Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

KimT

Star Wars Moderator
  • Posts

    16,057
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by KimT

  1. Bah! I did give you both names.
  2. Nice work. So that's what you needed the Geonosian Wings for? Nice SNOT designed lava-stuff. Keep up the good work
  3. I could be wrong, but since the title says: "Corran Horn's X-Wing", then I'd think his name would be "Corran Horn" I am not sure though. And the little astromech's name is "Whistler".
  4. Which is? Showing your dioramas? Well that is done by posting them and having them indexed in the pinned MOC, MOD and Diorama Index. I kinda found the display baseplate discussion rather interesting...
  5. Nah! I'd rather keep it. Otherwise we'll have someone else ask the same question and we're off again; linking to this topic and the other topic... I know there's been some search engine issues lately, but they should've been fixed by now.
  6. You just did that so that you could discuss it. I'd rather not have someone act like that in this forum. We all know that the minis exist, but c'mon, when we talk released AT-TE's, don't act like that. You'll just come off sounding like a smartass, and noone likes a smartass.
  7. Yeah I wonder too...no wait, I read the topic and actually I don't wonder.
  8. From the album: Star Wars Related

    A comparison between the original wings and the scan printed on paper. The topic states that some members have ahd success in using OHP* paper *OverHeadProjector
  9. Here you are
  10. A great plane with some very useful parts. Also the attachment of the shovel and pickaxe is a neat play feature. A few modifications and this could rule the World in the hands of Sam Sinister.
  11. We're still working Ep1 and CW. So feel free to check those indexes for needed pics. @JD as mentioned in the first post I need the pics in 1024x768 pixels. Horisontal shots, just like the ones that yellost have done for the index. Check a few posts back, I posted them full-size.
  12. Yes, yes, which is why I didn't mention it. Does it matter? Is it even important to the discussion? kværulant
  13. Where did they hide the candy? How long are they going to hit the Piñata? Does the orcs have rules on Human Cruelty?
  14. Sadly I watched AVP2 -REQUIEM yesterday. I recall the first one being ok, but this one was really crappy. The animated scenes were dark and fast as if they didn't have enough money to make great scenes and SFX. The story was crap as well - I am in no mood to watch something evolve like a mainstream-hollywood-teenage-horror-movie. It's offensive to an alien/predator fan. I don't care for skin, love and other plotfillers. I expect massive action and violence when I rent a movie with aliens and predators on the cover. I knew I'd be better off watching Aliens - Director's Cut instead. - It never fails.
  15. We can always hope. Though I am not sure that UCS sets will include minifigs. Only the DS and Cloud City from the 10000's sets have had minifigs. But having a UCS set this year will surely ruin me. We're getting an awesome amount of high-quality designed sets and I'd rather have multiple copies of the Endor set than another UCS set this year. @TheRestOfYou - after having 2 members posting the images, the rest of you spend 2 pages discussing that they did. Here's a new try-out for you. Please ignore when anyone reposts what we've already seen. The staff is on it, and we'll strike down whenever this happens. Ignore and this will be a much much better topic for everyone.
  16. Great work. The Imperial Shuttle & AAT are awesome. Thanks for sharing them with us.
  17. I am sure that a search would have done you good. Did you even look for it? Here Click that and you'll get to the topic on the new magnets, it's no more than a week or so old.
  18. Who's Lord Turd? And why would we ever need another Tri-Droid?
  19. Dumb move.
  20. Then what are you waiting for? Do some pics for us. Member yellost took these fine pics for the index: So I no longer need pics of these two Obi-Wans
  21. Thanks for reviewing this def. A great JSF in my opinion, but I have and will never like those droid fighters (and yes, that includes the new Hyena Droid Bomber). Poll added and review indexed.
  22. I think everyone here agrees that the fig count and selection is a little off. Sadly I am sure that they are the figs we're getting - no more - no other
  23. I've merged Motti's and Ditto's topics, since they were similar. And here's my thoughts: I know that they boost the size of the boxes to ensure sales, but it's odd that we (in 2009) still fall for such tricks of the trade. I had hoped that the "regular Joe" would step up and demand that companies acted more enviromentally correct. The BP's for example are twice the size needed - saving the paper and print on those would do a lot for the enviroment, not to mention the space needed to ship these sets globally would also be cut in half. It would be awesome if TLG had the balls, to say: "In order to ensure a better enviroment, we've cut box size in half. Buy LEGO - save Mother Nature, buy Megablocks and strangle her instead" Yeah me too. There's plenty of enviromental talk around here. Windmills and solar energy is what the general public and a lot of politicians want. So it is odd, that TLG doesn't take the above mentioned step.
  24. You goddam right. And noticing it yourself, keeps you out of the chamber this time. I'll move this to the proper topic, since you're aware of the mistake.
  25. Yup, but back in the start of the SW theme we were given a zillion Jar Jars, R2D2's and Lukes. So it's nothing new that they're spraying us with the famous characters. OT has reached a point where the sheer amount of sets available and the time of being produced ensures that every fan (regardless of fan level / insanity) has been able to get the theme characters. Now the OT seems to be more about getting the people what the peolple want. = sets which include important parts of the story. (Endor, Hoth, DS and so forth). Let's hope this continues when the anniversary year is over - though I see no reason for TLG to reintroduce Luke. New fans don't care about a character invented more than 30 years ago and I fully understand that. I grew up watching Star Wars (I was born in 1976) and therefore the OT means something special to me. But if I was 19-20 years today, then I guess I'd be all CW instead. It's all a question of timing. - And since they're not rereleasing the OT in a new new new version, I guess we'll soon see the end of that as a subtheme, except for a few special sets each year intended on AFOLs, hardcore fans and for those who'd want to add a little something to their CW collection.
×
×
  • Create New...