 by Alasdair Ryan Quote
Corvette3 Posted July 17, 2015 Posted July 17, 2015 Really? I built the 42030 and accidentally put one of them in backward, and did i frantically ask message boards for help? no, i calmly disassembled the past ten minutes of building, flipped the rear diff and calmly resumed building Honestly some people really lack common sense. BTW i was only joking with the 18+ comment, relating it to an R movie or something. Quote
aol000xw Posted July 17, 2015 Posted July 17, 2015 Regarding my LDD update wish... It is a bit puzzling that even common PF parts are missing but I have no clue of when it was first launched or how frequently it was updated so I don't know if a 3 years hiatus is kind of normal. Quote
D3K Posted July 17, 2015 Posted July 17, 2015 If it has to be RC, [...] RC control for pneumatics would be pretty awesome. [...] That would indeed be awesome, and with the release of the "V2" pneumatics, I think if we're ever going to see RC pneumatic valves, now will be the time. Unfortunately, I highly doubt we'll ever see such parts from TLG.. but here's to hoping! It is a bit puzzling that even common PF parts are missing [...] That has been one of my biggest issues with LDD since I started using it quite a long time ago! However, having used LDcad a lot lately, I don't think I'll ever go back to LDD! LDcad does all the things I wished that LDD would do, and it has the complete LDraw library of parts, including unofficial ones Quote
N-4K0 Posted July 17, 2015 Posted July 17, 2015 Really? I built the 42030 and accidentally put one of them in backward, and did i frantically ask message boards for help? no, i calmly disassembled the past ten minutes of building, flipped the rear diff and calmly resumed building Honestly some people really lack common sense. I did this mistake as well. I've read about this mistake before, so I suspected I had put one of the diffs the wrong way, though. Quote
Patman Posted July 18, 2015 Posted July 18, 2015 I like the heavy equipment, so I think a large cable shovel along the lines of the Mountaineer or Captain would be kind of cool, especially if it was R/C. A retro set along the lines of 8858 perhaps set up as a huge diesel generator set incorporating a transmission of sorts might be fun, too. Quote
dhc6twinotter Posted July 18, 2015 Posted July 18, 2015 A forwarder would offer a nice level of playability, but perhaps a bit too similar to 42043. A road grader would be nice, as would a remake of 8455 or a truck with forklift. Quote
GoldVillage Posted July 19, 2015 Posted July 19, 2015 Its a safe bet to say we will just get another mobile crane, a pneumatic version of 42009. Quote
allanp Posted January 6, 2016 Posted January 6, 2016 Yo, just bumping this topic to remind folks that we have a wishlist topic, and this is it. So if you see someone in a purely speculation thread posting something that is merely a wish it might be helpful to redirect them here do you think? Quote
Jim Posted January 6, 2016 Posted January 6, 2016 Sure thing! There's a thin line between speculation and wish list Quote
Technictiger Posted January 6, 2016 Posted January 6, 2016 Thank you guys i found right topic Lego Technic 2018 , 2019 or 2020 ? 1.General Electric Evolution TE-33A http://www.railpictures.net/images/d1/9/0/4/1904.1356715310.jpg 2.Huddig Muddy Mary http://www.koneurakointi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/huddig-muddy-mary.jpg 3.Mitsubishi Trexia 150 16T http://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-U9za6rDrEak/UgXb9JKxjvI/AAAAAAAAA2o/ZCSMMrlz_CI/s640/FD80-160N+Series4.jpg 4.MAN 6x4 , Trailer & Laboratory wagon 1520mm http://www.parovoz.c...&LNG=EN#picture 5.Volvo FMX 6x4 http://gallery.balticrailpics.net/albums/userpics/IMG_2906~0.jpg Quote
Buddy010702 Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 I would really like a licenced tractor, with well known names in Canada/USA, such as a John Deere or Case. The Claas is peaking my interest, but I'm not too familiar with the company. In general more tractors would be fantastic. Quote
Brickthus Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 Technic creatures would be something a bit different. I've had a go at a pneumatic octopus arm and also a cuttlefish with its propulsive fronds. A Star Wars BB-8 droid kit in the £170 price bracket with Power Functions would be great - my project for this year, please add your support! Mark Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.