Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Recommended Posts

Posted

True, but most reception to the model has been "A Batman mech? Seriously?" But LEGO does have creative liberty, and they're allowed to choose classic vs. N52 if they don't like the DCnu version. I haven't heard of DC forcing them to make anything, since LEGO is the one making the toys for them. Sure, DC probably has a lot to do with the Bat-centric sets, but otherwise, I thought LEGO could make what they wanted and run it by DC for approval.

  • Replies 7.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I like that LEGO combined the New 52 and Classic. In my opinion, New 52 works better for Plastic Man, Green Arrow, and Martian Manhunter. Classic works better for Supergirl, the Batman villains, and (obviously) Starfire.

Hawkman is somewhere in the middle with having Golden Wings and Helmet but no exaggerated armor and sharp thingies.

Posted

I like that LEGO combined the New 52 and Classic. In my opinion, New 52 works better for Plastic Man, Green Arrow, and Martian Manhunter. Classic works better for Supergirl, the Batman villains, and (obviously) Starfire.

Hawkman is somewhere in the middle with having Golden Wings and Helmet but no exaggerated armor and sharp thingies.

Classic also works better for Captain Cold IMO.

Posted

Am I the only one who isn't repulsed by Starfire's new 52 design? I mean, we're grown adults right? There's nothing wrong with a little bit of sexy....

Putting this nicely, it's not sexy, it's trashy to be honest. No reason to show that much skin while fighting supervillains..not to mention a good portion of the target audience are kids and they don't need to see all that on a Lego fig.

Posted (edited)

Am I the only one who isn't repulsed by Starfire's new 52 design? I mean, we're grown adults right? There's nothing wrong with a little bit of sexy....

Well, I like the minifigure... But I don't follow DC. Is the minifigure the New 52 one?

Edited by just2good
Posted

Well, I like the minifigure... But I don't follow DC. Is the minifigure the New 52 one?

God no, just look up a picture of new 52 starfire

Posted (edited)

Putting this nicely, it's not sexy, it's trashy to be honest. No reason to show that much skin while fighting supervillains..not to mention a good portion of the target audience are kids and they don't need to see all that on a Lego fig.

Lol no I agree that it definitely should not be a Lego minifig

Well, I like the minifigure... But I don't follow DC. Is the minifigure the New 52 one?

Not even close

Edited by Hexagonical_waffles
Posted (edited)

Am I the only one who isn't repulsed by Starfire's new 52 design? I mean, we're grown adults right? There's nothing wrong with a little bit of sexy....

No, some DC writer did change it and DC approved of the decision so I'm assuming they must like it too. Throw you in, and I think's that's about everyone.

Edited by psqidexslizer248
Posted (edited)

I like the Batmech...

*oh2*:damn: HOW DARE YOU!!!!! :damn: GET OUT OF HERE NOW!!!!!!!! :damn:

:grin: I'm just messing with you. :wink::grin:

This is New 52 Starfire: http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120306205733/batman/images/4/42/Starfire_-_New_52.jpg

This is the New Starfire set to replace that one: starfire_580.jpg?1423229747

As you can see, the new one has slightly more clothes.

Slightly? I would say quite a bit more.

Thankfully, no.

500th Post! :grin:

Agreed X 1000.

Edited by psqidexslizer248
Posted

I think it's a poor justification for Starfire's near-nudity, as well. "Her planet doesn't have a taboo?" Well, too bad, you're on earth, Kori, do as the Earthlings. Honestly, how many women would appreciate being rescued by a hero with almost nothing on? If the DCU was real, she would be causing controversies there, too. All because some artists decided to entertain themselves with an oversexualized costume. We already had Power Girl for that, no need to rope in Starfire and Harley Quinn. And that's why I like the minifig versions better than the comics versions. Harley with a tiny, bursting corset? Why? Harley with a checkered acrobat outfit? Perfectly appropriate. But, what I'm trying to say is. thank goodness for LEGO's younger target audience!

Posted

I think it's a poor justification for Starfire's near-nudity, as well. "Her planet doesn't have a taboo?" Well, too bad, you're on earth, Kori, do as the Earthlings. Honestly, how many women would appreciate being rescued by a hero with almost nothing on? If the DCU was real, she would be causing controversies there, too. All because some artists decided to entertain themselves with an oversexualized costume. We already had Power Girl for that, no need to rope in Starfire and Harley Quinn. And that's why I like the minifig versions better than the comics versions. Harley with a tiny, bursting corset? Why? Harley with a checkered acrobat outfit? Perfectly appropriate. But, what I'm trying to say is. thank goodness for LEGO's younger target audience!

