Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Rick

Town Admin
  • Posts

    9,157
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rick

  1. Please refer to the Eurobricks FAQ, specifically this index post. Short answer: Because Eurobricks is not an image hosting site, you'll need to host your pictures elsewhere (e.g., flickr or Brickshelf) and embed them in your posts. Tips on how to do that can also be found in the FAQ.
  2. I see you're using Hinckley's favourite building technique.
  3. Becka Bulldog is a brave firefighter in the Fabuland Fire Brigade. Along with Chief Brody Bulldog and fellow firefighter Buster Bulldog, she keeps Fabuland safe. Becka noticed there was an increase in calls for forest fires lately and she wondered if it was just a coincidence it all started when the mayor threatened the Fabuland Fire Brigade with budget cuts. Chief Brody sure seemed to enjoy his walks in the forest lately.
  4. What kind of keyboard has the shift key close to the "E" key? You were quick to reply to Redblade's post about the capitalisation of the word "endgame", but I can't help but notice you failed to address li'l Hinck's earlier accusations. It looks to me like you're trying to find out who's who by labeling people as red and blue and seeing how they respond. Do you think the masons or other scum team you're looking for are going to obviously "group" themselves in the playground if the whole point is to prevent the scum teams from uniting? It's interesting you're only identifying two groups instead of three. To me, it suggests you're not as much of an "outsider" as you want us to think. By the same logic why are you defending li'l Chrome? If you believe all five people li'l Chrome puts on team red are scum, there's another problem with your "analysis". They'd have to be the team of recruiters and have been very lucky in their recruitment. It's of course possible the scum teamed up already, but your "analysis" seems based on voting patterns from previous days. I agree with li'l Hinck that it's unlikely they found each other already, especially as early as yesterday.
  5. I think we can all agree that li'l Chrome hasn't exactly been contributing a lot. If he isn't even talking in private to people, I wonder how he's trying to help the town. I guess the same can be said for li'l Wonderboy. In addition he made himself look suspicious by statements that could be read as him reaching out to another scum team at the start of today and yesterday. But then again, you also have to wonder what people like li'l Endgame, li'l Nightshroud, or li'l Redblade are doing for this town. I'm left wondering why you're specifically singling these three out. Walter's post at the end of day 1 struck me as a little over-the-top townie (along with some of li'l Kiel's posts on day 1). Then there's the request for sharing info, which Hinck already mentions, which could be seen as a scum trying to fish for info. But I also think they'd be a bit more careful than this and resort to contacting people privately. What struck me most about him was that after yesterday's vote (for the "least scummy" of three) and subsequent unvote of li'l Dave, he explained his unvote by saying he had been talking to li'l Dave in PM and trusted him based on that. It could be seen as painting a target on Dave's back. Scummy intentions? I don't know. I didn't say I mentioned it before, I just remember others mentioning all the possibilities for the lack of a second kill on the first night. I "zoned in" on the blocker because (as I said earlier) that's the only scenario which actually yields information about a potential killer. Moreover, you're "zoning in" on one part of what I said and seem to ignore that the comment was made in relation to my question if we should assume li'l Cecilie was killed by the scum. The blocker's approach (if they're alive) towards their target should of course be different if we think there's a chance li'l Cecilie was killed by the vig.
  6. All that remains of li'l Trumpet is his hat. I haven't been in the sandpit since day 1.
  7. Well, yeah, of course. I can keep mentioning all those other scenarios, but if a killer was blocked it could lead to identification of the scum killer or bring town PRs together (if the blocker accidentally blocked the vig). Thanks, so are you.
  8. If we assume the scum killed the mayor, it seems they wanted to get rid of her badly, despite the high risk of her being watched. I sure hope this isn't an indication the numbers are getting really close. Should we rule out it was the vig who killed Cecilie? Anyway, if the reason one of the killers didn't kill last night is because they were blocked, the blocker (assuming they're still alive) may hold vital information.
  9. Monorail creations are normally posted in the Train Tech forum, so I have moved this your topic. I love how you manage to capture that "updated" classic town feeling in all of your creations.
  10. Then why do you make a new thread for it? We're trying to keep the forum organised. Next time, please put a little more effort in and find the appropriate thread. It shouldn't be too much work as I found it in under 10 seconds in the pinned GD&N index. Merged indeed.
  11. A thread you started about the same topic was closed. Please keep the LOTR discussion in the pinned topic as LuxorV indicated. Thanks.
  12. Yet, earlier today you state that you find Cecilie suspicious, along with li'l Zeph and li'l Pie. What's the point in mentioning their names if you don't find them suspicious after all? We've been asking for explanations for what you seem to see all day. If you really are town, now's the town to help us see what you see.
  13. You still haven't explained your "hunches" regarding li'l Zeph and li'l Pie. You seem to find a lot of people suspicious, but - as has been pointed out by others - you haven't really explained any of your suspicions adequately, so I fail to see how you're helping any more than some of the people you accuse of not contributing. Perhaps you're afraid to guide the town too much when you turn up scum? Vote: Li'l Palathadric (Palathadric) Let's hope so.
  14. It's a strange reason to assume they're simply confused townies. They might not be alone, but it doesn't mean they're getting good advice. And you still didn't explain why li'l Pala's posts were "insightful" to you.
