Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

KimT

Star Wars Moderator
  • Posts

    16,057
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by KimT

  1. Prices can't be singled down to part count. The Ewok heads aren't cheap to produce. The different colours are also not equally expensive to produce. If we want Ewoks - then we'll have to live with fewer parts in those sets. The 7929 has plenty of Battle Droids - I doubt they'll ever make a clone set that's even close. Clones are more expensive to produce both in the Clone Wars and in our real world. It's simple actually - once you consider all the factors included in defining which parts goes into a set and how much such a set is to cost.
  2. Nice review. Dunno how I missed this one. I'll frontpage it tomorrow and leave the T-6 Jedi Shuttle Review up for a little while.
  3. Amen! It's a shame so many members still haven't learned to check the first post before they ask questions
  4. Mkay, let me refrase what I've said many times before. There's no reason to discuss the price of a set in a review. We can all agree that licensed sets are much more expensive than non-license sets. We'd all love to pay nothing for LEGO, but it's not going to happen. EB is a global site and LEGO isn't equally priced globally. Let's stick with discussing the set itself and keep from price ranting - which is and always will end in nothing but sour faces and a lot of barfy posts.
  5. The good ol' "Blame the neighbours' kids" Nice army - good to know it's only the clones that suffer
  6. DarthPineapple does a fine review of the new 7931 T-6 Jedi Shuttle (click the image to go to the Star Wars Forum to read the review)
  7. Yeah and you're just a gawd at photography yourself? I actually think this shot is awesome. A little dark perhaps, but it's got that "postcard-feeling" and that's enough to me.
  8. Entries may be posted on the 31st of December until 23:59:59
  9. DarthPineapple does a fine review of the new 7931 T-6 Jedi Shuttle (click the image to go to the Star Wars Forum to read the review)
  10. A little dirty indeed, but still a great shot with some nice photoshopping afterwards.
  11. Agreed. Enough is enough.
  12. So you just had to comment on a post made almost one year ago?
  13. Need we say more? Click the picture to learn more on how to enter this contest (Thanks to Fenris for letting me use his picture) HJR shares with us a new MOC The AT-XT (image is link to topic)
  14. HJR shares with us a new MOC The AT-XT (image is link to topic)
  15. Great winter shots - except you're in the wrong camouflage
  16. Nice work- I'll frontpage this when my fingers aren't frozen anymore...
  17. But why as a spoiler?
  18. Plus people, before you go ranting on the new sets, remember that the pics we're seeing are preliminary designs and not final as such. No need to whine about set or minifig design - they're liable to change more than once before we see them as final products in June 2011.
  19. Which is the right interpretation. X-mas inclusion is optional.
  20. What's your flickr?
  21. And please dust your LEGO It gives me the creeps when LEGO is that dusty
  22. You mean Luke Skywalker or Luke Darkwalker? I suspect OT ANH?
  23. Thanks and updated once more.
×
×
  • Create New...