Brilliantly said, I could not agree more! It's one of the few times I'm glad Lego didn't intend it for AFOL's.

Posted (edited)

I think it's a poor justification for Starfire's near-nudity, as well. "Her planet doesn't have a taboo?" Well, too bad, you're on earth, Kori, do as the Earthlings. Honestly, how many women would appreciate being rescued by a hero with almost nothing on? If the DCU was real, she would be causing controversies there, too. All because some artists decided to entertain themselves with an oversexualized costume. We already had Power Girl for that, no need to rope in Starfire and Harley Quinn. And that's why I like the minifig versions better than the comics versions. Harley with a tiny, bursting corset? Why? Harley with a checkered acrobat outfit? Perfectly appropriate. But, what I'm trying to say is. thank goodness for LEGO's younger target audience!

Perfectly said, well done. :thumbup:

Edited by psqidexslizer248
Posted (edited)

Well, thank you. :blush: I thought I was going into "venting" territory. But perhaps DC could learn that "edgy" and "adult" aren't necessary for a comic franchise to be good. Sure, they improved Starfire's look (with clear TTG influence), but who's to say they won't make a modest heroine more sexy post-Convergence? Whatever the case, LEGO knows (for the most part) how to make their minifigures both accurate and appropriate, which is why I collect the theme.

Edited by 8BrickMario
Posted

Anyone remember how CW Reverse Flash was rumoured as an SDCC exclusive? I think TLG may have already made a mould for his mask, the top of Ultron's helmet, I know it's not all correct around the eyes but it could work, the Lightning bolts would be printed on the side. Has anyone else had this idea?

Posted (edited)

Anyone remember how CW Reverse Flash was rumoured as an SDCC exclusive? I think TLG may have already made a mould for his mask, the top of Ultron's helmet, I know it's not all correct around the eyes but it could work, the Lightning bolts would be printed on the side. Has anyone else had this idea?

Except the nose thing on the Ultron helmet would keep that piece from working. If we do see a CW Reverse Flash SDCC, I think they'd go the Captain America route with his helmet and just ignore the lighting bolts on his head altogether.

I'd have thought they'd just recolour the existing Flash helmet.

Or this.

Edited by psqidexslizer248
Posted

Well, thank you. :blush: I thought I was going into "venting" territory. But perhaps DC could learn that "edgy" and "adult" aren't necessary for a comic franchise to be good. Sure, they improved Starfire's look (with clear TTG influence), but who's to say they won't make a modest heroine more sexy post-Convergence? Whatever the case, LEGO knows (for the most part) how to make their minifigures both accurate and appropriate, which is why I collect the theme.

Um, Black Canary's fishnets are back, so I guess that would be sexier than the weird padding she has had the last few years? I don't see what that has to do with Starfire deciding Earth is a little chilly though? I hate "sexy" costumes as much as the next guy (er, maybe it depends on the next guy), but DC gets rid of one of the worst offenders (Starfire was possibly only second to Star Sapphire, and she has been covered head to toe since the reboot) and you just complain about it in a roundabout way because they might do something stupid later? No wonder we can never be happy. :/

Posted

I'm just not ruling anything out. I certainly appreciate Starfire's new costume, but I'm not entirely sure that DC is going to make every female heroine more modest. You can never be sure, but they seem to want wider appeal, so I think it's optimistic for the female costumes.

Posted

Am I the only one who isn't repulsed by Starfire's new 52 design? I mean, we're grown adults right? There's nothing wrong with a little bit of sexy....

It's not a matter of "sexy". It defies every law of sense and gravity in its design for the sake of turning her into a sex object. It certainly doesn't help that her character didn't escape the grounds of sex object much in the writing, either.

The new costume is much better. It's both sensible and visually appealing. It feels like Starfire, which doesn't require her to be as close to naked as they can get.

Starfire is the kind of character you can do that with, though. She's never really had a costume with too much weight on it to change. Look at Wonder Woman. No matter how many times they try, they'll never be able to go anywhere beyond slight changes to the traditional suit. Heck, even giving her pants stirred up problems. Starfire's costumes have never been too attached to her, both literally and figuratively.

Posted (edited)

Sorry to change the subject, but has anybody heard any recent news on when the joker bumper car polybag will have it's mainstream release date?

Edited by ndunnavant

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Announcements

  • THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

×
×
  • Create New...