Rick

Don't believe this. It's Amy alright. You even changed gender now...

Read this. On a flickr photo page, click 'Share this' > 'Grab the HTML/BBCode' > Select 'BBcode' and an appropriate resolution for EB and just copy and paste the given BBcode into an EB post.

Beatrice's story seems to make no sense indeed. Looks like the only way to find out her true (new) alliance is to lynch her. Although, I'm still confused why she keeps saying she was killed by a Rogue (she was killed by the sword killer) and knows or suspects that the Rogues are acting independently.

My sigfig on Roman number four

Yes... why would that have changed?

I guess it's just the number on the engine. The rail piece is the best clue in there that this may be a real set, but also the abundant use of 1 x 2 cheese slopes, including for the mirrors on the Unimog (a recent trend in City sets).

So, I guess you offered the same thing yesterday?

That's what I said. :wink Sebastian was lynched. The resurrector had that information before sending in a night action. Beatrice was killed at night. So this was the first opportunity to bring her back. But the choice of this resurrection target is indeed very weird. Why not bring back Walter? I'd like to hear the resurrector's side of the story. I hope someone is in contact with the resurrector privately. Harriet?! Another option is that the resurrector is a neutral as well. I thought of the same book. Very strange for the killer (whether neutral or village) to be able to be converted and moreover retain his night action.

Then I would have thought Walter would have been brought back to life with his revealed (by Harriet) night action. Any explanation of why you vanished into thin air the night you were killed? That was a reason for us to assume you'd come back. Well, then the Rogues have two killers now (because Daniel was found to be a Rogue killing by pickaxe) and the sword killer has taken out a Rogue (Daniel) before. What's your take on that? Was the sword killer converted? That's unusual for an assumed neutral (or even vigilante at that time) to be converted and retain his killing ability. I'm sorry but this still doesn't add up for me.

Yeah, that has me worried as well... Besides, if you are a vampire (are you or aren't you now?), that sounds like a faction that we have to 'eradicate'. About your resurrection: I can perfectly understand that Sebastien was resurrected and if it was a one-shot resurrection I would have waited for that as well. So far, things made perfect sense. But why not officers Nathans and Sokern? Why not Raleigh? Why not Walter? Why YOU? It can't be just the cleavage. Uhm, you're referring to our 'daily lynch' and not your night killing abilities that you've never told us about, right?

Well, that was a brilliant night. An investigator and an independent working for us the last couple of nights dead. I think it's most likely by now that the sword killer is acting independently or, and I don't want to depress you all, has allied with the Rogues after killing Daniel. And then there's this resurrection of Beatrice, which some of us already expected, but to - apparently - see it performed by the same person that resurrected Sebastien? Looks like some bad bets regarding protection were made last night. I hope the investigation of 'Gary Coleman' will at least help us out. And... Archibald, seriously man, are you just not paying attention at all or are these deliberate, but really obvious attempts to steer us in the wrong direction?

Well then there's only one option really. Fold your boxes flat (or store big ones in little ones) and store your sets in zip-lock bags or similar.

I will remember that you have a very vivid imagination.

Happy Birthday Ras!

Because 'normally' the annual modular building is released in March, I consider it most likely that the release date was pushed back after the set numbers were decided (I recall it happening before with exclusives that sets were not released in the exact order of their set number).

That Sebastien was a villager after all?

Popcorn with applesauce? Why don't you try some cock? Anyway, have fun watching...

I think we should not let the evil that's still out there get ahead of us and, as I said earlier, with no leads from last night to go on, we should look at what has been said during the days. It may go a bit far that a father expects his child to be a vampire because of his mother being bitten by one apparently, but I agree that the silent ones either have nothing to contribute or something to hide. Either way, although I'm not absolutely convinced he's 'evil' (I think no one can be absolutely sure at this point), I can agree with convicting Quinn today, if nothing else comes up today...

Thanks, I think you certainly may be right about Baron von Poopshispants and his role. I was just wondering if you were basing it on something more...

Excuse me, you didn't inform the whole village, which I can perfectly understand and contacting Harriet is even what I suggested after you revealed having a night action. Perhaps I would also conclude rationally that your story makes sense if I would know it. That Harriet has confidence in your story convinces me enough that we perhaps should not go after you. But you can't blame this village based on information we know nothing about. We were rightfully suspicious of you. And I think Ignatius is actually backing you up (sort of, just like me) there. I would have thought you'd know when to keep your mouth shut by now.

As I said before, I have no reason to doubt the good intentions of you or your resurrector as of yet. So, are you assuming that all those wandering at night and have been confirmed loyal to the village cannot be lured into working with evil factions? Or was it something more specific that you were told? Anyway, Harriet's turnaround on Charles is surprising. He must have had a really convincing story. But then again, she's probably in the best position to verify any claims someone makes. If he has a night action it should be easily confirmed or disproved based on the all the night action results Harriet knows of so far...

And you didn't trust Sebastien? But you do trust him to clear you tonight? Why don't you go to our night action coordinator (*points at Harriet*) and tell her in private? Be sure to also tell her how you've been helping us over the past three nights.

Ahem. I agree, this is starting to look like an attention diversion...

I guess it's the same big green slope that's used two more times in the same set.

The reference to Zed's book was brought up in relation to Beatrice. I wouldn't just conclude something like this applies to Sebastien as well. I think his current allegiance depends on the person who was seen resurrecting him. We have no reason as of yet to suspect he was resurrected by an evil faction.