Fugazi

No worries, you will get the hang of it!

MOD topics normally belong to the appropriate theme forum. Moving.

Greeny, you were allowed to create polls only as a Review Academy student and within the confines of the RA -- please read the RA guidelines carefully. Other members need to reach the rank of Knight before gaining poll privileges. I will leave your topic open, but please refrain from creating more polls outside the Reviewers Academy.

There's already a pinned thread for BrickLink questions, named "BrickLink questions". Merging.

Me.

We never ban anyone (except spammers) without discussing things out with the member first. However, let me repeat that it is not acceptable to open multiple accounts, regardless of the intent. If for any reason a member feels the need to open a new account, please get in touch with a member of staff first.

You would have found your answer by reading the member guidelines, or asking the staff (and waiting for an answer). From the Site Guidelines and Terms Of Registration: Said Member Guidelines also mention: Changing your user name is no valid motive for creating a second account. Had you not created this topic, you might have gotten in trouble the day we found out you had two accounts. From the Eurobricks FAQ, in Website & Forums, where you should always go first for such questions: Expect your two accounts to be merged shortly. We are very strict about the multiple accounts rule. And it's in every member's best interest that all abide by it.

Indeed, but blame thank CorneliusMurdock for the tag concept.

There was a recent discussion on selling MOCs here, you can also have a look.

Thanks for having me, TinyPies!

Not exactly. I'm not going to serve you the scum names on a platter if that's what you're looking for in an analysis, but I'm trying to get some discussion going. I pointed out that in my opinion one of the groups I mentioned is more likely to include scum members. Do you agree or disagree? You seem awfully jumpy, what's so creepy about people agreeing with you? Don't get me started on your contributions so far.

Unless I'm mistaken, new members can't add links to their signature until they reach 10 posts. This is one of the anti-spam measures we must live with in order to keep spammer activity in check. I will double-check this and add the info to the FAQ as I think it's not a documented feature.

I guess this belongs to another topic altogether, but thank you for your feedback nonetheless. Rest assured that staff are reading all your comments, and will keep exploring options to provide a better forum experience for new and old members alike.

Another way to group players: Those who helped lynching Petr yesterday, but DIDN'T push for Naemr's lynch today: Canute, Naemr, Mursi, Helga, Jarni, Gofraid Those who helped lynching Petr AND pushed for Naemr's lynch: Dragstyrr, Lefsi, Patrekr, Rurik, Wary Those who DIDN'T vote for Petr but pushed for Naemr's lynch: Dufa Those who DIDN'T vote for Petr and DIDN'T push for Naemr's lynch: Baulf, Finn, Snotra, Wilhalm. Personally I think that the group most likely to include scum is the second, but in all likelihood Servants of Loki have attempted to distance each other and there could be scum in every group. Pick your favourite!

I'm going to digest it for you: 6 players 'pushed the lynch' yesterday: Gofraid, Lefsi, Wary, Patrekr, Chlodochar, Dragstyrr 7 players refrained from voting because 'they wanted to save Naemr and were too sissy to push another lynch': Wilhalm, Gofraid, Helga, Sigrid, Baulf, Naemr and Canute. Who's on both lists? Me! I obviously don't think much of this, because you're assuming that scum pushed the lynch yesterday and you're also assuming that the non-voters today had an ulterior motive, disregarding the option that they just didn't buy the case against Naemr. Because there's very little overlap between the two lists (and that the only overlapping player is Einherjar), my conclusion is that the scum who pushed the lynch yesterday also unsuccessfully pushed for the one today, or that scum who didn't push for Petr's lynch yesterday also didn't push today. Either way, this shows that there are scum in all groups, equally today and yesterday. Hmm... There's more to this I think.

I think that he's Einherjar, but given that my belief is mostly based on gut feeling I wouldn't be overly surprised if he turns out to be scum. I have been wrong time and again, case in point Kolgrima only yesterday. The usual: inspiration from reviewing the daily logs, claims, slip-ups, action results. Sometimes clues do pop up unexpectedly.

Yeah, I do think that Naemr is Einherjar and that's why I'm not keen on voting for him right now. Don't be offended, but I'm not convinced by your case against him. It's not sexy. In my opinion it can go either way, his reactions may well be that of a less experienced townie. I am ready to lynch today, but given that we're already losing a Viking who I think is also Einherjar, I'm not ready to lynch just anybody without more evidence. If one of them turns out to be scum, all the better -- but I just don't feel that they will. See, this is what I'm talking about. Not sitting well. You can't really put a finger on it and build a convincing case against me, but you think that I'm scum. I can't justify why I don't think that Scampi and Naemr are scum, it's a hunch based on general impressions. For the record, right now I'm most suspicious of Canute (where is he, anyway?), Dufa and Snotra. General impressions, nothing solid. Hopefully tomorrow we will know more and have a more productive day.

This is not exactly the solid case I was hoping for, and we are again in danger of losing an indecent number of townies. But speaking of 'everyone else', there were a number of votes made yesterday that people don't seem to follow through. Baulf, have you changed your mind about Snotra? Dagstyrr, Snotra, I would have thought that you would support the case against Naemr. Dufa, does Lefsi still rub you the wrong way? Finn, what happened to your suspicions of Jarni? Patrekr, you were also wary of Lefsi yesterday. What has changed today?

Pin pon!

It's your interpretation, and I still think that you're reading too much into insignificant words. I can hardly defend myself against "looks like I'm trying hard to blend in". If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck... I do think that Sigrid would have been whipped to any kind of action by her team had she been scum, and the events will tell us soon enough. And this also would apply to Naemr as Dufa mentions, although I disagree that one bad slip is more likely to be caught in time than a non-posting attitude. Perhaps Naemr didn't run his theory by his team, or the timing didn't allow him to. Whereas a non-poster will likely be badgered repeatedly until they come up with something to try and shift the focus away, which in Sigrid's case never happened.

You thought that I might be the SK? That's funny, but also unfortunate. There's still time to build a better case for a lynch, though if that doesn't materialise we could indeed settle for the information the death of Sigrid will provide.

Statistically speaking you are right, it's likely that one of the 6 would have been scum. Perhaps scum decided on a different strategy, but let's assume the former. With Chlodochar gone and myself out of the equation, remain Dagstyrr, Patrekr, Wary and Lefsi. As I already mentioned, I find Dagstyrr's voting maneuver peculiar, and I'm sure he will want to explain it himself. He would be my most suspicious candidate right now. I don't have a good reading on any of the three other, so they could be anything. I am not totally sure of the claim you are making, but if my understanding is correct you are saying that I'm not a Serial Killer?