  15. Do you really think a vote was necessary just to get him to talk? How exactly has he convinced you to unvote him? All he seems to have done in response was vote for his accuser. You are suspicious of someone for things they didn't say? What about your suspicions of Zepher and Pie? Do you really think it's safe to come forward with a clear town role in this class setup? With the results they'd clear a townie or confirm a scum. We all know what happened when li'l Cam confirmed a scum the last time around. Even confirming townies helps the scum, especially on later days. They might already be figuring out alignments behind the scenes and by the process of elimination they could end up finding each other. Can you explain how li'l Pally's contributions are "insightful"?
  16. I hope you had a nice lie in. Knowing Mr. def a little, I don't think we should read too much into that statement. He simply points out that if the scum recruited perfectly, there's six of them now. I was hoping it's clear by now that "incredibly good evidence" to lynch someone will only help the scum unite. How exactly are you trying to "move the day along" by anything you've said so far? Besides hoping he managed to draw in scum and pass the information on to someone, what can we do?
  17. You really struck a nice balance between Fabu and spooky. I like the way you integrated so many Fabuland elements into your build. You can almost hear that piano play on its own in the middle of the night. And it seems you finally found a good use for those creepy-eyes second generation Fabufigs.
  18. Great crossover entry. The stagecoach looks great and I love all the little details and scenes inside the saloon. Shouldn't we be robbing the stagecoach somewhere in the middle of the dessert instead of having a showdown with Mike in front of his sheriff's office?
  19. I am still aligned with the Town. I know others have pointed it out, but is there any content in this statement of yours? I agree li'l Pala isn't making a lot of sense and some of his statement are downright scummy, but you have to wonder how likely it is that the scum teamed up already yesterday. If they didn't, there's no way for a scum to know for sure who's town. The mayoral position is becoming more important indeed. As Mr. def pointed out this morning, in the worst case scenario it's 10 versus 6 combined scum today. If we mislynch again, the scum successfully kill and recruit, and the vig kills another townie tonight, they outnumber us by 7 to 6 in the morning. That's the absolute worst case scenario, so it's likely we'll still outnumber the combined scum, but it shows how important the mayoral position might be at this stage. You also have to consider that this class is quite different from a regular class as there's no way to positively identify scum (a failed mason recruitment could be due to being blocked for recruitment, for example). Especially if the scum managed to team up, they could be thinking of the long game right now and have concluded it's worth the risk. I'm not saying li'l Kiel is scum, I'm just saying you might be jumping to the wrong conclusions.
  20. I guess li'l Foog was killed because of his odd statements at the end of the day yesterday. Too bad he didn't get a chance to explain his words as he said he would try to do. I'd say it most likely was the work of the vigilante, but maybe the scum killers interpreted his words as an obvious attempt to lure them into contacting him. But if it's the latter, I don't see why they wouldn't just let him live and perhaps let us waste a lynch on him. The reasons for killing li'l Corny are less clear to me. Maybe the scum thought that as a mayor he'd be in the best position to unite the town and they held off on killing him on night one out of fear of being watched. I can't really see this being the work of the vigilante, unless they noticed a change in behaviour from day one, and thought he was converted. It proves the vigilante was alive yesterday, but they could have died last night. So, until tomorrow, the only thing we can be sure of is that it wasn't li'l Trumpet. How many times does it have to be pointed out that he had the same chance of being convertible as any other townie?
  21. Do you "address concerns" by agreeing or reiterating? As I tried to explain, your name was mentioned because you were relatively inactive and your posts could be seen as trying to appear more active without actually contributing much to the discussion.
  22. That's a very good point. Only the scum would know when they successfully teamed up. I got the impression you tried to post more when your name was mentioned a couple times, but the last couple of posts were mainly reiterating or agreeing with what other people had said. I wouldn't call those contributions, so I don't think it's misplaced to point that out.
  23. Dave, you're suddenly in a chatty mood. Too bad you're mainly repeating what others say. Don't you think that after this post, people were waiting for your "idea or two"? I haven't seen them yet. If there's a lie detector role and it has been used, the evidence coming from it would be too conclusive to use publicly. The best we can hope for in this class is that the more concrete evidence can somehow be used behind the scenes. As we all know before we entered this classroom (not sure if everyone was paying attention though), every townie is recruitable by the masons (unless they're blocked for recruitment by the scum) and a random (pre-determined, power roles included) number of townies can be converted by the scum. Moreover, those townies don't know they are convertible. This has nothing to do with the clarification Mr. def posted yesterday, it was common knowledge before the class started.
  24. I don't know what it means either. I just noticed it because he's repeating he sees himself as "the one who got away" and because it has some cryptic statement following it. I'm sure the scum are looking harder for signs like this, so pointing it out actually makes it less likely to be effective.
  25. The post by li'l Scouty I highlighted earlier might have been his somewhat subtle attempt at contacting the other scum team.
×
×
  • Create New...